From unknown Sat Aug 16 10:49:51 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#26220 <26220@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#26220 <26220@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: core-updates: r-rcpp fails to build with GCC 5 Reply-To: bug#26220 <26220@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 17:49:51 +0000 retitle 26220 core-updates: r-rcpp fails to build with GCC 5 reassign 26220 guix-patches submitter 26220 Leo Famulari severity 26220 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 22 17:20:51 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2017 21:20:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqngZ-0003jA-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqngX-0003iw-JX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqngQ-00016y-WC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:43 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40902) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqngQ-00016t-Sk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqngP-00043P-CR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqngL-00013q-EF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:41 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:47818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqngL-00013J-2J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:37 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DE0208CD; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=6PR +WgJFmxlcw/lRvwL23QPukY4PpbbyAxLkhxz00Xg=; b=SHPvCA1sbP0Yf7zvAd4 dIAo8y0VjG2SGBUw5T2skBBh/G4VSyDzc0XrtiHZQ9UBm8dqRA6Jw+DSr3OhONAU ZiapqZhRRVGsn7ZBJ9uqMdmSiKrxBCEyvmgeQo6UDs2tB16Sqwh9clUGnxBA0LsT DkM+PVY/3uFSKecBu2iHU28I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=6PR+WgJFmxlcw/lRvwL23QPukY4PpbbyAxLkhxz00 Xg=; b=pZQOQzS61KA3qoLc5j9pv96X1RxMysUAC+EnRYq+Agr+Fcci6YlZtdkhm BdHLN7BLSAC/PhuT1SMI78DwmGOlA6G44cdPYnCuHDm8HPj+SNq3cJ3lL69TZoob D88c9U8ixLBuzWpyEuNF2CORWRN+iQrzdWraHPxg5OP+8tKNVeOcx0qWz3zoZkWr SGfc3eIO2puTXtLMCMg0l9uxdW/MSLakw4XnKpT4chdiM36ioHDWzX9qBLeiMHKa 15y0PSHVCujyrgTAqN06+vGoIHEG6cGSGcXiPr200v7BnyuhJefyXqvME54H+C8s Q0+UOoGlYUHH8IpHItyLL9MfPv3tw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: Ne4sA5PXXWkU+rvLD2WFIv1tWWf0dKFRkjEfyPf6Y3S1 1490217635 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4D7377E0FE; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:20:33 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: core-updates: r-rcpp fails to build with GCC 5 Message-ID: <20170322212033.GA4051@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Ricardo Wurmus X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Is this an appropriate solution? --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-gnu-r-rcpp-Fix-build-failure-with-GCC-5.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom 216000bc2d05799f3d68ae1806bb4b2ce6ab0782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 =46rom: Leo Famulari Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:16:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: r-rcpp: Fix build failure with GCC-5. * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-rcpp)[native-inputs]: Add gcc-4.9. --- gnu/packages/statistics.scm | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/statistics.scm b/gnu/packages/statistics.scm index a90ac2f42..a40633f24 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/statistics.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/statistics.scm @@ -822,6 +822,9 @@ Munsell colour system.") (sha256 (base32 "0is1vql1q82g7yakad4skx707ip0fx3rgdwv9a8mi8259gly2qji")))) (build-system r-build-system) + ;; Fixes 'version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found' build error. + (native-inputs + `(("gcc-4" ,gcc-4.9))) (home-page "http://www.rcpp.org") (synopsis "Seamless R and C++ Integration") (description --=20 2.12.0 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAljS6qEACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgdGhAA7iWZ0kBPHMqgZsy3mJscysEaRfEawR+M6UqHhOOsYWLQDjyvOyS7cfKW rlgQCTfdOmzmqplwiY95sXoi9S+wLer+JNmz2A9PsWlzXJdk2zeT8ZaC1rblGAlR 3IZGJzFvWdvcb1M82py0+7Paan41nursFNin2H8XZ5MU2rGpYyd4zo18+CHA1uAi ZRNoQmvswiK07XRWQVM9OfhjTGKQRyqWghr6I3TozNfIXUPvbIYoU0dFTG2EfozW PWeYTTyK1Bcm+/1ogHakqmrTcsq+NRutZBI0RosCNzu7mLfLzQz695W3+ek7wI6e 0ihn9m4ck/f4mboSE6a+Xugwie2dFOdexEEfgAOjjBxV1HZQ/6fKoiH6qKEhiFCN Di/merE/7ZrMMP3x70uJiM9TeeW6Rg/JMNDCwDTrlgkJNv2qE4ccNIiu5HXyDa8D o214j0njrcm3d0LV6uCT83A/Dhzxs0RhO0qHFSBfrRVDZJb7YU+j/DushfmuyxIZ cW/kvsLPN6ko11XRpeFqCxOZcxiF6N6RsID+zRxWmYIiXLU4tnClfvq+0eK1ZAbp 9wsPe1wKtUfbd1cU7N2e8HuYqAiqUfqnYvbE707LYSc3HBYm8jlaSgR3q8ZhaICu MPcQRWp+tFzMZd1uCKS7kJ3K0vclGVO3Rkcwdr7hSwCaGkcNzwA= =eGJu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 23 02:24:25 2017 Received: (at 26220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2017 06:24:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqwAb-0000VC-Eh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 02:24:25 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21063) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqwAY-0000V1-UO for 26220@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 02:24:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (x4d021a69.dyn.telefonica.de [77.2.26.105]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1490250260437753.5758867096686; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:24:20 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170322212033.GA4051@jasmine> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: core-updates: r-rcpp fails to build with GCC 5 In-reply-to: <20170322212033.GA4051@jasmine> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:24:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87r31ose7i.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26220 Cc: 26220@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Leo Famulari writes: > Is this an appropriate solution? > From 216000bc2d05799f3d68ae1806bb4b2ce6ab0782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Leo Famulari > Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:16:58 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: r-rcpp: Fix build failure with GCC-5. > > * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-rcpp)[native-inputs]: Add gcc-4.9. I don’t think so. The real problem is that “gcc” was updated to point to “gcc-5”, but “gfortran” still points to “gfortran-4.9”. We should update “gfortran” to point to “gfortran-5” instead (and maybe add a comment next to the “gcc” definition to remind people to also update “gfortran”). I’m not sure if this is accurate but “guix refresh -l gfortran-4.9” tells me this: Building the following 142 packages would ensure 475 dependent packages are rebuilt … What do you think? Do you want me to push it to core-updates? -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 23 10:11:50 2017 Received: (at 26220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2017 14:11:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3Sv-00073T-OL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:11:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56577) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3St-00073D-Hu for 26220@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:11:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3Sj-0005yt-QA for 26220@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:11:42 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3Sj-0005yp-Mt; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:11:37 -0400 Received: from [193.50.110.248] (port=45596 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3Sj-0001MG-0s; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:11:37 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#26220: core-updates: r-rcpp fails to build with GCC 5 References: <20170322212033.GA4051@jasmine> <87r31ose7i.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 Germinal an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:11:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r31ose7i.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:24:17 +0100") Message-ID: <87shm4krqg.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26220 Cc: 26220@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> Is this an appropriate solution? >> From 216000bc2d05799f3d68ae1806bb4b2ce6ab0782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Leo Famulari >> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:16:58 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: r-rcpp: Fix build failure with GCC-5. >> >> * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-rcpp)[native-inputs]: Add gcc-4.9. > > I don=E2=80=99t think so. The real problem is that =E2=80=9Cgcc=E2=80=9D= was updated to point > to =E2=80=9Cgcc-5=E2=80=9D, but =E2=80=9Cgfortran=E2=80=9D still points t= o =E2=80=9Cgfortran-4.9=E2=80=9D. > > We should update =E2=80=9Cgfortran=E2=80=9D to point to =E2=80=9Cgfortran= -5=E2=80=9D instead (and maybe > add a comment next to the =E2=80=9Cgcc=E2=80=9D definition to remind peop= le to also > update =E2=80=9Cgfortran=E2=80=9D). > > I=E2=80=99m not sure if this is accurate but =E2=80=9Cguix refresh -l gfo= rtran-4.9=E2=80=9D > tells me this: > > Building the following 142 packages would ensure 475 dependent > packages are rebuilt =E2=80=A6 > > What do you think? Do you want me to push it to core-updates? I think so. It=E2=80=99s probably better than leaving some of the Fortran packages in a broken state. Could you make this change? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 23 10:39:04 2017 Received: (at 26220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Mar 2017 14:39:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3tI-0007gc-8m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:39:04 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cr3tF-0007gB-JO for 26220@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:39:02 -0400 Received: from localhost (141.80.148.97 [141.80.148.97]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1490279937815783.8463314267314; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:38:57 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170322212033.GA4051@jasmine> <87r31ose7i.fsf@elephly.net> <87shm4krqg.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#26220: core-updates: r-rcpp fails to build with GCC 5 In-reply-to: <87shm4krqg.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:38:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87efxorrb2.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26220 Cc: 26220@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> Leo Famulari writes: >> >>> Is this an appropriate solution? >>> From 216000bc2d05799f3d68ae1806bb4b2ce6ab0782 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Leo Famulari >>> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:16:58 -0400 >>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: r-rcpp: Fix build failure with GCC-5. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-rcpp)[native-inputs]: Add gcc-4.9. >> >> I don’t think so. The real problem is that “gcc” was updated to point >> to “gcc-5”, but “gfortran” still points to “gfortran-4.9”. >> >> We should update “gfortran” to point to “gfortran-5” instead (and maybe >> add a comment next to the “gcc” definition to remind people to also >> update “gfortran”). >> >> I’m not sure if this is accurate but “guix refresh -l gfortran-4.9” >> tells me this: >> >> Building the following 142 packages would ensure 475 dependent >> packages are rebuilt … >> >> What do you think? Do you want me to push it to core-updates? > > I think so. It’s probably better than leaving some of the Fortran > packages in a broken state. > > Could you make this change? Done with commit cb4805e34 in core-updates. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 30 08:46:03 2017 Received: (at 26220-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2017 12:46:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52023 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctZSk-0008Hz-Ov for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:46:02 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21026) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctZSi-0008HX-La for 26220-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:46:01 -0400 Received: from localhost (141.80.148.164 [141.80.148.164]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1490877956849926.9766341685996; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 05:45:56 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170322212033.GA4051@jasmine> <87r31ose7i.fsf@elephly.net> <87shm4krqg.fsf@gnu.org> <87efxorrb2.fsf@elephly.net> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: 26220-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#26220: core-updates: r-rcpp fails to build with GCC 5 In-reply-to: <87efxorrb2.fsf@elephly.net> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:17:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87h92a52g6.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26220-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) > Done with commit cb4805e34 in core-updates. Closing this bug. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net From unknown Sat Aug 16 10:49:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator