From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:28:03 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#26204 <26204@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#26204 <26204@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: core-updates: fix bigloo build failure. Reply-To: bug#26204 <26204@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:28:03 +0000 retitle 26204 core-updates: fix bigloo build failure. reassign 26204 guix-patches submitter 26204 julien lepiller severity 26204 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 21 08:32:07 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2017 12:32:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37297 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqIxL-0002dC-19 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:32:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32966) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqIxJ-0002cb-5Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:32:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqIxD-0003Dp-36 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:31:59 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:56533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqIxC-0003Dl-W3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:31:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqIxB-00072c-UN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:31:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqIx8-0003Cz-P1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:31:57 -0400 Received: from dau94-h03-89-91-205-84.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr ([89.91.205.84]:59580 helo=skaro.lepiller.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqIx8-0003Cc-Bi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:31:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skaro.lepiller.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C070A80BED for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:31:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lepiller.eu; s=default; t=1490099511; bh=zM/Q8fFZZEU29Pax/js1cPhEdeDzTzzWZats+cMCSoc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=dB2JEoq6RaoZAlJkHzJYdEaM88daYmy7ME4H87lARUunoSaFDHN4F9h4WIzSEAVqj S9278/sOU/vgtNoVdRjge9yr2lwSqY2jbfRWa7zV8cdlV7qaZQtZNY43cryJVfnWnE VO1WHpymL6uw7fDDmoF4bOr833jQJSBNak+M9ppOypGFP3gB3dR19EQi0Ls7Y9OgVt AcXMdnN9KwWCTYqncE4vFjSs2WLtff9gWe/DHns5FFK8rWh6tcQupAsyTsJyAxk0LY NTnwOHqvPaxMxR3PblTZ0et+7wh36gtOy81qmHqths3Ill9fqBnGNiqIopTr57RdG6 IlG0y1euSpXk8/q8Ypk4bd8B6iMg3O8sRFyQcOmlKDiM1DZCOTepRhFkRQLVqCwVDi 1WyFqLL7f3f557HT3m1RdvF5HYQ+OVfZeuB1TUQmmy+kfnHgywBWXHAgYcylgz6LY/ c63m17xrRGNQXvyep5m6We25wp48AL+u1ej048SZHGCONOodfa599RLWT8cKNn/1IJ klMrPXVka+RSdhVgOONK+wZwlcVV+zJuEKZU3EuI2S6TUxaJ9hE4F00t67E+8sHAqi FyEOq1Y3LwwnVPNloUrBB62/keKktW5UD5kaxrciEHbnn2LpeBgo+kdav/rccy+yMF /BW7A3Hk6w0AAZ/I8dlrwfoo= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lepiller.eu Received: from skaro.lepiller.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lepiller.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TUiNo886vHIn for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:31:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skaro.lepiller.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A1E4080042 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:31:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lepiller.eu; s=default; t=1490099507; bh=zM/Q8fFZZEU29Pax/js1cPhEdeDzTzzWZats+cMCSoc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=pC5AjxA3ccKLX9YArFIXjFMnlJvZE/L0vxmNvAyDO19spFEdBpAJ4Ya5vIyNFNNAB 911GcnLJoQcZ7BqkS0M2M8oFOuauiaCb/+7N5D6yadGYgOBeG08fm3kDunZpUH0mvQ mHnZDyvAgkC0LAny0Ad3qzYSsJt4mG48e0w0Q7YpDbTUZ2Z5yeKhgTCvREdW6OzX3K yfCASm4kjmN9gj2cgwG6VCEtPas50vbB8+SqJ5q0Jo+4IcYb5LldKFXlfNRy8S5J7D SCzIwEYZxm75LlL/x6FrjqFAqz8byA9X6SNZgtDJr7Vm1HdtG0cnqVg3VCO6OCgSfB XjTwJhJjtJ3waqW6K9SryN+nc7BvYRnkIQQaQDOwf3FO3G6O0hdplSDmDSUj0k1t7w HXqwKEmCbJ24/hXqqAWXbaBqmTQcPLWJvF9l5scEGy317sQs73RqeuCfP2GEYac3Q/ qdAqVX6f+X/trykbO+uK9uuHv/mFqlNoggQ6aOTb7+Gnp47EDDyjsZvrW/SLivnUUy bz0YoUC8PeQCnTPF66uCmvHNcLny+Kcxd2bQs5cePaPltotb+BqKNiJhln1NzoVU2P zywHwWBdW9uGPHZZFj/6jWOq6SH91bjJ1v2Zte+KYvFj8y3kggXctsNt3d7LkTqASB 7XhpIQIz80BiQLhaiCteFZE0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_de4c436319740c3f658a33578a4ae638" Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:31:47 +0100 From: julien lepiller To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: core-updates: fix bigloo build failure. Message-ID: X-Sender: julien@lepiller.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=_de4c436319740c3f658a33578a4ae638 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hi, here is a patch that fixes a build failure in bigloo on core-updates. I'm not really sure about the commit comment. --=_de4c436319740c3f658a33578a4ae638 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/x-diff; name=0001-gnu-bigloo-Fix-build-failure-in-ld.patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-bigloo-Fix-build-failure-in-ld.patch; size=1045 RnJvbSBmNGMwOTI4ZDQzNTkzMDgyYWM1NGI4MWI3MTUzODU0NjdlNDc0NjVhIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBKdWxpZW4gTGVwaWxsZXIgPGp1bGllbkBsZXBpbGxlci5ldT4K RGF0ZTogVHVlLCAyMSBNYXIgMjAxNyAxMzoyOTowMCArMDEwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIGdu dTogYmlnbG9vOiBGaXggYnVpbGQgZmFpbHVyZSBpbiBsZC4KCiogZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3NjaGVt ZS5zY20gKGJpZ2xvbylbYXJndW1lbnRzXTogQWRkIC1mUElDIHRvIGNmbGFncyBpbiBjb25maWd1 cmUuCi0tLQogZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3NjaGVtZS5zY20gfCAxICsKIDEgZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkLCAx IGluc2VydGlvbigrKQoKZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL2dudS9wYWNrYWdlcy9zY2hlbWUuc2NtIGIvZ251 L3BhY2thZ2VzL3NjaGVtZS5zY20KaW5kZXggZTFkYmE5Yi4uZGFkYThmZiAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEv Z251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3NjaGVtZS5zY20KKysrIGIvZ251L3BhY2thZ2VzL3NjaGVtZS5zY20KQEAg LTI0OCw2ICsyNDgsNyBAQCBmZWF0dXJlcyBhbiBpbnRlZ3JhdGVkIEVtYWNzLWxpa2UgZWRpdG9y IGFuZCBhIGxhcmdlIHJ1bnRpbWUgbGlicmFyeS4iKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IDs7ICItLWN1c3RvbWdjPW5vIiA7IHVzZSBvdXIgbGliZ2MKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAoc3RyaW5nLWFwcGVuZCItLW12PSIgKHdoaWNoICJtdiIpKQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIChzdHJpbmctYXBwZW5kICItLXJtPSIgKHdoaWNoICJybSIpKQorICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICItLWNmbGFncz0tZlBJQyIKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAoc3RyaW5nLWFwcGVuZCAiLS1sZGZsYWdzPS1XbCwtcnBhdGg9IgogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChhc3NvYy1yZWYgb3V0cHV0cyAib3V0IikKICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAiL2xpYi9iaWdsb28vIiAsdmVyc2lv bikpKSkpKQotLSAKMi43LjQKCg== --=_de4c436319740c3f658a33578a4ae638-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 21 14:13:26 2017 Received: (at 26204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2017 18:13:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38242 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqOHd-0002Yi-P4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:13:25 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:50695) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqOHb-0002YX-1P for 26204@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:13:24 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4692F209F3; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:13:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:13:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=tkrdFWm4UBu00CiDMwgXwxbiMliei9OFF7+tqP p8rBU=; b=i7VXpXlGTtcJ/PbClEFbB2rNelnl74vT4SV1lijkOrEaOZ12WUxqMP pRutK656CgIb150bmm1f/K17+4y/dJm9tjaEhcjVSnKqVFJXQj9rAdPB7uXsFpKi wLDM+0+TSsx4Magw5LglgdiGfp+A/AQAVKP2w+tzpbQFKJtVuzT7Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=tkrdFWm4UBu00CiDMw gXwxbiMliei9OFF7+tqPp8rBU=; b=OLhDKeuo5MsVbjFZjmCVygv98iiwlimajn vIvuztQv3EOHN9wkxdjjBdwqgf3ZP65i1+pHEW8mlxVNxdzXcFgTNY5+20EFTI3P Z1ZcE7wb2nE5gBC1Ik4aAsjATOr+JDgAdKC8eJ+h+j/x7zHjdjHUV/gw+cYpvI6a UkPHKb/Mahcwk8uets993PNTSqAOA1cs2IU3CPNytyEPwvmNcfRbZqRFZyf5YXCv GvaGApaUY7wH4eWue3jacgsfB6LNNE6hPSdsohq0wFdSEg6Ck26w7xYtHORidDcx PHdESsYgRWo6zok2QRODA2Hz6i/AnlMtxR5biXTdvnOahXS2djzw== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: hd4YAeUEUMFd/4/URyn5yKpXqXZw3n2+IGRngppsL6lT 1490120002 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 074F17E1DC; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:13:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:13:21 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: julien lepiller Subject: Re: bug#26204: core-updates: fix bigloo build failure. Message-ID: <20170321181321.GA17696@jasmine> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26204 Cc: 26204@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:31:47PM +0100, julien lepiller wrote: > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bigloo: Fix build failure in ld. >=20 > * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (bigloo)[arguments]: Add -fPIC to cflags in con= figure. I'd do it like this (based on the recent example in commit d5c969ce0c3cb0de0e68551de3db62588fd2c534): * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (bigloo)[arguments]<#:configure-flags>: Add --cfl= ags=3D-fPIC. --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAljRbUAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjyDxAAj8oWGGzgvE3tVSvhMbQ8KW5LZTanGHoDJbUB9T08paXArtMEOZCzpLq+ cFcxaL+VWFv6RVhsGWYF5wqeBgRkySkvLXPFpeyO6sahGSMIZTXfOepQlFhNlKnA D2f1Ruv1nFTc0DBgdBN9PQ4AuomFOS43A0JjBMP6H7t32+zVAP/vLrPIQY3/+AtL 0SkA2sT4roER4TbGuBHjR67VdG75V1F3k3VdLE+F0IfeGqbdUEh7P5S5/WF8HCaH dnTDqKYWYad/qAU3mBvgDoMFWQadpDsj4y+DYe61uT8DwoXI1J78fdS0sQvMrSaT X+KyZ9CloDRBQYoNMiFyLup9JUpcTRh/DLsWJG0QbDPAU7myIeaHKxQxzrW6iNvr 32Buw9MOQedbDWrlxsRM3kd9jAmo67+a1d5MsBUHIVX62ikYedorhkXA9T0HxCdw I2XdDXKifyle4Q/ix1ZSIqS6a4cpBSRrUoTTSwmZSLuKqYIJC6Iruz3yxs6ic0H3 Bo3QFP4kF8JbcU+G0PhP0ya0wtWeXICzvQZ7LxAi4e+9rawc5r+kanUvQ4Q0BeV0 zaRFx0hIyznaNTJW29uNEx0gXEuu8Cy/Iqu2T99cGhYf/ui8ypw7/95YD64DD7WJ bWe5qVg/Yc40/A/tx83jv+BYBr3N8HEnjRSCakhwBI21ZoNwbwI= =0MAc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Mar 25 09:06:52 2017 Received: (at 26204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2017 13:06:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43297 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1crlPA-0000Bn-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:06:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1crlP8-0000BY-Ka for 26204@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:06:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crlP0-0003BK-71 for 26204@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:06:45 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1crlP0-0003B8-3w; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:06:42 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:33204 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1crlOz-0005XT-De; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:06:41 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#26204: core-updates: fix bigloo build failure. References: <20170321181321.GA17696@jasmine> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 14:06:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170321181321.GA17696@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:13:21 -0400") Message-ID: <87wpbdwlnk.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26204 Cc: 26204@debbugs.gnu.org, julien lepiller X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello! Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:31:47PM +0100, julien lepiller wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bigloo: Fix build failure in ld. >>=20 >> * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (bigloo)[arguments]: Add -fPIC to cflags in co= nfigure. > > I'd do it like this (based on the recent example in commit > d5c969ce0c3cb0de0e68551de3db62588fd2c534): > > * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (bigloo)[arguments]<#:configure-flags>: Add --c= flags=3D-fPIC. I agree it=E2=80=99s nicer. That said, more importantly ;-), this patch sh= ould go in. Could you take care of it Julien? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Mar 27 04:07:16 2017 Received: (at 26204-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2017 08:07:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46723 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1csPgK-0007ga-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:07:16 -0400 Received: from dau94-h03-89-91-205-84.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr ([89.91.205.84]:37979 helo=skaro.lepiller.eu) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1csPgH-0007gM-OS for 26204-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:07:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skaro.lepiller.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C9C815D8 for <26204-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:07:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lepiller.eu; s=default; t=1490602027; bh=frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=LH10yiQS5V+rvCDIELKcBHcnP7a8doVoshqpr7f/a6PzNPHHQ3G2P4G7bJ/0HQ2Ot X6tb/2usgK6qIdL2/lUr3UrJZcjyIXzzZy+7vk985I3yx6HnzBjLop4Tr9jO84y1Rb 8EyN8HBgThYgcQbdc/Giu9jwr3tn8ZZ9gx8GmZ5CPbUJ4c7P1GuU56qp3tiPuPnuK3 l/5rveCY9oVHrIY+DbDQfGGnaM4GbYaKm6Uc68H1SvgXQbZpGp2li40mECgtdw6Afq +EC706r8amkG1NOb9dZ6iBN9bMgJCGQ/+OyxjCM3tjeMeKvB8CVtreLnYh/oqJFuIR Hpu3mQ8MhqGYZ8yzJpaIUYJ9pEcTNSVXAxLWWXsrm4WkWlyjHtmx6mJx/oSknnrA5Q MgQOb7OHUgITfo8muJRUgKvq0qQ3nfqj+g5r/kkp4ha3rHekYocSQTaH9aPqq1rVfP c9kS+Sgxh6oOCv+HbpJp9KPUG+A8Eunm9wmps1Dn3v5MaFaHA14ZTTWPnNsZGg5j4P G/uSxdcNkiLJIwwmXV73/4HsesO1/aOLIfNvaKaUFXnY4cIhJ+XRkLePSRGNnxwyJc 08jPsgF46Qgr4Zxh7FPfqeJZZgEiOTzxDhdj+XIxFOGGz7lZsPpYB71za5qGteKlb/ qnLiK5mn2VXJTBn1V+7Je0Go= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lepiller.eu Received: from skaro.lepiller.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lepiller.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0uCmEOdlF58U for <26204-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:07:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by skaro.lepiller.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 30FB881033 for <26204-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:07:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lepiller.eu; s=default; t=1490602024; bh=frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=fBSgSsOPxeIELjdy96Z3K7qDDk8FLJ4hUroAf1o6D07JtQ7Wl+dJ45B27uXWGIIJJ 8+ydCJZJxtEXYyoDtRPnA4kG1fFboV8ubvZ6B2jprP7eiQFTU/GMmsAW677XJfRIsL Gzy36gsPzNBPniDPA+PXOjNXmbBCPoaI+N45pCtGKB0IGKw98F3q4PzECq7HOWxYDz I7Wy0lKap3cujqxFAhFrzjzcvW1jPCoTCvr070gd0Deb1xdCFyiyPNfbbZQr34klBD c5TfCpD/tMmGxOaL2NFWxMhA2RSswNjpdkqpSK3SChzV2hp6FaGIiveuWwd6G+XqjR Yr61LShpc5pYNfp1AiULpHrV/dLYmNQgCDBGuYDOSGa2OFP1JspQ4VLHOlDaqF3MMj 9hqDMhHc6x4Ds+FODL7bWRtyfTSFZUUx6vwDaWvUT8e9Bnf6sf5Ydd8av3avf5V05I i6/ZrUiakA0i+HKluy6S22T/0YKDwBnGl9xvIE9gXoWVEZ7/dyVAwKxayrox+LiGbh pEGPai7vbtI1Utvh6qz/htQLB9bC0vFMEzSmNTh3vprMbsJKqcZl93N107rRCJvhEf Xuk+nNcjQD6VcbbneiOQW8BAfLJ6NLml4QyePCQFB6rh14DIZ8oIk+ccVUeR4ylb3p 1v6CHbvsZgekA0/ycziHpVoI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:07:03 +0200 From: julien lepiller To: 26204-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Message-ID: <87fea8af1f06044a62ff5707b904d25a@lepiller.eu> X-Sender: julien@lepiller.eu User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4 X-Spam-Score: 4.7 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [...] Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no Subject: text 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 26204-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 4.7 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [...] Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no Subject: text 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:28:03 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator