GNU bug report logs -
#26165
date-week-day screws up prior to AD 1
Previous Next
Reported by: Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:46:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#26165: date-week-day screws up prior to AD 1
which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 26165 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
26165: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26165
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Zefram <zefram <at> fysh.org> writes:
> Looking at day of the week, via SRFI-19's date-week-day:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (srfi srfi-19))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (julian-day->date 1721426 0)
> $1 = #<date nanosecond: 0 second: 0 minute: 0 hour: 12 day: 1 month: 1 year: 1 zone-offset: 0>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (date-week-day (julian-day->date 1721426 0))
> $2 = 1
> scheme@(guile-user)> (date-week-day (julian-day->date 1721425 0))
> $3 = 6
>
> The output for 0001-01-01, Monday, is correct. The preceding day is
> actually a Sunday, but Saturday was shown. Looking at the code, this
> bug arises for the same reason as the problem with date-year-day raised
> in bug#26151.
This is fixed by commit a58c7abd72648f77e4ede5f62a2c4e7969bb7f95 on the
stable-2.2 branch. I'm closing this bug now, but please reopen if
appropriate.
Thanks!
Mark
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Looking at day of the week, via SRFI-19's date-week-day:
scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (srfi srfi-19))
scheme@(guile-user)> (julian-day->date 1721426 0)
$1 = #<date nanosecond: 0 second: 0 minute: 0 hour: 12 day: 1 month: 1 year: 1 zone-offset: 0>
scheme@(guile-user)> (date-week-day (julian-day->date 1721426 0))
$2 = 1
scheme@(guile-user)> (date-week-day (julian-day->date 1721425 0))
$3 = 6
The output for 0001-01-01, Monday, is correct. The preceding day is
actually a Sunday, but Saturday was shown. Looking at the code, this
bug arises for the same reason as the problem with date-year-day raised
in bug#26151. The date-year value, of the weird zero-skipping year
numbering, is passed to an algorithm that obviously expects astronomical
year numbering.
Looking at the code also reveals a second problem: the algorithm is
written to perform divisions with quotient where it obviously needs
modulo. This will manifest in erroneous computations for some earlier
years once the above is fixed.
-zefram
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 211 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.