GNU bug report logs -
#26150
[PATCH 0/15]: Add pplacer and OCaml dependencies.
Previous Next
Reported by: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 00:38:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi Ben,
Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au> skribis:
> On 05/04/17 23:18, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft <at> uq.edu.au> skribis:
>> [...]
>>
>>> +(define package-with-ocaml4.01
>>> + (package-with-explicit-ocaml (delay (default-ocaml4.01))
>>> + (delay (default-ocaml4.01-findlib))
>>> + "ocaml-" "ocaml4.01-"
>>> + #:variant-property 'ocaml4.01-variant))
>> I choked for a few hours on this one, my main problem being that I
>> didn’t want us to duplicate the logic from build-system/python.scm.
>> This led to commits f37f2b83fa95c1fe2bf01c4b8072cfc23d4c67ec and
>> 1618006d0bc9bfdc63f4d199fd980f29ecc78ec4.
>>
>> Is the “variant” property really needed? In Python it’s needed because
>> the 2.x variants sometimes need a different set of dependencies that
>> ‘package-with-python2’ cannot automatically guess. Conversely,
>> ‘package-with-guile-2.0’ has no need for that.
>>
>> If the variant is not needed, then I recommend using
>> ‘package-with-input-rewriting’.
>>
>> If the variant is needed, then could you use ‘package-mapping’ as in
>> 1618006d0bc9bfdc63f4d199fd980f29ecc78ec4?
> I ended up pushing this series, ending in
> c033f5d6b5b565c43588d25b7b47d177f0c0933c.
>
> There was one package where a different set of inputs was required
> (ocaml4.01-bisect), so I used 'package-mapping' as suggested. Your
> solution seemed very clean to me, thank you for spending those few
> hours.
That’s good news, thank you!
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 14 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.