GNU bug report logs - #2605
23.0.90; doc string of eval-buffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
Subject: bug#2605: marked as done (23.0.90; doc string of eval-buffer)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:15:06 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:07:57 -0400
with message-id <87ocwadw2a.fsf <at> cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line Re: 23.0.90; doc string of eval-buffer
has caused the Emacs bug report #2605,
regarding 23.0.90; doc string of eval-buffer
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org
immediately.)


-- 
2605: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=2605
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 23.0.90; doc string of eval-buffer
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:15:42 -0700

Doc string doesn't make clear what the interactive use is, in
particular, which parameters, if any, are used when called
interactively.
 

In GNU Emacs 23.0.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2009-02-01 on SOFT-MJASON
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'
 

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 2605-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: 23.0.90; doc string of eval-buffer
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:07:57 -0400

> Doc string doesn't make clear what the interactive use is, in
> particular, which parameters, if any, are used when called
> interactively.

The answer is "none".  I've tweaked the doc-string to make this a little
clearer.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.