Subject: bug#25987: 25.2; support gcc fixit notes

From: Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:49:19 +0200

On 09.03.2017 18:53, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> So you suggest a separate minor mode, is that right?

A minor mode would be a good way toward the "quick-and-dirty" solution.

But we'd still want in-buffer indicators and a way to promptly 
invalidate them as soon as the user makes some changes.

Ideally, also a way to refresh them automatically (e.g. as soon as the 
user saves the changes). These requirements spell "Flymake" to me.