From unknown Tue Jun 24 20:50:06 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#25939 <25939@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#25939 <25939@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet". Reply-To: bug#25939 <25939@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 03:50:06 +0000 retitle 25939 [PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet". reassign 25939 guix-patches submitter 25939 contact.ng0@cryptolab.net severity 25939 normal tag 25939 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 02 16:12:09 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2017 21:12:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37004 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjY1B-00020Z-HI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:12:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34952) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjY19-00020J-K0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:12:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjY13-0000el-Km for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:12:02 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjY13-0000eh-Hd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:12:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjY12-0004BJ-G3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:12:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjY0z-0000dB-53 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:12:00 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:56418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjY0y-0000ar-UI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:11:57 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.210] (helo=mailfront10.runbox.com) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjY0u-000466-9D; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:11:52 +0100 Received: from [31.41.219.228] (helo=localhost) by mailfront10.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1cjY0e-0008UX-8v; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:11:36 +0100 From: contact.ng0@cryptolab.net To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet". Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:11:25 +0000 Message-Id: <20170302211125.15124-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: ng0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) From: ng0 * gnu/packages/mail.scm (neomutt)[arguments]: Add "--with-kyotocabinet" to configure-flags. --- gnu/packages/mail.scm | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/mail.scm b/gnu/packages/mail.scm index ee82a1b8b..af1763b16 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/mail.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/mail.scm @@ -269,6 +269,7 @@ operating systems.") ("gdbm" ,gdbm) ("lmdb" ,lmdb) ("tokyocabinet" ,tokyocabinet) + ("kyotocabinet" ,kyotocabinet) ("gpgme" ,gpgme) ("ncurses" ,ncurses) ("gnutls" ,gnutls) @@ -293,6 +294,7 @@ operating systems.") ;; database, implies header caching ;; neomutt supports building multiple backends "--with-tokyocabinet" + "--with-kyotocabinet" "--without-qdbm" "--without-bdb" "--with-lmdb" -- 2.12.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 02 16:32:04 2017 Received: (at 25939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2017 21:32:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37016 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjYKS-0002WC-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:32:04 -0500 Received: from fragranza.investici.org ([178.175.144.26]:29182) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjYKP-0002Vj-Aq for 25939@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:32:02 -0500 Received: from [178.175.144.26] (fragranza [178.175.144.26]) (Authenticated sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 627222C011B for <25939@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:31:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptolab.net; s=stigmate; t=1488490319; bh=yGouKrK78PuzV1iF85rtiyl7UxOIcqMLLiCjUkIE5gU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=qGwqe+fv/MoSxHX2EfzxwjXItUdP0lEM9AJOHpAeGaaor/hf8Kfa1xPfr7vb0EfXN /7bwE/0m+UiBTiYQkQ1KUQ9IteNkF6Sa7b4P9CPhvF7JFZmkdYdzQVY6Ww73qsRJh/ +jyAi6E5XZkllyl19w1kX/Z37hZt1GOMlXrfY97I= Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:31:54 +0000 From: ng0 To: 25939@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#25939: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet".) Message-ID: <20170302213154.5q7tqcjcs7xbwl6u@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: 25939@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170302211125.15124-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25939 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) In the last patch which added tokyocabinet and its support to neomutt, I did not know that neomutt has support for kyotocabinet which is a separate database from tokyocabinet but kyotocabinet is the currently developed/recommended database (by the database upstream). Should we add this in addition or drop tokyocabinet in favor of adding kyotocabinet ? I'm okay with just adding it. On 17-03-02 21:13:02, GNU bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org. > > This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message > has been received. > > Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other > interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. > > Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): > guix-patches@gnu.org > > If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please > send it to 25939@debbugs.gnu.org. > > Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@gnu.org unless you wish > to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. > > -- > 25939: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25939 > GNU Bug Tracking System > Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 02 17:00:43 2017 Received: (at 25939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2017 22:00:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjYmB-0003CT-D8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:00:43 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:43083) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjYmA-0003CL-9q for 25939@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:00:42 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2208A20D3D; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:00:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:00:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=WzuAfg7Yv98Tyw9xwul1DTECCKs=; b=UVeJqn OYewibD5e16lgNNTS1K3n+4WVWNiaGlpl8DePtRu7cc1aaDSDT98tyhdFC6Ntmjx Bm67UsotMN4QkbUM9osmFZ1E/U81Ecq/6hL1uhz0+uKWzUv0kWuhSrEdXajGnJ7r OLHL8aJRCm8Yrq1qU7pVKyvVTL3y6ZXd0BRio= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=WzuAfg7Yv98Tyw 9xwul1DTECCKs=; b=M47yjkGS7zpb5IOb+IecWMjNZNUbBm9S5xWg6D95SRh87V vMqJNsqZG+y1edMdYnwEA+15debB0JXKo/B7IEpQgP5xDr926+tsslb4MbxXbhQ3 IsVyyMslNxkxW3oI2r4U9gtoXa/p6SSkZuFTWlDjnpOYBABRElqCMcV4DV71U= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 9w47bMyutkU6Ews/YIBAXL6PDAKjyvLvJaSjfzvR39ld 1488492041 Received: from localhost (unknown [172.56.28.9]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E1BC77E16B; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:00:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:00:40 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: contact.ng0@cryptolab.net Subject: Re: bug#25939: [PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet". Message-ID: <20170302220040.GC13685@jasmine> References: <20170302211125.15124-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170302211125.15124-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25939 Cc: 25939@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:11:25PM +0000, contact.ng0@cryptolab.net wrote: > From: ng0 > > * gnu/packages/mail.scm (neomutt)[arguments]: Add "--with-kyotocabinet" > to configure-flags. So it has support for both tokyo and kyoto, and the user gets to choose? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 02 17:01:38 2017 Received: (at 25939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2017 22:01:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjYn4-0003EC-MM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:01:38 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:42110) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjYn3-0003E5-MG for 25939@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:01:37 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9078D2076B; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:01:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:01:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=kbOokGwgs5QDh7esDHggF3wl6tM=; b=bZZEy4 IvwolhtGcCPBVMY1Weqxetnecuq9yJ6QeIRYchQUFGEnFiONQR2xljWTamM1Ss5c Y+Sj/Eq/NChWjHKkwyvjapOIb/PGQ21ZXsxscSp83G5PU14+LqLuscGnorQZywG2 JpgPmKKOq2ixgoQbAUI9VhRyebEl1A4fySIkU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=kbOokGwgs5QDh7 esDHggF3wl6tM=; b=MY7gkZtpwobc6xrzHLbap8fhf8Gn/LHcSnChsfmgIOKGnW DPM5XRP+kLzjhmOAYG3uQ6TI1DjZOLvecrthMCLcoZspU+Qk+Cge4xpg7RixmSGG ilo6xgKFiPOwBUv5ZqGMayLeRC5vacS0MBp/ak7Hs6E2nHGpBeGQ+L+Ymmsqo= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: F0neOJh/soPn7ALY3nkkr5TI3hD2QraNrrvdfCADq9mD 1488492097 Received: from localhost (unknown [172.56.28.9]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 519627E077 for <25939@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:01:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:01:36 -0500 From: Leo Famulari To: 25939@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#25939: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet".) Message-ID: <20170302220136.GD13685@jasmine> References: <20170302211125.15124-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <20170302213154.5q7tqcjcs7xbwl6u@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170302213154.5q7tqcjcs7xbwl6u@abyayala> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25939 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:31:54PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > In the last patch which added tokyocabinet and its support to neomutt, I > did not know that neomutt has support for kyotocabinet which is a > separate database from tokyocabinet but kyotocabinet is the currently > developed/recommended database (by the database upstream). > > Should we add this in addition or drop tokyocabinet in favor of adding > kyotocabinet ? I'm okay with just adding it. Sorry, I replied to the patch before seeing this message. If tokyocabinet is unmaintained or superseded by kyotocabinet, then let's just remove it from neomutt. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Mar 02 17:16:43 2017 Received: (at 25939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2017 22:16:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37039 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjZ1f-0003aQ-1w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:16:43 -0500 Received: from latitanza.investici.org ([82.94.249.234]:55941) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjZ1d-0003aI-4w for 25939@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:16:41 -0500 Received: from [82.94.249.234] (latitanza [82.94.249.234]) (Authenticated sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6337D120BF5; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 22:16:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptolab.net; s=stigmate; t=1488492999; bh=SCpsYZkEVcYs8IkzqP4NcX8DgtG5x3doWN+geVGg5A4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=VpFGoEUS3hjb0/zg0uS/YB206AfAryTx6GZ3JGYwoDy8jaOSWLVbc4zF5x1Ie/akY SdzGleYXZou2WUCw8mGuWZKeTn6wuQ4SASAFOUa7Iz2OdGEsB4lWUzZmLv7Pa/Wozo +QE8+H7bQRJwOkEKFMXp2M22iLBpM2Ie1/wypSKE= Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 22:16:24 +0000 From: ng0 To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#25939: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet".) Message-ID: <20170302221624.md6ginramilh6yeu@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: Leo Famulari , 25939@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170302211125.15124-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <20170302213154.5q7tqcjcs7xbwl6u@abyayala> <20170302220136.GD13685@jasmine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170302220136.GD13685@jasmine> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25939 Cc: 25939@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On 17-03-02 17:01:36, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:31:54PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > In the last patch which added tokyocabinet and its support to neomutt, I > > did not know that neomutt has support for kyotocabinet which is a > > separate database from tokyocabinet but kyotocabinet is the currently > > developed/recommended database (by the database upstream). > > > > Should we add this in addition or drop tokyocabinet in favor of adding > > kyotocabinet ? I'm okay with just adding it. > > Sorry, I replied to the patch before seeing this message. If > tokyocabinet is unmaintained or superseded by kyotocabinet, then let's > just remove it from neomutt. > > > No problem, I've only realized it after the patch was merged in. After all the patch includes not only the tokyodb. I'd read the database website and leave it up to someone else as a second opinion what's the best course of action here. I only knew of kyotocabinet before I found tokyo and read as tokyo as the work which happened before kyotocabinet. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 17 12:42:48 2017 Received: (at 25939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2017 16:42:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1couxk-0003XS-Nm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:42:48 -0400 Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:59564 helo=mail.openmailbox.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1couxh-0003XJ-Vr for 25939@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:42:46 -0400 Received: by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 20002) id 37E355177C8; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:42:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1489768964; bh=4Fdxm0TY3abv56zfL6GyVpNdYxpQbUFlMsf5oMLQZkA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Bsh87yptugsxrkJDZpRRa66iz6x5DTSjPlN2pdSafflWbtQEm3+L5xedr1t1kD2lW Sq+iXOgxpFbxdryoxed1q7lQ2cgDqqZ9hfh+3R2nOxKP4QBE0nFI17tCShWyfazIFl buO7cIhG/RutVITxH8WlVXBKtAbHpbGkbTyFBgKE= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on ZDZR003 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_RECEIVED,NO_RELAYS, T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 From: Kei Kebreau DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1489768938; bh=4Fdxm0TY3abv56zfL6GyVpNdYxpQbUFlMsf5oMLQZkA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NM8xqZ1k/UbC1vrrsdrmvMSKug2P8+G/LGmQNUvHIEMZ6aLV5tiaua9doHq1BFjyE gSSeBzEhVr9vRFMPWNbKL3vzyBA5WEXjfKh+AKCOlLOjf9+KYJB5oo2ytthv3JoZ/5 mYgqMjNU+XALkc7dvcQWg3cHVd9QZNqBj8nrYeX4= To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: bug#25939: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet".) References: <20170302211125.15124-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <20170302213154.5q7tqcjcs7xbwl6u@abyayala> <20170302220136.GD13685@jasmine> <20170302221624.md6ginramilh6yeu@abyayala> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:42:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170302221624.md6ginramilh6yeu@abyayala> (ng0's message of "Thu, 2 Mar 2017 22:16:24 +0000") Message-ID: <87efxv7t45.fsf@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25939 Cc: 25939@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 writes: > On 17-03-02 17:01:36, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:31:54PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >> > In the last patch which added tokyocabinet and its support to neomutt,= I >> > did not know that neomutt has support for kyotocabinet which is a >> > separate database from tokyocabinet but kyotocabinet is the currently >> > developed/recommended database (by the database upstream). >> >=20 >> > Should we add this in addition or drop tokyocabinet in favor of adding >> > kyotocabinet ? I'm okay with just adding it. >>=20 >> Sorry, I replied to the patch before seeing this message. If >> tokyocabinet is unmaintained or superseded by kyotocabinet, then let's >> just remove it from neomutt. >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 > > No problem, I've only realized it after the patch was merged in. After > all the patch includes not only the tokyodb. > I'd read the database website and leave it up to someone else as a > second opinion what's the best course of action here. > I only knew of kyotocabinet before I found tokyo and read as tokyo as > the work which happened before kyotocabinet. FYI, I committed the patch a little while ago. I decided to remove tokyocabinet, as kyotocabinet seems to be its successor. You may close the bug if you feel it has been addressed satisfactorily. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAljMEdoACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg3SKA//ajVLk2tn1BxloHm66pjxjo58G2C76BNslnX7nEFtGhQZFzYytJchETkJ mrXeYTdgZJBDEFBJAOOVTKjE+VD6YxkrqoUJy2RY0qXuPCn3zLNdaHvFyZpvPyzT S+Yo+Z6r5flwJLce0+w+GIUba3RCjcfyZldcJHZPg3/HPQ5zG49MAUemN1vrH9ct I5OpeKL5ZN6vJFac4YUCOFWeVvF/h3sBkWiTW/C3boWTudcWU2/7dFXVR1J87H3X vvMKbbkM1sO/UxD+urIhrGeVA0XHu5IMisfHmgGIa/4R7CI87pAKcEfNIPU5vGhC qsgEfpnkCPPOSFdwTmb8fgLvzudP7M+NCLL6z63ymODXUUmTDj5mynrt2VcKrMNp E2rBYAEeZ45QvO/Ue9ZOLghP8woq4T7Eg13XjjGrPt7LJ7l38uKEkR4nTLSK9aQP EKwdBoYShcer0pH6DYbmKzuk7Tpjvatj11bnkG+ImVFY7DB82E3Xorc64mJSRhvJ T+5urHswAWyyeK7fQWP1re30LekvT/EUlxhIwUEFgEA5Uj2hS/lZZ1fqV7r17kiL LfiIj1RxmOzQ8sJT+tI8Jv4uG3Pdqcvd8W4yj3WxYN2SJ8/de0ZnrMJT+vfQ2AGu gxjMsOtn6whfuz8b+fof0DjmkpqsxQ13Q5yPC5x4Ys1FFhXVyCU= =j5Ok -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 17 13:46:02 2017 Received: (at 25939-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2017 17:46:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1covww-00058D-41 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:46:02 -0400 Received: from fragranza.investici.org ([178.175.144.26]:48998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1covwu-00057k-De for 25939-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:46:01 -0400 Received: from [178.175.144.26] (fragranza [178.175.144.26]) (Authenticated sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6A782C010A; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:45:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptolab.net; s=stigmate; t=1489772758; bh=vCrCigzR9ewwVCOCI4d54aBPfwPzjAnMwlsFckGPUw4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=UMIYprnOkWKknbEHoWZPOX+eQHweAqtqUCZXtmv+2bAPUNOYbVciLKrk3dVv3n7C2 c1EtLuhFGPsNKb5ZL9MA6wvqVgdtOP8kABE+dGUTvp92x6zlA3lcQsN+b9xm1xrZ8E r9aHZvlX2NP3BAV3UbnHnaZqcVbCm7h/wYM7PVEs= Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:45:52 +0000 From: ng0 To: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: bug#25939: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: neomutt: Configure with "kyotocabinet".) Message-ID: <20170317174552.m3bqlrav2ov742wx@abyayala> Mail-Followup-To: Kei Kebreau , Leo Famulari , 25939-done@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170302211125.15124-1-contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> <20170302213154.5q7tqcjcs7xbwl6u@abyayala> <20170302220136.GD13685@jasmine> <20170302221624.md6ginramilh6yeu@abyayala> <87efxv7t45.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87efxv7t45.fsf@openmailbox.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25939-done Cc: 25939-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Kei Kebreau transcribed 2.3K bytes: > ng0 writes: > > > On 17-03-02 17:01:36, Leo Famulari wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:31:54PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > >> > In the last patch which added tokyocabinet and its support to neomutt, I > >> > did not know that neomutt has support for kyotocabinet which is a > >> > separate database from tokyocabinet but kyotocabinet is the currently > >> > developed/recommended database (by the database upstream). > >> > > >> > Should we add this in addition or drop tokyocabinet in favor of adding > >> > kyotocabinet ? I'm okay with just adding it. > >> > >> Sorry, I replied to the patch before seeing this message. If > >> tokyocabinet is unmaintained or superseded by kyotocabinet, then let's > >> just remove it from neomutt. > >> > >> > >> > > > > No problem, I've only realized it after the patch was merged in. After > > all the patch includes not only the tokyodb. > > I'd read the database website and leave it up to someone else as a > > second opinion what's the best course of action here. > > I only knew of kyotocabinet before I found tokyo and read as tokyo as > > the work which happened before kyotocabinet. > > FYI, I committed the patch a little while ago. I decided to remove > tokyocabinet, as kyotocabinet seems to be its successor. You may close > the bug if you feel it has been addressed satisfactorily. I noticed it (thanks :) ). I just did not know this was still open. I think you may close bugs (NNNNN-close@debbugs.gnu.org) after you have pushed them. If there are questions, they can still be addressed in the closed bug and reopened. From unknown Tue Jun 24 20:50:06 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator