GNU bug report logs - #25911
Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#25911: closed (Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in
 'Basic Lisp macros')
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 23:42:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Fri, 03 Mar 2017 08:40:56 +0900
with message-id <87efyfckmv.fsf <at> calancha-pc>
and subject line Re: bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25911,
regarding Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
25911: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25911
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Subject: 26.0.50; Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:35:31 +0900

We might move its definition into 'Basic Lisp functions'.

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
From 3b4254f7a37c4dc8418e9a03e91cd233a4180e10 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 17:30:52 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (apply-partially): Move to 'Basic Lisp
 functions' section.

---
 lisp/subr.el | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el
index 4f848d1400..6b0403890c 100644
--- a/lisp/subr.el
+++ b/lisp/subr.el
@@ -132,15 +132,6 @@ defvar-local
   (list 'progn (list 'defvar var val docstring)
         (list 'make-variable-buffer-local (list 'quote var))))
 
-(defun apply-partially (fun &rest args)
-  "Return a function that is a partial application of FUN to ARGS.
-ARGS is a list of the first N arguments to pass to FUN.
-The result is a new function which does the same as FUN, except that
-the first N arguments are fixed at the values with which this function
-was called."
-  (lambda (&rest args2)
-    (apply fun (append args args2))))
-
 (defmacro push (newelt place)
   "Add NEWELT to the list stored in the generalized variable PLACE.
 This is morally equivalent to (setf PLACE (cons NEWELT PLACE)),
@@ -344,6 +335,15 @@ frame-configuration-p
   (and (consp object)
        (eq (car object) 'frame-configuration)))
 
+(defun apply-partially (fun &rest args)
+  "Return a function that is a partial application of FUN to ARGS.
+ARGS is a list of the first N arguments to pass to FUN.
+The result is a new function which does the same as FUN, except that
+the first N arguments are fixed at the values with which this function
+was called."
+  (lambda (&rest args2)
+    (apply fun (append args args2))))
+
 
 ;;;; List functions.
 
-- 
2.11.0



;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
In GNU Emacs 26.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.8)
 of 2017-03-01
Repository revision: 03f64ebbc685d803f9dcbb638c37501e0d6f8340

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
To: 25911-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25911: Subject: 26.0.50;
 Defun apply-partially is in 'Basic Lisp macros'
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 08:40:56 +0900

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:28:41 +0900 (JST)
>> cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>, 
>>     25911 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> 
>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Glenn Morris wrote:
>> 
>> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> >
>> >>> We might move its definition into 'Basic Lisp functions'.
>> >>
>> >> Can you tell why?
>> >
>> > Presumably because it's a function, not a macro.
>> Yes, that's the reason.
>
> Fine with me.  (I don't know why Stefan put it in that particular
> place when he moved it from simple.el.)

>> > PS why even make a bug report for this? Either ignore it or change it.
>> To get suggestion about the proper branch where to do the change:
>> Emacs-25 or master

>Master, of course.
Thanks for the clarification.
Pushed to master as commit 6a9ba271a956127e566192b33fc811e802d2d475

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.