GNU bug report logs - #25852
Users not updating their installations of Guix

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:13:02 UTC

Severity: important

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>, 25852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:33:30 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name> skribis:
>>
>> > In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
>> > pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of
>> > users who were still using the guix-daemon from 0.10.0.
>> >
>> > It seems unlikely that they have been updating all of root's
>> > packages except for the guix package. Rather, I bet they never updated
>> > root's packages at all, for ~1 year.
>
>They could have been stuck with an old daemon if they copied the systemd
>or upstart service files we provide.
>
>That problem should be fixed by 613d0895b92c677e0639d5e77c55043e38e020c8
>(build: Don't embed absolute paths in .service and .conf service
>files.).

That is right. But

1) there was no release with this "fix"
2) I (as distro package maintainer) didn't take this patch manually as
  it is fragile and hacky. Have you considered fresh guix installation?

Best regards,

S_W
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 15 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.