GNU bug report logs - #25852
Users not updating their installations of Guix

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:13:02 UTC

Severity: important

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 25852 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 17:43:59 -0500
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 09:29:41PM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:11:56PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix
> > pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of
> > users who were still using the guix-daemon from 0.10.0.
> > 
> > It seems unlikely that they have been updating all of root's
> > packages except for the guix package. Rather, I bet they never updated
> > root's packages at all, for ~1 year.
> > 
> > I think this is a serious documentation bug.
> 
> One problem may be that Guix on top of foreign distribution is not
> able to update itself.

I can update my Guix-on-Debian systems without trouble, using the normal
`guix pull && guix package -u .` method.

> I still offer guix-0.12 RPM package for openSUSE installation as there
> was no new release. Guix is able to update itself via `guix pull' but
> it doesn't affect system installation of guix-daemon.

Interesting, I didn't know there was a distro package for openSUSE.

For that package, the root user cannot update the guix-daemon?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 15 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.