GNU bug report logs - #25834
Update scientific Python packages

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
Subject: bug#25834: closed (Re: bug#25834: [PATCH] Update scipy stack.)
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 22:54:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#25834: Update scientific Python packages

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 25834 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
25834: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25834
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
To: Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
Cc: dannym <at> scratchpost.org, 25834-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25834: [PATCH] Update scipy stack.
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 23:53:42 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be> writes:

> From: Marius Bakke <mbakke <at> fastmail.com>
> Subject: Re: bug#25834: [PATCH] Update scipy stack.
> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 14:25:26 +0100
>
>> Please pay attention during the 'check' phase of Python packages -- 
>> both
>> colorspacious and the shutils backport prints 'Ran 0 tests in...'.
>> Usually this is a sign that they require some other command than 
>> 'python
>> setup.py test', which is the default of python-build-system.
>>
>> I pushed a fix for python2-backports-shutil-get-terminal-size that 
>> I had
>> in my queue, but it would be nice to enable tests on colorspacious 
>> as
>> well. Any takers? :)
>
> I've attached an attempt (now runs 34 tests).  Am I right that 
> running “nosetests colorspacious/*.py” is the only way to make it run 
> the tests in this case?

Thanks! By adding "--all-modules" to the "nosetests" invocation, it was
able to discover the tests without having to add them as arguments.

Pushed! Closing this bug now, wahoo!

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Thomas Danckaert <post <at> thomasdanckaert.be>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Update scientific Python packages
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:30:15 +0100 (CET)

Hi,

I'm submitting a patch series to update numpy, matplotlib, scipy and 
ipython.  I've split out the documentation for numpy and matplotlib 
into separate packages to avoid issues with the following cyclic 
dependencies:

 - numpy documentation depends on matplotlib, which depends on numpy.

 - documentation for the new version of matplotlib also depends on
   ipython, which depends on matplotlib and numpy.

If the preference is to work with multiple outputs instead, I can 
work out something with “bootstrap” packages and 
package-input-rewriting, but I like the simplicity of separate 
documentation packages (which also avoids repeatedly building the 
same package for bootstrapping purposes).

Thomas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.