GNU bug report logs - #25818
25.2; frame moved off display does not return (OS X)

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
To: "Charles A. Roelli" <charles <at> aurox.ch>
Cc: 25818 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
Subject: bug#25818: 25.2; frame moved off display does not return (OS X)
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:05:14 +0100

> No, I did not; thanks for the reminder.  In 24.3, with a second monitor
> plugged in, (display-pixel-width) returns 1280, i.e. the width only of
> my primary monitor.  In 24.4, in the same situation,
> (display-pixel-width) returns 2330 = (+ 1280 1050).  Second monitor is
> 1050 pixels wide.

So the problem occurs only with the second monitor plugged in?

> In both the case of 24.3 and 24.4 with no external monitor attached,
> (display-pixel-width) returns 1280.

And there is no problem in this case with 24.4?

> So it seems that the code for `display-pixel-width' (or code that it
> calls) was changed between those releases, maybe to support multiple
> monitors.

The code was changed in two tranches

2013-05-20  YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu  <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>

2013-07-04  YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu  <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>

I'll CC him - maybe he can help us solving this issue in a more general
way.

> I notice now that when running the test form on 24.3, the created frame
> never actually leaves the visible portion of the screen.  For example,
> when the code calls (sleep-for 1) with the frame supposedly being
> offscreen according to its frame parameters (right before step 2), the
> frame is in reality maybe 50 pixels left of the screen's right edge.
> This is with just one monitor.  When I run the example with two
> monitors, the frame just spills into the second monitor but does not go
> further (since 24.3 does not seem to give correct values for
> `display-pixel-width' with multiple monitors).

Do you mean that the value is already wrong for the primary monitor or
that the value simply does not account for the second monitor?

> So it seems like there used to be code in Emacs that prevented a frame
> from programmatically leaving the screen area in OS X.  For example, in
> 24.3, if I call (modify-frame-parameters nil '((left . 10000))), the
> frame is put, as above, about 50 pixels left of the screen's right edge.

In any case we have to change ediff-wind.el in order to fix the issue at
hand.

martin

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.