GNU bug report logs -
#25762
trailing slash breaks “guix package”
Previous Next
Reported by: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:43:02 UTC
Severity: important
Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#25762: trailing slash breaks “guix package”
which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 25762 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
25762: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25762
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hello!
Alex Kost <alezost <at> gmail.com> skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus (2017-02-17 23:38 +0100) wrote:
>
> [...]
>>> (let* ((profiles (match (filter-map (match-lambda
>>> - (('profile . p) p)
>>> - (_ #f))
>>> + (('profile . p)
>>> + (readlink (string-trim-right p #\/)))
>>> + (_ #f))
>>> opts)
>>> (() (list %current-profile))
>>> (lst lst)))
>>
>> I don’t know if this is the right place for this change or if this
>> should be further upstream.
>
> I think it is not the right place: you modify only 'process-query'
> procedure, but there is also 'process-actions', so the following command
> will still fail:
>
> guix package -p /tmp/test-profile/ -i hello
>
> while the following succeeds:
>
> guix package -p /tmp/test-profile -i hello
>
> So I would rather modify 'canonicalize-profile' procedure in that
> module. I think it will be a general solution for --profile option.
Indeed. I pushed something along these lines as
edbe07cd67d6050d94fe8ac1af15ab15e857b61d, and a related fix as
561f4e450078a06c707d3dcda2cf0e7d6eb5ebae.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Here’s a confusing error:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix package -p $HOME/.guix-profile/ -l
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
160: 13 [catch #t #<catch-closure 15d20c0> ...]
In unknown file:
?: 12 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 15d20c0>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
66: 11 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
432: 10 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2404: 9 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 15f5900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
4056: 8 [#<procedure 15f5900 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
1727: 7 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
1732: 6 [#<procedure 1609b70 ()>]
In unknown file:
?: 5 [primitive-load "/gnu/store/i3a6hwy46p0hzwiwvpaykl9w84vgpz2p-guix-0.12.0-4.d9da/bin/.guix-real"]
In guix/ui.scm:
1228: 4 [run-guix-command package "-p" "/home/rekado/.guix-profile/" "-l"]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
160: 3 [catch srfi-34 #<procedure 20e3040 at guix/ui.scm:432:2 ()> ...]
160: 2 [catch system-error ...]
In guix/scripts/package.scm:
885: 1 [#<procedure 20e3060 at guix/scripts/package.scm:884:4 ()>]
688: 0 [process-query (# # # # ...)]
guix/scripts/package.scm:688:14: In procedure process-query:
guix/scripts/package.scm:688:14: In procedure car: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting pair): ()
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
This works fine, though:
$ guix package -p $HOME/.guix-profile -l
The only difference is the trailing slash of the argument to “-p”. Guix
should handle this case gracefully, e.g. by stripping the trailing
slash.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
This bug report was last modified 7 years and 310 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.