GNU bug report logs - #25758
Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler?

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mekeor Melire <mekeor.melire <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#25758: closed ()
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:05:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#25758: Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler?

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 25758 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
25758: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25758
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Mekeor Melire <mekeor.melire <at> gmail.com>
To: 25758-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:04:29 +0100

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Mekeor Melire <mekeor.melire <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler?
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:01:22 +0100

zathura is a document viewer:

	synopsis: Lightweight keyboard-driven PDF viewer
	description: Zathura is a customizable document viewer.  It provides a minimalistic interface and an interface that mainly focuses on keyboard interaction.

Meanwhile, when you only install zathura itself, it's not usable for any format. You have to install zathura-pdf-poppler in order to be able to open PDF files.

So, shouldn't zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler so that PDFs are viewable by default?

On IRC, we agreed that zathura should depend on zathura-pdf-poppler:

	<mekeor> i just installed 'zathura', a PDF viewer. it doesn't work. i get this error first: "could not open plugin directory". can anyone reproduce this?
	<mekeor> oh, i think i have to additionally install another package.
	<mekeor> zathura-pdf-poppler
	<lfam> mekeor: If that's the cause, we should fix it!
	<mekeor> lfam: yes, it was the cause.
	<mekeor> lfam: there are several different backends for zathura. it's imaginable that a person wants to install zathura without PDF support but only postscript support, isn't it?
	<lfam> mekeor: It's imaginable, but we generally intend to provide fully featured packages
	<Sleep_Walker> question is - is there anyone who would like to have zathura and not zathura-pdf-poppler?
	<Sleep_Walker> and I agree that it is unlikely
	<Sleep_Walker> that is moment where weaker dependency like 'recommends' would come handy

If you have a different opinion, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to send a patch next week which implements this dependency.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.