From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 16 12:01:45 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2017 17:01:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cePRB-0004Xh-3l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:01:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46113) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cePR9-0004XV-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:01:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cePQy-0001tI-3O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:01:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:41431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cePQy-0001t8-0y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:01:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cePQw-0001Zm-My for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:01:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cePQw-0001s1-3A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:01:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]:33253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cePQv-0001r7-Sh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:01:30 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id v77so4082730wmv.0 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:01:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LKvXTagLF0yS4Lh5uesyhasDSEGF1n9rJ7hbshTtyns=; b=K5j36wP1UJe5hk09bOSoNaLOeDcs+ZjQIZ1GiBawVJ7dK1e20nL4AGuWw9UjodXtPQ Yf87BakUhLf8JIR4Rxj/RlI6CyJe5MuCu3e+mcWHoXu6E9HR7xyO1XxvgtqopZ+P+xQI nEcRv3esqYF1XMrAj4VwZvRirImSJk6V6DJsEmXonKVd4XVTlyhFnfA0+quBIbNjWNGF BM+aVtpxcW8bLMtpURHGnJOoHGYJoXXZbI0QIC024G2fWkumEkmaoCKuJ8FSPQG5CsS5 YWzpF5Dx5OQYCNsOuD8KlPgWbjAh/BsacJ4fyXXEA2qnmNd8X1GB0i5vlooEq2pXQPQt eEpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LKvXTagLF0yS4Lh5uesyhasDSEGF1n9rJ7hbshTtyns=; b=ImqNLKcywBePgO7TahVONY5vtv+uUKTroFt3r03MzgkpL1xipTkn+HI105fiHCRSsQ 3PRbWsqn+QZVxSPO0DeBhsUp45zf2OQ+L5s6CgOp15aW7d40HSykC+/Tk9FOKLDGG9gj dUVHsYzB12VrTA4llKHaGQwchSu8HMb7XxJpa+Nih3Qtx2NWQ32Zudcpa7GmuUbDBiKw b3svS5W8XB80nUiHAYwaADh/YwVEL7DthzNgYki43e4Wyb5XioebkvqnWrsn4qz6Mx0K giMJW0jWYe4pLsF/JBRm+TWh2afXWgqyfGsLp2oPmMQKl1uqToLXghIWtd8Qzkh5+1Rt 1jrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kh/nBnUmjtYIzgD1zKRBu7LR/VNrquqao32cxhLEXQ+cU1Ebe1E91/ZsWFkwoZhQ== X-Received: by 10.28.129.147 with SMTP id c141mr14110299wmd.12.1487264488350; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:01:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2001:4ca0:0:f225:9ade:d0ff:fe15:14cb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e73sm955803wmi.32.2017.02.16.09.01.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:01:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:01:22 +0100 From: Mekeor Melire To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler? Message-ID: <20170216180122.2f3a6fd7@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) zathura is a document viewer: synopsis: Lightweight keyboard-driven PDF viewer description: Zathura is a customizable document viewer. It provides a minimalistic interface and an interface that mainly focuses on keyboard interaction. Meanwhile, when you only install zathura itself, it's not usable for any format. You have to install zathura-pdf-poppler in order to be able to open PDF files. So, shouldn't zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler so that PDFs are viewable by default? On IRC, we agreed that zathura should depend on zathura-pdf-poppler: i just installed 'zathura', a PDF viewer. it doesn't work. i get this error first: "could not open plugin directory". can anyone reproduce this? oh, i think i have to additionally install another package. zathura-pdf-poppler mekeor: If that's the cause, we should fix it! lfam: yes, it was the cause. lfam: there are several different backends for zathura. it's imaginable that a person wants to install zathura without PDF support but only postscript support, isn't it? mekeor: It's imaginable, but we generally intend to provide fully featured packages question is - is there anyone who would like to have zathura and not zathura-pdf-poppler? and I agree that it is unlikely that is moment where weaker dependency like 'recommends' would come handy If you have a different opinion, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to send a patch next week which implements this dependency. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 16 17:29:47 2017 Received: (at 25758) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2017 22:29:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ceUYc-0003o4-S7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:29:47 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:35142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ceUYb-0003ns-1m for 25758@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:29:45 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f66.google.com with SMTP id z127so137113lfa.2 for <25758@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:29:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=gosPU97EpT15U850MJprpnyON4f2Z9fV6PuWciu1+vI=; b=MoKTTDK4ah/PQdM5rn0lZUpXR4SUdWaAbPysWbM3Dc7dKm/8nPrGB1a/tFRS5qAu+4 nd0MwKEdzJDog202WPbTcW+4KMNa+whvLhhHN2plmtHk+NfYjM33pwiv0UIzby5JazZ4 VKebKqQnADJngk3Nd5rXXdj3TKj7CILv8C5Ka9W/iIhDMOO72q62PbnT/P8ffTKs6Z6I 0l4SHLMpCyBuu2nsCGnK/DaIvMwE27ODUz92OyTtqWihXY3xKYEHOTPCxUXSA2lqxnXl v/96xE1dL79uPXdn6bmGZLC+7KQEi7vQU46kpBHwnozVReXVzJEEW5HKo4BRqJ8s/LgO BEeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=gosPU97EpT15U850MJprpnyON4f2Z9fV6PuWciu1+vI=; b=fn7GdsEOjCvNtgqk27vZCraNCgA9YrCX4GN6TQEk/0dZRPwsrM54svrhlUmz3PsO9y DHar0ttcX24/PHLYgF64yV0GeTozKTUxvi2uO7WnJoWCaWEpiKcCM+ckX1rzCWXr8hPT vAxtRn+th3xfAp987cH7PfLbA0aR9dXRqQnMxQF1lIUxPb3V+m29Fazsj1LRrKXr4F3h mzYTDnB4JKEaCHkf5PQY1rrahinnIkhj/NzeAY50O0Yrhp1c8aHZrHrB9fI+AIFi2XNQ DicfT0N+Qjq4fyJpM3yKe98ko8uphjzymLBwijk94nWTKwR9dXc8V3UnSD5ywkdDKz4B hRfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39keZ4wDYseIDTytwYywxv/24inYd0GiBES7umedWEFPhRbONWHdwCH1/Cp4Cwc3YQ== X-Received: by 10.25.221.204 with SMTP id w73mr767324lfi.41.1487284178989; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:29:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from leviafan ([217.107.194.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r18sm2062377lff.4.2017.02.16.14.29.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:29:38 -0800 (PST) From: Alex Kost To: Mekeor Melire Subject: Re: bug#25758: Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler? References: <20170216180122.2f3a6fd7@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 01:29:36 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170216180122.2f3a6fd7@gmail.com> (Mekeor Melire's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:01:22 +0100") Message-ID: <871suxhir3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25758 Cc: 25758@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) Mekeor Melire (2017-02-16 18:01 +0100) wrote: > zathura is a document viewer: > > synopsis: Lightweight keyboard-driven PDF viewer > description: Zathura is a customizable document viewer. It > provides a minimalistic interface and an interface that mainly focuses > on keyboard interaction. > > Meanwhile, when you only install zathura itself, it's not usable for any > format. You have to install zathura-pdf-poppler in order to be able to > open PDF files. > > So, shouldn't zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler so that PDFs are viewable by default? > > On IRC, we agreed that zathura should depend on zathura-pdf-poppler: > > i just installed 'zathura', a PDF viewer. it doesn't > work. i get this error first: "could not open plugin directory". can > anyone reproduce this? > oh, i think i have to additionally install another package. > zathura-pdf-poppler > mekeor: If that's the cause, we should fix it! > lfam: yes, it was the cause. > lfam: there are several different backends for > zathura. it's imaginable that a person wants to install zathura without > PDF support but only postscript support, isn't it? > mekeor: It's imaginable, but we generally intend to provide fully featured packages zathura is already a fully-featured package; it just happens that it doesn't include any plugin, so it's not usable by default. But it's an upstream choice. So I think we shouldn't modify zathura package. > question is - is there anyone who would like to > have zathura and not zathura-pdf-poppler? > and I agree that it is unlikely > that is moment where weaker dependency like 'recommends' would come handy > > If you have a different opinion, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to > send a patch next week which implements this dependency. I have a different opinion. I think since 'zathura' and its plugins are separate projects, they should stay independent packages, and 'zathura-pdf-poppler' shouldn't be propagated when 'zathura' is installed, especially taking into account that there is 'zathura-pdf-mupdf' (which is not packaged). Also what if a user doesn't want to view PDFs at all? Well, it's unlikely, but still. There might be users who like djvu and don't like pdf, why not. And the same logic should be applied to 'aspell'. It's not usable by itself, you need to install some dictionary. So what about installing 'aspell-dict-en' by default along with 'aspell'? To be clear I'm against this and against modifying 'zathura' package. But I think it would be good to update the description to mention that a user should also install 'zathura-*' plugins to make it work. -- Alex From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 17 09:33:41 2017 Received: (at 25758) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2017 14:33:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43118 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cejbR-0002fz-E8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:33:41 -0500 Received: from fragranza.investici.org ([178.175.144.26]:21824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cejbP-0002fr-NY for 25758@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:33:40 -0500 Received: from [178.175.144.26] (fragranza [178.175.144.26]) (Authenticated sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3A982C025A; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:33:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptolab.net; s=stigmate; t=1487342018; bh=K8UsxwwWkGnfG5ODTQAEFTTncxBvo1fcig01m6jcQZg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=IXOexk+/tySEn3OKz3+MIBJTaOUwbMLEYOZHE2LIPicKMKiTkvnNLPFB1BDHsV/HH +iV1q+73cbelkdhza3QBXER7Sk522jnjNHWev3MigvemTYeMSksUN6kS4knlPhXi+V f03gNy7MNUTHy878+IZ/PcOJO9fVpBj736wp4zXI= Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:35:34 +0000 From: ng0 To: Alex Kost Subject: Re: bug#25758: Should zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler? Message-ID: <20170217143534.p7omzyszagtp3a4h@wasp> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Kost , Mekeor Melire , 25758@debbugs.gnu.org References: <20170216180122.2f3a6fd7@gmail.com> <871suxhir3.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871suxhir3.fsf@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25758 Cc: Mekeor Melire , 25758@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On 17-02-17 01:29:36, Alex Kost wrote: > Mekeor Melire (2017-02-16 18:01 +0100) wrote: > > > zathura is a document viewer: > > > > synopsis: Lightweight keyboard-driven PDF viewer > > description: Zathura is a customizable document viewer. It > > provides a minimalistic interface and an interface that mainly focuses > > on keyboard interaction. > > > > Meanwhile, when you only install zathura itself, it's not usable for any > > format. You have to install zathura-pdf-poppler in order to be able to > > open PDF files. > > > > So, shouldn't zathura depend on zathura-pdf-poppler so that PDFs are viewable by default? > > > > On IRC, we agreed that zathura should depend on zathura-pdf-poppler: > > > > i just installed 'zathura', a PDF viewer. it doesn't > > work. i get this error first: "could not open plugin directory". can > > anyone reproduce this? > > oh, i think i have to additionally install another package. > > zathura-pdf-poppler > > mekeor: If that's the cause, we should fix it! > > lfam: yes, it was the cause. > > lfam: there are several different backends for > > zathura. it's imaginable that a person wants to install zathura without > > PDF support but only postscript support, isn't it? > > mekeor: It's imaginable, but we generally intend to provide fully featured packages > > zathura is already a fully-featured package; it just happens that it > doesn't include any plugin, so it's not usable by default. But it's an > upstream choice. So I think we shouldn't modify zathura package. > > > question is - is there anyone who would like to > > have zathura and not zathura-pdf-poppler? > > and I agree that it is unlikely > > that is moment where weaker dependency like 'recommends' would come handy > > > > If you have a different opinion, let me know. Otherwise, I'm going to > > send a patch next week which implements this dependency. > > I have a different opinion. I think since 'zathura' and its plugins are > separate projects, they should stay independent packages, and > 'zathura-pdf-poppler' shouldn't be propagated when 'zathura' is > installed, especially taking into account that there is > 'zathura-pdf-mupdf' (which is not packaged). > > Also what if a user doesn't want to view PDFs at all? Well, it's > unlikely, but still. There might be users who like djvu and don't like > pdf, why not. > > And the same logic should be applied to 'aspell'. It's not usable by > itself, you need to install some dictionary. So what about installing > 'aspell-dict-en' by default along with 'aspell'? To be clear I'm > against this and against modifying 'zathura' package. > > But I think it would be good to update the description to mention that a > user should also install 'zathura-*' plugins to make it work. > > -- > Alex > > > I agree, the packages are good as they are, what must be improved in this case is the description of the root package (zathura). -- ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 08 16:04:37 2017 Received: (at 25758-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2017 21:04:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59009 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCXWX-0007bO-JN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:04:37 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f175.google.com ([209.85.128.175]:56885) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCXWW-0007bC-Sq for 25758-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:04:37 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q66so3646510wrb.13 for <25758-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:04:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=Z87EYxpQWzUSypkmbSp8buewIC5njZwW+vYCvXtfxY+YRKfcRicJgeTJ4ioOSBCAJM fVUJUl7ug88GE0N+yJZsuE+WjxrastESSMlWMwif5HJQ+VtE7JHZu9r1fAeesv7EQngJ GNxIdV7Ys19sDIn1BtBIPe9ytf8j1WcHbPGQQAFx+vSLUBSpa/nHPf/KG+1fQkuvvtk4 u8bLSHZqLr5x08iGlIGvOml4KhAO8HQ2uw3SbS1DpQYxaFGvhYk8yJ+WqscC7eiwxO4n klvBO3vFiPcUNMnYCbH8HutUrn2dp1wIi5sRlmkI6rt60gVjkl6ykHH2whO7FdsNAblB K1LQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=DUzLBbxKvHKTzwSu2FDf7hNk+i6edhSXuKaLWn7zqvV3ZERiFwu7fmCGeaE2S1qZrt IYIjDnwVM/B+BPWgq7ZMKUF4SYAQ8VDa+zJUEhep6giqrphR30pyL8L5QX84ePsKNu69 LC2chUpYRS45OK00HOzoPDfSkQXhp89RaV3keojot3zAQBUFD6FfzVXxsruyy776KWXi B+NClXmmKzn7W1kVOtcnSxYUl9K5lqzCjej/stIDaQYYPfBq8Nqt1JuMF5IQ16DVUFd/ 2dkChX1Kpyp2+Lk6M4/ZEfG8nJup8W5OeoyCqJxqjX6uiZud6jQEkzZHr2SgWUzQjmvM JyJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5MSZKX/wjAzYTATMHlxY1DcAhRS3u+lLxDdOeHMzjZ4wn8vnQP xhQubpZ60lnSOUOfH7rL+I6YWw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QfRpUq7DjbIn92d7WMMnTWtQ2GBagc1/mlb1+5wiRULIOVGGw1dSa7hVMWd34iRULwqHZrAA== X-Received: by 10.223.135.90 with SMTP id 26mr1494865wrz.114.1510175071240; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:04:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from melibre. ([2001:a61:22d3:8101:6a36:7529:e8d:e69b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19sm5082688wrh.64.2017.11.08.13.04.30 for <25758-done@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:04:30 -0800 (PST) From: Mekeor Melire To: 25758-done@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:04:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmkcfpnm.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [209.85.128.175 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mekeor.melire[at]gmail.com) -2.8 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.175 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no Subject: text 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25758-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [209.85.128.175 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -2.8 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.128.175 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.128.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mekeor.melire[at]gmail.com) 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no Subject: text 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:46:14 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator