GNU bug report logs -
#25701
25.1; Fresh build on OS X doesn't get keyboard control after spawned
Previous Next
Reported by: Edgar A <edgar.factorial <at> gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:39:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Found in version 25.1
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 25701 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 25701 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25701
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Edgar A <edgar.factorial <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:39:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
I'm on 862d6438cfa6c6c035033697751f3d002357b024 and built emacs with:
`./configure --without-makeinfo`. This resulted in the binaries under
`src` called `emacs` and `emacs-26.0.50.1`. Now when I start these
binaries in a shell then the GUI does not end up getting the keyboard
control and it continues typing in the shell. In addition, focus never
shifts to the GUI and click on the top bar doesn't change focus to emacs
although I'm able to move the GUI about.
This bug is preventing me for fixing another emacs bug that I found in
the tooltip for emacs on OS X.
-Edgar
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25701
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:07:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 25701 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Edgar A <edgar.factorial <at> gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 13. Feb. 2017 um
08:39 Uhr:
> Hello,
>
> I'm on 862d6438cfa6c6c035033697751f3d002357b024 and built emacs with:
> `./configure --without-makeinfo`. This resulted in the binaries under
> `src` called `emacs` and `emacs-26.0.50.1`. Now when I start these
> binaries in a shell then the GUI does not end up getting the keyboard
> control and it continues typing in the shell. In addition, focus never
> shifts to the GUI and click on the top bar doesn't change focus to emacs
> although I'm able to move the GUI about.
>
These binaries aren't proper application bundles in the macOS sense, so you
can't run them directly. Run
make install && open nextstep/Emacs.app
instead.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25701
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:08:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 25701 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Thank you for the reply.
But what about developing? I don’t necessarily want to install this on my machine, just to test/debug to fix an emacs bug.
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 12:05 AM, Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Edgar A <edgar.factorial <at> gmail.com <mailto:edgar.factorial <at> gmail.com>> schrieb am Mo., 13. Feb. 2017 um 08:39 Uhr:
> Hello,
>
> I'm on 862d6438cfa6c6c035033697751f3d002357b024 and built emacs with:
> `./configure --without-makeinfo`. This resulted in the binaries under
> `src` called `emacs` and `emacs-26.0.50.1`. Now when I start these
> binaries in a shell then the GUI does not end up getting the keyboard
> control and it continues typing in the shell. In addition, focus never
> shifts to the GUI and click on the top bar doesn't change focus to emacs
> although I'm able to move the GUI about.
>
> These binaries aren't proper application bundles in the macOS sense, so you can't run them directly. Run
> make install && open nextstep/Emacs.app
> instead.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25701
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:11:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 25701 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On macOS, 'make install' doesn't actually install anything, it just creates
the application bundle in the nextstep directory.
Edgar A <edgar.factorial <at> gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 13. Feb. 2017 um
09:07 Uhr:
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> But what about developing? I don’t necessarily want to install this on my
> machine, just to test/debug to fix an emacs bug.
>
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 12:05 AM, Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Edgar A <edgar.factorial <at> gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 13. Feb. 2017 um
> 08:39 Uhr:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm on 862d6438cfa6c6c035033697751f3d002357b024 and built emacs with:
> `./configure --without-makeinfo`. This resulted in the binaries under
> `src` called `emacs` and `emacs-26.0.50.1`. Now when I start these
> binaries in a shell then the GUI does not end up getting the keyboard
> control and it continues typing in the shell. In addition, focus never
> shifts to the GUI and click on the top bar doesn't change focus to emacs
> although I'm able to move the GUI about.
>
>
> These binaries aren't proper application bundles in the macOS sense, so
> you can't run them directly. Run
> make install && open nextstep/Emacs.app
> instead.
>
>
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25701
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:51:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 25701 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
tags 25701 notabug
quit
Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com> writes:
> On macOS, 'make install' doesn't actually install anything, it just
> creates the application bundle in the nextstep directory.
Should this be documented somewhere?
Added tag(s) notabug.
Request was from
npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:51:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25701
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:59:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 25701 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
<npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net> schrieb am Sa., 18. Feb. 2017 um 18:50 Uhr:
> tags 25701 notabug
> quit
>
> Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On macOS, 'make install' doesn't actually install anything, it just
> > creates the application bundle in the nextstep directory.
>
> Should this be documented somewhere?
>
It's documented in nextstep/INSTALL. "configure" also instructs the user to
run "make install".
Maybe these instructions could additionally mention "open", for users that
want to run the bundle from the command line.
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
bug closed, send any further explanations to
25701 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Edgar A <edgar.factorial <at> gmail.com>
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:29:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 86 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.