From unknown Sun Jun 22 09:58:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25672: Font-locking issues when font-lock-fontified is nil (Was: What to do when font-lock-flush + font-lock-ensure do less than font-lock-fontify-buffer? on emacs-devel) Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 25672 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 25672@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.148667536422304 (code B ref -1); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:23:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2017 21:22:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33504 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cbwAt-0005nf-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:22:44 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cbwAs-0005nT-8c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:22:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbwAl-0001ko-PN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:22:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:35093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbwAl-0001kk-M5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:22:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbwAk-0005d7-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:22:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbwAg-0001kY-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:22:34 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:56878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cbwAg-0001kM-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:22:30 -0500 Received: from [18.111.113.197] ([18.111.113.197]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102 [212.227.15.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHYCK-1cYcmt49ro-003Nh0 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 22:22:28 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:22:21 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Okm9eQ9Eo94jb5XbthjHF5igpqgF3E8JV" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vB3C6VcVmSNAGDMQVvzteuWNXu1lWegpq1d7FUMYZIUfJwJadFY dRvRT+HHtX12nmM6fKGyX3GSoExuiW6EwN97nJqyptuIR406pzlcbjxsOiOK2RJR1V2Zz3h RxH13TDmpBmKJB/MpTiesNbbrUOfsLVlvAFToUDstyMeXpNu2gxIM9k8jqnUkgsEY2An5WS 4pfP1FRqhgByrEp+9C44g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2vS36jkP5Dk=:s9K5TIoW36P5NxefQuW3iZ kzvk6FrpYemTx9yNTK0SP8pZd+e9cZInpmpNvL286EgiyPA0eW8SXwLhHLuimaHri6MDieX71 XEaBpwemwll8QOm+Rtzmvd0e6OR1ydmdd6SE7dHNkmJSYWFfs0OSWA2rFoSiooYv9t9puILSl O5YMvznlMr0elpZOhAzQSQBH7NTOmAgXyzBwQdOv34SeXmAikbGgwH3GKu6bpmWJ7ijj+UwXA coJldMSA+ot4XkzGGutJDeZkBBmY6Q5zuYEoP4+hjftJ9z/v+cedJ7ezMIZ+NQz6NeK7G0uUw fTKDMM45h1l/3vi+xtSZ/hnAp3h2Jx8doypdzxZ0ms5uTzgzrUrdFZkIKg/LfWjSGWf7+aqtt 2oMM9Xq8PLJ380pcZmr2EQlA/Tx1gOAaJlm8JFpuANow/vcoL9Uv8MIMpxDltMW2ncOpL+fD6 fTLDpZGLSRu4A0MWoEdIFFFni9G82KfosG7gkq00l/emsa9GmoFzoAmq+H9B0pnUZfQOEN/6w aRucxNs7MpPZw4yQOqGU0NqLzvJfiNX8jg3/OnSi0NX/CsiS+do9ovuu5a1vtQbTgvWUERBv4 u83uQnSqNmEx9+SHGkAyU6rNwgtl9fHYbWYR3kJiqGPf3pGp4dJkRfA0vVVJNb7uY9lKV45vf dL5YgBdsjbwl7dDZz7FrpSpRz2Pe/l0ufwY3L9hoaMKP30Rgsg148nEZZ0KXq/22AjRk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Okm9eQ9Eo94jb5XbthjHF5igpqgF3E8JV Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ctCMwkF30xll0jqNfl4VK4PbOkb9rfrsw"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Font-locking issues when font-lock-fontified is nil (Was: What to do when font-lock-flush + font-lock-ensure do less than font-lock-fontify-buffer? on emacs-devel) --ctCMwkF30xll0jqNfl4VK4PbOkb9rfrsw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Debbugs-CC: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Hi bug-gnu-emacs, Sorry for the long delay in opening this. This is a follow-up to the Ema= cs-devel thread "What to do when font-lock-flush + font-lock-ensure do le= ss than font-lock-fontify-buffer?", where Stefan asked me to open a bug r= eport. My original question was this: > IIUC the proper way in Emacs 25 to signal changes that require a > refontification to font-lock is to call font-lock-flush. This doesn't a= lways > do as much as font-lock-fontify-buffer does, though. In particular, wh= en the > font-lock-fontified variable is nil (which does happen, though I don't = know > why; I don't know what this variable is for), then calling font-lock-fo= ntify > buffer does refontify the whole buffer, but font-lock-flush and > font-lock-ensure don't seem to do anything. What's the proper way to m= ark a > buffer for refontification (and refontify the visible portion) immediat= ely in > 25? And here's is my original test case: (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create "temp") (erase-buffer) (setq-default prettify-symbols-unprettify-at-point 'right-edge) (emacs-lisp-mode) (prettify-symbols-mode) (insert "lambda\n\nlambda") (pop-to-buffer (current-buffer))) Moving around in this buffer unprettifies and reprettifies =E2=80=98l= ambda=E2=80=99s into =E2=80=98=CE=BB=E2=80=99s as the point moves in and = out of them. Setting =E2=80=98font-lock-fontified=E2=80=99 to nil breaks = that mechanism (the =E2=80=98=CE=BB=E2=80=99s are unprettified but no rep= rettified), and no series of =E2=80=98font-lock-flush=E2=80=99 and =E2=80= =98font-lock-ensure=E2=80=99 will reprettify them. Eli remarked the following: > However, please explain why font-lock-ensure-function calls > font-lock-DEFAULT-fontify-buffer. If it's supposed to be good for any = mode, why > does it call the default fontification? > > As a matter of fact, if I replace the font-lock-default-fontify-buffer > call with a call to font-lock-fontify-buffer, the problem described by > the OP goes away. That is why I said what I said. And Stefan answered: > I haven't seen the beginning of the thread, but if that fixes the > problem, then I think it's a good change. > > To go back to the previous question. I guess I used > font-lock-default-fontify-buffer because the whole point is to get rid > of all the misuses of font-lock-fontify-buffer, but I think in this cas= e > it's indeed the right thing to do. Then Stefan said: > > Should I open a bug report about this? > Yes. And put me in X-Debbugs-Cc. Done :) Thanks, Cl=C3=A9ment. --ctCMwkF30xll0jqNfl4VK4PbOkb9rfrsw-- --Okm9eQ9Eo94jb5XbthjHF5igpqgF3E8JV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYnN2NAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjiKkP/i5BtES8GqK+H5EaTpcHi+FT 8/7bZkqzhguSDKiF4/cukmMKTg6XUA1AiAcJ+4BEoc50MQNw0BJxRrYXm95KO3kx kJr5SfPT7LbXMLCYU6LSWhuimFtMUwwJvteAFogXqq129MwI4HTKWT7or4M8RVi4 bm8HOYC7R4hqwn1ZnA7irOhc+mzPRD3CWymfbyh6UiIy09NtUM6jFznV4M0Y2TWF xu5+kK9+3b5rIi5Zao7gSmlyaT0x/yxFFMB/A30E4H3id3O2Jvg8cXFD6lxwn7DG vWNdg33hYHjOwRwvSEePzpe3jJfom7UOrOkB3rspvNP5K87P7UpghIPNJnz+Pghk 2icN3JPlYV40GySIuuNYzd10QLlR78PXw/5LD5CKlSHevD/KqmR1HMztC+sWXk1Z hC6YK1lZJFM9Y0kZxBTNqhBaDSB6gDtO7c0LFybYygwwN5zCPY7wzEbSyIYthylz kW49zaom2rjPWN04mOXdBcoeh76NSpv8JFAPw1lvWPnjd9TeLbjgBxYL+5tL/fWo lSDC+nCmeCHfxh0oWlTfggXJSWbe2/Acqhjp7fxDzgqCJAWWORyC5kieI8ce4nOq f74dIG0y/FhUJeCDNdvS+mZGh3h6K7Rxd8dTEXEeLZVdOnvRBpR6RYrEtULFqmVB 8OgxrQ2wl3uSInYVMf8R =DkUe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Okm9eQ9Eo94jb5XbthjHF5igpqgF3E8JV-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 09:58:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25672: Font-locking issues when font-lock-fontified is nil Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25672 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Cc: 25672@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 25672-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25672.15724516379905 (code B ref 25672); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 25672) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2019 16:07:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51311 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqVB-0002Zh-9u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:07:17 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:59004) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqV9-0002ZY-8K for 25672@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:07:15 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqV5-0000Pk-Eu; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:07:13 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:07:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel"'s message of "Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:22:21 -0500") Message-ID: <877e4mrzdd.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel writes: > Eli remarked the following: > >> However, please explain why font-lock-ensure-function calls >> font-lock-DEFAULT-fontify-buffer. If it's supposed to be good for >> any mode, why >> does it call the [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel writes: > Eli remarked the following: > >> However, please explain why font-lock-ensure-function calls >> font-lock-DEFAULT-fontify-buffer. If it's supposed to be good for >> any mode, why >> does it call the default fontification? >> >> As a matter of fact, if I replace the font-lock-default-fontify-buffer >> call with a call to font-lock-fontify-buffer, the problem described by >> the OP goes away. That is why I said what I said. > > And Stefan answered: > >> I haven't seen the beginning of the thread, but if that fixes the >> problem, then I think it's a good change. >> >> To go back to the previous question. I guess I used >> font-lock-default-fontify-buffer because the whole point is to get rid >> of all the misuses of font-lock-fontify-buffer, but I think in this case >> it's indeed the right thing to do. I think this was fixed last year-ish if I'm reading the change log correctly. Currently, font-lock-ensure calls the value of font-lock-ensure-function, which has a default value of (lambda (beg end) (unless font-lock-fontified (save-excursion (font-lock-fontify-region beg end)))) If global-font-lock-mode is on, it's jit-lock-fontify-now. So I think this now works better, and I'm closing this bug report. If this is still an issue, please reopen. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Jun 22 09:58:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25672: Font-locking issues when font-lock-fontified is nil Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25672 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Cc: 25672@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 25672-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25672.157245180710173 (code B ref 25672); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 25672) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2019 16:10:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqXu-0002e0-Rc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:10:07 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:59052) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqXs-0002ds-W6 for 25672@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:10:05 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iPqXn-0000UT-Jn; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:10:03 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <877e4mrzdd.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:09:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877e4mrzdd.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:07:10 +0100") Message-ID: <8736farz8o.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think this was fixed last year-ish if I'm reading the change log > correctly. Oh, I didn't. This is the definition of that function: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think this was fixed last year-ish if I'm reading the change log > correctly. Oh, I didn't. This is the definition of that function: (defun font-lock-fontify-region (beg end &optional loudly) "Fontify the text between BEG and END. If LOUDLY is non-nil, print status messages while fontifying. This works by calling `font-lock-fontify-region-function'." (font-lock-set-defaults) (funcall font-lock-fontify-region-function beg end loudly)) which is indeed font-lock-default-fontify-region, which is what was requested to have changed. I think? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Sun Jun 22 09:58:02 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25672: Font-locking issues when font-lock-fontified is nil (Was: What to do when font-lock-flush + font-lock-ensure do less than font-lock-fontify-buffer? on emacs-devel) Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25672 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Cc: 25672@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 25672-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25672.16289506602069 (code B ref 25672); Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:18:01 +0000 Received: (at 25672) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2021 14:17:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45248 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mEuTg-0000Uf-6R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 10:17:40 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33718) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mEuTb-0000MP-FI for 25672@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 10:17:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wdcpxdqjG3o5MrsG0hYgWs9cG8se3srMoeUkDaOodC8=; b=IgFBUWlVZtLJoJ677cCHuUZruN mv9PT7sWf95T8155l713SoI5GZaKU+jTLy7tpi8xsSDrof8ZfhK7M07BvJwA+UXmFbu7dwx1Z6F/P o7XpZpUrQoyr7OKkV3Vy4u5vvwc3VuQCM/l/C1uU9/UlB0milskd/jxoKTwNc2UgbUrY=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mEuTQ-0001tC-Gf; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:17:25 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <877e4mrzdd.fsf@gnus.org> <8736farz8o.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:17:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8736farz8o.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:09:59 +0100") Message-ID: <878s14rtzj.fsf_-_@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> I think this was fixed last year-ish if I'm reading the change log >> correctly. > > Oh, I didn't. This is the definition of that function: And now I re-read it again, and as far as I can tell, I read it right the first time. I.e., 21beb19d80b6a fixed the reported problem, so I'm closing this bug report. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> I think this was fixed last year-ish if I'm reading the change log >> correctly. > > Oh, I didn't. This is the definition of that function: And now I re-read it again, and as far as I can tell, I read it right the first time. I.e., 21beb19d80b6a fixed the reported problem, so I'm closing this bug report. But I guess there may be subtleties here, so if this is still a problem, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 14 10:17:46 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2021 14:17:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45251 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mEuTm-0000YT-HV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 10:17:46 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:33732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mEuTh-0000R4-9P for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 10:17:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=owk5DmX9pSCgIcm19U4SNHyWnygxjPTTdGINHe73N/8=; b=iT4K1dmENBJVq+gH1uW8zcNIut 0ujInwJaNn+GiT76a0lUIU0Uq9HUYoRoGCk2JFdvP1e+bRg5a+Pwly5TCfBn3+9XuhowoH3J+wkoc c3zmGIWdjh9R5OxyClePEFqfTWtVsfuwTLaHFFrGo0F3RsAwXYABYpqH/dxdZY2hjT28=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mEuTZ-0001tM-AZ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:17:31 +0200 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 16:17:28 +0200 Message-Id: <877dgortzb.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #25672 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 25672 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 25672 quit