Subject: bug#25671: Feature request: emacs -Q --script as a single binary

From: Clément Pit--Claudel <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45:55 -0500

On 2017-02-10 10:02, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Cc: [email-masked]
>> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <[email-masked]>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:17:00 -0500
>>
>>> I believe changing the program behavior depending on how it was named
>>> in the command that invoked it is against GNU coding standards.
>>
>> What about providing elisp or emacs-script as a separate binary?
> 
> What about it?

Would that be OK? Could it work?  I thought it would make implementation simpler to just make the emacs binary ct differently based on how its invoked, but if that's not OK then could we distribute a separate "elisp" or "emacs-script" binary that can be used in a shebang line?