GNU bug report logs -
#25572
Signatures on Emacs windows .zip files
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 2017-01-29 20:14, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> According to https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/download.html:
>>
>> Since the 24.5 release, tarballs are signed with the GPG key from
>> Nicolas Petton 7C207910, fingerprint 28D3 BED8 51FD F3AB 57FE
>> F93C 2335 87A4 7C20 7910, which can be found in the GNU keyring.
>>
>> However the windows .zip files on http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs are
>> signed with some other key:
>>
>> $ gpg2 --verify emacs-25.1-2-x86_64-w64-mingw32.zip.sig
>> gpg: Signature made 11/29/16 19:54:09 GMT Standard Time using DSA key ID
>> 60C3B396
>> gpg: Good signature from "Phillip Lord <phillip.lord <at> russet.org.uk>"
>> gpg: aka "Phillip Lord <p.lord <at> russet.org.uk>"
>> gpg: aka "Phillip Lord <p.lord <at> hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>"
>> gpg: aka "Phillip Lord <phillip.lord <at> newcastle.ac.uk>"
>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
>> owner.
>> Primary key fingerprint: 8352 2404 7598 ECBC 61A1 DA34 5FE9 658D 60C3 B396
>
> That's because the zip files with Windows binaries were produced by
> Phillip.
Thankyou for replying. The point is: how do I verify that I have a
legitimate download of the GNU Emacs Windows binaries?
I have an informal trust path to
28D3BED851FDF3AB57FEF93C233587A47C207910 because https://www.gnu.org
mentions it. No such statement exists about
835224047598ECBC61A1DA345FE9658D60C3B396.
> Why is that a bug?
The web page told me to send comments to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, and so
here we are.
Is there some more appropriate reporting channel?
ttfn/rjk
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 178 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.