GNU bug report logs - #25565
mark-whole-buffer and unnecessary (point) call

Previous Next

Full log

Message #40 received at 25565 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: dptd dptd <dptdescribe <at> gmail.com>
To: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 25565 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25565: mark-whole-buffer and unnecessary (point) call
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:23:19 +0100

> On 29 Jan 2017, at 22:29, Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 22:46:02 +0200 dptd dptd <dptdescribe <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>> Here is the newest patch.
> [...]
>>>> * lisp/emulation/viper-cmd.el (viper-mark-beginning-of-buffer):
>>>> (viper-mark-end-of-buffer):
>>> 
>>> There should be no colon `:' after `(viper-mark-beginning-of-buffer)',
>>> since `(viper-mark-end-of-buffer)' in the next line is in the same file.
>>> 
>>>> * lisp/cedet/semantic/senator.el (senator-mark-defun):
>>>> * lisp/allout.el (allout-mark-topic): Remove unnecessary argument
>>>> `(point)' from calls to `push-mark'.
>>> 
>>> Steve Berman
>> 
>> I want to contribute to the project but I cannot even prepare the
>> patch file correctly... dammit!
> 
> If that's the worst problem you have as a contributor, Emacs will be
> very lucky indeed! ;-)
> 
> Steve Berman

Hello again,
I think my paperwork with FSF is done now. What should I do not to make sure that patch from the previous messages will be applied by someone?

Best regards,
B.D.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.