From unknown Wed Jun 25 10:47:30 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#25542 <25542@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#25542 <25542@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized Reply-To: bug#25542 <25542@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:47:30 +0000 retitle 25542 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized reassign 25542 emacs submitter 25542 Dani Moncayo severity 25542 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 03:15:49 2017 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 08:15:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfDh-0004lU-60 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:15:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58333) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfDg-0004lI-9f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:15:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfDa-0006sr-1S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:15:43 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfDZ-0006sm-Tx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:15:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfDY-0006cZ-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:15:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfDY-0006sQ-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:15:40 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]:35174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWfDX-0006sB-Pm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:15:39 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n124so141303338lfd.2 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:15:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Co9efPwxaykp6SzygNJdUvpkMZAaqnpdLvL4o36Jpjw=; b=Ds/1NehZOM8NY0wWdI653vGilPrU7haXwDi+CwE5ud5Vg+r/ENLa7Et/kmkruKNPZO o1SeFX1NGRR5hhmFF+fifH8zqlmEQMIE9YVtRFGrHKsxTiNs3fTwhjZ/uRySLOcA3bgh fTZeMx6X428v+j8Ls+bal93tN1FrQ+VAeSMLYXU6APvXyCt9rgd+C1wOXn0lFdMdkQEp LajC+vD3QqI5d0Q3K7RXDEjH5tUU1g1NyEPYFX2AIYHT/7zHh45+3oDl+Njjf0TEPyhc 3ls/Rbmd1ZQeb0I6licWKrwPeZ9LmmQglKnYaBQ0JXbml3E/w2XoYJ39HfE5e2UuIz6I bMNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Co9efPwxaykp6SzygNJdUvpkMZAaqnpdLvL4o36Jpjw=; b=itb9cfLpDQk08EP6JalIPcZtlRgi3wnoYj9jidYGeUTaLMdGWdLKqiJbFNKqSnc5u4 yeOxLQRStKa9U5AZ3JwWA/+TAddYxc2sqq5K3Zk5uWTuDEog9sWUOte+oh8+g2X3nKbV 88Cvp45CD0RdSyl4aZcgkpPBbkF60C2pI0q9C5nvPNDZc+OI6KYXl5/T/5MVz5o3TSb6 sCXg8F1MR8QL47BUbX40Ksd3bHi7+CXsjfRKoAHIyei8y6MMWUwyA4Ex4x3v3C2LPsEG XfVzSEyyuN1A7XD4u0MXfjr3+C4O5gKm1/Md/khlyiq8JZkMkT9gorv/EVtqm5mI7ig0 T7Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKOhzzyOYub9N1ac7+U/6adssnA3Zd5K4h0QXiY5aCXzsJbNO0s7U7lvRC/HREudlzuyj0dSxc8BKkZqA== X-Received: by 10.25.132.6 with SMTP id g6mr549246lfd.144.1485418538139; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:15:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 00:15:37 -0800 (PST) From: Dani Moncayo Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:15:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: bug-gnu-emacs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Recipe from "emacs -Q" 1. Maximize the frame using the mouse -- for example, on MS-Windows, either click on the "maximize" button or double click on the title bar. 2. Switch to fullscreen by pressing F11. 3. Press F11 again. Expected behavior: The frame goes to its previous state (i.e. maximized). Observed behavior: The frame is not maximized (it is smaller that a maximized one, both in height and width). I'm using the Emacs distributed with cygwin, which uses the native MS-Windows GUI (package "emacs-w32"): In GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-cygwin) of 2016-09-17 built on desktop-new Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.10586 Configured using: 'configure --srcdir=/home/kbrown/src/cygemacs/emacs-25.1-1.x86_64/src/emacs-25.1 --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --docdir=/usr/share/doc/emacs --htmldir=/usr/share/doc/emacs/html -C --with-w32 'CFLAGS=-ggdb -O2 -pipe -Wimplicit-function-declaration -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/kbrown/src/cygemacs/emacs-25.1-1.x86_64/build=/usr/src/debug/emacs-25.1-1 -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/kbrown/src/cygemacs/emacs-25.1-1.x86_64/src/emacs-25.1=/usr/src/debug/emacs-25.1-1' CPPFLAGS= LDFLAGS=' Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG IMAGEMAGICK SOUND DBUS NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS Important settings: value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 04:52:07 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 09:52:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWgit-0006xm-5L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 04:52:07 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:52878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWgir-0006xE-Ra for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 04:52:06 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.41]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M7Xi3-1cKfXd1GJ5-00xJyG; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:51:58 +0100 Message-ID: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:51:48 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dani Moncayo , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OR+TRv3X9Aw8I6aK3944/XaD5Ub8EEzvekbDNY/cn8yhnOJ0BVv 6ysfRtBgAiGsbPPwCzhm72OgQ/p95ncCYTxKShPGmKcFOftws/p+f6WnOkWDkzH8jZYAiqd FR0DLBkaQOPebzJPfRE7TVNdNhKsVuxW8sDJRjkji9MhayZq96WDh7TOvkOqhHNv56EqQZN lQxAKBxbBnGxn4MWqtiLQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:BO0iaIP1R68=:x7ujXWh3GbY6y18fytMG1p OlTQ+LEVvXQXbe5hTCbmIFJgEmP1RZFrAOafUPO8KBGbFN1MlJ0+gXNDezswOtzAvnPO//nvR eLUe5vpEpIEGQYCVOWgyPuuN7TBjuG7TbLE8qRnW65dNla38xNYwRwT5aLoth/HbG1AALYx7A kUxvfXbZMdrnSIr9xdKUa6kE9npOpIhTLExacX8fSKUpB32glW8C2cXvZPZIVhsyZNa558X6K bJ4kfbgsy2TwVxCGu1QBKwRSnExDCTztQhHwEWA7shYdT4YT4WCFtPkychIp41Z+8vQfbQKD7 Vsz3GrglOP0urfXBGiZxrQaaxjFMaOfXilBLa2Q1BBk9Nj6g/iL+vaQD8uqV6Z/n5J1xMLh9c jiPSOeN2kWUN1wLGzuIa6IEmBVn9zGO1JPcb8rFSwENw8bkPjq3VSrAs/euiddWhidTUfmPOK E5o6UsLrtTmsiiA+lIuyzNocBg3y4+kVtEzafDQnHCKRcey1kkxzH+gkUk/NnQAiwBMz65VPQ 4jeq43DlVqPKgxy/C+8zKwr/81VBuPMLKIlNfg0ydKfewjFshHu5egqt+xw4n3O2docr36uQy uPjxBtSlsrCMlbgSZ6U2g59Ixk/oURrYz3Bc2/ki05rXrsILokhLPf4cuxNfkNZZ9E/k4qpLG oBgoL3YwlId4c3Khm3melNK035AA5fq2kW7xWEc+Lv3VScJM5KQTxZ65Bw9kMnOC6tEkv80S2 wCmbxIosfwjGYJqaS0l2XmoOcVETCvL7hOqzKJDWea11n9BiXxo7LHNXGPPCt34iZqIoPh9lR PLtWbOnrNs5mo7gUzP8CsEOVVZ7OA== X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Recipe from "emacs -Q" > > 1. Maximize the frame using the mouse -- for example, on MS-Windows, > either click on the "maximize" button or double click on the title > bar. > > 2. Switch to fullscreen by pressing F11. > > 3. Press F11 again. > > > Expected behavior: The frame goes to its previous state (i.e. maximized). [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.41 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.19 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Recipe from "emacs -Q" > > 1. Maximize the frame using the mouse -- for example, on MS-Windows, > either click on the "maximize" button or double click on the title > bar. > > 2. Switch to fullscreen by pressing F11. > > 3. Press F11 again. > > > Expected behavior: The frame goes to its previous state (i.e. maximized). [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.19 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.41 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > Recipe from "emacs -Q" > > 1. Maximize the frame using the mouse -- for example, on MS-Windows, > either click on the "maximize" button or double click on the title > bar. > > 2. Switch to fullscreen by pressing F11. > > 3. Press F11 again. > > > Expected behavior: The frame goes to its previous state (i.e. maximized). This is the behavior I get with my MinGW builds on Windows XP. > Observed behavior: The frame is not maximized (it is smaller that a > maximized one, both in height and width). > > > I'm using the Emacs distributed with cygwin, which uses the native > MS-Windows GUI (package "emacs-w32"): What is that package "emacs-w32"? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 05:20:32 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 10:20:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44180 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWhAM-0007be-Tt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 05:20:31 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:32975) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWhAL-0007bQ-4W for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 05:20:29 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id x1so56398798lff.0 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:20:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q0VjjpdZMv6ic0XkfJHYQTvoXIJAeLDOL/RciQDnILQ=; b=pDjTPXVMmISgKcB03+MFxJrBhAWgYWhUIqXLqOTXvrxClsklFS/CHgxU+ayenkt4Lc x3Qx9SWJlCriCum1RSNaRksWDCprhinxosmFidBKonjUmjAU4DQcN0Fl8zBfglFM5c5l gq0rGELXZkxsozjE5hVO8ENL34jYuEGGUlcwqun8XtBbiL2CQZlZU/3rGYoG2R91zcv9 HOFtP45Ia8tcjBIRhROv0SFkObvQA0KV/hOcWiKl1gI3W4ShUREWUZXggloM7Aawl560 PQo9tN0W6E2q1q3CdIUPT/zQ0ur6CgDn/kRSwcKexSoDPorqbNKBkZ6vidjIMkx3VDOL L2kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q0VjjpdZMv6ic0XkfJHYQTvoXIJAeLDOL/RciQDnILQ=; b=i8iUfRPr9Neqdpvl3wPc2fTNY6+ySsz6xnT2N5BcSZKPsmPz2XQZGpM7qPqdk6BY/E J1ZWIsSvdCo5kDVwFWETzkXtPiSsJhwMSD0ajKxQjF1/nNpUVU6hQhkxdJUO/FxoMD8+ WjmRTOa9DVbIHdbubSOv1X9hHetvWl56yQ86akD2NuvD80lx/mORm5FbWjz4jNjUWqAV +dk3Cmm0/57aFrq1Z1xRa/YXCUSBJL9HUMOqbk/AopkcqjuojyBBmX+K2x8WRNjizG4+ gRDIqcW8IaK1Ztz+De6gTvaIL5KpMphbkTbqrRfWvFiJNnAET3ViQUiaFj+rduS9KKAH u35A== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIRymMCAU0+O5RVu5BwMmFTh86TCGUd5f1sMlp/nwcUvW2DO1OrvXWdL8uj3P+QOFK9XfOrVWnLb4s5Ug== X-Received: by 10.46.83.19 with SMTP id h19mr732538ljb.72.1485426023036; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:20:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:20:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:20:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) >> I'm using the Emacs distributed with cygwin, which uses the native >> MS-Windows GUI (package "emacs-w32"): > > What is that package "emacs-w32"? I'm not sure I understand your question, so my answer may be trivial/useless to you, but anyway: Cygwin is a distribution of software organized in packages. The name of one of those packages is "emacs-w32" (you can search for it in the cygwin package manager). Well, that is the package which includes the Emacs binary I'm using. It's basically a build of Emacs made for the Cygwin platform, but modified to use the native MS-Windows GUI, instead of X-Window or another toolkit like GTK+. HTH. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 05:54:31 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 10:54:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44204 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWhhH-0008Nj-J6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 05:54:31 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]:36502) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWhhF-0008NU-Q6 for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 05:54:30 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id z134so143448022lff.3 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:54:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8Z24Z4yVEJvv5kwe8VqMH61AWGVoGa646hbNnTaJchY=; b=sDgc4y4EaYlaKvg+4onXIZw/7Qq5L3UT+nNHGEEh3IeK3lhLUp15xugO503QTSZH7R wqRhpKWTymiL3bVsMh6Ea24KG/ckkU86wd1QGl69I899xY0c7J1xd43uE7EUN05ZqDCV nSUjx3lGshUGd2uwC91J/U6jeOSelLv0BRLfe4fLxneXoBbCzXFd0tJcNpIlNJzcemJM X++PqEccRzOPkhsOyvkY84pmOdGPGzxlAkI+/aaFqJ+P2PWmhjN+taZ54CjWE9K8z3TL 2CSq7hX+k14Jo9Pnn0hg40hDqqaMjzmuVZF3zsZ86TYSi6n6kRYqVmRKXSH/crbJkdc3 4umw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8Z24Z4yVEJvv5kwe8VqMH61AWGVoGa646hbNnTaJchY=; b=pDN1QypPuVLkTXVHiUo5jGYHy6zYGvQk6ITK8lXGu0pmy11OMFoaOrFL9jQtsMCuc8 IVp2jVfQUAwaYG8ocoVru77JX+SaZrCJNl30gPNzWt4k0UlquSQNkGtQCpJvAGQ9pjHL qs8rzZRAse858RHY2VNc5ViBDfMD91CJgvol1f98Hg/vTD/DvLZ3jPv3/9rj1c3Q/ARE T6M3miJCEh9BI3FN8CP6yC9tyg1brB+OaVdckutmH6beVVtAKw8OXBYQ+w/n4QOORoxy xtnInF0Uxprnudqy3fLMHtLc4Qu5x6ztpvdG/6FZv65AQITQVHjQnj/Li75I85vPfJaf 0d3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIHIqqk9rUbv6a7TTfouYdLe7Wf3o7YhALXvdJfX9VBEmmXtUD7QG7S5v6vFsWElavzBlHJTnzza8eXoA== X-Received: by 10.25.67.19 with SMTP id q19mr757508lfa.9.1485428063779; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:54:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:54:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:54:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) BTW, I forgot to mention that my OS (on which Cygwin is installed) is MS-Windows 10 Enterprise. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 09:00:54 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 14:00:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWkbe-0005qQ-Ld for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:00:54 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:51527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWkbc-0005qB-G9 for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:00:53 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.41]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTCDO-1cxoDL0v6E-00S7lh; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:00:45 +0100 Message-ID: <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:00:34 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:II7fXA6zMn90fhRdcN4XD6ghcCfzSGvnKmsbF9gwCYZzNOBO/sC WImdb5qcejQFxukTJpRuyJi/K1Wl+OZZxhQaj9zYx7dOTJnY2M/GjIX9BQTXwKA6Sss9tVI /2Y28HDHTv+4EFN/S4bs+JSAq+SILsVmPLwpI+NZ9o7R9dpLya5T86kpu45ATzGZja8YbLf ggMscPV/V8mBKdyJCf4lw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:25R2meHZVB4=:/PePw+bz1MKWkTva+I/Qio WT2mJTQaKAgV6YVIHWc2WMuEhwfW7ex6n2eR7V5x+6NGUUDLHFaYW6no3OMb/Z4o1QYvfSyHR ZMCz442HVIs3WpdVgtqg30lrhoGZvqH1idbzc1SlgToYT0QMxQE1wzd43ktV3rWCuGNzkXVeH 300HxinJg1hqtW0kBP9QqY0QB2oi5uQuYKS9y0Gfl7tOdyqOs68fB2FTi9txBpffI0wiUl+An k8enulisQpJ2EgCkprZjBUPh/4NZznOYrXtJHSYbh3cm5V3FxAY8G307kDqpRQFoWMBdrFmto mXPNXfNQIyfFlWqpnx5dviThPwjF7IeMM71+snaLK8WbTjHEHCbPjkK4veTRXlLZ/iMGX4Vz2 xV1yRmrprXG2egKhnHwWE5OmhoOSi2/jjT2KQVJbUN2nCjO7zqLWEsaCVzxOzbcLtRIPDDod4 pgOd55xrwbj4AzMRB3G7n9/5L80Ei9lgzUlAa8+LjQjSDFKIvtR3OHvAma1c+uO4gC8JfPrXy jPJMhkw1XfetKkbnOc45Hn7rL3DNxVaK60FXtz9GsY5VmDsZi74hh4p+/zZkGf/ZVlE1S5E/d HELE5KdkvwqTrEqgw+vDfxLcSjJeuRIEtkx1BcBJjgAz24K2Jxy08Epd/jH50o6RhheqVOf23 NtzdpB+k3QR2KDB/xk4JuwVP3uKyuSpu73jn/pp/pkdDTSGhheGB50c1Q5quzVDE6GJN7Ag5D raXu2aXF9SYwCC9LWZHGWYwlMAx4FhXATgW/MUI30unrR9+2m0izJSL7JWx7H/2H2k39KyVDX pqAws+5u3M3qw1kriVpAo/3ywgGkg== X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> What is that package "emacs-w32"? > > I'm not sure I understand your question, so my answer may be > trivial/useless to you, but anyway: Cygwin is a distribution of > software organized in packages. The name of one of those packages is > "emacs-w32" (you can search for it in the cygwin package manager). > Well, that is the package which includes the Emacs binary I'm using. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.41 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [212.227.15.15 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> What is that package "emacs-w32"? > > I'm not sure I understand your question, so my answer may be > trivial/useless to you, but anyway: Cygwin is a distribution of > software organized in packages. The name of one of those packages is > "emacs-w32" (you can search for it in the cygwin package manager). > Well, that is the package which includes the Emacs binary I'm using. [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [212.227.15.15 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.41 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) >> What is that package "emacs-w32"? > > I'm not sure I understand your question, so my answer may be > trivial/useless to you, but anyway: Cygwin is a distribution of > software organized in packages. The name of one of those packages is > "emacs-w32" (you can search for it in the cygwin package manager). > Well, that is the package which includes the Emacs binary I'm using. I don't have Cygwin installed so I doubt that using its package manager would make much sense for me. Anyway, I suppose it provides a w32 executable, say emacs-w32.exe and some additional libraries. I was a bit confused by the term "package". > It's basically a build of Emacs made for the Cygwin platform, but > modified to use the native MS-Windows GUI, instead of X-Window or > another toolkit like GTK+. We would probably have to look at these "modifications" in order to find out what happens. Meanwhile a few questions: (1) What is the appearance of the maximize button after step 3? Does it show two overlapping windows or one large window? (2) How do the frames from before step 2 and after step 3 differ? Please use M-: (frame-geometry) and post the =E2=80=98outer-position= =E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98outer-size=E2=80=99 values. (3) Apart from the problem you reported do M-: (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen 'maximized) and clicking on the maximize button of the title bar produce frames with the same size and position? (4) Does setting =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 to t change any= thing? (5) Can you try with a native Windows build or a GTK build and see whether they exhibit the same problem? > BTW, I forgot to mention that my OS (on which Cygwin is installed) is > MS-Windows 10 Enterprise. Can anyone with a native build on Windows 10 reproduce the problem? Thanks, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 10:43:37 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 15:43:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmD3-0006u1-B7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:43:37 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]:36269) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmD1-0006tp-Ub for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:43:36 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-f47.google.com with SMTP id u143so140137370oif.3 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 07:43:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=+LY1N/oYi0+2LQ+kKlCuRdeqx7FwrRg6FPhT1fOS2Lg=; b=shThRdOW14/eX4sN9osNbrL0mPbZ0gl9ZkPlIeurfWG2II1MWn0ggExHRtIsmsUq2g sRHALEtn/FQI4iTHDlr3cDF/fgRQuGdPLcx4cBU+YEZfwffan/ATU8IW4I8j2uoyC1D2 v3NjeVuXtWbzznUQwyW+eHAiQEW8DDpxP0MhzRhYksQJQbHuT8206xeSv05E2GGh2AYf SecUj8Q14lK168UoRhmeNoEYRkVA2k41/Gh2wkrExGJ86ac/UtJ+h0tBAh38Rcr1t2fk hvV0xN//qUMbOt54kPuGEju5hx6TXtMd83UsRTqbuU2yGQ7JNZ3XeAGJLQYsPokrxPkA wVHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+LY1N/oYi0+2LQ+kKlCuRdeqx7FwrRg6FPhT1fOS2Lg=; b=mpxcAQfJgQW2BARe53UVnr7tkrrpX9cQSmIQmBa2/p7DplEM2EdtmGfUkIZFp/YzvF bBMeQTxXr4MS6odjEd58XDwxw3GX8BsiivZdJyssRmOO4vBwdin0wooCnVWS7SI8Oxi9 MWIjKdEaIWmvKMkCocmEzB2jQHEpFvrZYjAqAIMEG6tegiY5qfqi85ugMTvTBZUl4ETZ FxYj9GbheN4hXfdwxA/1aU030xlsrsI/cCiU6CFeOz7SIDGsUZRjikwsAKsGAcalq5o+ nDZdXEbfsnqGK/o3hZWds4rHsu/seNCaNiOVOyzs9/RoemnN+iO+AWMmrcbHr2x27GxD 5IFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL1ZkS0+3mKUrGeN6Ai6ip9gTR6ww+Aw88YF05K+xWUH5cb5VnNCmbm3Pz/mG3tYsHzEpBhRs6OfL2t9g== X-Received: by 10.202.105.70 with SMTP id e67mr2371730oic.26.1485445410156; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 07:43:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.21.117 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 07:43:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:43:29 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: neAJd_XIQtYIWdo3OA0xRkNNGuc Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Dani Moncayo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:00 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > >> BTW, I forgot to mention that my OS (on which Cygwin is installed) is >> MS-Windows 10 Enterprise. > > Can anyone with a native build on Windows 10 reproduce the problem? Does not reproduce for me on Windows 10 using the native 25.1 release or master from a few days ago. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 11:08:30 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 16:08:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmb7-0007Y6-UT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:08:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmb6-0007Xr-Hm for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:08:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmay-0000Oo-9r for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:08:23 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmay-0000OQ-63; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:08:20 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3600 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmax-0005RF-Du; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:08:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:08:06 +0200 Message-Id: <83bmut3iu1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: martin rudalics In-reply-to: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:51:48 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:51:48 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > > > Recipe from "emacs -Q" > > > > 1. Maximize the frame using the mouse -- for example, on MS-Windows, > > either click on the "maximize" button or double click on the title > > bar. > > > > 2. Switch to fullscreen by pressing F11. > > > > 3. Press F11 again. > > > > > > Expected behavior: The frame goes to its previous state (i.e. maximized). > > This is the behavior I get with my MinGW builds on Windows XP. As do I. I also tested on Windows 7, and I see the same expected behavior there. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 11:10:36 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 16:10:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmdA-0007bA-9M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:10:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59351) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmd8-0007ax-LA for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:10:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmcz-0001rH-CF for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:10:29 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmcz-0001r7-A3; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:10:25 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3603 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cWmcy-000630-27; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:10:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:10:08 +0200 Message-Id: <83a8ad3iqn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Noam Postavsky In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:43:29 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:43:29 -0500 > Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:00 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > > > >> BTW, I forgot to mention that my OS (on which Cygwin is installed) is > >> MS-Windows 10 Enterprise. > > > > Can anyone with a native build on Windows 10 reproduce the problem? > > Does not reproduce for me on Windows 10 using the native 25.1 release > or master from a few days ago. That's strange, since the Cygwin w32 build is supposed to use the same code as the native build for its GUI display backend. Maybe Dani could test a native build on the same system? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 12:49:58 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 17:49:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45807 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWoBJ-0004rV-OL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:49:57 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:35953) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWoBH-0004rI-Kv for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:49:56 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f46.google.com with SMTP id z134so149506785lff.3 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:49:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ujDbN9/doB+MIhWiX40Qqk8xvahEXH81NQjLVozyg6E=; b=XuuWF0pnPi4gjsX4Z6g39NXxNVMC0iyY/+KBCdMuSix8WW9/Yfepz6jvkjbu6UqEt7 r9CSTzgWbrkqu2p8eRBjeZ6VwrA/Hgd6FLOA5B5MEpU0H+ACnfPsMGhqXe+evDcXHJ08 JSKK+k/VhQtgXE0+v8L9OWPSYlYVfQ4d9uyh0WfCZldNH7wXa6DI5wFB/XykPQu7WLj4 OkH+cGpembHc52th/u/DyEZmg6XQCTf2uAK1sj10oLR8mARZ8aRLyH19IZfhgA1T/5ZS udpkCySG2MabFHLcyO3wxeZzihc/OOGENcjp3v9IB55Ra8UrLx45pOL/HbmuebHYz+7J S2nA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ujDbN9/doB+MIhWiX40Qqk8xvahEXH81NQjLVozyg6E=; b=S9LBeYvfP56YuR6yNBQyKxUUbQkiHVsVqs4kZm9j6Tl+C8pf3gUhh51qW56+Ye2wHH HU+xtbtD/yP6C7u1cHjPnxItAXpE2bPpo+voxt5WtxCU1tH00xJ3FyMrMFOBVzq+EMbd I/9i64BygKoSf9GIlSkmbzCAW1r27QW26+UzaAIOw3eUd7I2JGqX2EsykQqDGZJOodQp 1LVy3mqxLepjxCUQ89Fz9SV6qVi5VQz6N/QKGZnVhyCPyZmuhnrDYX8l07raXwlt+lyX iUh06OwYk42V15IG0+DbQrsoGNlM8fBrHQmq30bapEOOfdhTMopOEgIm4N41SiBMer5V JNtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJumd3+Gt8uJjdT/qPqHfw8iakcAKJ0KxrhpzQhWCQz2eiUMtvKsj55bRZHo4xo5MOOCEC11Msakn8EqA== X-Received: by 10.25.145.89 with SMTP id y25mr1444876lfj.102.1485452989616; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:49:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:49:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:49:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) Hello, I've just realized another detail required to reproduce the problem: the Windows taskbar must be docked to the left side of the screen. (If I move the taskbar to the bottom side --its default position--, then I cannot reproduce the problem). I've just reproduced the problem also with a native MS-Windows build of Emacs (a recent build from the emacs-25 branch): In GNU Emacs 25.1.90.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2016-12-28 built on LEG570 Repository revision: 697167b5432a89db009238cf5cbddc61e69ad339 Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.14393 Configured using: 'configure --host=i686-pc-mingw32' -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 13:02:18 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 18:02:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45811 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWoNF-00059d-Ty for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:02:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ot0-f196.google.com ([74.125.82.196]:36411) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWoND-00059Q-W4 for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:02:16 -0500 Received: by mail-ot0-f196.google.com with SMTP id 36so28217764otx.3 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:02:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=q63TzEsJuaT9UsdK6l1CHBK5WHxP4ZkfMcj/o0I4JYs=; b=t2JDnYPtRlhbggBRmfAs6DdvnR0EQEcq6LCbAATP3sm9zv+UIndupL/yaIbxQLsVWg g5WJalEjQ/5V2BXKqn2shN2vJlqeuQbF+U89FnfdePHUylmdOI5EE/ybEe0OnanmIak8 NfsbGucxcHB3lJrTm2gTWNka63OJO8bqrgDJbX6vXWxmNA1ZY/jeAIXuJpHHQI+KOZAA UmoJ4m4ymF6gq9aP7g9ukpbF2hDWqZvixb/b6Y2vM7uaECAdCqfx5cU3Wum1ZysycaJk TI4PnY2hO+Ss7jtAqjIbmbcc8xe/wPTdYgDZ+rsVfaVN8pC0eK+FlMuTydsX5pa6LIMr 501g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q63TzEsJuaT9UsdK6l1CHBK5WHxP4ZkfMcj/o0I4JYs=; b=sMLC82C6IADeORohuhH0OrnWzlFbZgPK3t6yJr6ZXoBAHr41P89Z/247VXAb3tCnl9 f9muq3ppAAQt6QfYOMneM5Fll/+Ue/62EM//j7zXlIqefpWUHTChUlLlL+axmc0KjJmN HmKoBS9MCBgDQVK2ojUy5ICpUR56lz/fgVB+p0dp2UdxW9mH/oYe2SvjMESjrBlsbkbd jbb3nVSrHg1DHy57OQ/emPA4SDymwIKQuBS3KbzXs2Q1JJpeX8H3GSdYcZVs7Af2bXbO tYYIDuCqvYk3cTyeFucUPH75loOzZIFrjDBhW6jTw3dX9HTN5S1FaZrVblkrwOjHmDLN PgSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLlACwzwtwqRPdwCRd/y1c+7ovO3pEMY5jpziNCEh4jbHPDjQyheiFvMeGTHSbDuOw/HaeWAD49oAuZ8Q== X-Received: by 10.157.42.202 with SMTP id e68mr1723277otb.221.1485453730300; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:02:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.21.117 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:02:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 13:02:09 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MSBAh7dGId13kP-Zgw7cGjunxkU Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Dani Moncayo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Dani Moncayo wrote: > Hello, > > I've just realized another detail required to reproduce the problem: > the Windows taskbar must be docked to the left side of the screen. > (If I move the taskbar to the bottom side --its default position--, > then I cannot reproduce the problem). > > I've just reproduced the problem also with a native MS-Windows build > of Emacs (a recent build from the emacs-25 branch): I can confirm with 25.1 and master. Oddly enough, having the taskbar on the *right* side of screen (which I usually do) doesn't trigger this issue either. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 26 14:06:58 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2017 19:06:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45988 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWpNp-0003US-VM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:06:58 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:63377) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cWpNo-0003UF-3x for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:06:56 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.116]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Man6U-1clbLT0lty-00KRdA; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:06:45 +0100 Message-ID: <588A48C3.80409@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:06:43 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:w+qUdxl/L6NjCYlpmH0EsxhpXElEZANcRL7/9Wfu4z+ydpOZCGZ Rj/qzbW6JY1xkxZlUuCZ7LYb2QrHaaxqPjngGSj3+yWcHunKIx/CCgfdHXnc0VYAig7eFpS JJaRr5/tmumGcPJGt6Sz5KsyMK5jMoAT89iBMAFGuH0PY0vs30tW73N2oh00zynY1iFPaww CeHh1bF3yUq71gKTFfbsA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kUaEgtQcONI=:WzZHLebpGL/dcmNfA5cdMh mKFyWmxCFD3OSyxBVGNhqzp4SOaY5sBDrHkpk/pWvisXauhKVxQktWP2bGkKMJWaqvorrTogV k2DSrc6rUFdY6zGGfeItEiQJP72HG8lXfDcIDJfeHuoNarDxTODSyGEkBLiQTs/Lkp6ZHeqQP SHWZzR1ZrHbWqTO/aDsX9AU3SasX7BXhOLS9CM4HmUYvSaHJUESY8oWpPIulNXusaK9K7VX7E 867svf5UgTokNGrTVwuBgRg1h286mvruhPsf1mPWNqz+TJaACba1jGQ7xBeOwkFcB+BQtdlFm cxlWKQUi9i01xe9k0IBBf9q/Z/12JgukUOeuNVtKuKwDLum0CAqw8BDrwLsinuTEzmTXIRAmL nFXRQ/VgEcKeEhSskMAtsMZAb9TyqTPgSp0QSalhh/YAzImie6hsB7lJhq1BS+lds4EyewxBm GScr3bE0DGHGLJK5yxKlkzobPUzR5AJ6SHaCR7YCB7xWP5vJx5xdMU8WGYYwcOBACRO/iksF/ ewjreUl6ccSYRNRuymMnt9OUEIIGGbxeqzXX7cEO5UMrWudfzBqlaPXLK0OfgjcAGUUQe2QMc MPifHhCkuasomcSfo2oHGwy+m4MHZuGIHYOm3sh+fsWSFWQbHd5v/6HU8BOkPUomRFDUMipYE AEy7XkpIk4YBQL3wP9Llfyo0J6V78zhsvXaBgsggReyQkaZFoBUUfXr1RfYo36cSRiD02Z74f L2W9BYaEVsLsw9/ZaLJg1wIxBglXNuHoplm4I0xf96V2tZ5B/NHfqBWavkWT0IRnjIpl5J0QY IKFqH76XyNaQEWeDHNmUA90CzFmldHxr+mRFSiP2AEZZiFJ4kZVWwN5VOOb2jxs1enquIXa+W nrCr2OlP5vtew004XZAw2+LkizUfNcNPbCI3QxvLcJefMp+ArpOji/GyOMtu7idDwQKAzxdof 1ob582axaSCIwUqhAZ37EqDcjG+jp0xHAMyQOv3JThrKq+RDpJmDG2o8bdcBD/zELKR/LsrNx NJMdMnPlmTmwbnZahL1c2/9BkzUqaiJU+Hu9bCgIfuKcxDdQLrw1iUNKXMzOHBEi7Q== X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I've just realized another detail required to reproduce the problem: > the Windows taskbar must be docked to the left side of the screen. > (If I move the taskbar to the bottom side --its default position--, > then I cannot reproduce the problem). > > I've just reproduced the problem also with a native MS-Windows build > of Emacs (a recent build from the emacs-25 branch): [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.21 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.116 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I've just realized another detail required to reproduce the problem: > the Windows taskbar must be docked to the left side of the screen. > (If I move the taskbar to the bottom side --its default position--, > then I cannot reproduce the problem). > > I've just reproduced the problem also with a native MS-Windows build > of Emacs (a recent build from the emacs-25 branch): [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.21 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.116 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > I've just realized another detail required to reproduce the problem: > the Windows taskbar must be docked to the left side of the screen. > (If I move the taskbar to the bottom side --its default position--, > then I cannot reproduce the problem). > > I've just reproduced the problem also with a native MS-Windows build > of Emacs (a recent build from the emacs-25 branch): What does M-: (w32-display-monitor-attributes-list) return when your taskbar is on the left? Do other applications handle your scenario correctly? Firefox? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 02:54:53 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 07:54:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46903 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1Mz-0003ls-4b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:54:53 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:34727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1Mw-0003lY-4a for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:54:50 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id v186so157897785lfa.1 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:54:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K7MJg221Oiv1s/RKgHXnBzOrUMnHj8OExw0gF0JBWTA=; b=h8YOfAyW08w8VRr/txX0e0UEZHz4Z7F26E7vRTFLxWR/E5az62LnjRQmoN6RlM4e2z kjbSt7/uOlQJ92jaiiII1vMICAGCdZOgOWxBZ8sc3nrR2UFpTBRDyDMOpoDkLDqsUWpg XocqyScFKs/51pTv1u3yXfi2XeSt/rZ/yyxP4ChLvoNyoVSoxAghGhnr6KItMmaugZSo nudgZvVbRSHV4dYYBeNVQe2E8ilEVLHfEDBe7M/Yt5OM0EZfdF/wOJlSRy8m/ebeO2+Z aoyB6BwPVQlUfW1wX7az/QPJI/FP+/GX08XAQ7Njcwbm2ZSLw2moGiT7Ng/8HZQivPD9 D37g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K7MJg221Oiv1s/RKgHXnBzOrUMnHj8OExw0gF0JBWTA=; b=A3filT5bm6/hT7sKNuJ3L+l5oIiB8/CMS7r/in0tUqxLtKKGYlxBCOuR9SjypCWFpc sVIL2rEKIaHoG5UT0DhS+X84TJAwx2LJfW8NOb5vbA5FN+RKLeXhsOQVKmsRzmSzvV3F Nj/iGGl5HKdtEez1VWkjrqNPY5t50hmnGEgI5kwluW0UTPj2AV2NcOekDpT/NdnHPVKZ QAR0qRebPAYfGtxuCqnGG10cRX1PLXcBZ0fK3A195l/rRjgQiraVWBQuaC+G1+s+eMy1 zRXZeaUt6sn7u4JL3hz5/OXeqZX42h4DTpHsOv4C2MEW1kCpWEhe0iy1kFPqtlgE/ba/ srhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKuJm7epzkVA6gA8eaQU58GOMU/+wi4/Lf9ikd+gkXasfIpvAOpmKF68ZMnbc3Q+Zjd03e9Dx80FQt7fw== X-Received: by 10.25.155.11 with SMTP id d11mr2355277lfe.110.1485503683927; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:54:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:54:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <588A48C3.80409@gmx.at> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A48C3.80409@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:54:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hi Martin, > What does M-: (w32-display-monitor-attributes-list) return when your > taskbar is on the left? (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 62 0 1538 900) (mm-size 443 249) (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames #))) > Do other applications handle your scenario correctly? Firefox? I've just tested the chrome browser, and the File Explorer. Both behave correctly. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 03:03:48 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 08:03:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1Vc-00040e-Ew for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:03:48 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:36062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1Vb-00040T-OQ for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:03:48 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f46.google.com with SMTP id z134so157957319lff.3 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:03:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7DHgMDF1aS6xdAx8DZs10ShYTU8JJFmHN8WblNUWJhk=; b=q1aMbWPElRQwaE/t+pPnZ1t3GL90Wv0PeSsXeUmcU7FiPstu0Md4U5Ubj3F+WII+Xm Y/RMJokbJak7IPI6Ijf7qUVGmeCtUxnljC8L4Y73a/STCBMuhSCQYkX7P8Vj+BWzRiRa +sck2WoX20UypnqPRN8oSLGWX8G/2Hdwv3o+gVz+KKtxrV2kEQR211W87r+mAJvmbUyJ bNt8HP9CQ92/2q9tlNbR0GMeTVzfngqX8Kmvy5Wf4KJZcWZZ5D+ha8H1v/VLwmLaLfzi VAtNAM1uWF9Cx9b6P3eR04mp03i6ayK3FXlZVvmKfyZMPTPqlw4YBHxNSh8E6Toy15RO P+NQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7DHgMDF1aS6xdAx8DZs10ShYTU8JJFmHN8WblNUWJhk=; b=Gw1kcjEfpj57THZMMoKjWFsToqSRc6hl4S4Ql8enY9E+lh7OHBIpW+p9c0FwC5zXao G1V7RG9noTHfnyKwbUVa+D5HO2oYS9UBbF6apHaV6OoLUEBwbEmWSC7Z6ArrPc6l+ekT vqRJtidWhjWjBUwuAvnpEODXutS/3tTO2GAp46FioyTQ/iGIDi6rNGCAFnizokl8kbis JCpgvaWlTQoEix5y8P+OqcEV4ko7J/AxyRNHUNEDevEQ0sStymyEcXr1LpD7OsCkCySp sX9nB1Vz28kqePaM8X4P6FWAfleDDdOdhbL3eF0+V5oq0y3OYRj0HwFCrE4m8wSTQMth 9ciQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLerVk//OLoGvDfcHtCyVhD34Zh3uUQytiGoyI6iYUORXXbTmaOY1bvPwDY0hbktbphHNx8sxs492rK4A== X-Received: by 10.25.67.19 with SMTP id q19mr2266070lfa.9.1485504221861; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:03:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:03:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:03:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) > (1) What is the appearance of the maximize button after step 3? Does it > show two overlapping windows or one large window? The button shows a single box.- i.e., the window state is _not_ maximized. > (2) How do the frames from before step 2 and after step 3 differ? > Please use M-: (frame-geometry) and post the =E2=80=98outer-position= =E2=80=99 and > =E2=80=98outer-size=E2=80=99 values. The frames are exactly equal. Both in size and positon on the screen. > (3) Apart from the problem you reported do > > M-: (set-frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen 'maximized) > > and clicking on the maximize button of the title bar produce frames > with the same size and position? Yes. Both are maximized frames, which take up the entire screen except the taskbar. > (4) Does setting =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 to t change any= thing? No (the problem persists after setting that variable to t). > (5) Can you try with a native Windows build or a GTK build and see > whether they exhibit the same problem? This was answered in a previous mail. The problem is reproducible also with a native windows build. --=20 Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 03:17:05 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 08:17:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iS-0004JB-QG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:17:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58407) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iR-0004If-TW for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:17:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iH-0005Vb-La for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:16:58 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iH-0005VW-Hy; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:16:53 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3965 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1iG-00012j-Ku; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:16:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:16:40 +0200 Message-Id: <83sho429zr.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dani Moncayo In-reply-to: (message from Dani Moncayo on Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:03:41 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) > From: Dani Moncayo > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:03:41 +0100 > Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org > > > (2) How do the frames from before step 2 and after step 3 differ? > > Please use M-: (frame-geometry) and post the ‘outer-position’ and > > ‘outer-size’ values. > > The frames are exactly equal. Both in size and positon on the screen. This seems to contradict your original report, where you said the two frames had different sizes. Or maybe you are saying that the above 2 functions return the same values, but the actual values are different? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 03:23:03 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 08:23:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46931 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1oF-0004Ro-Ef for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:23:03 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:34477) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX1oD-0004R6-IJ for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 03:23:01 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id v186so158199435lfa.1 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:23:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wPU6ENunAAIhCOpNqbVMx3AuvesW6DbFjzbD8hSSgYc=; b=Vv/tA/brykbwh6+355Rfl6t0KTS24QTCGUI2H2fIH8IhhN7J1YggzI0+oRob3rdRHK fnsjVmH0kIEo+ciNKKUGtTuaqiNtR0Nh9l0ibktQ1X+wFrx68bwscEEkRoOjRd7o14el uZpMOxxkkEiMjsC8H7SV5MXRG4H/jLWS7S7eQdDit1Qhd3GnfiwMrczfwN6B/0vJGc/j ODuPLQIMfFbBm1+3i3FthS2vlRvPbSO6SA7tet/BD7io9ED/8jFU82udWsQVMQ6eOCdd usqDf5lWSZERD5EeseYgXArJ40Ec4W1ZAXm1CHeg5Fu12GzY3Tu0UrH4BgRuJifr2hFX 5jIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wPU6ENunAAIhCOpNqbVMx3AuvesW6DbFjzbD8hSSgYc=; b=Y3O4S5RbB2CdQp95VjbXl8dHhgSxgRSOzo0rNwFdD7+MvMO8Q/kUj5CjzfG9EDN4wU D48xG7Fu5mzakNWUyKKBpy4xmokDcQwHJ9qkT31onuu7c/RpEes5VHJfgGVGRjKMEgmH EGievSNewzCzYuuFb4xrXhfYPL5UB6Ga3456nxNA1RYr9OM70WNxMhxMZ89jujVj7JEk HrHWz4U61xq+PazPOiAL4AugOrA6poJLIzSdIxK4tMODToWOj3euRLuFwUG1vg2CZ14i I5z7FT99dwCpi97ZetQpKrDVCN/+Mw40jDLF7xJOibeXBwLm6/q2wpVmxqRIDPQl1FUK ywhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXItoaRV6api1xmlULDM678cdREbxEfOy6YNAA7gLKw/TPWlVHXUBFjUz3fJMUISkx7/g6n2xdEK8sOgTA== X-Received: by 10.46.83.19 with SMTP id h19mr2651258ljb.72.1485505375654; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:22:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:22:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83sho429zr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <83sho429zr.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:22:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) >> > (2) How do the frames from before step 2 and after step 3 differ? >> > Please use M-: (frame-geometry) and post the =E2=80=98outer-positi= on=E2=80=99 and >> > =E2=80=98outer-size=E2=80=99 values. >> >> The frames are exactly equal. Both in size and positon on the screen. > > This seems to contradict your original report, where you said the two > frames had different sizes. Mmmm I said this: Observed behavior: The frame is not maximized (it is smaller that a maximized one, both in height and width). So I don't see any contradiction - What I wanted to express in both cases is that the Emacs frame, after the final step, is _not_ maximized (as it should be). IOW: in step 3, the frame should have been switched from fullscreen to maximized, but it actually switched to the initial status/size (i.e. not maximized). HTH --=20 Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 04:18:57 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 09:18:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46959 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2gL-0005lG-8x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:18:57 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:51239) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2gJ-0005l4-GF for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:18:56 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.23]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYwyp-1d16Vf1ZSd-00VjrY; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: <588B1076.2060008@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:18:46 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A48C3.80409@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zuWH7ugqVk2lKPpNsG1cgKr50ScuD8wRBkkHjTVxwV/+HQp8VGz asiXbP2ulcdyFhktuwLERdtjlBj82H4PZVqeRP+UrCjA1wObtHvjeClNdPZkVG7js5KQ5xv yct1cNYDcV/BQ++N3wjfuis9fvFwIBwUI1jmEQ0kEW/wCrXOGYPyP7stRGmYnd3/xkgrLcQ LhuFkq4i3zHoIfD06W4Ww== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:BHEBvFihqys=:LFowZYD22WqGfssVOchPj9 xb7i/F+OYe6eaOto2XCjGDPmu2bnuH1COaSw3M+WByItC1RkeFaK1BBV/mn5onFU33YPTGlM9 9OTqOsHVk4aMuyi93DmQ5xU6Pg8KENGbukO2OkDfEa7N/sECKhKELGTomY+uYotXN8Qgsmkkf UAChEtIvkA939clzQdn+AkrE8CdEjYwmI0E3Rh31KA+0rwWBP9CL1BecXjYwYD+meJlQLTAHj DTdvx3p++xOpxIbjLqKnBNqGpl5wYJDvLmdPpNKV2YDLxRPQloAbmPWvOAPx/+6b2n/NV/BX5 mEZ8DePmNlMViPetfQkh4ysyhNLrAjhI6mYXeop4ubcUv2tsrYFXYbrEYYRqSCuxlIfjuwPBz jY4tF4AhvBAxTfJ8qKaGjq/WwgqokNo3p5mfrZdmAgHKIMLqLD6Yc0LC34aKJVVohbAQfFD28 D0ZwRAqrSujC/NPuS0htPfUuokojIPqLiDp+ldXt3Vl7JJtT3T7Y04qiMxSwZKIAx1DxmQpRZ i7bCjRQnM9yh1kD+w71DwCs5YpcaYsVyV7xg7pZPVZSvbgNTx/JBMRq2oT/n4OzPKmrTG7xYa GZIXaQcaQjiODK70PRBywYdA3na1Q0JV15aR1c6ggp53252k9L1edoTrtFnYp1JJT6mHQAdHL 2Ta6+aBT65/BOKCIJeBjA8zO4SpRaK6u85AURUF5+PG+EKwZGc76EltKzH9Z9C+HYYYbkxunr EZgqV6Jfd/DuL2Jy9Xsev1UrN2J1Kc5qrl003AohbSIwGb80tGem88y2j7Xv5JQzbPDf+NcRA ENPj10BO1kjEBT3lmeaLeUdfRWfIw== X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> What does M-: (w32-display-monitor-attributes-list) return when your >> taskbar is on the left? > > (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 62 0 1538 900) (mm-size 443 249) > (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames # 0x10100bc30>))) [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.18 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [212.227.15.18 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> What does M-: (w32-display-monitor-attributes-list) return when your >> taskbar is on the left? > > (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 62 0 1538 900) (mm-size 443 249) > (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames # 0x10100bc30>))) [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [212.227.15.18 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.18 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) >> What does M-: (w32-display-monitor-attributes-list) return when your >> taskbar is on the left? > > (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 62 0 1538 900) (mm-size 443 249) > (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames # 0x10100bc30>))) So the taskbar is recognized correctly. Thanks, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 04:19:20 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 09:19:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46963 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2gi-0005mG-Hl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:19:20 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:56658) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2gf-0005m3-Vn for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:19:18 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.23]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaGJa-1c5BFx3378-00m3YT; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:19:11 +0100 Message-ID: <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:19:10 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:9si18SWr7JoH0Z9lp+YOH60JvOa6/APYLWgMJWUBisAwo/XzcTH aHQrf6o2HYtYJ+j+QPoj/PhJLQMKkYFeWl1/SaexP4WsXwbBl1663thAdUG1Au5N1IsSgvx eI0/eatyjpLAUPBcqTreBGFGXnThbBvRzRY0f223NjOlkrgqhTXcsR2R85TNN8yGeommtM0 JK6AVIZZzkhgzmVahcO2g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:pLqjKt8sH7s=:v90AdP9sUeW3Fjd5um1VoA Eh0sA/eiyJn+28eP3+FAunFyXb0LKPDz4rRxFiWHhhXnHZ1rUzOpnKMOSQjq8ixoMRBjWIEQS a97G/4SLQx/QKtrFMOHiKrE7TPNxGwoC6jaF5y6nisax2DmRp4UX0Ei9td3WAhVSTdR8ELBkU ys1n2rYfiuzPJzPGoExi7ToMJy6U09PBrzbZfez+VLZYiYxEbpXfIuBz7ZwzFN/s4HERKpYFU fgZwm7E5X1AG7jM/jwV3xC5FPEvdtRSfix93iV5wMpZLn2o5NZxrg/TWiECZ24Zjxx4SJnG80 NBQ4vJgvF8lKCXQc6/fg4taJY6PTjopA6FT/HckDD6w3p6Bmi6xQU/rrQi4ctAdLpkYWh3tu9 uPR1QutCV9a682s2+VHQONpUB0QpVpzS+eieEGTxCiZHBOshVxw0iw0QtisIS9CGAHx13upw5 /P8bjbq2D9SkUUtn/LGSSTTv2OB45+cGQMFszpE3ZTcvyQ7NPRIvzgN7ZBAF9IahuIu1042s0 EhcTTV68juJnQg6VsIIIT079odhfznagPg25gH+eUo9sm2oqoJpS/mKv6MaingtQqJND0Tb+U PnfbA1pyfx71lKCSIWKJnKrA8LidXb82nrci2jv4uC1hbXdijSVM9U+FrjN842QWZlhl5kH5Z Rqi8p7H0xDWp1Woj3TgS6EoeAV8hDFpuS1/GJVjpfKj1Mtsvu8Na/W0zsD1G5SXmCzhwt6anW JM1fClr52bjCV3bZWJGkAu5JQQABw5xIUTbob9xdx0pwea8RF04mCxYg2m5J4HnHGVmx7Cv5s HyUu35wkUmy43q6Khc5D8naQWa4Ow== X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> (1) What is the appearance of the maximize button after step 3? Does it >> show two overlapping windows or one large window? > > The button shows a single box.- i.e., the window state is _not_ maximized. [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> (1) What is the appearance of the maximize button after step 3? Does it >> show two overlapping windows or one large window? > > The button shows a single box.- i.e., the window state is _not_ maximized. [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) >> (1) What is the appearance of the maximize button after step 3? Does= it >> show two overlapping windows or one large window? > > The button shows a single box.- i.e., the window state is _not_ maximi= zed. This should not happen. Does it show the two boxes after step 3 with the taskbar placed on any of the three other sides of your screen? >> (2) How do the frames from before step 2 and after step 3 differ? >> Please use M-: (frame-geometry) and post the =E2=80=98outer-posi= tion=E2=80=99 and >> =E2=80=98outer-size=E2=80=99 values. > > The frames are exactly equal. Both in size and positon on the screen.= Please post the values, maybe they can give us a clue. Thanks, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 04:25:17 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 09:25:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2mT-0005uw-71 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:25:17 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:34724) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2mQ-0005uj-S5 for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:25:15 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id v186so158915798lfa.1 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:25:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9pjvPVJ6GPO1c25ej016+C/jk1ML3hqGeoL7RQV2dh4=; b=JzrVziJVJzX/9FlPeee+z31w1pETK8TsWmeUiG1Qrx8ZipbdmKoF2+4K/Hf/OExq2h 4A7nwpbFl/xRDCgNYPIz1UrgCHMQFaF+1ao5VeaI9n62bJi/1//Ra8aZWNNY8RekAujH kiscDxnMfoZ/5Wuu4SzLisYfWL9Yet0fZ4X2ABy+gOujWL9/HzUzNvvFvNBlNcq9H6hI JjW3crQlZJ8R5qQQfbIzjnhgOeOTB2A3wEBOG5UF339bV1drvMDWRCNdL5ATBwFXVzem XIF/4sMQYWOMC1MuUimZG/m6BtwzGDvvFklR3OrGDr9J4heBkpaykaOpLwCU4yc9FID/ eSMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9pjvPVJ6GPO1c25ej016+C/jk1ML3hqGeoL7RQV2dh4=; b=AV38eWkkTOuWqGh74yPCrezzADLnSIE2gulB/oK1aC2UYiMCIAnhWdyufIvMIG8W82 DQCtvp4GQli+Wu9/vb8+DNgmSsXZAoh+2nckewkDnAWAgUWImLTL595VLz5MuPRa/FUV r6HGWeM7kf2r6tXC665r2lFP0BPvkJTRCpaYyAkkaHbNZLlDPgou2MmWLJzSziJrf2Ux kHTCxyrcsFVI35QTuHZN2lHzQv0JWt+OgowYN8i+F644+yvudfzkUWmeoRUJC4ce2FHz DnjMmJZ8zoawJo9vs55hq5KMHY1TXpfFDZapd+FIcso17AbScLKdAHO66eSMMEBqAJ09 k7Jw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI3Ib3bDdnha9sJnQAcRXdHaOy+nk1SN3cnGF5Vke3DZ7mjgHEWnUI17QRcVlVqgwdSBa0jxyDALHSehg== X-Received: by 10.25.195.144 with SMTP id t138mr2012221lff.78.1485509108802; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:25:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:25:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:25:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:19 AM, martin rudalics wrote: >>> (1) What is the appearance of the maximize button after step 3? Does i= t >>> show two overlapping windows or one large window? >> >> The button shows a single box.- i.e., the window state is _not_ maximize= d. > > This should not happen. Does it show the two boxes after step 3 with > the taskbar placed on any of the three other sides of your screen? I've just tried with the taskbar on the bottom side, and yes, it does show the two boxes (i.e., maximized frame, expected behavior). >>> (2) How do the frames from before step 2 and after step 3 differ? >>> Please use M-: (frame-geometry) and post the =E2=80=98outer-positi= on=E2=80=99 and >>> =E2=80=98outer-size=E2=80=99 values. >> >> The frames are exactly equal. Both in size and positon on the screen. > > Please post the values, maybe they can give us a clue. In both cases (before step 2 and after step 3), (frame-geometry) outputs th= is: ((outer-position 192 . 130) (outer-size 689 . 671) (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 651 . 23) (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 673 . 20) (tool-bar-external) (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 689 . 36) (internal-border-width . 0)) --=20 Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 04:31:43 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 09:31:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46978 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2sh-00065V-E3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:31:43 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:32905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2sg-00065G-BN for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:31:42 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id x1so72286788lff.0 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:31:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2aaP+dKBqGiw7rlVry7z+Nn1aYSevYR5TmIzk8XYWoU=; b=p4LpqrD1ComR2h+g/Cd0m99Gzm8+rpgbOcX53Gvv5bs/L6UMdkRaYpSGFa3ubQcS5z jWkpz8zzxhFvZ+4YwRur8mV2ajpZW+cwSsYQY/qUjUUFocCokIOkA3hNQ9mokJJRHLmT /0pLhNu0XNtfFu1JpxXJoduy6wXZMi2AQV/BLi69j4bDIAAVUIVTu09QSOBwYllxF6mn UIjM3Yh8rnq3y9IG9FVL66S6eeuIE1KLVTm8bdRyhgfkBhFCf6KfpHTT9gxiAEIe5rs3 O979BDegx/O6X61hlsSGJdXcWwKZ5tx7Mc+Zwciz8fJBWwJubQ6eeWgpDgDVyY5uwVO3 G8yg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2aaP+dKBqGiw7rlVry7z+Nn1aYSevYR5TmIzk8XYWoU=; b=oIoJn4t33sOs0Qph08ORJxKi5Ea9V408mDm1JEsd5dtmdeEJuyKkTsmMoKNOpbtUQF 4wMVIc7Fu8Owwg841yG9l1huflrZIF2vdu8qvUIKZjqQbqG0idKZcHjV8aVG4lu7owf4 0U0q/2zK+sivqnQWkNI0TPig+xXCej3B731eMxZeHjyAm3X5RXTEteXA/xQl06PiZuHU A0Ri3o922Dl+deDyda8rk6zaVyPcuWfRxHMik/VKFAegR4Jh2q65yO5QUA0GQ/GZxTs2 b8DSh7po+ocugcCcxqMvD60H08VEp6px2I0IOPdn3cF7SOlZ4+wVcBNt71Q2Q42NIB9P ZKUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKPdfA4QGDgcIejij67fUOIoJI6EL5hEjHjiSbNU8XiR976X1HeKUWDsUH4QbDk7Bs4zW8rDFk1wu69pw== X-Received: by 10.25.195.144 with SMTP id t138mr2021195lff.78.1485509496486; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:31:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 01:31:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:31:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) BTW/FWIW: I've now tried to reproduce the problem with the taskbar placed at every possible side (left, right, top, bottom). I see the problem with the taskbar in the left or top. I do _not_ see the problem with the taskbar in the bottom or right. HTH -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 04:34:59 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 09:34:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46986 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2vq-0006AU-UC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:34:59 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:61864) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX2vo-0006AB-1q for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:34:57 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.23]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5cMq-1cHqUL0Wt6-00xf8t; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:34:49 +0100 Message-ID: <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:34:47 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lQlYg+KHMxx3xzy20luWZ3XoumDQuLOs+ZdzOqDaPWQ5ZY5Kr3a eIPfIU6vbMP5+o7AIa1knPsNKVQNvZ5MP2CiXSfoBJRMdVYPkvNOr4FVxhikt5IqfJMtLsZ 6cLexPFeojzHHdJ//qLnlNxdyef1DVxgqXPHSkombWpezu+KskJNFG2Ixxqd405zxnskV+v /fKFGd1YmpoIgG2GuxLDg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zdtsfW1K0x0=:vWU+SFjw5fblF/3VIvVQQe qHZvc1byhjZbq7eHABhT+4ceBfjSJjTDIIN5C//CmUdNq3/EBwkk7ILmU7+Q277MToVD0zvJS Sr4iiSkZiykpSPD0FvqsidVOfHNiRzstaIlVOLSXJw0DzMQMk9kIRqf8s9HYBuIbc//vRdBla 3x80IiMCT3bAB9TU+F7hAyN1X+DOxdJR73j+Ww0BKdHaSBk8ozlsVXAdlJuxzRxZ9COo99mdc rhtNtKVr7Nn2oIqr/Em/8iRh3fnilsfWj7+g/AqDmUId699q8WEOdD5hZysYA9koaKPkrbtjl pJty1prUpTsTdzLZiTaYk0ZtfKsvx6RWhShfrNF9LD59pr03AWiHj0x5loX+KFwhi/LImcdoZ X/GvKYOlaNRgFAj9j7/gA4kfDYvyKqa+C1bNUIuQchI0a6VPJFOkcwzISL76hgFirB33ttfN3 WgrkNbxHFVGzlcBcmMbff3BvqcOJROvMnynVRt+ISlNouMljpenJUN/nDDnH66+UidSpQUriB nWfjc+ereMfYVA1tCBHv9DAa9vpycY2eFdFyD8m69AhgQ02opBVxcy7SDoCorK61eZOdb2I1v N4uDre5gkUhbYGp/+8d3WldH7lcGOgLUTSkNix0hHTK15bmgqyRBUr+9ExVN9qWZbVnNIfLIm eYCSukg9PcvrU+z0vEHD1OqSHCgdL7CVq0yP3CKnftlchJjsvh6q48bQHTdEn04PJMFfqMPD4 jYF9EoePhb8IXlce0+GEjpF511mctvuTzIjnTX9Q1Aaae5tYjShU5BUFQVYF77VUQQ4KxkLKB ESIjsfzZWELhfppf7gikyLOW0hEYg== X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I've just tried with the taskbar on the bottom side, and yes, it does > show the two boxes (i.e., maximized frame, expected behavior). Can you try the other two sides as well? > In both cases (before step 2 and after step 3), (frame-geometry) outputs this: > > ((outer-position 192 . 130) [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.19 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I've just tried with the taskbar on the bottom side, and yes, it does > show the two boxes (i.e., maximized frame, expected behavior). Can you try the other two sides as well? > In both cases (before step 2 and after step 3), (frame-geometry) outputs this: > > ((outer-position 192 . 130) [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.19 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > I've just tried with the taskbar on the bottom side, and yes, it does > show the two boxes (i.e., maximized frame, expected behavior). Can you try the other two sides as well? > In both cases (before step 2 and after step 3), (frame-geometry) outputs this: > > ((outer-position 192 . 130) This completely contradicts what I have seen till now: outer-position should be negative on at least one side (in your case the value 130 should be something like -4 accounting for the external border width). What's even more strange is that it shows this value before step 2. This seems to indicate that the frame was not maximized before step 2 either. What are the respective values with the taskbar on bottom? > (outer-size 689 . 671) Is it true that your screen is almost square and has so few pixels? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 04:50:32 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 09:50:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46997 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX3Au-0006Wr-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:50:32 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:64411) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX3As-0006Wb-5J for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 04:50:30 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.23]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MI4yc-1cVP0b1qHe-003uQs; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:50:23 +0100 Message-ID: <588B17DE.5090105@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:50:22 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ts5klF4x8+Y2HHHaBnz7hXxAL4FLi4Xn2fd17FMic/yznXM7GEZ npt4L4aV40mZLDVq0IXT47UZNL9LP5as+0CGOuXOgEF8z/PaN+4095nv+XEO5b2HQzye2Xl viEPXVJewXkL9sKHNnQDoczkwvRsGBt1RQDQDa3czDjHf+6E/bgRdninJ6UAaoA9mhnM2hN uGf2UdPKkSJ3K6GFbFpbg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:IDPpnPcnX1w=:lj32z8pq8N92tgToCpc8xe 6wSJykQjuLp7TrIluiWZ/f3PQRN6eeAJYE7Yp6g6H5PGTJZR6QLZFnE3WXrPI5eMDFDe+Prbo v+Th7jrEstXpab2ggbwmDGSroghZ22KuRDF5mGjNV5/Q+H+Aaf5UCTUf++7F/5mo65kcMwFq8 hJ3uWp7weAvJVw7f8hnOVpdpkv9DTG6asXj6y28OMB6pbe3s32SNr6Dl2BbGL72m8eudohcxC Q6cTs1zgMd6LlKkq0Q5L0aX9ZAiWrp29m4bSnz3KLJJBsectZAxRHqQOU/yDhdasdJ1hHB/YE yQgwhiQbIY/fRY85MeEYTpUTagPGduVtSMNvEF8Co0dbnJgZAautDoOOHfNvZp7fT2Pc6RwAR x7hgAxcXj4bvFu4Owxi69DJTrmCS4tBmULr2TvrKYGzntaMpP8sH7tSjcfDbcbEHaTWgHLsYm 97gdz+98BfyvU+b1OlWcBtwyHIOtKKRNXmmogm+ozKeRyZk6gwxtgy3TFhWNH/hlF67JztYio XU+d+OxXYbrmn9RN0I9LDpROsRXYg3C2hUPcIVfPaaF48pXK9lyBJChAr7O7YJeA2qgGWElSj 98Xo0EWFmd5X6AEN3y2LAdRdCpdvdalNFXt8pSzCeOrAnB9QQiIq+xJj95pIBx/OSPeltfMbj oKqhLrvKm7Gi9Use8dG70D4IognkUIsfRSN3SyjmBMP8bIB16FVHqym8E99S7n+klgfPs7aYq n3rWAPVFVqlp3IUSu8Z7snrpEYwEKzAUzcoNLtKLzjjXswpOYf3hqZogKHPDl/HkMSfRSEIx2 FwoguuF7ciPTn32V3bQ6WA9dbR1KQ== X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > BTW/FWIW: I've now tried to reproduce the problem with the taskbar > placed at every possible side (left, right, top, bottom). I see the > problem with the taskbar in the left or top. I do _not_ see the > problem with the taskbar in the bottom or right. [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > BTW/FWIW: I've now tried to reproduce the problem with the taskbar > placed at every possible side (left, right, top, bottom). I see the > problem with the taskbar in the left or top. I do _not_ see the > problem with the taskbar in the bottom or right. [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > BTW/FWIW: I've now tried to reproduce the problem with the taskbar > placed at every possible side (left, right, top, bottom). I see the > problem with the taskbar in the left or top. I do _not_ see the > problem with the taskbar in the bottom or right. That sounds at least consistent. Please post also the =E2=80=98frame-geo= metry=E2=80=99 figures for all three cases and `w32-display-monitor-attributes-list' to know the height of the taskbar when it's at bottom/top. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 05:01:21 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 10:01:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47023 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX3LM-0006oL-UF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:01:21 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:34500) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX3LL-0006oA-OO for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:01:20 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v186so159343785lfa.1 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:01:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wAbCrrZBJyOHuKnpnummLkMGFt5/njOwIGFMCFx5pn0=; b=oXjrLScb8l5kQRM0lBmNon2015nL+cfDzUK4Kuswo95x31ULsSO6uWJmmGdvV27WFC hTaK8aSarsNVKepLlN2yFp8qwBdAHL/HDzi30Eym8YMmUBjk/qbJxb5LRKQCGT1fkIac 7PXaC3ovOqzklxfH8JdrrDMJnIsopCJWSeKJX8wX+6GolTBdS+7HAux+YoLAc6JHNa82 ojWRlaAHa6d+sL6mqKfVzfGcuOkx5bxGAWi17W4fc7LBgqdS82cRVRe3VSWAHV5FgMv+ xzVUeI4CBXHRAJzyXMDU94Z6OfvY9P71/zq9uP+g6VNQ4bhrXoCHZ2ZDz0lFesBCoYh6 d2FA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wAbCrrZBJyOHuKnpnummLkMGFt5/njOwIGFMCFx5pn0=; b=G/xtQJQ2KUokUQ/9JSH6Px+iLHWIUd3sHnIKEq7YPBqMzse3YEfN4k4SdQcSBxcNeR HiSV1AnW6tHbW5t0w8blODCWd2h74BM/W1+tNg6uWYsSLsaFTAgHwfrlBZJ7TjxQzXMe +6cd2mLwNf56ScZyjLGY6Fh26tLD4hlvSycYp7ulCPrS5gpSqeBNCxe0JvoS53rQstr3 bFMQP0LNBPl7JYmfpUFCMQb0Rbb6v5mhNU9iNQ+jLP0s5CZ5tmmF0gplvYA5Eg4d1TPc uN4VfkHCCC/yb9WLnl2RnlORotda2j+VMPdsZKLH9tOcs6ZkNFQsv/VtvhX6VR61gu7W S2HQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK+x1JZiWdc+fqXADG187wr6WD13dJXewsOcpZiTzyWm3nY3kTGbb3X0IWmf1qPEazxnFN6G+kDhPkYeA== X-Received: by 10.25.199.9 with SMTP id x9mr1994646lff.95.1485511273765; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:01:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:01:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:01:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) >> In both cases (before step 2 and after step 3), (frame-geometry) outputs >> this: >> >> ((outer-position 192 . 130) I'm afraid I've been imprecise here. I was comparing the initial and final scenarios (i.e. before step 1 and after step 3). So, I'll now post the values you wanted: ** Before step 2 (i.e. just after maximizing the frame with the mouse): ((outer-position 54 . -8) (outer-size 1554 . 916) (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 1516 . 23) (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 1538 . 20) (tool-bar-external) (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 1554 . 36) (internal-border-width . 0)) ** After step 3 (i.e. just after pressing F11 a second time) ((outer-position 192 . 130) (outer-size 689 . 671) (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 651 . 23) (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 673 . 20) (tool-bar-external) (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 689 . 36) (internal-border-width . 0)) These values (after final step) are the same I get at the very beginning (just after "emacs -Q"). Sorry for the confusion. >> (outer-size 689 . 671) > > Is it true that your screen is almost square and has so few pixels? No, my screen resolution is 1600 x 900 pixels. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 05:22:59 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 10:22:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47032 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX3gI-0007IB-V9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:22:59 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:34508) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX3gH-0007Hy-SU for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:22:58 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v186so159607271lfa.1 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:22:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KCU9dMmatCN7HWhlcDMSGzBxYRpSowRHMpAmV4n9+Ng=; b=WftEgTBamN2OsmvOWQyT7FuC/uL3txErPsr+mXc6P8w1XxmBYyLZXSRngp66OXMDPv s8QT3RpsjJJbkhnZGnP+2LCDY1zEZHqHJzBXEhMZzN4uSfZXAsh1eYKE0qCC5h7mTI1O M3J1P7PWak/6iOmW72jz/Uu8iI9LuOvwNd67uP+FLAqo6AeLOIHMc+w3ASL5W2AFhQLX Cn4QOE7lhDU1mGMIetbX6e3p+4ARJa7luVg9nJ7IV2nUBKWX6ThC6ag9FqBnhNNiBxk4 3vcPkfLqq2iKeGY3tcsVm2lNPBT9l0pSMgbZ65KgorIARPxOmWx8eegm4lxQjVYFrBdM mL4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KCU9dMmatCN7HWhlcDMSGzBxYRpSowRHMpAmV4n9+Ng=; b=d7dldgIMYG6xrf0lV/VoxTTEb6aCJWpMHFvMh2jfW+7IMerdH9iLUzjkyTTk0aMigJ Gs7Fq/g5UQopthaN5cUfKG8B9/GH+FdZfz19QUGFSjEdPfgVBm4XHtnykklj8QY/ME1M n9v0fji35wnjlkwObSD/VsGpV9iqdRpG0ElZ5GEWLHCQ0QAQSMiueMOd6ogUW3F6C9dc VjfH4AvO8kRFh0fz0Jb6dHW5+fl3jGxWJvPrsheK1Cu7x+Jqg6dPZSn7yyB3Uw33Sgnw JykNwNnWSERE9iDkXlY9YJG9dqlAC4dwLYW/OmdxLtwI8uANGNojxeeCr+JqcMK4GhC8 tMVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI8RaM6SQjlWKvh7sDUNn6RTmzhwitanFfDU8vjHU3F2jIuaXusYyhFCV/VFTW2bM7v4zMJ2iqCsWBu+Q== X-Received: by 10.25.132.6 with SMTP id g6mr2626399lfd.144.1485512571979; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:22:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:22:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <588B17DE.5090105@gmx.at> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B17DE.5090105@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:22:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) > Please post also the =E2=80=98frame-geometry=E2=80=99 > figures for all three cases and `w32-display-monitor-attributes-list' to > know the height of the taskbar when it's at bottom/top. OK, here is the ouput of (frame-geometry) when the Emacs frame is maximized, for each possible position of the taskbar: TOP: ((outer-position -8 . 22) (outer-size 1616 . 886) (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 1578 . 23) (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 1600 . 20) (tool-bar-external) (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 1616 . 36) (internal-border-width . 0)) RIGHT: ((outer-position -8 . -8) (outer-size 1554 . 916) (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 1516 . 23) (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 1538 . 20) (tool-bar-external) (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 1554 . 36) (internal-border-width . 0)) BOTTOM: ((outer-position -8 . -8) (outer-size 1616 . 886) (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 1578 . 23) (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 1600 . 20) (tool-bar-external) (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 1616 . 36) (internal-border-width . 0)) LEFT: ((outer-position 54 . -8) (outer-size 1554 . 916) (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 1516 . 23) (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 1538 . 20) (tool-bar-external) (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 1554 . 36) (internal-border-width . 0)) --=20 Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 05:27:32 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 10:27:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47036 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX3ki-0007On-KQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:27:32 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:34714) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX3kh-0007OW-9e for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 05:27:31 -0500 Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id v186so159659550lfa.1 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:27:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iFfqACo3KjZVUV7JkmFTS9/dmfHUuE1dn3ShbPxUmb4=; b=on3aPBkWgy5jYhuC8Q14SJPkdXTxbDIxeo5OeHs4vmgi65qwnDTK9klx5dpi0K6UDy vfc+xp62+UlVOtEgV9mAqemmaIzucoBv+8uOJlLZYnHslwi3jpHo5XcZ3mknehL9x85h /R3TBYM+/KDHT/0/DIcSQ2U7X/pps7q21CVydxc5hLVPNV/Mus6pQWswCKPN+7ndu0Oh Er766pJfbE97N51CWhoexUP4ZRPEyJaOVUzXHh1sf2U5hawnZuXfq1/4TaQQs+9iZ5xQ b1E01p8O/R4IEvKzIMKz/yEvROoRcTy53h8ZvQeAqbRcA19Lux98CbH6++Yc+VX7gaiB PWMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iFfqACo3KjZVUV7JkmFTS9/dmfHUuE1dn3ShbPxUmb4=; b=EQIg8lYoL9FY4y4E97JaP30nMjxLU8N06TgFyOGZm2cntT5rCvVtUxm/7E5A8swV2l xtdkJgVAvWew0sVJRH6qpZcDqVLf6Gh+FRZcb5OIHV8uEFJbw21bB9uNhVgzmX2sulrp 2wNp3/1GVqvUir+4+cQ27kErlfotmpv7RuI5JIz0H3vK3b9pHGzQxrILT1Nx0aNuUOWo JWjN4lZPSDu/CT09yGZoRrTadb4OQMK+q0t5/yiCYsv4bR2+Rf5u2NenSOkEnqBBmro/ y/rMxa1QgvRxbFgDWOxt7JHPEFdwsbZrKgdz9mNz6khKl70pcY51yJ6pl8DxxJ4f72Ym 5MOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLjN00/yDp6Qsofe1RH3I67TCq2bxIJaPo6HvW/AfikJeJ8lsosdVceb0MkiKpUfS+EyHZJM1oBaU2q3g== X-Received: by 10.25.193.145 with SMTP id r139mr2463006lff.73.1485512845507; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:27:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.24.194 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 02:27:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B17DE.5090105@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:27:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) > OK, here is the ouput of (frame-geometry) when the Emacs frame is > maximized, for each possible position of the taskbar: And here is the output of (w32-display-monitor-attributes-list) in those same cases: TOP: (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 0 30 1600 870) (mm-size 443 249) (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames #))) RIGHT: (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 0 0 1538 900) (mm-size 443 249) (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames #))) BOTTOM: (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 0 0 1600 870) (mm-size 443 249) (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames #))) LEFT: (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 62 0 1538 900) (mm-size 443 249) (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames #))) -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 08:47:52 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 13:47:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47138 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX6sa-00075P-DP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:47:52 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:61116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cX6sY-000758-6w for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:47:50 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.23]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MfVU3-1cq1Ia1cNv-00P9dE; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:47:43 +0100 Message-ID: <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:47:40 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dani Moncayo Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PjTIlJb02N9GN65MkRGHx+zMv9js71VHM3L18O9tr4qwxFapCZ5 unlXzpF20Nhc3y9jW2TrPmh5o6OUN1viF70yUE0tC2tGjFXyVJwzgXezHKE88iEein51NOE wjdgv+OkV5qcFQNVqkAZb+IXJN9DXkacR918Gq35TfUFN8eLA/B21/ou2VjQAKYT4QrmvuQ NWWVsL1vFuhObBHsCmKQQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2zfC/L8X2JE=:xw1mxZzvcvOIPhPbsQEhIJ LJ6vj6QpLq/wHz2Ydr7/nKhHyB/b2roxJCzYQnOXnbKgAImIEtZTIl4L92UV3Hmcy66AYjqTZ lQiha65t0HUUEXTqYWJJ9Le/QeQoPMWl375IGjXQMbLSEFyKR7d+izQlMpYj7CZw08jImouas qiXVtjFpPqWM3kewTLrfeHEEdYj4TO38z/kkO+rEXsrt2hlUTIfgdegfXC26OKoG+uk24eBae xUXsXaVtkI50mdDlznxcMfaCE9/1RluAYFluK7lc6/YEFVe5UipPD1XOmn019SzDwof/iS40w bbnjYsRkOojmEIlFCKZlv8quEMAwL2svssS/XOfnjsvJVINyDt2ssYk6J3vThgp5J2DKtsEme Wo7jkAvnbCmm/go79Vl4aQKhcaKOg9FI1GAyAOdRDUh/gAnwY55lUD2S0Xc0K9M1O1KmpAzoH DIFxEBQRbPe4S/1mvMng8h8BeZEwgS7nAEzI1tIHnD3SwDmJZ5lvEBXVyCEJA2Xii6drhRocw vNYauT6eCZfq56s83lQdE7m68RlpQ8tHOJlIx5Kevszn8ZKDCR36X+2dw/VCnP8hrMGTHMDra IP2OcS68CUEiha/lbdkiRVcuql7uW2vqJUi5Dz3bNqFSQEVeaQ6qEObbDK//DShyLgEwyhFk2 k5cimAH6M0Cld5vchA3E9Y8F4XhHzkt8kIIBkxKFGa8HHFixpjaFpDF/UigWTQeYUHEsqTA2X zzZIjuYjzSWBBt31uR7iouoqKOQqhjhwbKsnzLgqYqwwiKK9H7kcToB8fbybCSeffHK9ufgL3 c/oizSViEholp314+QWn8BYvv8z4A== X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > ** Before step 2 (i.e. just after maximizing the frame with the mouse): > > ((outer-position 54 . -8) (outer-size 1554 . 916) 54 because the frame's left outer edge is by external-border-size pixels left of the taskbar's right end which according to [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [212.227.15.18 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.18 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > ** Before step 2 (i.e. just after maximizing the frame with the mouse): > > ((outer-position 54 . -8) (outer-size 1554 . 916) 54 because the frame's left outer edge is by external-border-size pixels left of the taskbar's right end which according to [...] Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source [212.227.15.18 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.18 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.23 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > ** Before step 2 (i.e. just after maximizing the frame with the mouse): > > ((outer-position 54 . -8) (outer-size 1554 . 916) 54 because the frame's left outer edge is by external-border-size pixels left of the taskbar's right end which according to > LEFT: > (((geometry 0 0 1600 900) (workarea 62 0 1538 900) (mm-size 443 249) > (name . "\\\\.\\DISPLAY1") (frames # 0x10100bc30>))) is at 62. -8 because the frame's top edge is by external-border-size pixels above the display. > (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 1516 . 23) > (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 1538 . 20) (tool-bar-external) > (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 1554 . 36) > (internal-border-width . 0)) > > ** After step 3 (i.e. just after pressing F11 a second time) > > ((outer-position 192 . 130) (outer-size 689 . 671) > (external-border-size 8 . 8) (title-bar-size 651 . 23) > (menu-bar-external . t) (menu-bar-size 673 . 20) (tool-bar-external) > (tool-bar-position . top) (tool-bar-size 689 . 36) > (internal-border-width . 0)) All these values are consistent now and indicate that the frame has returned to its normal state after step 3. > These values (after final step) are the same I get at the very > beginning (just after "emacs -Q"). Everything seems clear - the bug is all mine. Windows just told us that the frame was maximized but the simple hack in w32.term.c case SIZE_MAXIMIZED: ... /* Windows can send us a SIZE_MAXIMIZED message even when fullscreen is fullboth. The following is a simple hack to check that based on the fact that only a maximized fullscreen frame should have both top/left outside the screen. */ if (EQ (fullscreen, Qfullwidth) || EQ (fullscreen, Qfullheight) || NILP (fullscreen)) { int x, y; x_real_positions (f, &x, &y); if (x < 0 && y < 0) store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); } fails becaue either x (in your case) or y (in the taskbar at top case) are greater zero. (I boldly assume that NILP (fullscreen) held, maybe Noam can verify - I never move my taskbar.) I could replace if (x < 0 && y < 0) with if (x < 0 || y < 0) to handle the two cases but that check appears downright silly and will fail anyway for border-less, maximized frames. I must devise something better. Thanks for all the information you sent, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 13:50:47 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2017 18:50:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBbi-0005pM-Tv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:50:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ot0-f194.google.com ([74.125.82.194]:35618) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXBbh-0005pA-2r for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:50:45 -0500 Received: by mail-ot0-f194.google.com with SMTP id 65so31897619otq.2 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:50:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=+F7vGHoT+dGu0TL8v6fjciAf8LsvP5tTa8NYPbglsTo=; b=B6TCf6c/a+kBg9Eu6VIcSj/c4eGEzPR2t2U7dd6kjKkTt3ird39lNH/XNJFVQ3puxu Ds3eNlSxtwZXVl5NoKCs4kfYfDaCBqN56V7iR/s1SosMwjCICtWX+8QgVoNTdtoNSHoK B26MzSmO48V2UmTh/q8Cpj25rf5D3bBpJZ2WJhoGkLb8r18BKnh2C9pBw1sYo/VtY3lb Swrs73pSzqSi0M0xGOEq43qWtcrHOpffCEFuTHbmNvk9UIsuRMI9HwkZijRvQB6EFNvO clGMRKmYdaX7mDa8a3a6PS3SUl/xzwdZIIgD/L8U5O5ANnhGjLC/5UYxUa2hs4FTu6w3 xfFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+F7vGHoT+dGu0TL8v6fjciAf8LsvP5tTa8NYPbglsTo=; b=JcTejIstrspViqS6AqjXP21hYppdKlL1gt0l1s1EPAPURy05TL5hRyOoOoKVRGE2Dx FDHxpbyHvwZGOaiOJ42eFsksuwJzX6TotRs3D/tsEqapbUgshZJnLGlEKjvfkkd5LQJ7 lpvUcuXDWcaLbFdrYGNtfUM9PUdO52SaZ/tF11PUX06iPrpuY9mcg+Fa2eTKvrR8FPVr JalY/2FcM8Poj3cugpQq8Iwqvcd4eRRmi24wnwcC/4I2rQZas96xKRoLKMFc7d4pjGI7 LncJ+RiQvrHq3YMIRZeNrr8t4iHpzJPopHQLnO5qvq46X85oWJiwbc3mlXumI2K0yNOn 5fIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJPTGIirnlpdM+5fB8ZQCdU9KUIc/ZlUDqnJbYxUqdprTYUHBGhzVt+Okw2MTFFyZPzYvI4CTDlcGuhfQ== X-Received: by 10.157.37.209 with SMTP id q75mr5067964ota.267.1485543039407; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:50:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.21.117 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:50:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:50:38 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: TxYxVMs2edza0l2NRMDLPnBK5Go Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a113db4b229c662054717f115 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Dani Moncayo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) --001a113db4b229c662054717f115 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:47 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > Everything seems clear - the bug is all mine. Windows just told us that > the frame was maximized but the simple hack in w32.term.c > > case SIZE_MAXIMIZED: > ... > /* Windows can send us a SIZE_MAXIMIZED message even > when fullscreen is fullboth. The following is a > simple hack to check that based on the fact that > only a maximized fullscreen frame should have both > top/left outside the screen. */ > if (EQ (fullscreen, Qfullwidth) || EQ (fullscreen, > Qfullheight) > || NILP (fullscreen)) > { > int x, y; > > x_real_positions (f, &x, &y); > if (x < 0 && y < 0) > store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); > } > > fails becaue either x (in your case) or y (in the taskbar at top case) > are greater zero. (I boldly assume that NILP (fullscreen) held, maybe > Noam can verify - I never move my taskbar.) Your assumption is correct. I added some message calls to master (as in the attached diff). With the taskbar on the left I got: SIZE_MAXIMIZED, fullscreen = nil SIZE_MAXIMIZED, x = 54, y = -8 on the maximize, and SIZE_MAXIMIZED, fullscreen = fullboth on hitting f11 the first time. Nothing the second time (when Emacs incorrectly switches to non-maximized state). With the taskbar on top it's the same except x = -8, y = 22 (when taskbar is on the right or botton both x and y are -8 and the the second f11 produces the same message as maximizing). --001a113db4b229c662054717f115 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="w32term.c.msg.diff" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="w32term.c.msg.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_iyg5mnpv0 ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBpL3NyYy93MzJ0ZXJtLmMgdy9zcmMvdzMydGVybS5jCmluZGV4IGQ2Yjc4ZmQu Ljk2MjcwMTkgMTAwNjQ0Ci0tLSBpL3NyYy93MzJ0ZXJtLmMKKysrIHcvc3JjL3czMnRlcm0uYwpA QCAtNTExMCwxMiArNTExMCwxOCBAQCB3MzJfcmVhZF9zb2NrZXQgKHN0cnVjdCB0ZXJtaW5hbCAq dGVybWluYWwsCiAJCSAgICAgc2ltcGxlIGhhY2sgdG8gY2hlY2sgdGhhdCBiYXNlZCBvbiB0aGUg ZmFjdCB0aGF0CiAJCSAgICAgb25seSBhIG1heGltaXplZCBmdWxsc2NyZWVuIGZyYW1lIHNob3Vs ZCBoYXZlIGJvdGgKIAkJICAgICB0b3AvbGVmdCBvdXRzaWRlIHRoZSBzY3JlZW4uICAqLworICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB7CisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQVVUT19TVFJJTkcgKGZv cm1hdCwgIlNJWkVfTUFYSU1JWkVELCBmdWxsc2NyZWVuID0gJXMiKTsKKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBDQUxMTiAoRm1lc3NhZ2UsIGZvcm1hdCwgU1lNQk9MX05BTUUgKGZ1bGxzY3JlZW4p KTsKKyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfQogCQkgIGlmIChFUSAoZnVsbHNjcmVlbiwgUWZ1bGx3 aWR0aCkgfHwgRVEgKGZ1bGxzY3JlZW4sIFFmdWxsaGVpZ2h0KQogCQkgICAgICB8fCBOSUxQIChm dWxsc2NyZWVuKSkKIAkJICAgICAgewogCQkJaW50IHgsIHk7CiAKIAkJCXhfcmVhbF9wb3NpdGlv bnMgKGYsICZ4LCAmeSk7CisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBBVVRPX1NUUklORyAoZm9y bWF0LCAiU0laRV9NQVhJTUlaRUQsIHggPSAlZCwgeSA9ICVkIik7CisgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBDQUxMTiAoRm1lc3NhZ2UsIGZvcm1hdCwgbWFrZV9udW1iZXIgKHgpLCBtYWtlX251 bWJlciAoeSkpOwogCQkJaWYgKHggPCAwICYmIHkgPCAwKQogCQkJICBzdG9yZV9mcmFtZV9wYXJh bSAoZiwgUWZ1bGxzY3JlZW4sIFFtYXhpbWl6ZWQpOwogCQkgICAgICB9Cg== --001a113db4b229c662054717f115-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jan 28 03:02:37 2017 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2017 08:02:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXNy1-0003aq-6M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 03:02:37 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:63701) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXNxz-0003ab-FQ for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 03:02:36 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([213.162.68.35]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MaaOf-1cn06Y36Px-00K7DZ; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:02:15 +0100 Message-ID: <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:02:11 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Noam Postavsky Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:N+WlfsUPqu28gjVClz9kqs423kyCF4WglQIh/7QO9ysHAYANmyo JHcOXWfNiaEiWgs9bZPxcsXGcUwA/lcvymsabzF2T4ShrFhKmN0vKZulyFUvnUzSh5qE3tj 3R91gNxzApfUiT6gla3QYr0o4pW7XMEGRNICITBUgIyCicyWeTwf8EULy+AsY1ES/Nw21Xl psGfVek5L4NxvECXJccGA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:x8V6GBG9BH4=:W+Mb/S/XvAeY7tuJWlU8QB 45EeX96g9NfvVi6Bo25zKLV9xQOAYz93d7Mq2yNigOOjVWoNQuTtbLyi7wqCtNbsfiETJR3YQ Dvo5f8EeCUi0ZVCqJAFVrWT/aJcyNBL9xnjORzr9ZFpccW+Nd9o4OLycJABdcY3Do7l5IGj+o 9A7K/Q7rj/PgxuGkP84PLqyTpHtL9blitSRF3uq+wkhGhAz+H93ZP1yhAlAZbbhbdrkGmRbbd llwpZaMYkjXD7kyCFZScLqMc4AhXQO9HQDgIyBnKLreGKILtQ9LsXqLWwY5U/gxs5pbTpxdQz fqgnHdYTsyoryumHKIgE+851I+Yguv56U40DNYwNELwC7pKpWunIns3IBqgvTTixDjAzczpaL 4Al94ENdtPpY8PtAmmnwTyd0zynbov5qJGQLLrtLqmF9EtoBpNOREbUCGSfnQBGH56cOsYdfp dOpCXkHz6j/WOJVwkGWySnev4iGn/SwZRyJwyxtY+n0Ddga620y3OoIiheLgAdhwilFEE3rLI dhH7riRbgbpxTxb2YvkY+yZ22tEXwKZ93IxEb+E55fSqTCiJxke7w+ZdEHomiGF7YHp1zVHkB WZX+jasHOBUp07n4WAG+ph0+4JxgAUGkKakK1nRfVBJue9ziLJpbJRci15y6OTOQU3wnv/LdX n/wv4KPVI7gYcjq9fGr/OBwDavXEJXgPvuQGK9DkU8guO76k+oeew3mLUxci3OdHrZfacwniY hwaV56j5Xn7fFrk7a4g5cwtuqF5l4puCzLq9OzIn+tYvAcQR0Ri7QvaxNlmcwdjuIpZRS044K RXf0jtkkvqlmN8xSA//MVrYCKo6Ng== X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Your assumption is correct. I added some message calls to master (as > in the attached diff). With the taskbar on the left I got: > > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, fullscreen = nil > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, x = 54, y = -8 > > on the maximize, and > > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, fullscreen = fullboth > > on hitting f11 the first time. Nothing the second time (when Emacs > incorrectly switches to non-maximized state). > > With the taskbar on top it's the same except x = -8, y = 22 (when > taskbar is on the right or botton both x and y are -8 and the the > second f11 produces the same message as maximizing). [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.35 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.19 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Dani Moncayo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Your assumption is correct. I added some message calls to master (as > in the attached diff). With the taskbar on the left I got: > > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, fullscreen = nil > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, x = 54, y = -8 > > on the maximize, and > > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, fullscreen = fullboth > > on hitting f11 the first time. Nothing the second time (when Emacs > incorrectly switches to non-maximized state). > > With the taskbar on top it's the same except x = -8, y = 22 (when > taskbar is on the right or botton both x and y are -8 and the the > second f11 produces the same message as maximizing). [...] Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.19 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [213.162.68.35 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > Your assumption is correct. I added some message calls to master (as > in the attached diff). With the taskbar on the left I got: > > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, fullscreen = nil > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, x = 54, y = -8 > > on the maximize, and > > SIZE_MAXIMIZED, fullscreen = fullboth > > on hitting f11 the first time. Nothing the second time (when Emacs > incorrectly switches to non-maximized state). > > With the taskbar on top it's the same except x = -8, y = 22 (when > taskbar is on the right or botton both x and y are -8 and the the > second f11 produces the same message as maximizing). Thank you very much for checking. I suppose that replacing if (EQ (fullscreen, Qfullwidth) || EQ (fullscreen, Qfullheight) || NILP (fullscreen)) { int x, y; x_real_positions (f, &x, &y); if (x < 0 && y < 0) store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); } with store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); should work because I doubt that "Windows can send us a SIZE_MAXIMIZED message even when fullscreen is fullboth" can happen but who knows ... martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 08:33:15 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 12:33:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37852 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEAu3-0008AJ-MX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 08:33:15 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47988) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEAu1-0008A5-Jj for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 08:33:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HGmXr8/RKK+8jettzLHycIsXArTv8AKZYimnEyEWL5A=; b=Q1AroE681aZa0D71xpwUoJZGhS FHXgz78zy+CpXOEnTYHMq/vCcty6brN1yEOc1AraWjk+8tAITzwXPsGGLcgm49ZDuUv8XQcoX6uUb n720E4Dai1+Rbw5lbX2LDCN5uGjvXivcWFhoSFS0XlRViwR9oSB1x2tKL4oeJ3tnmpZQ=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kEAtp-0007V8-7e; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:33:06 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> X-Now-Playing: Meg Baird & Mary Lattimore's _Ghost Forests_: "Between Two Worlds" Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 14:32:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:02:11 +0100") Message-ID: <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: martin rudalics writes: >> With the taskbar on top it's the same except x = -8, y = 22 (when >> taskbar is on the right or botton both x and y are -8 and the the >> second f11 produces the same message as maximizing). > > Th [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Dani Moncayo , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) martin rudalics writes: >> With the taskbar on top it's the same except x = -8, y = 22 (when >> taskbar is on the right or botton both x and y are -8 and the the >> second f11 produces the same message as maximizing). > > Thank you very much for checking. I suppose that replacing > > if (EQ (fullscreen, Qfullwidth) || EQ (fullscreen, Qfullheight) > || NILP (fullscreen)) > { > int x, y; > > x_real_positions (f, &x, &y); > if (x < 0 && y < 0) > store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); > } > > with > > store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); > > should work because I doubt that "Windows can send us a SIZE_MAXIMIZED > message even when fullscreen is fullboth" can happen but who knows ... Reading this thread, it seems like the problem was analysed thoroughly, but this was the final message in the thread. Did anybody try this solution to see whether it fixes the problem, or has the problem been fixed in a different way over the years? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 13:53:17 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2020 17:53:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40564 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEFtl-0004WR-53 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 13:53:17 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com ([209.85.166.54]:40125) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEFtd-0004W7-3N for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 13:53:16 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id j2so7971045ioj.7 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:53:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QgoZ0SifEoMtzkAT8cJZSmAJZkW7EZHMAIOcX9swzCs=; b=Rez3bxE/M4VhNbUmHbyTSyv3dnOGOo+qJuizLRyOHzz9WdWmGf7cy4Q5ZtqFzLKeAO OOHM0+iBFp4oBCibOON+KtmlNCvYLbmJBmLCFO/WGG3nu0s1uMxjEYg9S0hawrY4HgWd jm1ISXRwLA9J/sb8M7iP4e8qsl6qw1ujGAMFy1ubSLl+3I5AHbLvV73FO12pa503wlL3 BcUeMM+Hagl2ztyb+3jheEqM2ry2U2PZZPQ8m6xZT9N6VL0eRJHGdP1vU0wW3zQ334x8 udg4kthSYZ4gGYDFvZ/vkK56TRCzJIBZxOkxCBKwtnEyRpCawkQgIFEM4fyStAmILzAg K+AA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QgoZ0SifEoMtzkAT8cJZSmAJZkW7EZHMAIOcX9swzCs=; b=CFbcaAVtG1iCesJhfnDUTPpFm+icxACY0jbUskoshbd7z1uT4ETyXiI6nAyqocJQcq H7GtVnQq1YzMq0HPtFLmQmFa163cukUoeXlgWMZk12DVa/FqPHCk1/U7Xgi24QnNi5Zw Uu4N6JsRKCge4MBLeoDmIKsTNIYw9P5U6pqen1k+AttjuekM0BPJdBGosaaNaOGhxfTg xU2JG32G24SckX9DvKApx1O7tIeP3pTq3kijZATopKp67v/smtzJ4TGukQAJedRxbxzY Umu+3bjUUrBTu7VE569i+imGP7C0fDOCk1Br4zYz4Vj45lwrrVmwnr/1hrlV6XmNwEkf jySA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5337N/fzHPuLK81MEDB5r7nA8Ro1Il4uwEY3foVJlAl1vmEFm6N3 araPBPn9adGsDNLBekwmT14sx2PZJ89XAbpNBQQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFQkRHgX8FQSRElf2Vg6UwyccXoNIBkTQzgAg/oz1jDOUCyE9SpDVicmZa7k+VcJGvo442L8t7FPHL9YuB5cA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:11cc:: with SMTP id g12mr5434761jas.113.1599241983348; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 10:53:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 19:50:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:33 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > [...] > Did anybody try this > solution to see whether it fixes the problem, or has the problem been > fixed in a different way over the years? I've just seen that the bug is still present in the version I'm using: GNU Emacs 27.1 (build 1, x86_64-pc-cygwin) of 2020-08-11 (Sorry, I don't have currently a suitable build environment for Emacs, so I can't try the proposed fix) -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 02:47:14 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 06:47:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41422 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kERyj-00038G-QO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 02:47:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kERyi-000383-BI for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 02:47:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kERyb-000682-Nv; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 02:47:05 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4751 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kERya-0006oS-E6; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 02:47:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 09:46:54 +0300 Message-Id: <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dani Moncayo , Ken Brown In-Reply-To: (message from Dani Moncayo on Fri, 4 Sep 2020 19:50:59 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics , larsi@gnus.org, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Dani Moncayo > Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 19:50:59 +0200 > Cc: 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 2:33 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > [...] > > Did anybody try this > > solution to see whether it fixes the problem, or has the problem been > > fixed in a different way over the years? > > I've just seen that the bug is still present in the version I'm using: > > GNU Emacs 27.1 (build 1, x86_64-pc-cygwin) > of 2020-08-11 This problem is specific to the Cywgin's w32 build, so someone who uses it should try the patch. I cannot say that I'm happy with the patch, though: it affects the native w32 build as well, where the problem doesn't happen in the first place. If it helps, maybe we should make the change conditional on CYGWIN or something. Ken, can you try the patch, please? And WDYT about the solution? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 08:01:57 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 12:01:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41679 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEWtJ-0008K1-CP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:01:57 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-f180.google.com ([209.85.166.180]:45009) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEWtH-0008Eb-VX for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:01:56 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-f180.google.com with SMTP id h11so8609547ilj.11 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 05:01:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/ZdqMI6oNAsEz3t26C2MOI/s7B7Ul5PwTAnjXc+eGZ8=; b=DBEarhYenCXEcMiXp8zSolxav9Ei/Cd8uCOHTM9IBR5dwY53oTptQauVyUj5eg/Qm4 KpYKiIc8mAP7EBG34pbAjxXR36oVkU6EE3gAtGzu4aYMexPXPsJHCrxig6xO6Wll1Ucb KLr8JC/5Xp6n5c7UXP3LTUgM9r8Ihnc22wFwuWaDi6Vn7bjdPLNUFuOb9tt53/yrWGHR O+dQuuy5WwMUR6Md2Bv7Smpui8NKDv1xFO2eYc64U3X7omeo94NVzfSXq322HgD7On6a ldysiB5fhJzaQHIjxReeQUy5YjAxEKZtLArvjeWL2zo3ux24/+Q77xdvaeYj0NUivEw5 bBYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/ZdqMI6oNAsEz3t26C2MOI/s7B7Ul5PwTAnjXc+eGZ8=; b=s6XQCA18n5hWBw/MeXJAa0FstMc4VjBtFs1arnXSoQDNeYeA7t/JTYvNslxqSlzEAM YyX6RT/bDflm9EkdMzUsFM5W/z+kIaJIv/4gx72BpW4fd3+vQmY9BGdi+4eR8F4toVdI Xu6yTYsqLVjYw92QcFHtv5lSx3I7Lej9O8t5lR0QMMG3SM/P1W8zhmGtpuXdtScQv1gI DiAsqUZKNEeFsyQl5g/CfkRZMESDUKu03zUYY9OYk7l4bErAnj2aOAu2ekpOHmr6d8EM vyfwfffK8fU/fvuxHvK2QY/MTCJ+VaipY3/jpdhw55+aFQEf1L2pu/YkqyXOW6Oqo3ew EkSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531g83uaZmha8fLjeUNk8ZsYcBz1rkTO3OvcwAzYzl1QLulqDYIz Xwx1GGVYh1SPgxHcUQUGtZnZClk4zB9q+40q8HE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzj1ggGNIAyifwaUsyhqWecawxYRfRMFMzljcXSg+lIep3EJmljXR3gZWnIfWE3+BPW+HhhagCMXEJDSBu6NpQ= X-Received: by 2002:a92:8b52:: with SMTP id i79mr12434768ild.177.1599307310342; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 05:01:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 13:59:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Ken Brown , Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 8:47 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > [...] > This problem is specific to the Cywgin's w32 build > [...] I've just downloaded a native w32 build [1] and I've run it on my system (MS Windows 10 Enterprise). I see the same problem with this native build. [1] http://ftp.rediris.es/mirror/GNU/emacs/windows/emacs-27/emacs-27.1-x86_64.zip This is GNU Emacs 27.1 (build 1, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2020-08-21 -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 08:17:40 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 12:17:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEX8W-0002wm-61 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:17:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56348) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEX8V-0002sL-3q for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:17:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEX8P-0006Lk-0n; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:17:33 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2271 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEX8O-0005HA-GP; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:17:32 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 15:17:24 +0300 Message-Id: <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dani Moncayo In-Reply-To: (message from Dani Moncayo on Sat, 5 Sep 2020 13:59:46 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, kbrown@cornell.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Dani Moncayo > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 13:59:46 +0200 > Cc: Ken Brown , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, > Noam Postavsky , martin rudalics > > > This problem is specific to the Cywgin's w32 build > > [...] > > I've just downloaded a native w32 build [1] and I've run it on my > system (MS Windows 10 Enterprise). I see the same problem with this > native build. Then we have a reproducibility problem, because I don't see this with the native build, and neither did Martin at the time (see his initial response to the original bug report). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 08:21:20 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 12:21:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41712 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXC4-0003Al-NQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:21:20 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com ([209.85.166.47]:45881) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXC3-0003AY-RL for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:21:20 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id u126so9668587iod.12 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 05:21:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5jaga91lCIOViSPaapJ+AnAyZdxjJY6J5OoFMc+vDt0=; b=kVxnnoeuoJuF4D2n8vD2D2fLyHZdTeJCwbchJy3R9rjuJE/2oITKNqHkg5fiUF5g5Q 5DOBKz5fxTf1XbHJqVuDVsC77ZdMQ4I9Zi7uAODRHfOga03ORluJB46w6la4ZRw/eoec OEvZnFsIOjFgysvVXwQKuy/bUc6oqB6meGbA47znOPKC0FibvhR5ZTCk4OL9GW7UVJqS KMiMg/fqSJJPt1WgCYWwxYjzrtjkLVQw/Uu5RQRymZWFwkFxk0R0vxdY+q8jHu+u2Are Tsp1Jyt1Lc0B/acBmGSTRa9jFF73ecqLpTC1kLSQaEmGLaKlO8vFECXQn+BCc7xNycsf Kw/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5jaga91lCIOViSPaapJ+AnAyZdxjJY6J5OoFMc+vDt0=; b=XqdcBclpwhJJmFflA+mTrdhUzZsU5EmvwCqVThtkiROYVb5LNt7cR5UvD9PF6+vaIa +2Pres0UeHCi2t5IdeKkfHs4NyDEdnevpQFl182O8Db18JlL3ErWRuBlIrIfXGn0OCXo C6dwANs4/C6h2M8N5JgS0G1FWf/EfYDDCjvNbgN4y+sP1anvb3ldpxwKZFdlb6lOb5Ap wI705wFp6jqooUE1zyyUCQ+envr8Nb3x9TkEutV0Clet4FGmy+UJx3c7PEkDNJTKnogX iXUrbAJ1++dRuSj9wSnFJ6Z5h74AQueoSHvPdoLCIZUtlsB3Xjdqk0qbfci+KcpMidv7 LzVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ByPn9eHo8zpPj/db+7TID7noqpZ1rs/PKUUILxidtDZw0dm1d pflmyw1+dGCHBT1kKtsJuQbw6GZSwnqJ+yPhrLU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPXAULezOG8kgfrMv0w4oKVyqhSjh3ZiH9ValOcB8qN7OsaPdgpES+6Y027Eh48Uj2NJtoV3bPiqkFu4q20no= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:11cc:: with SMTP id g12mr8446193jas.113.1599308474159; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 05:21:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:19:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Ken Brown , Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 2:17 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > [...] > Then we have a reproducibility problem, because I don't see this with > the native build, and neither did Martin at the time (see his initial > response to the original bug report). Did you try with the taskbar attached to the left side of the screen? That is required to trigger the problem, as I said in this message: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25542#29 -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 08:31:02 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 12:31:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXLS-0003Rm-9I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:31:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58632) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXLQ-0003RT-CZ for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:31:00 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXLJ-0007qR-TR; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:30:54 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3089 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXLJ-0005ko-Bb; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:30:53 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 15:30:44 +0300 Message-Id: <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dani Moncayo In-Reply-To: (message from Dani Moncayo on Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:19:10 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, kbrown@cornell.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Dani Moncayo > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:19:10 +0200 > Cc: Ken Brown , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, > Noam Postavsky , martin rudalics > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 2:17 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > [...] > > Then we have a reproducibility problem, because I don't see this with > > the native build, and neither did Martin at the time (see his initial > > response to the original bug report). > > Did you try with the taskbar attached to the left side of the screen? No. And it isn't clear to me whether Martin did. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 08:34:15 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 12:34:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXOZ-0003XD-DG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:34:15 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-f177.google.com ([209.85.166.177]:41063) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXOX-0003X0-NL for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:34:14 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-f177.google.com with SMTP id w8so8671863ilj.8 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 05:34:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IzjThT8/BcVzcZLdZ2KuYjtq8ufUG/BXrhG/EaYNO0A=; b=jqxHHcuxj0FAHdiV1NDkwsCTx1qKeVXx95l2eU7f6+Op4+elYbx+h2qjtIXGOPN+wK xGJ5B+yVsqEv770r0ZWKjpwIc98W/OoStF9+6T1xFsoYPTsl0pp9z0ujtsupWe994LAH JY7s/3WoXLtgHyfDz78O9uW/rEc+L4wsl3HwFOdHcdz1tFsMk+R8tifuzWx3Of3IOBaI ZxvNp2uWvbSiGQuQaKvF3oo0OMYZhVv5P+JxEICGFVYAzLN8j9u3s81RgFOPdB7Jdsl+ 95/wVGvAM/tZSOMXiTyL34EHMfbFraOSMP17a7zUQcp18ju8qKmHi6acDxXvAIjr8J8o TUpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IzjThT8/BcVzcZLdZ2KuYjtq8ufUG/BXrhG/EaYNO0A=; b=id7wWFs8M9rp+/LZ1+1JPpEkpN18YLMxbdL06yTA79QxIRNuJ29Vezp9gVEadIu/ak Rb0jZ1x9Di7ENDgVsh4MkcM2PpxeEfy0mTxaUVUEvPaQ12j600YzYDaif7pvOBlnJvdh miTXFjlcnQZujccM9gPTbY5BXM2qlk0PNR4O6/uJAfBqMzkPU6JjVQIhxVy1vYUJTxsH T7llJHikYT2GhnxL7DGOxcLrOiWJENTV4nmL1p+9sRhB7pEjM5/KR1sCvIdxGJlQsoJl 6mYNMktc3unRKO5WKYacanwNPxgSKSCguM9L6HwkwLYhP1qLhWM0gRCqZsd/TRM2zkUu P9+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532IpfcF4xWNM65JpAh6uCJ420C7juoixJ2OtbCa/Oak/Dwc/qR1 tV3uOyBZudlShkpt4E0qilkoKkzxA3SYJBOBokg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0U1PJ0G8EoKq3G31Ntg+Gsc4mFenFi+GTtEb3tcFQkOVrTRmuCyVuHQxOW51q97c1iYyjXu8U0qqmJ9nvZAw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:58c:: with SMTP id c12mr10776060ils.284.1599309248209; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 05:34:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:32:04 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Ken Brown , Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 2:30 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Dani Moncayo > > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:19:10 +0200 > > Cc: Ken Brown , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, > > Noam Postavsky , martin rudalics > > > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 2:17 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > [...] > > > Then we have a reproducibility problem, because I don't see this with > > > the native build, and neither did Martin at the time (see his initial > > > response to the original bug report). > > > > Did you try with the taskbar attached to the left side of the screen? > > No. And it isn't clear to me whether Martin did. OK. So, are you able to reproduce the problem now? BTW, another detail I've just noticed to reproduce the problem: in the "taskbar settings" the flag "Automatically hide the taskbar" must be turned off. -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 08:49:04 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 12:49:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXct-00065p-Te for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:49:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33026) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXcr-00065B-MM for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:49:02 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXck-0001Jx-Kb; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:48:54 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4192 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEXcj-00028o-MI; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 08:48:54 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 15:48:45 +0300 Message-Id: <83blikpexe.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dani Moncayo In-Reply-To: (message from Dani Moncayo on Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:32:04 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, kbrown@cornell.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Dani Moncayo > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:32:04 +0200 > Cc: Ken Brown , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, > Noam Postavsky , martin rudalics > > > > Did you try with the taskbar attached to the left side of the screen? > > > > No. And it isn't clear to me whether Martin did. > > OK. So, are you able to reproduce the problem now? I didn't try. Not enough time, sorry. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 11:10:43 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 15:10:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43839 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEZpz-0001uQ-34 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 11:10:43 -0400 Received: from mail-bn8nam11on2112.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.236.112]:25340 helo=NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEZpw-0001uC-Gj for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 11:10:41 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=B5vUIXTIXFta6JAZCx552N3tyB98JXSUJxztY5HTuij0YpMFC9wjf495wTaSyn/hY+b3Va1eZEuXUqv+DaA87MFiuP7F1/ARF1oyjjkfZRug4cKrMZiWKrWf/LD8EjAzp/Wv5RM2dD+Ra+wdFJ3WGatctcsBsOEiZp7bh7C7xSRLYTdVyMUrVj/th3PQyPmnXLaxwYn0cZLHtIjaOH+h+mLh5rxnfyyxIod8PVoIQXk4fUrAcDJNKMjm6K/V6/tMqj5EMh3Bn5Dg65hN3ACF5N8VUn4CQc1osvoiZqw9yJmWYreXmMav94suzXw5cMrupiqpz0BZ0oPQCM2LYg2YnQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=buyup+9NmDRoNDzAp4465fYdnm/8zeohy2z+YySWLSU=; b=Obkd8WnDF3xsA46+TrbHqdZZQiD+BJjMnWZvFhetEfUYbCYN6qm6oe9pm/NuurrqapxGHi0wxRZbqQkOgDlvmxIq99yKKTDGF8VYNKUFIBcKjUnMcA3M+jj17ONamrI6QFhjQVoGmbvuuViD5S789ZotKERN1Ou/r6++ph5sJCrys1KoaONk4vkjvAqSBmtkj/tvLB4yYGK/I0SwGogTkoWXdoF6KdzwSC6LLopUdjaWWdgjdpP0SPN62ehxCfDLowpQsDDRj0tYmH4qpQ34/frCfFvmuvSu+x9W2CtGfq/21DUYR0VaIsjE3ry1zVZrxQYincy0RKfBP/okWcroLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=buyup+9NmDRoNDzAp4465fYdnm/8zeohy2z+YySWLSU=; b=Ppc2vSHJbFlHIA4lKBRdfKyim3XEosvZ8DjGD6FlmerDahVqGsq/RrQ756W1KBtnGXL50nCbF+VGCWss7ygez1LAP6/0sYFR0s2wdiG2OgCJLIWCjOGDlOm55Ops0i4Jasl19xukA2yJWyu6dekw8QJjEUB8dE5NNZ0JtSboclk= Authentication-Results: gmx.at; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmx.at; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB5487.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:d5::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 15:10:34 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.017; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 15:10:34 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <5bd82b3a-0108-5dd4-88dd-e3def6b77e01@cornell.edu> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 11:10:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: BL0PR0102CA0027.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:18::40) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [IPv6:2604:6000:b407:7f00:6c3f:b207:591d:92fb] (2604:6000:b407:7f00:6c3f:b207:591d:92fb) by BL0PR0102CA0027.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:18::40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 15:10:32 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [2604:6000:b407:7f00:6c3f:b207:591d:92fb] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: d3595f81-341d-4684-7675-08d851add63b X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB5487: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:7691; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: CNvK7z3QZd8Cu9BMTdapkk0+xS8Im8fRUtXmFAR0GKRLnYFD89NG10b4qMDz4/kdoe1zwMsQHfOHlr9agonsettEJKO1W2CGHI/+mMBBe2AElzz53Cs2IBmH1qnot+0RG3Nnb/fz1PvizW5eujKpZNjNfPA4IeOxwOORDE6FXq/9EpbTpGwemvjpEuSl/RphOAOggJVwIfl9Ayjmc3s4LDeclK51lNdicrJi3QB3RKmVSatHqIXLuz/cEULHfjrTir8ZP1EVc57nI/UWwArRfCx9NBd2amIS56gEs4AVSMzAlNMOgrKJpqP25Xl/sgEkC+y2s6i0L+L91ZGHvcQT3gSKJrTAWdnOIwIo4vhwl8X87eKmoPJY79VOEZ24ot2m/0AfasJ9JSYUdI5K9oq+UX/gDRp0zHLAFYxUp2vdg1yB6Up/b7OIJ2amCgFt50XbpDT5M9rbVPH+0hw8t0eZQ+oB3Gq+wiAMwAZ0DxG5H0M= X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(54906003)(8936002)(110136005)(2906002)(8676002)(52116002)(186003)(16526019)(53546011)(316002)(786003)(75432002)(478600001)(36756003)(6486002)(66556008)(5660300002)(2616005)(66476007)(4326008)(31686004)(86362001)(31696002)(66946007)(83380400001)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d3595f81-341d-4684-7675-08d851add63b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2020 15:10:34.1076 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: pPjjuOuS05YVua/hT320AdqOGnE5dy2U//cQe7wwFYwvcOqc0qe6joViDUuddFtqZbnHtZXkV1VhCvrlqviktA== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB5487 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) On 9/5/2020 8:32 AM, Dani Moncayo wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 2:30 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >>> From: Dani Moncayo >>> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:19:10 +0200 >>> Cc: Ken Brown , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, >>> Noam Postavsky , martin rudalics >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 2:17 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> Then we have a reproducibility problem, because I don't see this with >>>> the native build, and neither did Martin at the time (see his initial >>>> response to the original bug report). >>> >>> Did you try with the taskbar attached to the left side of the screen? >> >> No. And it isn't clear to me whether Martin did. > > OK. So, are you able to reproduce the problem now? > > BTW, another detail I've just noticed to reproduce the problem: in the > "taskbar settings" the flag "Automatically hide the taskbar" must be > turned off. I can reproduce the problem on the Cygwin w32 build, but Martin's suggestion (https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25542#83) doesn't fix it. He suggested the following, if I understand correctly: diff --git a/src/w32term.c b/src/w32term.c index 76cf6bd696..c7da95528b 100644 --- a/src/w32term.c +++ b/src/w32term.c @@ -5454,15 +5454,7 @@ w32_read_socket (struct terminal *terminal, simple hack to check that based on the fact that only a maximized fullscreen frame should have both top/left outside the screen. */ - if (EQ (fullscreen, Qfullwidth) || EQ (fullscreen, Qfullheight) - || NILP (fullscreen)) - { - int x, y; - - w32_real_positions (f, &x, &y); - if (x < 0 && y < 0) - store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); - } + store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); } break; If I make this change and follow Dani's recipe from the original bug report, the second F11 press doesn't restore the previous state. Instead, the frame appears to get slightly smaller for an instant and then immediately reverts to fullscreen mode. Ken From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 12:08:11 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 16:08:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43946 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEaja-0005Wj-Pn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:08:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39848) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEajZ-0005WX-6c for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:08:09 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEajS-0000GA-VP; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:08:02 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4422 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEajS-00053u-AW; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:08:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 19:07:53 +0300 Message-Id: <835z8sp5pi.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Ken Brown In-Reply-To: <5bd82b3a-0108-5dd4-88dd-e3def6b77e01@cornell.edu> (message from Ken Brown on Sat, 5 Sep 2020 11:10:31 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> <5bd82b3a-0108-5dd4-88dd-e3def6b77e01@cornell.edu> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, > Noam Postavsky , > martin rudalics > From: Ken Brown > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 11:10:31 -0400 > > diff --git a/src/w32term.c b/src/w32term.c > index 76cf6bd696..c7da95528b 100644 > --- a/src/w32term.c > +++ b/src/w32term.c > @@ -5454,15 +5454,7 @@ w32_read_socket (struct terminal *terminal, > simple hack to check that based on the fact that > only a maximized fullscreen frame should have both > top/left outside the screen. */ > - if (EQ (fullscreen, Qfullwidth) || EQ (fullscreen, Qfullheight) > - || NILP (fullscreen)) > - { > - int x, y; > - > - w32_real_positions (f, &x, &y); > - if (x < 0 && y < 0) > - store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); > - } > + store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); > } > > break; > > If I make this change and follow Dani's recipe from the original bug report, the > second F11 press doesn't restore the previous state. Instead, the frame appears > to get slightly smaller for an instant and then immediately reverts to > fullscreen mode. Thanks for testing. It sounds like the proposed change leaves the original incorrect behavior unchanged, so we need to look for some different way of fixing this. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 12:11:08 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 16:11:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEamS-0005ax-92 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:11:08 -0400 Received: from mail-dm6nam12on2103.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.243.103]:2305 helo=NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEamQ-0005aT-NR for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:11:07 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YySUWhPCIzExIqmYR9SdVYJEiLsjCPlJXXwkmjjtpsSF8ucPBdYeFB2CMYw/7fdqFIL2jh0aT7MlflXgCjKdCiDDstkMLwo3h6PeXeP7tiLE+gZZrrLmEfOtAS9q0amOCblN8tt8ku06n/IQr3K7rdcdm9HjxcfQGcpiSxCwNVOCVERlNleMijZwl6RIxPP+bFrrmL9FphGxKXbim/0UFr0ZHeOjddnqzPu1M6ErcrX2v/g0MCRKRqcPi6SYi3EmodfEj0Z9IKuV92jA4Y8flxbrBPwS/OCmR+iPcAkgorGnbQdyt9v5K/BXjfo7bbdqfOBR6NcgtSQHyyv9VAjN6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rjGpfYXY3RdcTxUqE8G8jrmyWJHnfTMXI8fCNMSC+rM=; b=oPGuSxPvEpEPfbjPNdu/tocFgeXIJ7r/ztVQF4kDe3uI1gHjMLGNAFgiDBu3zhfPaJ5aLXRCFOFPGvcQNYQfPHJfAStRlIr4Qobj8tqjbPGhqv/erkJA3bRwTpLVEIkj+AUTdpG31HgpuVMxmczyYK5l5dc4w6hkmiPHPvhVL6q2UpqCDwT8U13T+rxlCw8b2Namb0+EXq/7ykVYrnd6+1tWvKIhPtNoMtPdMWKDsDetVkcLstJwnTciZg0hmCYkpTxRZ8f26NPYlUeusxVHJEhfSNiRee6EKIba0qmZJS5P4m164pvtS1yrQI4VepgMCAektvSdNxiNMplksIphKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=rjGpfYXY3RdcTxUqE8G8jrmyWJHnfTMXI8fCNMSC+rM=; b=dnTgIHBfCWDA+RLR4/hVnlSpQDKVGdI3hn+kuF+qcOd0V69ArTRssAWwPcq16dQe+/5kJKhOghr9C8WLb7Fiuj973MXIByaro4as4hCUk4IhlAvM1cXeEH7e6b3rcmb8HN2mwmwXC674iRDXyHtWUuZWXIL0tMbFhM/aTsuRWZQ= Authentication-Results: gmx.at; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmx.at; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB5647.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:3f::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.15; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 16:11:00 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.017; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 16:11:00 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Eli Zaretskii References: <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> <5bd82b3a-0108-5dd4-88dd-e3def6b77e01@cornell.edu> <835z8sp5pi.fsf@gnu.org> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 12:10:59 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: <835z8sp5pi.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: CH2PR04CA0022.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:52::32) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [IPv6:2604:6000:b407:7f00:6c3f:b207:591d:92fb] (2604:6000:b407:7f00:6c3f:b207:591d:92fb) by CH2PR04CA0022.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:52::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.15 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 5 Sep 2020 16:10:59 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [2604:6000:b407:7f00:6c3f:b207:591d:92fb] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 00938533-a2b3-4a76-9d4d-08d851b647b0 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB5647: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:9508; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 7dZ+NVDVh/KbI79LhvzNh3cKVOxwDGkeH/GXssRSRLJVhGjDUQPKF0YuZA07LO0scH69UaWqKVa588c82+vikBLRwlJgbigwdN5HoH6qUNvaoAjb4Jn5mrDFVXb0aExvDC1GiYUvTrZFOn+Iq7N7eByhXgs3vN/PoHmrUxJykkokbMAeckGkk9kKMY98mPzYHNPIrXj2pCrk8Lc/3NE3aYduTC7SUF4ltmbPU0dmOCdnZpokYZKokrnJ3naB9cyz56ar1zWzJqrNy6u2k+A7XaCRV2bTL7nR5un+URnOmF+9AEGUCkFrQj3LsGeA9pHJ6D4oiMykZYKq8ehGdItWNZmaCf2TKNI4YgomyB2SkVB7P0FFjwMiq4EwWinjqBI4A5/HMiTluhxa3j2dWG0CAA== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(86362001)(186003)(16526019)(4326008)(83380400001)(66556008)(66476007)(5660300002)(31686004)(66946007)(8676002)(52116002)(8936002)(6486002)(478600001)(2906002)(75432002)(316002)(786003)(2616005)(6916009)(31696002)(53546011)(36756003)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 00938533-a2b3-4a76-9d4d-08d851b647b0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2020 16:11:00.3278 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: z++LgdeRg+hrwN4Cqbu2tg8oVm7GlsZ65HFYyy7fn9UjHztiRbLQOl61wKC3l3+Hysv/zkHNcwSgcQPJV/p8yw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB5647 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) On 9/5/2020 12:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, >> Noam Postavsky , >> martin rudalics >> From: Ken Brown >> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 11:10:31 -0400 >> >> diff --git a/src/w32term.c b/src/w32term.c >> index 76cf6bd696..c7da95528b 100644 >> --- a/src/w32term.c >> +++ b/src/w32term.c >> @@ -5454,15 +5454,7 @@ w32_read_socket (struct terminal *terminal, >> simple hack to check that based on the fact that >> only a maximized fullscreen frame should have both >> top/left outside the screen. */ >> - if (EQ (fullscreen, Qfullwidth) || EQ (fullscreen, Qfullheight) >> - || NILP (fullscreen)) >> - { >> - int x, y; >> - >> - w32_real_positions (f, &x, &y); >> - if (x < 0 && y < 0) >> - store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); >> - } >> + store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); >> } >> >> break; >> >> If I make this change and follow Dani's recipe from the original bug report, the >> second F11 press doesn't restore the previous state. Instead, the frame appears >> to get slightly smaller for an instant and then immediately reverts to >> fullscreen mode. > > Thanks for testing. It sounds like the proposed change leaves the > original incorrect behavior unchanged, so we need to look for some > different way of fixing this. It's not unchanged, it's just wrong in a different way. Previously the second F11 resulted in an unmaximized frame. Ken From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 05 12:42:11 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2020 16:42:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbGU-0006Jv-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:42:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbGN-0006JM-JQ for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:42:09 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbGH-0003rE-GO; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:41:57 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2554 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kEbGG-0002ce-VA; Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:41:57 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2020 19:41:48 +0300 Message-Id: <831rjgp44z.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Ken Brown In-Reply-To: (message from Ken Brown on Sat, 5 Sep 2020 12:10:59 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <83eengpgdn.fsf@gnu.org> <83d030pfrf.fsf@gnu.org> <5bd82b3a-0108-5dd4-88dd-e3def6b77e01@cornell.edu> <835z8sp5pi.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: dmoncayo@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, > npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, rudalics@gmx.at > From: Ken Brown > Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2020 12:10:59 -0400 > > > Thanks for testing. It sounds like the proposed change leaves the > > original incorrect behavior unchanged, so we need to look for some > > different way of fixing this. > > It's not unchanged, it's just wrong in a different way. Previously the second > F11 resulted in an unmaximized frame. You are right, sorry for my confusion. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 09 04:45:04 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2020 08:45:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFviy-00084V-J0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:45:04 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:35759) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFvix-00083j-7y for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 04:45:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1599641078; bh=fQz6oZyy5fagQda0vnWOT0sUJzVOrIapcUim22uFzN4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=DI0SB0s6GZBYLj4gbTZf0CdbUkYi+IS3UUf0Y23VQctJVESYzz7PvbPITNNhSbP3n VAA/9rLdrH0R/7SBqs26zcdU71ryCnA8WgMfaVqtYPou0orclVre9GGbOYt7NAJOW9 Q1eOntONR+k1tAeFIQIg2xsuwOoJj7gUFHY2Ew7w= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.222]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MS3mt-1k5rsU3wAl-00TW5R; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:44:38 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> From: martin rudalics Message-ID: <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:44:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cx4zDBZastbW54ppTvMAjpvZwF6iOopY0HmdotJ/hRsf6K5x8Jd qwHr7b9vjBBdN14b3p7nzCuDVa5P17BUlS1RPXiOVotGc8zg55BWJZ+svjpRpouD8Fz0PiK mOgxOTAxUe40duhDRzTPoiB/vhlYmnfsKC44rHyCUng/btj1ajtR9+o8yTa4uIdm9HGWzHs Vo2/k8Er+2qQjV0bAMgGQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qA1pFS6aP1o=:eCEZp1VAZczuVDXVK7yBFS topCSbro5CEOp1oXO/P23OtH4kZ6zkGbhesqCwjc6ml3oLMK6ZaXfFzOi84OcoKdKv80Nr/xT 8b7m48lIcJAaqfkXxvRA4NKNbqSVjUvAilQ+wxFRUQorCbFUqouBHo9i+SrNRwimJgXabniMy 0c7hbDbzAZ++XQgmXgo5AnIdr12YHV3CRIuasjdUSNFeHe+mFWiy5Fx/qbF9Ij2xcTOl9dJsN flaswoWw6d3U+bd/52zpmnm4tcCr60JiMVSxinImZislB2CG5bCSSRDJoIh8oWNtPQXFv3nM/ 2w4jd8Z1z5edO++6yTNDilSnlT3v4U2SKpbYvokGBnuwHYUAYF6w0BFatxiTwcwH93G9uUkWG fQ3KdficMgCkQrKQ+u73JOU1BB/k0mdvMrat1FooQF4Biy6Vqdz+D/4SorOU9oAh6wKW7q6gj wAgCazlJmwAhAjEoVktUPb03jyKkB0QyIhoduVC9tcJN39HjegOIN+wQP0xidHUMMxcL7PaJj Row6k77nIwymg9i/rXwCrj9+MUbOBShDhG1boM991AeZ6BsLjU0TrodAuR7cLo+2InXDT7Bdc UdKMss0qbF94VYy6bYSqicCVGM98PvVUyxGKg+mAYQ7wqJWXI34Fa46B/mKa55YYBXuyUpriG bqlNXG5j4eo+amkwwF7ba3z9VcbNCkpAp+4WU8f8mUDk6uaAnLZwtekHO3WytIdsTfpLI8I35 jU9Fp5TLFXF1oiUcC19rvTR7IlF3ZzJ2qNv6I3QCJZBmQGWvrfP+nkuV8ayFHpSj/x6sXfO5p a0yBU202eGfmb2lUhvmHEBge9s5lJ8/89AHowairfkCn6FAAX+6YzakpAj4lS7+WGNp3ZsVmc iZ2YRmpqIrz0b1+CicNtQGMMsbffHbmJS96/8DxTzKkakHebIWPKcyGAfTl4OcZoieYUy8qWP XkuW2S535I0R9O/I53qTFOhixVaWulrRmJ6sdrdnYo0FYD+6k/eWcd38Z7u3GO4EkX1zGEkO1 2EJSIWjq7H+CkcS7t5dtAyFBbOUpzrDeqyJA6V3ZiGNraD/1dIfM2WBgiurmzYf8Y382DfrnV 2A1sEDAVGCidsxNjYYasR/W0AFVMd1RcDffyTkNwa/ldspo7HlCa/m8CwvJVY85PjAXYQRdZw 9QjdbtP3oO55muG/69xKPRCA6TAu35jOSxVtaTNfWpXYeAjKafxMkqQ/RU3RLqbPFL3RZ2Rnb LnOL0qth4R5vwctdK X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I've just downloaded a native w32 build [1] and I've run it on my > system (MS Windows 10 Enterprise). I see the same problem with this > native build. Can you please run under gdb with a breakpoint in w32fullscreen_hook of w32term.c suitably in here Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [212.95.5.222 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Ken Brown , Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I've just downloaded a native w32 build [1] and I've run it on my > system (MS Windows 10 Enterprise). I see the same problem with this > native build. Can you please run under gdb with a breakpoint in w32fullscreen_hook of w32term.c suitably in here Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [212.95.5.222 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager > I've just downloaded a native w32 build [1] and I've run it on my > system (MS Windows 10 Enterprise). I see the same problem with this > native build. Can you please run under gdb with a breakpoint in w32fullscreen_hook of w32term.c suitably in here else if (f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_MAXIMIZED) { if (prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_BOTH || prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_WIDTH || prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_HEIGHT) /* Make window normal since otherwise the subsequent maximization might fail in some cases. */ ShowWindow (hwnd, SW_SHOWNORMAL); ShowWindow (hwnd, SW_MAXIMIZE); } and tell us how the frame appears immediately after the ShowWindow calls. Here the first call makes the frame appear with its "normal" size, the second one makes it appear maximized. Thank you, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 09 12:48:39 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2020 16:48:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33110 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG3Gw-0007YB-SQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:48:39 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f41.google.com ([209.85.166.41]:43490) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG3Gu-0007Xy-Nk for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:48:37 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f41.google.com with SMTP id z25so3854519iol.10 for <25542@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 09:48:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Heo7Oln4b/72vgXuUPQJ++Kwy7553EAKOg6KpYEJsJM=; b=h0VZfm8WdbOG6KzzRtHcRqOsXs8kZGdx+P6D1UhnNa3MCggogulhsR1pnuNrvBQOXL 7MKppx1fd/bnwHnjTaR7Z+VRzz7K5r/aLuW5cIGk3Fad358Ul1IKbj44J3w+gOZy6JFG 6UjSESaGsLka96JebxDRlGTXjLfnLH/gDKfDpxkF3AiYSDw0+L3D5XBLbX3LmmbQrpkT p6EZ/H84i1pez/vJ5h/uBYv90+dS6oA7idESBOpf3ZAzvEaicOQWVq3nnd+5QwZCFVJM 4WW9zjHC1ed8ekvYfM8FLHhSH0NTpBgwT5Y4yNnqRTWcvM/Cyqb6048Ql15I+m5waOW3 FQ1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Heo7Oln4b/72vgXuUPQJ++Kwy7553EAKOg6KpYEJsJM=; b=BJo03JSVasoDdgRxt+xS++k6nNGZlbyoGMMeoRyz6p1+Bsqs30G8DgbEKgP3ahBw24 +ufdZ+uTco2Kue+rwdJloVjQWWNPdoOxVKayipPdaSIcl7pcFoFHPudE+mOdGKFwz5Pg 10pax4C6JI07tI8nC5U4qSdatavtLmG6C5G1cManqN5cqCDXG0vh6LgCcRg8JsbeEFVQ JX0UCPYxgyaGSuEU681WrBN/JqEB8BMMN7gnqYvvaijSOJ+iwZ4o8kkKK1BF0/WmwXbp KXBKtf15fTeORV7GjtechyjPLyLNauxZNl3Kwrp+QyQIuZxxtE8LiY0u7z+QirWLIg9l e6sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533CmZnai+CELtYEkycnSYnsZqpaZbDhtHR4tNbjn+SrfPKrRZt0 VAZZ8N19EoinS14MrqgO8Le5m81ob8HL0Xd/wNQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAULEQmo9I4uajJCN8SOMG8GvJof3HvPNo/rYHVefYLlE8T/2ZtZkvO2Ahn6EdnWAGQ29aYOP/Lmh93nupBVw= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7f4d:: with SMTP id m13mr3955244ioq.80.1599670111177; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 09:48:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> From: Dani Moncayo Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:46:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Noam Postavsky , Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , Ken Brown , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:44 AM martin rudalics wrote: > [...] > Can you please run under gdb [...] As I said a couple of days ago, I don't have currently a build/debug environment for Emacs, sorry. Anyway, I think the problem is very easily reproducible, isn't it? -- Dani Moncayo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 09 14:19:47 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2020 18:19:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG4h9-0004Et-9E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:19:47 -0400 Received: from mail-dm6nam12on2114.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.243.114]:13152 helo=NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG4h7-0004Ef-07 for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:19:46 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=D91z5eWaZaG7a8g6WR9nGUnY1/3uOdjXvhA7PNJ3zodiEx3t+w25mXOT2hM0ndE6q4noFZLF/p6gY7gGdV3jPej3z3DoD4cZa1jokORBYWE1i1c0E5e8LxyPW9cYAJGydSq4d3VGYk/D90Ipf/XWr+sU+WCm61OLpuG4Ommi9j14yQpAB9Z99lLFwkxzfAbK8xyx/Lp5ILLWZOXV6w7sLrRW3kD+u3UDLahrPjHt3EdqbwUSL/N5t7U3uYWDBv4sy8J8oZXHkum/mvrwCUkuRckCY6rjqUhaot0k8TpDYkylbL74SfSzdnwrdqFIaaoExS3HoqHFzX/vLuDV/sf7kw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=19ThrDC4ZkEPLthipZGf8/6dapRrQ0YcqoFOZxGk/LY=; b=JiVoOXbr9v1776Mg6achVaRuw5A6F0e5m1Ysun6pK6EONcOwBtmewxg1CsB/ZAvUhO4lxi9DZ69shNkZb9NQyOfAPzqnpAk+0mCmLg1KtwVT6YK0uHLteVlZ1Zk8AqZVp5dBM2KPdL8v7RpSMK9oX33hv0vGlNw34ys1Dmtr5SfDVg+2MnMyHQpDxY5Y/l04b784JMRCWw4u4VAenZBr5OTBH0fqnOMDClsnj35zL1LYLCP8igiSNRvkdEjee14XJKMQ0kzQjhY5QVaDKh5phNUZ5N8s0YD2Ix6Zu/1RXCIs6QMrZw/L9ZIDO+b1A8h6X5t0DJE6Dq3fmVoXpoqqag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=19ThrDC4ZkEPLthipZGf8/6dapRrQ0YcqoFOZxGk/LY=; b=gTy3LstkOZi1GzBvFq8gd/2xgow3TNY8anbD+iRY1YV8UOEQRL/HzOa+ESKMdwJAtMtEuqIAJ5Vc/r903DBl4sczpZDGPH58S5aRKFyP/xfy7tIreOB3fzYcF/aU1+q6TtDPnnTNEWl11vKWJ7KDU+TpNVrY+x8abjZtIhupe3U= Authentication-Results: users.sourceforge.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; users.sourceforge.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB6000.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:d9::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.15; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:19:38 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.017; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:19:38 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:19:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: BL1PR13CA0006.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:256::11) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [IPv6:2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42] (2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42) by BL1PR13CA0006.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:256::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.10 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 18:19:38 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 4578dfc0-039e-4ac1-20da-08d854ece9d4 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB6000: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:5797; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: wuByUHjggRxm/zQ2cTSyuJaVwnKT6SLmnuc1Ah+6VsRl1wuyvUIx5Vg01riTNDw/YZ2VUXuyEK4OGEnq/latETtBznHgk2xOV7TEJhsX+ezZFm9bOI+RC13zh1XnacTIe1ckEi1gn0dXSpwLaCUhGVmzklkw7HPotEdkVQrD1FpY5rPG8iGE+HV1rL/iAX4Xizbx7RyP9GfpubQtCkNmF3YMi5jMqL2/uaqJmSYzMbKRYF8iJsx2g+Fqhf1FPMew+WUYOPW2H/ULF9kJqvfp1BnL2BbH8vA7E5BC5vMTjNLX1BBbwoA5FkzXraSW1Im4fM/CgwBvDpRpJiPe4YllnE4QvhyEF6hJqYzDg8+GIrXSFcC91m7xAdoQheZ2pIyO1/8lGm3juPl4cKvzDgA42w== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(366004)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(66556008)(54906003)(66946007)(5660300002)(53546011)(8676002)(4326008)(52116002)(86362001)(31696002)(110136005)(8936002)(83380400001)(66476007)(2906002)(6486002)(16526019)(75432002)(31686004)(316002)(36756003)(186003)(478600001)(2616005)(786003)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4578dfc0-039e-4ac1-20da-08d854ece9d4 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2020 18:19:38.7242 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: kCDSqBeWzb20nSi+rzXcRCWWzpT68TYhBNn9bFC9TbKVQiMvy91v/WUHW18lEo38BGi9nBfEY6QlsMISVS/WBg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB6000 X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) On 9/9/2020 4:44 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > > I've just downloaded a native w32 build [1] and I've run it on my > > system (MS Windows 10 Enterprise). I see the same problem with this > > native build. > > Can you please run under gdb with a breakpoint in w32fullscreen_hook of > w32term.c suitably in here > >       else if (f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_MAXIMIZED) >     { >       if (prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_BOTH || prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_WIDTH >           || prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_HEIGHT) >         /* Make window normal since otherwise the subsequent >            maximization might fail in some cases.  */ >         ShowWindow (hwnd, SW_SHOWNORMAL); >       ShowWindow (hwnd, SW_MAXIMIZE); >     } > > and tell us how the frame appears immediately after the ShowWindow > calls.  Here the first call makes the frame appear with its "normal" > size, the second one makes it appear maximized. I just tried this on a Cygwin-w32 build from the master branch. I put the taskbar on the left, started emacs, maximized it, attached gdb, put breakpoints at each of the ShowWindow lines, and ran through Dani's recipe for producing the bug. The breakpoints were never hit. Ken From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 09 16:24:44 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2020 20:24:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34846 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG6e4-0007M1-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:24:44 -0400 Received: from mail-bn8nam11on2133.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.236.133]:1473 helo=NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kG6e1-0007Lm-6R for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:24:43 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kw1iJsWXxBe6wwLHRoiLpLQ24hfbp2yfXyD7eFUPZN9bPOiP3ONEg5z8d3Nrj1N3FdqUMEf2RRwx82I5APqpolZeOmJAvXPVo0OXeJyibcTg3K/AKu2JvBIegspjHPLkwhz0iQbBtppIXGZ9nuyW/pYPQv0CoEYj8I/Ow/1ZI4OobYMr1auJ9DvCytd8oWVsWO4p/+k5lIvMlpPW+B/8Hv391lKubiVHXjQR40MRk6kvM0w53YeSW0ioKkq04WUkri6egj2990LRS8rgUKTS8H6HdHrbZNaX1vXCv0cKtSnIEhs5yDN5LrDcjHLqDpnaSj2tWQoOMIiHdOHetzqlYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=f12Ng1032uhmgdVlnRTDo5dkS9mvqipXW+G1Nzj0dBI=; b=QSdBdOwY22swbFFcrZDQBuJlEXp4OJeNTRabZohVDhrW57IUWq11T4bTjSsC0/c8SxwFWxABMpUBgQqNprfCTE9eQWEaTOD3HVRzxpwNoBFtfOaUBoQf5y+S8LjDnCsxxIom5hB+fhEkYAWV3bKX3mw21KnXLuSmBGMGGMpEeCLS0sBtzfT9ln9zJrQCigHWh+1o0qdGnzOhEtMHjNoIIEjMdlPI/sd0QPrNjqgrEfvpG7SPCfwP6vHhAfqojwsyyZAGCWbZW47346v2m/7WODpQVT5IS+ASu3uIxIRDczN3UxNHHXJ2n8Gx78QwLTd2IdFXSVKxrecFB9iKJIqIbw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=f12Ng1032uhmgdVlnRTDo5dkS9mvqipXW+G1Nzj0dBI=; b=LbowdVUy6m3hSQjzE/AQ5Fz09tBoEdKq9RionJrWdzaR5TbgkSuY5HOUZgaBHVVeMEWi79FxvVNtTfoyWmcrQLnPx64eRKP56YdBMtAWB+Puj4U/OOPqsWLGpaUEjDKuRGBjlxv33dBN/kCFBKEm5lRoVcof76qT1BCQkjqGWJo= Authentication-Results: users.sourceforge.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; users.sourceforge.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB6223.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:db::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:24:33 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.017; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:24:33 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized From: Ken Brown To: martin rudalics , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> Message-ID: <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:24:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: BL0PR05CA0013.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:91::23) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.0.17] (68.175.129.7) by BL0PR05CA0013.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:91::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.10 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 20:24:32 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.175.129.7] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 0aefb49f-c7b5-45fc-bb04-08d854fe5ce9 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB6223: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:6790; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: jOQLrGHiJAox94GsnOar2zJKYfxBHItH86xc8G//aQGsEZMtNe9QtgOEICcoRGk/b77pfV63i1Zu9R+IP8rmoHF8xeCOqXTiHowTpeQOZsrbjCl2jQ6OIaMos1xR8vcc9Z7twfsWflfWpWaIixMidp0tJncOFWUPn2W43wCdChKWkP+NKa8S4jWNl3h4m2KkO7q1xAnjAdQhBhi4N4TBL5FFJuVjn2HvkmoAwZ3iLNLPbMaLHjom/2mFNZxB/tUL+riJtFeoka3RQv3eRhQY4U7RSJk6EBy+fzcEnzFqItzPZ9SLZMHSktzoF1XH7+8O9D8qmV4WUw4YMRH+YZ+xMTvTjifCZ2exE3ouupBd039QdXCD3z6LvvX4+i/JMHJi/rbFDCBWzxFeBi0GCzQ6Ng== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(16576012)(6486002)(31686004)(52116002)(956004)(8936002)(31696002)(4326008)(54906003)(110136005)(66476007)(86362001)(66556008)(66946007)(8676002)(83380400001)(26005)(36756003)(53546011)(478600001)(2616005)(2906002)(16526019)(786003)(5660300002)(186003)(75432002)(316002)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0aefb49f-c7b5-45fc-bb04-08d854fe5ce9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2020 20:24:33.2521 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: tvu5MXavprh/A69C3RMd6knMV/BwkfatTTi4doxSRq17yrpd4eYPj953SAeFxFQSb+hjf1IoehEY8Esv1mF/uw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB6223 X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) On 9/9/2020 2:19 PM, Ken Brown wrote: > On 9/9/2020 4:44 AM, martin rudalics wrote: >>  > I've just downloaded a native w32 build [1] and I've run it on my >>  > system (MS Windows 10 Enterprise). I see the same problem with this >>  > native build. >> >> Can you please run under gdb with a breakpoint in w32fullscreen_hook of >> w32term.c suitably in here >> >>        else if (f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_MAXIMIZED) >>      { >>        if (prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_BOTH || prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_WIDTH >>            || prev_fsmode == FULLSCREEN_HEIGHT) >>          /* Make window normal since otherwise the subsequent >>             maximization might fail in some cases.  */ >>          ShowWindow (hwnd, SW_SHOWNORMAL); >>        ShowWindow (hwnd, SW_MAXIMIZE); >>      } >> >> and tell us how the frame appears immediately after the ShowWindow >> calls.  Here the first call makes the frame appear with its "normal" >> size, the second one makes it appear maximized. > > I just tried this on a Cygwin-w32 build from the master branch.  I put the > taskbar on the left, started emacs, maximized it, attached gdb, put breakpoints > at each of the ShowWindow lines, and ran through Dani's recipe for producing the > bug.  The breakpoints were never hit. I just tried again, but this time with a breakpoint at w32fullscreen_hook so that I could follow the flow. Here are the relevant excerpts from the gdb session: $ gdb ./emacs GNU gdb (GDB) (Cygwin 9.2-1) 9.2 [...] (gdb) b w32fullscreen_hook Breakpoint 2 at 0x10069507a: file ../../master/src/w32term.c, line 6441. (gdb) r -Q Starting program: /home/kbrown/src/emacs/x86_64-w32/src/emacs -Q [...] [Press F11] Thread 1 "emacs" hit Breakpoint 2, w32fullscreen_hook (f=0x8001f7c88) at ../../master/src/w32term.c:6441 6441 if (FRAME_VISIBLE_P (f)) (gdb) n 6443 HWND hwnd = FRAME_W32_WINDOW(f); (gdb) 6444 DWORD dwStyle = GetWindowLong (hwnd, GWL_STYLE); (gdb) 6446 enum fullscreen_type prev_fsmode = FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f); (gdb) 6448 block_input(); (gdb) 6449 f->want_fullscreen &= ~FULLSCREEN_WAIT; (gdb) 6451 if (FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) == FULLSCREEN_NONE) (gdb) 6452 GetWindowPlacement (hwnd, &FRAME_NORMAL_PLACEMENT (f)); (gdb) 6454 if (FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) == FULLSCREEN_BOTH) (gdb) 6460 else if (FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) == FULLSCREEN_HEIGHT (gdb) 6461 || FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) == FULLSCREEN_WIDTH) (gdb) 6464 FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) = f->want_fullscreen; (gdb) p f->want_fullscreen $1 = FULLSCREEN_BOTH (gdb) n 6466 if (f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_NONE) (gdb) 6468 else if (f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_MAXIMIZED) (gdb) 6477 else if (f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_BOTH) (gdb) 6479 int menu_bar_height = GetSystemMetrics (SM_CYMENU); (gdb) 6482 FRAME_NORMAL_PLACEMENT (f).rcNormalPosition, &rect); (gdb) 6481 w32_fullscreen_rect (hwnd, f->want_fullscreen, (gdb) 6483 if (!FRAME_UNDECORATED (f)) (gdb) 6484 SetWindowLong (hwnd, GWL_STYLE, dwStyle & ~WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW); (gdb) 6486 rect.right - rect.left, rect.bottom - rect.top, (gdb) 6485 SetWindowPos (hwnd, HWND_TOP, rect.left, rect.top, (gdb) 6486 rect.right - rect.left, rect.bottom - rect.top, (gdb) 6485 SetWindowPos (hwnd, HWND_TOP, rect.left, rect.top, (gdb) 6490 FRAME_PIXEL_TO_TEXT_HEIGHT (f, (rect.bottom - rect.top (gdb) 6488 change_frame_size (gdb) 6489 (f, FRAME_PIXEL_TO_TEXT_WIDTH (f, rect.right - rect.left), (gdb) 6488 change_frame_size (gdb) 6526 f->want_fullscreen = FULLSCREEN_NONE; (gdb) 6527 unblock_input (); (gdb) 6529 if (f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_BOTH (gdb) 6530 || f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_WIDTH (gdb) 6531 || f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_HEIGHT) (gdb) 6537 } [...] (gdb) c Continuing. [Press F11 again] Thread 1 "emacs" hit Breakpoint 2, w32fullscreen_hook (f=0x8001f7c88) at ../../master/src/w32term.c:6441 6441 if (FRAME_VISIBLE_P (f)) (gdb) n 6443 HWND hwnd = FRAME_W32_WINDOW(f); (gdb) 6444 DWORD dwStyle = GetWindowLong (hwnd, GWL_STYLE); (gdb) 6446 enum fullscreen_type prev_fsmode = FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f); (gdb) 6448 block_input(); (gdb) 6449 f->want_fullscreen &= ~FULLSCREEN_WAIT; (gdb) 6451 if (FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) == FULLSCREEN_NONE) (gdb) p f->want_fullscreen $2 = FULLSCREEN_NONE (gdb) n 6454 if (FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) == FULLSCREEN_BOTH) (gdb) 6456 if (!FRAME_UNDECORATED (f)) (gdb) 6457 SetWindowLong (hwnd, GWL_STYLE, dwStyle | WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW); (gdb) 6458 SetWindowPlacement (hwnd, &FRAME_NORMAL_PLACEMENT (f)); (gdb) 6464 FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) = f->want_fullscreen; (gdb) 6466 if (f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_NONE) (gdb) 6467 ShowWindow (hwnd, SW_SHOWNORMAL); [Now the frame reverts to an unmaximized state, exhibiting the bug.] Ken From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 03:16:29 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 07:16:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35849 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGGom-0002ws-Od for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:16:28 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:42447) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGGoi-0002wd-2J for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:16:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1599722163; bh=st5Kbr6fshx6SjtxgtzsPa1iGT/10AmUyjTjqWj8I0Y=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=fmTxhinQmzW+Xo/+Hv9Av4T715abDJR/x7/sDEsb8oM8j/lJGAAdqZRGkJ4VUrgld B9ZN9CL0o/ikuafxiAv2jZnZ4LSdMju/FTPbLOzQrdoE5yKUesdN7YrcQnlQOBBdZ2 qITUKYKlnux4ipnByhKV++Zd8mp8GC2pIlrt0Il4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.97]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M4s0j-1kHeFw0PRP-002292; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:16:03 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Ken Brown , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> From: martin rudalics Message-ID: <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:16:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/+rjaCEtH/8DC1NcwS7oSr5wfDdYqrdTUHoTMDuSh642PlnTsvY YIWc+J/XNf4Hlk7EopuPWKg89Thjk8WoLTi1TmULZt49nPVPixOAV3sw2+KgyioMrkWv2W6 nsHVE9Kn1Eh3CwEV4KPEmi0U4fP0jzYvvajori45I/R1e0ruwccv3nSW8oWBAexv9XQ8yYK 0yYtys1ayW3tmNfb006EA== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:/URKmN4ijDw=:Unkde5WBvD3Fec8wFwSVel wMKCb+LNbmNoOsCCkufoD3M5jU8h4P39hVLhIDGH3eTkrhP+Y27hQU/z1B8t6zG9ZXmjT8C7F X0V+7bvl761tbEzARdzfQe3fqgHW2QSScsCaV4v4FbGnO1oJ12aMrbhe4Z6Wz3do2BW8wkBRP MN5BPYWp9OUQyVsRcLj5vWALDKkwsKHz1wkpSuK9D8OQNVIDWLfnr2UM2dhmLZhpcHaoZkMFo nwdWjtoZOdHBKkFMlLXUq7usDP4DOLhmosHNeOH0SWEZFMAbRMIo9XItjy76l1E+j9DV2hgmr /RdVeZDiMoIdXaK8A3wA1+THkOU8eytDL0nhyyL5SRqJFdiUO0Ccu/wnbDerw60kUF6PvuRmT VZ9s5J56av4Nm3Sk/u1HdHBc+FweSYPDa6kuQjpgqCzK5suw/B+TMoSwAGOuGJk/M81Pf4QCG s0VljPo7nkV4/Pnsf0g5lLL/8OM4gJq8LOo174QUkR5BpFhwjMxPKSEApPyVQZMobNELe0tip msrXw8hP6WCAHYEx12BRpgfjbHBIpsvPSBiCRj0pb0p9fEkvOEZmcpBpqaqPdX2OCqUcEkGj7 VlGcbYn3TG/iomKteDYRdJ7/PDS89128FCdtasordwvzJ0C2014WT3cBP7W1uxzCnrEmfcJJp urJnC470CnOvTWwv2Hpah8vt4TQpjBXjJLYij0H1hjSqvcg76WMu25NhM8vq7tLh/gLfS9PYz bfUYMcefhBWx/LgXwPsV0mqFcSZR5mbfs6J9ddEjM+ZFDYqWyCJVfdwXxnW/xVLmyq/zB3wlH neIv6ym2ftji33IRQv8CcA2nTSLyyojjIWSJhtBemgpq5xWsA0pY6ntqOgynlfo14ZTeRA6Ph jvNi9W94fyghhwXq6CfU3jACTY5tPadZJBMbgoaPVnioPRqArRLj3p9U3+kxcUmxZyffwjWAh cGMS3EZn7oYG+8lgptDwk0e4pC/Js7sJaZFuXWacHgwAD1tAIBTASWNW/068kuaKDTmK//2Fw ua6HS5okFHtcqQfBIOJTkUgs/j6IZHu/Ee5d6PoTmAc/LraSUJuu+r8is2SaFA56C3S+xVAbY 5QHVxdC2UelmcBJeAcXP0tx9tDePvu5fXz6dzm4SgxZAtUAkra7zETSgl/yCVIilCd//dPam4 SzdBCtKdpgh1qQCexEzNNMF3N53z3zfaloh9HLj1Fjh8JSTOjDfGvxShelHoeohEHFauCpNWU ahkgGGIwae6vyxkqWQYCKyzebL6jvOA/Pb0SqtA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >> I just tried this on a Cygwin-w32 build from the master branch. I put the taskbar on the left, started emacs, maximized it, attached gdb, put breakpoints at each of the ShowWindow lines, and ran through Dani's recipe for producing the bug. The breakpoints were never hit. > > I just tried again, but this time with a breakpoint at w32fullscreen_hook so that I could follow the flow. Here are the relevant excerpts from the gdb session: Thank you very much for checking. > Breakpoint 2 at 0x10069507a: file ../../master/src/w32term.c, line 6441. > (gdb) r -Q > Starting program: /home/kbrown/src/emacs/x86_64-w32/src/emacs -Q > > [...] > > [Press F11] > > Thread 1 "emacs" hit Breakpoint 2, w32fullscreen_hook (f=0x8001f7c88) > at ../../master/src/w32term.c:6441 [...] > 6464 FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) = f->want_fullscreen; > (gdb) p f->want_fullscreen > $1 = FULLSCREEN_BOTH While this is the expected value ... > [...] > > (gdb) c > Continuing. > > [Press F11 again] > > Thread 1 "emacs" hit Breakpoint 2, w32fullscreen_hook (f=0x8001f7c88) > at ../../master/src/w32term.c:6441 [...] > 6451 if (FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) == FULLSCREEN_NONE) > (gdb) p f->want_fullscreen > $2 = FULLSCREEN_NONE ... the value I would have expected here is FULLSCREEN_MAXIMIZED. Something must have got broken before. Can you please (1) Verify that the f->want_fullscreen &= ~FULLSCREEN_WAIT; does not interfere in any respect. That is, does f->want_fullscreen have the same value FULLSCREEN_NONE before anding it with FULLSCREEN_WAIT? (2) Does 'toggle-frame-fullscreen' the second time when you type F11 correctly call (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore) with 'fullscreen-restore' equal to 'maximized' at all? (3) Verify that calling w32fullscreen_hook with the taskbar on the bottom does hit the breakpoints and subsequently maximize the frame as expected. Thanks again, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 11:05:34 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 15:05:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGO8k-000609-AG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:05:34 -0400 Received: from mail-dm6nam12on2126.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.243.126]:63393 helo=NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGO8i-0005zw-RP for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:05:33 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MrGEXTg4NNj4JBTaFb7BSyE1y1ZAatUSEy5SriqTgChXvJSqspf0zvhfiW+I6kyGFUTXt/XEgmJb22P3JSkYUEZ1+in96YK4FfSXHRXnWX+DC+80h4fE6nK8tYjL2B+5wLh9+lLqePRde5X7jRP9xBTJl6VPVf8DcgNhO84dJp4U2C3x9IK/cgiPknxDCnfYT8bptQ/ROCbi55KK8HiEbX3xBFxeE84ral4J+Ca9d5PsY1Ie2Kiv0mdtVsYc0IZWuW7CotvzIqQoBVHmEJ1ZMLh+BoLIkajbc4bBilGJdXk8dAwipng3CuBWLq5ZxJB5ljNxf/42TZGLXUonLcnKDQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PVX7mlB3YDnxaPR2+WClMCwlRrmXJY2p/LzY2kRJRYc=; b=bDtMs8LNsTUZFpxkh+9wSpZNka3HGJtfSGfM22ZE3r+F1ZsjuOqtC3Y464CcJzIbPtsx4upwCIKhOHC9TprZSnHUfxrC043brzenkRIPLMo1tnUv8TlxmzinB2Eyzk6Jzisb29vHMxKMPyxHMBn2roDw/KceIZhZu6tULrQPHIjDm3qokqHyWJwNVsPAMfgoJMts/DOub5b1szr72WV9nzuhb2VeQwK8t9jrw8b7SDOA8sNOHjuMU7ibx2HMRADX+3Vs60uGwXr/ydmJC30E2UnKh96oT1DOFTjfkeUwI0pDbP3LIhYx6LmpLO/bgIJAg9ENKHKXF8xTK42nK1+t9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PVX7mlB3YDnxaPR2+WClMCwlRrmXJY2p/LzY2kRJRYc=; b=FIF1nUG5pwul8ovNEh10UybnWyNKlN+vq+hPG5kW4LmKYh40uPsKcSSwE1ho3KJiTOZnqOiMaPCwf9+VS6mbXip8ReqVUdJTfgZVE1E5qD+z4b+3Fe2/POvfZS4jc2fwvnPeEl2vgoxxmUPMB50+i7FumvgQXW51TwzBetacGqg= Authentication-Results: users.sourceforge.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; users.sourceforge.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB5661.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:a0::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.16; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:05:26 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.017; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:05:26 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <5889C6B4.8060506@gmx.at> <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:05:24 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: CH2PR03CA0011.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:59::21) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [IPv6:2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42] (2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42) by CH2PR03CA0011.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:59::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:05:25 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 47a05c63-ecf9-494f-6184-08d8559af29b X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB5661: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8273; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: EWrcULVGVo4Q9ah4snn+BoABCeSFSkjZM2JoLngJoWsquHmFPiWFwcNyxr3MrMDBs8/MdXxNV40ZbYm9HCchXXwPu0UlF2sZWZ+GaL2loQ5SvqiPxFwRtrIidIgCH812YqgCCJkZjLDb9DB8Eka91yJBu80vMk6UxSVd/hv1wpuWlfZJBISjZeC0YWJdhjloxIYx0bW/3qzPN1eYRmCfu3P4xJIeDPfeFfs+Ye1UCZjxQo62tk50bKDOaW6KV25E0xVkfupro+FxZxwdIORH28yFmNZy8ljpMacZh+uown8Ieyt6qZCwYpdzxj8sn2OES6z4FGhB2FFHMHlL1x0Igva6x4t392X/zEZUbWMU1cIZWW315FItEkHVXeLJ7plQeL3W9ZeVGFIDmuZfNh401A== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(376002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(2616005)(54906003)(53546011)(52116002)(110136005)(2906002)(8676002)(186003)(75432002)(478600001)(6486002)(8936002)(316002)(83380400001)(66946007)(786003)(31686004)(4326008)(5660300002)(66556008)(86362001)(36756003)(66476007)(31696002)(16526019)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 47a05c63-ecf9-494f-6184-08d8559af29b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2020 15:05:25.8657 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: V/PcXAjNjxtQpuf6IKy/YRdQxnwhX0xeH81urMC9RWWu/CaWx4PUdH7zswI7QzfjmkgpSTF0rGa76IdrZoYf0Q== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB5661 X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) On 9/10/2020 3:16 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > >> I just tried this on a Cygwin-w32 build from the master branch.  I put the > taskbar on the left, started emacs, maximized it, attached gdb, put breakpoints > at each of the ShowWindow lines, and ran through Dani's recipe for producing the > bug.  The breakpoints were never hit. > > > > I just tried again, but this time with a breakpoint at w32fullscreen_hook so > that I could follow the flow.  Here are the relevant excerpts from the gdb session: > > Thank you very much for checking. > > > Breakpoint 2 at 0x10069507a: file ../../master/src/w32term.c, line 6441. > > (gdb) r -Q > > Starting program: /home/kbrown/src/emacs/x86_64-w32/src/emacs -Q > > > > [...] > > > > [Press F11] > > > > Thread 1 "emacs" hit Breakpoint 2, w32fullscreen_hook (f=0x8001f7c88) > >      at ../../master/src/w32term.c:6441 > [...] > > 6464          FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) = f->want_fullscreen; > > (gdb) p f->want_fullscreen > > $1 = FULLSCREEN_BOTH > > While this is the expected value ... > > > [...] > > > > (gdb) c > > Continuing. > > > > [Press F11 again] > > > > Thread 1 "emacs" hit Breakpoint 2, w32fullscreen_hook (f=0x8001f7c88) > >      at ../../master/src/w32term.c:6441 > [...] > > 6451          if (FRAME_PREV_FSMODE (f) == FULLSCREEN_NONE) > > (gdb) p f->want_fullscreen > > $2 = FULLSCREEN_NONE > > ... the value I would have expected here is FULLSCREEN_MAXIMIZED. > Something must have got broken before.  Can you please > > (1) Verify that the > >       f->want_fullscreen &= ~FULLSCREEN_WAIT; > >     does not interfere in any respect.  That is, does f->want_fullscreen >     have the same value FULLSCREEN_NONE before anding it with >     FULLSCREEN_WAIT? Yes. > (2) Does 'toggle-frame-fullscreen' the second time when you type F11 >     correctly call > >    (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore) > >    with 'fullscreen-restore' equal to 'maximized' at all? No. The value of 'fullscreen-restore' is nil. But if I repeat the experiment with the taskbar on the bottom, the value of fullscreen-restore is 'maximized'. > (3) Verify that calling w32fullscreen_hook with the taskbar on the >     bottom does hit the breakpoints and subsequently maximize the frame >     as expected. With the taskbar on the bottom, f->want_fullscreen == FULLSCREEN_MAXIMIZED when I hit line 6449 after the second F11, and everything goes as expected after that. Ken From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 14:16:48 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 18:16:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41142 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGR7o-0004LY-1T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:16:48 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:43001) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGR7m-0004LL-2f for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:16:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1599761766; bh=9HDOHiX3wIyUcBVNqbpiZpmrvJ12O2MEl7NP6fSMF9Q=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=WHVq2aP74zEn9oVk/JJIxcxzTtjQHmBUGQi0WVO6gcipDbuG8M/Nj+cC8X3gSxPCE LwIHVZvY8uNUn8Kf+CLglwsF3K0o74IBOf0ZGmnYpeRvRkselLs/s4XOj7LMC+FbQP PuTrgVZkYhac5KGtV6ALGDbmrONe9RQ09m20I1Uc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.249.14]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M3lYB-1kGA8D1qkN-000rWK; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:16:06 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Ken Brown , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> From: martin rudalics Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 20:16:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:6a+4KSresisGZteN8ilUIfL3/HioMw5BPfqYb3Ubaw6PRHAW8iG w4UGIc7h613EfbLsETAffnsTEHNS8UJFLRt+WchcQJrqiMWaNeVTOc6EASiwdtOLGciZeKj w9IY09lEEqQDaAouOdMKYX/wBjIcHkSPhDV1W6OH8ZpbZ2UraS8RTlkNtv4Aat9ZgmsOemH k8UZxcY5sIc+bqiVJL7ew== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:tNCQYK90Xys=:lwFZ38jGetb0tqboB3zZIv S6cN2rRRKdtMhNWJuXD8zcs0HakvtiX2G9FouV4plkDpPq6UtP7Ow9Z7ZAeR/Cv7E0O1zKJUc 4i8eJS0vyLxRRkU3gMFw2km0YdXATNRrErv/bnp+qhBUVux1HgQXDPKq4LJlNZPcy9TZExXbs nj3+7YBFZcZ3VWNq/r2oqxs6hoqMAk846C0wUQ8XmgYrILIZafjQ23oJvGrHydkWk0ivy35xd Ouan1FWgCYGxtVn9O/ZG72ZoW14cV4BYsqfxVtPLTribuIsmR8N2lB9svmtDGbejZkSWphqFx x/vDmGkhqpEqWzM1UZ/pzuOj37KnrWA+B55OkPueUXjmjgLYZLIjofM1EZSxJv6s4qmxcKlf9 8+v0TZTRs+Ku7mwirvrRA2XkzEzrA711JrScQgZu2iBj3YR9QO48zOYhSFOuYVI9doGUGx+d0 hqKbi1L3e5El0QIWLhaCHo2Gpja2spgKlkoDa52KAFmHYnBeoPJEPNKLNowIjb5RXCFxpKgkK sFPvesPuCCMnta35bMgMlFBy6nRZfgHHxhZDE2TR5xuPfr0SadHv1rzIAXDOGeG0Pcf8NDilr e83HapM/fxi7GjHzM4b79oJ3KtInY7FT9wA6hS2rOYWnOxi+Ii2YRSANxXnO6xkzqbhS3IKmC 0H8ySBADTPq8Q0VGZRcA7l/j+1C09QxQS+DOKfDBV+fXwnroFmVHoMNqIR+6Av76FApXgYsa6 uRD5RI0c/rlURqILPZ1igYug+ShteEsLItEdxavyhccj2u5Um3lJEo2VGJfVVGT1HLGEL/E18 hR1O0EcfSiQ4SCBpv8j+SERGPc/7+frgvJK8nio4shtwoJ+dMLRPXbsFTeXlQTQK5mYouDrG7 +zkw06YwEvV9ezivfujDkyqCL8VFPxsr3ybP9FeNLrJaDzD/XY7ao/KWMFJYvGWeYsRcTYjB5 RsqwU+h1DoeC1qCGA+d+DbZZ606W8sd5gK6IVoAfzlp3IeW8FYNnkqFIZPqlw3BVZOA7JMdke nY+iJz03wQKhipcZDNovaDPyfgx/NmKsfbwRLr2x+hOsvIEVV+GSJZ3+ZFRYlovGp/Hw7EvYN tfoImvFitcesFqRVlDgnCs+ahdr2/CaxedtGpLZEva4GYfpSpxEWcjFZ2DqXbJovUkpN020Eb /deFYPlM8AKzSfd4+nlJ8JQLiIjKN5SAOjydvhx0lAR8VyCaRA85/mGBYxD79v/eyFU38LknY PbniJ+2qMP0CeGKRwhp7CmZsPQtxSKrQ6ZLD2EA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) >> (2) Does 'toggle-frame-fullscreen' the second time when you type F11 >> correctly call >> >> (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore) >> >> with 'fullscreen-restore' equal to 'maximized' at all? > > No. The value of 'fullscreen-restore' is nil. But if I repeat the experiment with the taskbar on the bottom, the value of fullscreen-restore is 'maximized'. Thanks for telling me what I forgot to ask. IIUC this means that after maximizing the frame with the mouse, the value of (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) is nil. Correct? And what is its value if, instead, you maximize the frame via 'toggle-frame-maximized'? In either case the bug should be a consequence of the earlier mentioned if (x < 0 && y < 0) store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); so we do not remember in the fullscreen parameter that the frame has been maximized. Apparently some check _is_ needed (why?) so probably using if (x < 0 || y < 0) store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); instead will fix it. Can you try that (as I said elsewhere it will then fail for borderless, maximized frames)? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Sep 10 15:04:39 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 19:04:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41217 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGRs6-0005Xc-Nf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:04:38 -0400 Received: from mail-dm6nam11on2139.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.223.139]:65377 helo=NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGRs5-0005XP-7T for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:04:38 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ikeFcjOzlNEVddnpUqJihQ646R4H27/6fEdWCewTR16bag9uWoGT4XFVlFpHbtpjz3/dxI79hnkDTBeSeMbobqHAZ+r/6H3Mkvtz2H1iq05v+XVna76MET8Ctu7YgwrnDWo8ax4EaGAEqCq+3vfMdyn3KyYCmxZzrs/HiPapv6izSLIeY0KmzKYNDWMeFBQtesA6uZ9NdJTZtFnpoXvWeeabmOSMD29T+9reNpjcGAbb4Tp5utG3fpZKc3LYCMkC2walF+sCRuIWDGPbkeJnWzS2S4KoXUmil37NXv896LlGaWo+/C/ZbCe8NxutnNcAM6LtRDJ2RlbBMYakfq6C1A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MVjQu3hgJQFb2R/YqSzF7Y5ICdG/83wF7atAfk41XLQ=; b=kWfBnvLKHZGJXudBZpBpw9Z8zCO1mzM6nM3Yt9iSjOKAIH2jV42kN+IBACr1yMIRhyAGIZlrxaxG/44uIFQsQQc2/BrO61wHmiu6MKfIlipd+881ghrRn12Ki0pVF/1IGDtarYUB6AAOJVVdCRnW9h+55Pj8nJc9UmrN+iYZinGsYlFdpmnUCVLNlhusOD/kjf/psk9LKhEy09Hn9Ai4c35W/bf+OYv36ZIQ8AzzAIbRPqWk4WxbDHGBlJVnkNcxWJAj6PVeePXAMGdTaSO0WV6e8JVIaSpHC6kNcBYOZmolqNrTKx9RHsMHo+kF6EowmxIFJqSkI/v9gr7yHGBjnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MVjQu3hgJQFb2R/YqSzF7Y5ICdG/83wF7atAfk41XLQ=; b=KVvfG7vIhMBhFiQGjcN2Fs6ukheJhK1ZU0r13F+rAtq5v9SJT40oie1N7WGMoMqSosMgbmrMg0E+Fg+DtsObPFI2GtPsVu4CPub9iDImPhDlHv/NthoXBU5NGYIIChfxszqrU6ePTPgoPiVPrKCRBYvp4Lnx7/mYRV5LEkFYIKI= Authentication-Results: users.sourceforge.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; users.sourceforge.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB5646.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:a2::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:04:31 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.017; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:04:30 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <588A0102.7010704@gmx.at> <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:04:29 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: BL0PR0102CA0035.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:18::48) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [IPv6:2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42] (2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42) by BL0PR0102CA0035.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:18::48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.19 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:04:30 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 07abaf15-1095-419b-faf1-08d855bc58c7 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB5646: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:9508; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: jwdv8ZqcK1Hx0RJVRUGOgY+NdIUWsFsRCHtf6RSBbUjhWds1Ndbk6YLcPPn7s10iNVH+pKIgMiqoOxdKaZJmwdONOqHiauGJ7FWc9k0Xs4X4LwuPjuhqWYVCCe6di5Ly+CVWk9IV1IxlBdhxTc6otCXQA0UKzUeL6goUmNMockA/ASPfperVnkRe08wf/NWguV5PhoygUt52sl2PWooNJANwHqVavPBFgTg7Uft7VqG/Z66y45Mx78D1X8MJjg+rrIdoRhKSY0NEogYUYKQgi14RwfPz8H7Slq4HBZYklYP6Rfu8lFsR7xPROV1C5fHE8MdCjYMd8Uhf65Qk8uo+UnVfzMsOZZ506lTPZVhD9yP1if8YmvNjWdpV029i2px+ntUNkGWPSNW0ATKENYRRog== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(376002)(396003)(5660300002)(2616005)(786003)(16526019)(316002)(8676002)(478600001)(2906002)(53546011)(186003)(6486002)(8936002)(54906003)(110136005)(31686004)(86362001)(4326008)(36756003)(83380400001)(66556008)(66476007)(31696002)(52116002)(75432002)(66946007)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 07abaf15-1095-419b-faf1-08d855bc58c7 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2020 19:04:30.7567 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: 3gv8T7e4xpAMRIBdYNmSpcwTby7sKTDFo1FE3G/vtejZiqLFUgLdtG9hpO2Dt44vYTk5Q9NwPxt4obCp6zVwFQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB5646 X-Spam-Score: -3.6 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) On 9/10/2020 2:16 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > >> (2) Does 'toggle-frame-fullscreen' the second time when you type F11 > >>      correctly call > >> > >>     (set-frame-parameter frame 'fullscreen fullscreen-restore) > >> > >>     with 'fullscreen-restore' equal to 'maximized' at all? > > > > No.  The value of 'fullscreen-restore' is nil.  But if I repeat the > experiment with the taskbar on the bottom, the value of fullscreen-restore is > 'maximized'. > > Thanks for telling me what I forgot to ask.  IIUC this means that after > maximizing the frame with the mouse, the value of > > (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) > > is nil.  Correct? Yes. > And what is its value if, instead, you maximize the > frame via 'toggle-frame-maximized'? maximized. > In either case the bug should be a consequence of the earlier mentioned > >             if (x < 0 && y < 0) >               store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); > > so we do not remember in the fullscreen parameter that the frame has > been maximized.  Apparently some check _is_ needed (why?) so probably > using > >             if (x < 0 || y < 0) >               store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); > > instead will fix it.  Can you try that (as I said elsewhere it will then > fail for borderless, maximized frames)? Yes, that does fix it. I haven't tried to test anything involving borderless frames. Ken From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 08:31:37 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 12:31:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiDJ-0006Ov-Mn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:31:37 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:38611) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGiDH-0006Oi-2b for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:31:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1599827463; bh=BRhckQ2NOm2al0YZHX+bmJook7U16HvcmQdO73PtwHU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gO4plX9A+cfiXEQP7FekPPre48LmiNc1gsyrA/R0Xr86kizmkZmsjwbjfA8cZ0rW0 +MgSAVX5m4HDAdFnYoFfKEV51po0yU3ghSLkdl/rDITXCvIdvpr6i24sDDsK+OEddZ kzQl6Bg68Og/iVMAypCN+Ljf8Ez5/qVSAeYAAbHs= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.5.223]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MWRVh-1k0OQH3bfH-00Xtuz; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 14:31:02 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Ken Brown , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> From: martin rudalics Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:53:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:0dEx3fURMeyR1UUJ8lEn6I4fMO/SrPuNL196PJ1a1ApHmmrfORx hdlA6NmvejHJnWcEOsZCrBZrzne3FqOguN35eFjTOUiJIxUsw18FljP0wLEZ2phcRQLc1w3 b4wpVI7Pvsk77o4VQD5+HayMtQL8VlYJ2lLWFNVft46QWWhJYjR2TcdMTT8vrCPr2nZFfF+ gByBvu4SAlPvMh7UBjYTQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:JpDiHbBQrJ4=:D0pLmk9eBOGbSOKjaI6cxl oWKBgs9UouqrCQsCkSFT4poCnrLzjvacZfyWElmesoVp3oTuiG3uE5Mai5tO3m1cGgelE4/Yi LVm/e46QbBw4kc1cvbgyIDGWRju9ktRmmwSSdH+Q5AxhblBcTSTLynaVEpBeHTFbpsi35wJAC M9TV911NZUzaPdW5urZ3oYjel202hQdFks8JL3GMuvw++UglDF4kyHvJl8UTf00lX4Y6VEKDl E/Bhyx/Mk8ZiDXEnqtZHYmH1zFuC7fwmClcmvhOwos/iKPk11UvoBebzx6FKyUoB4g6W9txgb r1zjDlMnuOe1FnulvqhT9gTqw2XpNh/ERUFPnze63L8B8tsGqDmLWRRqIH4VZbpcwc4qFhgfk OxC3VEpotonaAmYRSDzM+TR/fofFEPVge6ToIzehMr7fSVCdrFHt/I2cRx6SZ9MOdnvn5bEKz qQLfiAhwGRU5QN4JbHAyf7HNpLduYL0YtmXSxWgb4pUKGRq9jPLM56aGRXsQBYaAzIzYqlA3m DLLMtbUBjrsGtkZPmZ6uL/IJGS4KdkcGEaoKktqbL9T/TnNXfRIsEeARxLMSKWV6ppoLKnsoE JzyPC69lIW5VqpSvRI5CHYZvkw986RuuDHnlrliGQxY4vrsusdplQXgiWQvS0+GA8Yo7SQoQb INVwjcCe+wZX4SqN0e4y+z0aH0SRBAIxsyoFUdcoYHD2XXjSJtckx3toyQVaXDirkkIeHvhoe p3sJH6TffJuSKx+tu4JaxJavqPIjWx67NvsNuuU7fCcPGieBLw0YWFaini4YHPfgtaeBZvCto awLVSBJtkDdrA34HK1xICWhfr5QJdYOSxM/6i//Y5v7AkunA/fxVyhyQ6S/OarC43loshRg3A EAzv9teFZvJZmqENKtZn+9pu7oGsXzZXQKBfViehiQOTvEBEyZCk7u8KI4vly+Y/G4j/bu+7f LRhACkQBzAnAmJaT04B5DeIJQ1cSBx/jyFOzrct+Fzrz3jAvth3nxOo45NGUPg6BRTJgd1Qaf 1WRktRFkDNcE3cYa/Qo+92hgCYFiw+zvH7Zp16swSWUN2xaVczb6bY8wirrgaINRWjDwCJ94v VKB/5ri/Tn0PEyvSCKy2IGX7A0CKzgyBY5qALPj7GEJW8/XL7zYyqF9J+xYESt6RPcsRercxF XKSFhYWmVi8DJhlTHuni2+8X2L6eofXXF+ZPqRbAaxco2wi7Ef0a2VJQVPSuWBwFkGCe7YQIt mnJ3hxIGwiV0K6X4U6VU2LpUr+/vPPIxaQsFLOQ== X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) >> ... after >> maximizing the frame with the mouse, the value of >> >> (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) >> >> is nil. Correct? > > Yes. > >> And what is its value if, instead, you maximize the >> frame via 'toggle-frame-maximized'? > > maximized. Mixing frame resizing triggered by Emacs commands and external tools is tricky to handle. >> Apparently some check _is_ needed (why?) so probably >> using >> >> if (x < 0 || y < 0) >> store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); >> >> instead will fix it. Can you try that (as I said elsewhere it will then >> fail for borderless, maximized frames)? > > Yes, that does fix it. So we'll probably have to use that. Can you install it? > I haven't tried to test anything involving borderless frames. If you (set-frame-parameter nil 'undecorated t) and maximize the frame via some Windows (Aero, IIRC) command, what does (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) report? With and without the && ~> || change. And it would still be interesting to understand your earlier finding, namely that If I make this change and follow Dani's recipe from the original bug report, the second F11 press doesn't restore the previous state. Instead, the frame appears to get slightly smaller for an instant and then immediately reverts to fullscreen mode. That second F11 should set the 'fullscreen parameter to 'maximized so I fail to see how a subsequent action can restore it to 'fullboth. In retrospect, that /* Windows can send us a SIZE_MAXIMIZED message even when fullscreen is fullboth .... comment apparently matches your experience now but I cannot even recall based on what experience I added it back then. Thanks, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 16:16:21 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 20:16:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGpT3-00005z-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:16:21 -0400 Received: from mail-eopbgr680111.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.68.111]:63542 helo=NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGpT1-00005k-6N for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:16:20 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Wjo7WO0QstTzMLsJBMnlv/Y/kINxY7mz6cZbn3zDAcuywAGQ77kDYhDmxGm/pzLJFvzBWfupZnOKVKjp3FfHCPY0XFMPiYfCSTSfcev6s+QT03VqzUnpCo5ZE9QEzHswNGT0K2XeI9yruQAqep08MCCVMTzNv/94+SYM74EbBQvEy6Y8AJqsOXcM4vIf6gR8FrKJFDb1Q+RTqqiQKqLuO5fEDWsNQKZvkEPO/6nt3jSPzzLEOh2MjG2Z2eP4EmOyf2X9iljTAqgJW5EcBytscMZQbmph9OxQKZ+Rrz+xZb/yCrYk3bvn6KW/pfR2hF0KCpXWR3/gBVOPhSYdJpj0Kg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ornYPF8irdJO0HnLGgTZYD5BzmNzlQGx3GI61bQk7qk=; b=Pa0M3BZmepP7fRj0knAaYkK+GZ2N7ov0TvVi+6efLoQh2aZ6q+I418vYzGv+vWytc2T2gmktUqXjWFH0OF8J7hO664118xvXkieXuB1ulkqFB7EibWQr5Q6iXSo3pTRqwCQk2n0bYS91jFZ8te6/M8z3K0g9q2VfcNwNLo7fhgMddYQdSFOVOfj52gWVVcd+C+EN/f61gxAghixbKMj0kQ8MkI7ivR7u5x7Pe8NxheDp0pt3qi7qRP+hCN602b6rN/FKfE6smm6lFWPQx8P7RpG/SDhtSqQrsa7GyP9T1XVclDIei8xpxb9Ou9emlkY2/w32MfnCvhlWIw5aIvYcrg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ornYPF8irdJO0HnLGgTZYD5BzmNzlQGx3GI61bQk7qk=; b=SjEHzImT3N8nXaRF9nGoFG/tH7sIk/C2ktZeevSVY465TLhMWFawzF8Glqu93jvQuNrzZ4/0/7fvWj3ueGjQgVLiv/h8zauMUzGPp2r78qQ6pqBAjH+3Qdluj3u4J0UzBssrLXktLPx0L+ZBWizaYL0kxCEyBi2x7Y67Lv8kMM0= Authentication-Results: users.sourceforge.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; users.sourceforge.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB6110.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e5::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:16:10 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:16:10 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:16:09 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------7F46198AFFC10A2A9D711EF0" Content-Language: en-US X-ClientProxiedBy: CH2PR07CA0024.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:20::37) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.0.17] (68.175.129.7) by CH2PR07CA0024.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:20::37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:16:09 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.175.129.7] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: db0c449f-a84f-477e-7df7-08d8568f8629 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB6110: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:9508; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: zj0kG7XP4DQiCFr5jZiZZM925WPI19aqHvenE+Lue6Gxldam5PmhGiPtajrgQd7kLiiQJQOiUanNkhkOnelNVlyluXjnRhk3mLYK1fzhAspA1fhpP54Km1zg8IxrGPlUiKQKIJ46isRFmLZ7qHo6cNK1U9OkicNJp1GCDjtXvAB9Ngil3KluFeg81GFzOW0iwDrjyTDaFg3vnA4f9Mj0cT6ewdminsQXU/6OgLupPtXqlcwmZD/pElEPFj6YTqHesljZzrT3gt/7YT7/6D6zCZkub3KnzrAoHH1u6OwtmfYlHuFjj7uGIWkdGNpoyVb41rbWWjLYaaDeKgxK/S8ScxFeUKr+aJnNjN26ydum3XE5D8ZZlD1DSQsSobYQo6J02s1d93owJDqi4jooX2hAVQ== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(26005)(186003)(36756003)(110136005)(75432002)(786003)(53546011)(54906003)(66946007)(33964004)(2906002)(16576012)(66616009)(66556008)(66476007)(316002)(52116002)(31686004)(5660300002)(86362001)(83380400001)(16526019)(6486002)(4326008)(8676002)(8936002)(2616005)(31696002)(235185007)(478600001)(956004)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: db0c449f-a84f-477e-7df7-08d8568f8629 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2020 20:16:10.6512 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: QgnYCjyz2S/csUC1Ib7freMzjmsK6FZ2LinSjnb43qMaiSEHBwAswsQGpgwzwUn9digMT4giBtm6QlSz+u3P7w== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB6110 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) --------------7F46198AFFC10A2A9D711EF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 9/11/2020 3:53 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > >> ... after > >> maximizing the frame with the mouse, the value of > >> > >> (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) > >> > >> is nil.  Correct? > > > > Yes. > > > >> And what is its value if, instead, you maximize the > >> frame via 'toggle-frame-maximized'? > > > > maximized. > > Mixing frame resizing triggered by Emacs commands and external tools is > tricky to handle. > > >> Apparently some check _is_ needed (why?) so probably > >> using > >> > >>              if (x < 0 || y < 0) > >>                store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); > >> > >> instead will fix it.  Can you try that (as I said elsewhere it will then > >> fail for borderless, maximized frames)? > > > > Yes, that does fix it. > > So we'll probably have to use that.  Can you install it? Patch attached (under your name). Please check it and see if the commit message and comment change are OK. Eli and Lars, I think this should go to master rather than the emacs-27 branch, since there's too much that we don't understand about the fix. Do you agree? > > I haven't tried to test anything involving borderless frames. > > If you > > (set-frame-parameter nil 'undecorated t) > > and maximize the frame via some Windows (Aero, IIRC) command, what does Sorry, but I don't know what an Aero command is, and I'm not interested in learning if I don't have to. If anyone really cares about this case and can't carry out the experiment themselves, I'm willing to do it, but I'll need explicit instructions. > (frame-parameter nil 'fullscreen) > > report?  With and without the && ~> || change. > > And it would still be interesting to understand your earlier finding, > namely that > >   If I make this change and follow Dani's recipe from the original bug >   report, the second F11 press doesn't restore the previous state. >   Instead, the frame appears to get slightly smaller for an instant and >   then immediately reverts to fullscreen mode. > > That second F11 should set the 'fullscreen parameter to 'maximized so I > fail to see how a subsequent action can restore it to 'fullboth.  In > retrospect, that > >           /* Windows can send us a SIZE_MAXIMIZED message even >              when fullscreen is fullboth .... > > comment apparently matches your experience now but I cannot even recall > based on what experience I added it back then. > > Thanks, martin Ken --------------7F46198AFFC10A2A9D711EF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; name="0001-Fix-toggle-frame-fullscreen-on-w32-builds.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Fix-toggle-frame-fullscreen-on-w32-builds.patch" >From 9dd0fe7a16fba2b37e79be24acbd325b159086c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Rudalics Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:04:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix toggle-frame-fullscreen on w32 builds * src/w32term.c (w32_read_socket): Set 'fullscreen' to 'maximized' if Windows sends SIZE_MAXIMIZED and either the top or the left of the frame is outside the screen. (Bug#25542) --- src/w32term.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/w32term.c b/src/w32term.c index 1766b32514..2669f29b56 100644 --- a/src/w32term.c +++ b/src/w32term.c @@ -5478,15 +5478,15 @@ w32_read_socket (struct terminal *terminal, /* Windows can send us a SIZE_MAXIMIZED message even when fullscreen is fullboth. The following is a simple hack to check that based on the fact that - only a maximized fullscreen frame should have both - top/left outside the screen. */ + only a maximized fullscreen frame should have top + or left outside the screen. */ if (EQ (fullscreen, Qfullwidth) || EQ (fullscreen, Qfullheight) || NILP (fullscreen)) { int x, y; w32_real_positions (f, &x, &y); - if (x < 0 && y < 0) + if (x < 0 || y < 0) store_frame_param (f, Qfullscreen, Qmaximized); } } -- 2.28.0 --------------7F46198AFFC10A2A9D711EF0-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 16:33:53 2020 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 20:33:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGpk1-0000Vc-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:33:53 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGpjz-0000VU-Gy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:33:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGpjz-00024o-Ag for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:33:51 -0400 Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214]:45354 helo=ciao.gmane.io) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGpjx-0000dz-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:33:51 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGpjt-0004xm-HI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:33:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:33:39 +0200 Organization: Linux Private Site Message-ID: <87d02s59zw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dCtZzVNeOBh6BBeE2CRxX1y4+JI= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/11 16:09:03 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) Ken Brown writes: >> If you >> (set-frame-parameter nil 'undecorated t) >> and maximize the frame via some Windows (Aero, IIRC) command, what >> does > > Sorry, but I don't know what an Aero command is, and I'm not > interested in learning if I don't have to. If anyone really cares > about this case and can't carry out the experiment themselves, I'm > willing to do it, but I'll need explicit instructions. I think he's referring to the Win+Up shortcut, which maximizes the frame on the current screen. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 11 17:19:05 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 21:19:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45712 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGqRl-0001ZX-EJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:19:05 -0400 Received: from mail-dm6nam10on2125.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.93.125]:40129 helo=NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGqRh-0001Z1-W5 for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:19:04 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PC1Dc7jpmskaKQF/D216o4HHnaj3N9Hi5g336ubC6TdyzamaqWReH4pi5/9zg+qDqNZQEqEIS9Ru6kP3aZShoXEFVJF2+cyKVclRSEDM6WdfoKC18nuBulv6FUZLcdmiVxRMb4x/l6ai4BS2DEJQDW15Nm5f0aZP79FXastrwGwy8wBG9D+nDFRJnswyKbXh3JXZA/ghI5tJN52Rek3nEIqL54NGEVdGv2GXnCWXs1BwiOgj69TdeWDHYEBjM9V6ca72A3hzWG9SXp2AJon70CX0kL10a0RW7OvoFYwDuF/ZMlyQsrd4MscY86NUBlnjl+lTKZ9Hc2oL3M7uGe8zwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=I0C6zsnWPsOieBymPD2f58zhDMduNno4D0HAd/r8EH8=; b=OZCGOKccY1wa5WNLHEH5gcer+xCfWbijb9udZggnq3X1zVUeaOHoAzk0qamnGIJEw9VCJILKwoc8F2mnMZY+7FTaNXRsnF/fF/WtWjkjHSjQ66wY2KwiRVi0hRSDH9j1AW5bIkqMTjbEljWVZIawW/7haMlxVKK1HD+VXkYcWoNXSONUx4KvDBMkXNtywVJlf5nfaFc1B961RHPMFHunDdlFoYnaTcFuoXgLI+c6hxsaOdacFvb2wiFH1WEhHyJ0NAPfRkfiGOqHCu5noYF4nXWfywDa0Wf6EkuYGSAGLh1d0mfuEhrsCOfnNq59D8ic0ohumIIE7MvC5wNrFNoX7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=I0C6zsnWPsOieBymPD2f58zhDMduNno4D0HAd/r8EH8=; b=K3UdiHr99r10wRxrpJ6t5zuvL4Ui7yZcnU1Vazn3L5aLjW+vaEQtRoc4XvTfATr/I7/ojFkocsCtzLYMbnBQiYCZ9rwRdr+SInTsla/T/+Xtlp9SRXhQZITb+k7C4SixAxVJglu3v9P1SBSBwhgSv61mlmlmFb6zQDmWzsImQbI= Authentication-Results: gmx.at; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmx.at; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB5599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:fe::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3348.15; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:18:55 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:18:55 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Achim Gratz , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org References: <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> <87d02s59zw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <25e882b6-7f02-7aab-009a-54799e6744f9@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:18:54 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: <87d02s59zw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: BL0PR01CA0033.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:71::46) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [192.168.0.17] (68.175.129.7) by BL0PR01CA0033.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:71::46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:18:54 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.175.129.7] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: c41183de-2809-466d-3148-08d856984a0c X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB5599: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8273; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: jhODjK3IOq4lW8AKEXRjYAGs0qxJnL8nqz7dIrMXvAQea5f2GESGWVNo2oawLWIdLr/HGya4Ljpmd15e6OsjlRTnkMDTvLZpdVfzjxwQRNMVUs9h8H6MNQO82UvRqMKojY82Eu9YgXf+zP4Ynz1vv0WmXhnhTxrr1pF38ouKBB3FcjK3PyoZMFswe93C2s5Xhu3OOstyJf5iEN0RBDdX5E23KmLihsh/+FpYQHB/GYkYALMADfNFxfSLAl9BdlqSxL+xiQfCihqaoOAnMeFrrQNhStJIKR5dX0LpVCuOY2mzxQ6F8ZkPnCWom8MABP9fBWzky+UzbGzhMW8FWOmC169FWjWBma72WF9xg9sDlZh/6LgwnhYlhrRHTb4Lu/N6SXobP5FreeED18i7xcPYng== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(66476007)(6486002)(53546011)(956004)(52116002)(8676002)(186003)(8936002)(16526019)(5660300002)(31696002)(2616005)(478600001)(36756003)(75432002)(16576012)(66556008)(26005)(786003)(31686004)(86362001)(2906002)(66946007)(4326008)(4744005)(316002)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c41183de-2809-466d-3148-08d856984a0c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2020 21:18:55.2384 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: BBnu3e7iRHh/wfIjhF0MVGCVLIW/xGkUmksO+j4XA+m0eQYpKGSoIk2fqj8Ez/HAMt8OjJuFGmEMxmnLlqiQvg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB5599 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: martin rudalics X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.5 (---) On 9/11/2020 4:33 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Ken Brown writes: >>> If you >>> (set-frame-parameter nil 'undecorated t) >>> and maximize the frame via some Windows (Aero, IIRC) command, what >>> does >> >> Sorry, but I don't know what an Aero command is, and I'm not >> interested in learning if I don't have to. If anyone really cares >> about this case and can't carry out the experiment themselves, I'm >> willing to do it, but I'll need explicit instructions. > > I think he's referring to the Win+Up shortcut, which maximizes the frame > on the current screen. Thanks, I didn't know about that. Martin, is that what you meant? Do you want me to play with that and answer your questions before installing the other patch? Ken From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 12 02:06:40 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2020 06:06:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46005 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGygJ-0007ns-S0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:06:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46652) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGygI-0007ne-A5 for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:06:38 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGygB-000243-NW; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:06:31 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2569 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kGygB-0001nb-4i; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:06:31 -0400 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 09:06:29 +0300 Message-Id: <83y2lfedga.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Ken Brown In-Reply-To: <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> (message from Ken Brown on Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:16:09 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized References: <588B108E.9070501@gmx.at> <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, > Noam Postavsky > From: Ken Brown > Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 16:16:09 -0400 > > Patch attached (under your name). Please check it and see if the commit message > and comment change are OK. > > Eli and Lars, I think this should go to master rather than the emacs-27 branch, > since there's too much that we don't understand about the fix. Do you agree? Yes, I definitely agree: the use case is rare and the fix is not self-evident. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 12 02:54:42 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2020 06:54:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzQo-0000TJ-BA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:54:42 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:50099) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzQn-0000T6-I4 for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:54:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1599893650; bh=Yt5V/ZAekZrg6WNb4J4dlhoyizJ1+6myCoGaVrEKq9Y=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=SQKeTfhCAujIxX9zcL//VHKpPQ+M1upr+eizjLH05YWfw9SSfd6hvUicUdKLdxHzW I8hTiU6/8BcUFiDt6hBLVJukTUhJYzjFzlErM8iSixovlgvSCoccm/cwfhbCVs84ta peip019wg8DNlWm3iLskVZYoN6FyQfrOkWKFbTAE= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.20]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N0X8o-1kT91C1sCS-00wXjP; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:54:10 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Ken Brown , Dani Moncayo , Eli Zaretskii References: <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> From: martin rudalics Message-ID: <65fba4cf-1c59-d069-e528-de4120a352bb@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:54:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dW/01i5fkb9qz+r2vGWzCfWbgs3+w130wsgGq678yyRzqvb5SPx V9sxxVtjxFTxvy5l+Ld+aRmEK9LQUqkQ/ibltJQVL3S0LMjZlsdR0RC2OBb9tLeoEcC2xV8 VsJBC4bvTYyls1xkrMD+GJwa8W59acHRjkkblAGxrwPbtXYUBvFVLLaj/i5VHi35xVyU7bi GcSI6uLdE/qhLHwahSzFQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:O5lHaDMV8gM=:RZEDpQruxFFVSaT2/uSA8O EUSYoIbCx6Ia7THGi5C8HjbtLybi1eEBeLX2tbFbKdK+1lpkTtB5++tvChtfG9mDSQOSuuZMS itvS21cLh8NcCHHDw/9JKwUvtYpmT1uSNguDIYmuOyvwAGK61XoLmVrB3drMLgQz0vK1cmFHg nT6srbITN9WjKjVh73Pvs1Md5LIG0gLPeccASqV6NpmEWj2cyQHmXjA8amar0LgvdNCma6Urb fmYc/zUi7KtHnwuxrApJ6w0Y+Iipd7J5WlSB7bwBiAp0M8Dl+KXtF97cHvAZ/5L/zmuRM777T FNn7TH9clqNLdltDluAPD2aEDLgeqajg6Vyk3s3zLeuPzt7WVYym/QYpIZWwgn/nYimnL70VW XysS1UXNrj9tLrkPQ0nFLKCvgseKscwurX3icdc3UoZeTKu/w5aBhHWFOoNtmmp+J3r0M6qsy 3p/s2H4Ht8DGsexvwRodwrU93CVJ9vVkgNa4py+IfAEAHp5qqJI1x0OLHaI3nv6bH7H6w30oD n1GrWnR85L1DWo7LJd+QMdiLe7UevH82YFkdhZ9bf5YhRdRSJFgrOqpdC2nnHg9Bord0FhJIo UMEXR9hPYZKRjZRFRyMG/HBTVfG1Sw1DiGhUw38VUT4vrS0ACIFLS4i2A98tzeJyDPWDFODcC LXM0gJ+t8Omd//56PgA1jV8s1Ed6uamKxTOwQ6/lPLJ5OAQygTqXLUwIHYs/hlg8Zbn4EjwlB 2cnxt8fhKlsIk2YUjGf4g3uFVEPV9nKkqtB69CBbLsC5hU+ZKlBsh4ELbEx5Rgk8gKYJ47isd GTm3zD4M2ovy4sP/Otu+rQEQOSFWYocAPyl5+Wpro93SGmQWA4JsOPZ5lKIWboBZ5w0ULrwhr oqXgWDkafV2tqTBfp3HSgdyCARBKPW2xeTPvzT/JziF5kFLnCgD31tgsiqh2guUZ5Dvi/pJH9 khwYy64BdB8L//YOo2oMbhFNkJuy8z0ZcYmVBuy3ewwKLgMaG1Qn8cLh2ZsWj0Dee7AldV3J4 zDpXcP+9UEqLzt15I46SgrjZqGX4rBNd7+PYIVaaE3HM7js9BwOgceVTSiUPb2siavZ/tAbhc OjE4uAeylJ2KjmyOWtyxyXC68FI2hHfmwn1wNuZHY5iR1d/n3JAoRCOGb9dz0cRa11girWLqa 639cn72GOmbMR8Cft4fE+z51YZhhYhfzoJPqTA9FSq/53130jUwjoaqlV83Lp99lgte2OYSTT PF9uZApj/BYylPjG8pOul5wAL5T6K1rEPGcLoWg== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > Patch attached (under your name). Please check it and see if the commit message and comment change are OK. Looks perfect to me. Many thanks, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 12 02:54:46 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2020 06:54:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46066 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzQs-0000TZ-IQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:54:46 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:47527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzQm-0000T4-FJ for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:54:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1599893674; bh=EoAyCNKvNZL5unlmkO3kF0ltqpRGImT8oC879qMVQEc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=SL1VAFoNnAEjF6T3UXctd+9fkCzkblyENHS2HFJsZKeMfPbxN+/WOyfVreDcVsYDA u3Kj+yhajRlODX1wXYi+zvatHU3iUAmA/Ee1uOoBvoxYQgK12Rl/EA99sO16KyoK0y axJxP/HoODrVOzQ7QNUATXXk2e648DSZLCvDeUaw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.20]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MgeoI-1kicY205Ii-00h4rr; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:54:34 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Achim Gratz , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org References: <588B1437.9010303@gmx.at> <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> <87d02s59zw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: martin rudalics Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:54:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87d02s59zw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:0sf8iUJruTxD+wpStD/JSaE1h9OyagQki+IoFOHRbDm6UrKySx9 +mUfpKaQayvbkfVfZIWfUS3AkmyFPSHUv7JaMGl2flAs+fWk76pB5sEeQ0+Nxp2XlM+stDD ChUQA3Qu9HGwVX5I7RJE9CYIv73xUbUMk6MCbMsjhjoYaSwtknqu1p6PIXJm3BAPQOouuRV qDk3qcNB+OMAbpHvkEzrQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:3jop32MDMK4=:n8doOuFeUHWnbEYUQunYEA dlkPc0fynXrd9ZisR7hZ7I1/pKd0UkfPr8k76AYzTLCagNPga47NnYZ7FnzqkLtdyPnfPHeTb 6k49QM9JU+dgf7M2BxofL9KXkEpcv5jXPW8rQByav9/afk9eP/ejF7rbVVVnMGkSSGxtLxLxb tcuNmyL1lspd2VtDuHrTq5UwT76AiXe7xSiffnXVEkpTSSN8xM/KeiF/jK5kBV8I1/fC6On8I j1g5OTktVCCueDRvqaLk4f7hiWcDClL70VQ81PjaWIHZ3L3rShq55IQE9S27TvMnJ/HY0KvX7 4l5FtYGvDYLDnWuFXMe1vpjbWgztLCBBeN4ssYBr6FtZa/OUXiUhVE5go6pMAXzDlCsRwABuD mWwYOsHwknY5i0+MOfR5dDAmRagB3ETvqznbpJ4SqBTb+wmhTdM8t7YoWEK2mOnGJstqo754V UB6o0B0SOSre1cez32ZEdlofqjGbIDazTPeLn5MgR811Jg0KofXsDSA32PzUaOTQsTNUxsuIq M+8yRMNpBsCFcyqaSPeC7RMPy9UOWBGpBNHLssLr2QDAOirjBmSW4QGNn+A1Af0ngfv23T+Eg IobATkXJF+f5mQ3avAiGtQqKkBjlK1D0QNLbQ10OieXt6qGN0hE+pEA2XxjMwqk+Mdk2Mz548 UKwvIY8nkkcOpwmZzmkj6+d3/3768nIWonbl6G/vgBofm38Lqp8FsE4yUs11CFm8+fiH7GFrm +FDa8jMsJvb4WSR8FHiae+34yiU8SSdB2pBFTTRvdSGXU58JoQ4si35uUpwtioWtFGpaTOdd4 m0X+ofyZqBJsB6euFsoGk7YZjEQvPh1gMLwQAhymhrKHfpuX45iN30nNDuj5lgok1pkYczqXz YT2q86w4uaDORADNEezOJ0pQVte/7867uG4cCEz1iyup1qK9/v/gPVi1WnOKxHfzBv/xO3Sno bua1joNU6RLt95OqevLc+6nqoffuvG4pqnw+JzNcm3zWUgJ9A4ujz89XmwmfIEm4W+zrY2+Vy xeRcpkNe2BOUjffHU4CPd1FW1UKL1lsrUaOMrGZitEJktYaDILUb+9OUcV8xAjVtDVtKCpC0u 7KIz0d8Txielx9/GzHfAzmO1bE0kBy3hU9L82526LmQdh6J9JJxQ97mj0cDKZDOc6a+xjRgJ8 3YI6kOXZArggbgFPUilNJ0Z6fjRAgvEmxD/AsAUXCzLgHXBVcscjDzE6GMcpFFDR6iA0ukJFK OiE7cSYegM7BOnmb1aARsh/teHJzmaVjs+g+X4w== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > I think he's referring to the Win+Up shortcut, which maximizes the frame > on the current screen. Right. Wasn't that part of something they called Aero on Windows 7? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 12 02:55:06 2020 Received: (at 25542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2020 06:55:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46071 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzRB-0000Uh-Rn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:55:06 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:45727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGzR8-0000Tq-Gt for 25542@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:55:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1599893693; bh=vyJ+XnpgNGrhEjB2d9HJ8corFbRMRLeKAqZVXi+mcME=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=dKOfZdJnwczpeFCf38zf8vJlaTKKWK3QtoAxge4S/dcKbj11j4xtM9pQTKslUXk8y tws2es0o/ROowzlZoSqwKPOCnmkEcoqXPMf4mG0TIHT8uIYfg+KgjaXoWaMXIrQCe9 wwEesrb1RIIx9zGgNi5Y6q0A349rAPZyC46x+l90= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.20]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M3lY1-1kHomU1clH-000w1d; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:54:53 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: Ken Brown , Achim Gratz , 25542@debbugs.gnu.org References: <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> <87d02s59zw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <25e882b6-7f02-7aab-009a-54799e6744f9@cornell.edu> From: martin rudalics Message-ID: <40e307f1-934c-1e36-6d23-2646fe2d7fb4@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 08:54:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <25e882b6-7f02-7aab-009a-54799e6744f9@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:UTebIs5R6vlql1qSW4Ly/t0U/lFTD62y4m7jl3bYy4J71jwkKsW GQ5oERSTXqlTmpyZ+7HM9jEYtM1uZn50sahl26VElZmLyn2+VfCd3l7sv+ZpDFILIw6LDwF zuoFaeUHj4TYa1zXHonzINnbyer1xF9X1gRxxFx7K9LHip0ysa/tanwqqQUuvPtP3J6sgqu Wkyb85CcqztWg4etXN7aw== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:qhy7ZaRuLSk=:TmEWUX3lrN4dcmhDSJfdao 3avWoSyO/A9iRLuooJ7BN/J4TE3nXh5T+mVBmZlBMUh71WA5HJ2HBMOQgT6l5WPTOEBNNmVi8 rgJd4vKOhlrkSpjJix60ZQYZtv4hzImwG4oLGD3CygUHczWWQSLClfZlWWW7A4uY/JTj2NuGY L3unvkrYubiJwJS+oPnRXiirzzP+cMIO8DUiWEMR1QY/Tnz9Vf2Q0PIsiwsrmHvHKfM8a7ufP jmsVNx6LPwMR8+dQAg64Yg/qKIt8AVz8GwKh4pnOVapInrmmUK5DtIPcFBi219PMrjlQ1YYKb XkiQS77e0buYj7m/pR+KIxPYVoMJDbKuPScXqCMiB8jOGXzN71HvwGZ3duUHwl+mzgmlP6tLg iGNz056t6LIH1VffafNiFwIV6VIl/uSKddKVyzoPZQLSObgx4tj+8FMoH8peLXJjrzBY95Gag Jcw4jWTZqXqHejHar52cBDVm6ehnv4WwXRcCHEwv2k0UcZ14D1mpKZMecRnlcLWlNM0LF+ltA 5Jizolnpv+MqAaZolM+8i8GcoxdEJnP5k9W6Per3WIE/BijTUP/L5NV8zp6kAAmgeXRb7FGId 1OTISl/1fW1wofZt+FsagDmMGArSINvXZF4WpPdU4Wr5G8bvMgAX3y/U0XUEP9QgiyQuTjYRb 5tCYmO9KzyEWrBOVT3yRg2y7VK9VA7A0la2e0UNnOFHDINGhuE/0tluX1ZOZxD1jLkwXFSqS4 KsaQ2u3hGEnwNT6EAY7AVw71iuZzg0bbPewYfObnsb3EohrYmZ7ImNMgIjmhjF2lKkk9J6Fho EfJpIlnh/NPmdfQ8g73aA37JpRHI0Xb95/spuKbJnjjD27KzXcUCQnJTENZxbqmsIvoeq3Kuy /yLOb4LtPmoMCMm7zNGrn/ez1IJc48CE9rKNZkDvk2JZLpa/KL3vKXywaS+gHlvehm9z8I+d8 ZA/wT9NYVOnI3ohHExnUPpLXdVYf3nPW39juWucrKKnNWKM2djWc6iPgLP0h1SOTtWvudNfeg gwdQhQY3hb3UOZPFjkwJ1b7ZmJNAvUy2GWnh0xKnIcvMOMiYNOrji/PLvhbZoU1UZ+qoudWG8 nZtZytiCzmzOvDgoQDVf4V23hW8F4yXgaCB6SxhQKKBNGVHyEkA0jIFm2/hnJRH3tojjpyP7E ydjbkSdSHrf7ObvFI86nQOAF1bmnxeN0+TQ4/cYRyOkCW6QqSU80A3koO5QqLfZ/Qlh40tXoE z77LVSpFhJ/n3UMRs1MRMT/9eKwzkbF2vS5Jmlw== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > Thanks, I didn't know about that. Martin, is that what you meant? Do you want me to play with that and answer your questions before installing the other patch? No. Please go ahead and install the patch. Maybe, as soon as I can build master again, I'll play around with this myself. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 12 07:37:37 2020 Received: (at 25542-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2020 11:37:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46489 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kH3qb-0005Wa-63 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:37:37 -0400 Received: from mail-bn7nam10on2109.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.92.109]:24169 helo=NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kH3qW-0005WI-Nf for 25542-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:37:35 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=eDUyKxqcWgu9Ya+XIxRgzjrarmYe6WX5SncN56e0TEWHBYdY31Lo6sIFit8Pm+5BthnpMItBISgIxzZqHqL+LU6yy6X3mkx+45Pt4KcooZb6Q4wBbTDWeyEYtmLTxzKx2wgE9gFP36imQ1WEAxngGJ9t0UguA1X8N9loTVla1PEfKoJI8qkX6bw0j1OnttrFXojDlu9gTEOwuv7N/CbCccMj1iCpvr5998Ace+kv5gmwl2Gw1LBaxwnTl4GjCG67FzakioYT1xqsL212iwZhFq+WAR6jGT5vWMpO8qKI6U9d83N02FlItoslcbopOhPfmNR3dAXCXMo3+ZCuR0vDAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4vKfPwJE4xF8BNpO5RAVF9AQWUKIAKikQ9vvUOkHL/o=; b=IylYaWUXepyqpOvhaji8ERIR2Ouh20BeH5FPORvRadm6jUepFBpqCDIfTdMxTq2vjok2QwssLJhNVBZABZyS1s8ec1yQ4v2wXh6TBg5d57+xGJLCslxsoI6toKyleJgnM81/Q2wLXx2CPqx/d5tn83F+dA0pEpFJrOLezzzVc9+yUiFN+nP3UoYdA596oXF3kc5Un37dVSph8v/yBLDKEFkrnGo4f6XiAoM04kG5XHS4RG1KiHU5lDkKa2iERGU60+YxAGGi1u7/1XT8dztg78qfg0MSe6QqruDEMXxE+2c21urv/QAgYiX1TA5lKgxvbGB1SIzo3cMN/Hux11HDmA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cornell.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu; dkim=pass header.d=cornell.edu; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4vKfPwJE4xF8BNpO5RAVF9AQWUKIAKikQ9vvUOkHL/o=; b=hUOE/5H01CC0ieXU2CZxhTkVycAPooM/nKxCNHDeP23ACwkplGV00M11RI3DnksB/MFYQWOXuGGxeuFfPY4DBt9N0/zAWfQXsuapghJqbANJmrzUhCa75cCeAXuompsTUPLLaBNgC2dOzHS8fsO0J1WPhEkDaLEfBSKD3xR/DbU= Authentication-Results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cornell.edu; Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) by MN2PR04MB5646.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:a2::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:37:25 +0000 Received: from MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44]) by MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c144:d206:c369:af44%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3348.019; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:37:25 +0000 Subject: Re: bug#25542: 25.1; Restoring the frame from fullscreen to maximized To: martin rudalics , 25542-done@debbugs.gnu.org References: <588B4F7C.40909@gmx.at> <588C5003.4070409@gmx.at> <87r1rhbu2s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo18pvoh.fsf@gnu.org> <17a425a3-7b6e-56bc-40a3-35ac78fdaa6a@gmx.at> <56ee5ed9-fd85-b5c3-6aba-d51332398f03@cornell.edu> <818f2053-a996-7ade-c1cf-6592b6d2cde5@gmx.at> <4869c79f-2f3b-cafb-0459-c6f39f9a6bd5@cornell.edu> <3cea3f08-d87c-03a0-4b0b-b54f3ea63149@cornell.edu> <5d802046-c401-3a50-78b7-f5db80095114@cornell.edu> <87d02s59zw.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <25e882b6-7f02-7aab-009a-54799e6744f9@cornell.edu> <40e307f1-934c-1e36-6d23-2646fe2d7fb4@gmx.at> From: Ken Brown Message-ID: <01e93651-9198-e664-c68e-5eb6c050c01b@cornell.edu> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 07:37:24 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 In-Reply-To: <40e307f1-934c-1e36-6d23-2646fe2d7fb4@gmx.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ClientProxiedBy: MN2PR20CA0044.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:235::13) To MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:e3::13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from [IPv6:2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42] (2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42) by MN2PR20CA0044.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:235::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:37:24 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [2604:6000:b407:7f00:ad88:231:3482:1c42] X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 25e5f892-3ecb-43ff-6740-08d85710385a X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: MN2PR04MB5646: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:5797; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: v00xyreQD8UQ/FpcY9hzvqwtPtJdD8+NT9sC1ozqSCGdSH+Q0Dt2BNDo0d54n5CUpOEIzoS93FSrG7CloX9fSViIzCDWZjeg28g+BAcoYALfC+M9xxYqxOZFotxKhwKEUqDhurPSJ0F0BZZuJPId4w4oT2+iW634og2QwYEYtn1W0Jaq/sBDPgcE8c+erqdIV3i1l21fgrbCZfw7fGi5vQ68Zpqv08ml9zLc5ptVwPm6RLaq0sYLCOoE71YTWilGso/v36GdMgSjBA+MpSVTV5E0MgiAE4nm2Nmj7b/DE2RQ1PuJq8Dwdw7757cFUxaaJ4TVQmKUZ4WxXzTJdSS9dbMkF7FqwzBjWeIpNWHqEoNbn9vtcJPf+0MoGTnUsz949rMQUilFNcVZCKFvpxkqXw== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(2616005)(53546011)(8676002)(16526019)(186003)(478600001)(8936002)(5660300002)(31686004)(54906003)(786003)(316002)(66476007)(2906002)(86362001)(31696002)(66556008)(66946007)(52116002)(83380400001)(75432002)(6486002)(4744005)(4326008)(36756003)(14963001)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: 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 X-OriginatorOrg: cornell.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 25e5f892-3ecb-43ff-6740-08d85710385a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR04MB6176.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Sep 2020 11:37:25.3754 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d7e4366-1b9b-45cf-8e79-b14b27df46e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: yrLGIIuDg0yNDMz15vQ+FJ6jlf6I3yiApjd2PUb9/nW3/n/rJGQ3vuaOzwElVlkqs7yZ7orrrd6sVOEA8MHXzg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR04MB5646 X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25542-done Cc: Achim Gratz , Dani Moncayo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) On 9/12/2020 2:54 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > > Thanks, I didn't know about that.  Martin, is that what you meant?  Do you > want me to play with that and answer your questions before installing the other > patch? > > No.  Please go ahead and install the patch.  Maybe, as soon as I can > build master again, I'll play around with this myself. Done. Closing. Ken From unknown Wed Jun 25 10:47:30 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator