Subject: bug#25517: 25.1.91; print-format specifier mistaken as comment

From: Noam Postavsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:13:02 -0500

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:41 AM, Andreas Röhler
<[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Okay, see. However, it's not gone - see attachment.
>>> While correct at octave-mode.
>>
>> That's without the change though, right?
>
>
> No, changed source according to your fix. Otherwise wouldn't expect it
> correct in plain octave-mode.

It does, in fact, work without the change in plain octave-mode.
Perhaps you forgot to recompile after applying the patch?

>
> Isn't there good old syntax-ppss at work, the universal source of bugs?

I've seen that every time you get on this topic, a long and ultimately
fruitless discussion ensues. Therefore I won't respond to any
suggestions about this.