Subject: bug#25517: 25.1.91; print-format specifier mistaken as comment

From: Andreas Röhler <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:10:54 +0100

On 24.01.2017 16:41, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Andreas Röhler
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ octave-mode-syntax-table
>>> -    (modify-syntax-entry ?\' "."  table)
>>> +    (modify-syntax-entry ?\' "\""  table)
>> Thanks. That should be a useful cure in octave-mode.
>>
>> A resp. fix seems needed in inferior-octave-mode-map.
> Huh? What do you think needs changing in inferior-octave-mode-map?
> That's a keymap? If you meant inferior-octave-mode-syntax-table, then
> it already inherits everything from octave-mode-syntax-table anyway.
>
> (defvar inferior-octave-mode-syntax-table
>    (let ((table (make-syntax-table octave-mode-syntax-table)))
>      table)
>    "Syntax table in use in `inferior-octave-mode' buffers.")

Okay, see. However, it's not gone - see attachment.
While correct at octave-mode.