Subject: bug#25517: 25.1.91; print-format specifier mistaken as comment

From: Noam Postavsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:41:05 -0500

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Andreas Röhler
<[email-masked]> wrote:
>> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ octave-mode-syntax-table
>> -    (modify-syntax-entry ?\' "."  table)
>> +    (modify-syntax-entry ?\' "\""  table)
>
> Thanks. That should be a useful cure in octave-mode.
>
> A resp. fix seems needed in inferior-octave-mode-map.

Huh? What do you think needs changing in inferior-octave-mode-map?
That's a keymap? If you meant inferior-octave-mode-syntax-table, then
it already inherits everything from octave-mode-syntax-table anyway.

(defvar inferior-octave-mode-syntax-table
  (let ((table (make-syntax-table octave-mode-syntax-table)))
    table)
  "Syntax table in use in `inferior-octave-mode' buffers.")