GNU bug report logs - #25461
Missing doc strings for "," and ",@".

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Subject: bug#25461: closed (Re: bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings
 for "," and ",@".)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:10:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#25461: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@".

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 25461 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
25461: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25461
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: 25461-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Subject: Re: bug#25461: [Patch]: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@".
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:09:27 +0000

Bug fixed.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Missing doc strings for "," and ",@".
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:22:57 +0000

Hello, Emacs.

With any existing Emacs, when I do

    C-h f , <CR>
    
or

    C-h f ,@ <CR>

, I get the response

    [No match]

.  This is bad.  From a user's point of view, these key sequences should
bring up doc strings for "," and ",@", especially seeing how important
these symbols are, and how difficult they are to use for a lisper with
limited experience.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.