From unknown Mon Aug 11 21:36:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25429: 24.5; mml-secure-message-encrypt-pgpmime warns about some User IDs with unknown validity but not about others Resent-From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 25429 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 25429@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14842396369574 (code B ref -1); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:48:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2017 16:47:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51743 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWy-0002UK-3u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60734) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWw-0002U7-T0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWn-0002Do-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:09 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWf-00027Q-He for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:47:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWa-0001pQ-8O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:46:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWV-000232-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:46:52 -0500 Received: from che.mayfirst.org ([162.247.75.118]:50004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRiWK-0001zT-EN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:46:47 -0500 Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1DFA4F99A for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:46:32 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A91E220588; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:02:48 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:02:44 -0500 Message-ID: <87mvewqna3.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain This is a security bug in Emacs' mml mode when composing encrypted mail. The flaw allows an attacker to potentially trigger selection of the wrong key, and to evade a warning from gpg. Here's the situation: I'm composing a mesage in emacs in mml-mode (using notmuch, fwiw, though i don't think that matters here), and i want to send it encrypted. I use mml-secure-message-encrypt-pgpmime (via C-c RET c p) to encrypt the message. I have two friends, Alice and Bob, who have OpenPGP certificates that look like this: pub rsa4096 2016-06-02 [SC] 80213BD8FF27C90997B9F87215EA6D25570092DE uid [ unknown] Alice uid [ full ] Alice sub rsa4096 2016-06-02 [E] pub rsa4096 2016-08-16 [SC] F3CCEF926FE16622B7050F0804AEEB8BE699F289 uid [ unknown] Bob sub rsa4096 2016-08-16 [E] These are the only certs in my keyring other than my own. Note that i've managed to certify Alice's example.com User ID, but not her example.org User ID (she probably added that User ID after i checked signatures). When the mail is addressed only to bob@example.net, i get this warning when sending; if i answer "n" then the message doesn't go out: Untrusted key 04AEEB8BE699F289 Bob . Use anyway? (y or n) When the mail is addressed only to alice@example.com, i get no such warning, the message is just signed, encrypted, and sent. So far, so good :) However, when i send mail to alice@example.org, i *also* get no warning, despite the fact that the alice@example.org User ID has the same level of calculated validity as the bob@example.net User ID. This points to a nitpick and a real underlying problem, both related. Nitpick first: * The message "Untrusted key" warning message is misleading, since this has nothing to do with GnuPG's concept of "trust", or of the key. Instead, it should be looking at the validity of the binding between the User ID and the key. So the message should say something like: Unknown validity of key 04AEEB8BE699F289 for 'Bob '. Use anyway? And the real problem: * it looks like mml is actually basing its decision about the warning on the *maximum* validity of all User IDs on the certificate as a whole, rather than on the validity of the User ID that it cares about. This is a security flaw. Consider the situation above, but where Alice decides she wants to be able to read Bob's encrypted mail. If she were to add a new User ID to her OpenPGP certificate that was "bob@example.net", and i imported that cert into my keyring (e.g. while doing regular refreshes from the keyserver) then future messages that i encrypt to Bob would *not* have the warning, and would be encrypted to the wrong key. So mml is not testing the right information reported by gpg when it makes this decision. --dkg In GNU Emacs 24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.22.5) of 2016-12-18 on x86-ubc-01, modified by Debian Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11900000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux testing (stretch) Configured using: `configure --build x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var/lib --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-pop=yes --enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs24:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.5/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.5/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp --build x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var/lib --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-pop=yes --enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs24:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/24.5/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/24.5/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp --with-x=yes --with-x-toolkit=gtk3 --with-toolkit-scroll-bars 'CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/emacs24-aUhNHM/emacs24-24.5+1=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -fno-PIE' 'CPPFLAGS=-Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro -no-pie'' Important settings: value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEOCdgUepHf6PklTkyFJitxsGSMjcFAlh3qKUACgkQFJitxsGS Mjf6YRAAhvjAtlkHRSCFYIMpiS0kyH9cytfjR0LBypK+a2Zo93tBnaUIPy/2MGx5 6FVqDv24dWOO83GL0i3t5jqoWWznaJpfmRhhND5injpJwJRKU0NPxOgsJIFX0TwL K18X2XkyktrXrwN3azZL3enYe+zEYvHXMQo+MBWDdaDYhqaKcWnB5gwBp9tLLBfa KrG40aCi9+ALbFCtoB5PqIIb2SoQDGeULjREpNijICE7wLINuM7XPJ1btb8OoIhF xLlMG8kEOUY/IKJ0DT0KDR5veL8P+iyrDSmNHE6DW81Zc4Dfjm9K1uywBnbFAFi8 eqLKLuTBaZkfsQzOtZ7b+bpP/AmhGGk1S/cXuOJacvuQZk/A4MlpiZ40h1xh57Vq unibe5r5kqsq/R0Y53eKPleXtEUGUMB1x9pzBjIl7e0Lbjno1Q9Tw2XJUnIs4WAV c5aITnVDugcHg5MBQ+cWMihUwYQrMkraNSF4bKNIX+kffQ1xvkRdrk96eQtN/ND0 amQaSsZkiG4D4sthpA98aae8hscuTzlC04e2cu4LEyqfP9kndEh/Lj/VAzCNG33T +DWIqFDoH2WNddrulA1B/5x5L+P+iCMSltNqXypDpqqpVJgzgvw+a2bymr+HU8cW IVFlbKOSvaE+elt/uheb0SwYuIluT8Q+pFAMsA474VxCq4JyvRA= =x+r6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jan 12 12:51:00 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jan 2017 17:51:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51774 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRjWe-0005sf-Gs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:51:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRjWc-0005sO-PF for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:50:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRjWX-0006BC-2d for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:50:53 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRjWW-0006B7-Vh for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:50:53 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cRjWW-0007XR-Jw for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:50:52 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 25429 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:50:52 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) tag 25429 security From unknown Mon Aug 11 21:36:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25429: 24.5; mml-secure-message-encrypt-pgpmime warns about some User IDs with unknown validity but not about others Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25429 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Cc: 25429@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 25429-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25429.15691957947262 (code B ref 25429); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:44:01 +0000 Received: (at 25429) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2019 23:43:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34689 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCBVa-0001t4-7r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:43:14 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCBVZ-0001sw-3O for 25429@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 19:43:13 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCBVV-0004En-4m; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 01:43:11 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87mvewqna3.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 01:43:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mvewqna3.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> (Daniel Kahn Gillmor's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:02:44 -0500") Message-ID: <87r247gann.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > This is a security bug in Emacs' mml mode when composing encrypted > mail. The flaw allows an attacker to potentially trigger selection of > the wrong key, and to evade a warning from gpg. > > Here' [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > This is a security bug in Emacs' mml mode when composing encrypted > mail. The flaw allows an attacker to potentially trigger selection of > the wrong key, and to evade a warning from gpg. > > Here's the situation: > > I'm composing a mesage in emacs in mml-mode (using notmuch, fwiw, though > i don't think that matters here), and i want to send it encrypted. > > I use mml-secure-message-encrypt-pgpmime (via C-c RET c p) to encrypt > the message. > > I have two friends, Alice and Bob, who have OpenPGP certificates that > look like this: [...] > pub rsa4096 2016-08-16 [SC] > F3CCEF926FE16622B7050F0804AEEB8BE699F289 > uid [ unknown] Bob > sub rsa4096 2016-08-16 [E] [...] > When the mail is addressed only to bob@example.net, i get this warning > when sending; if i answer "n" then the message doesn't go out: > > Untrusted key 04AEEB8BE699F289 Bob . Use anyway? (y or n) I'm trying to triage this bug, but I just tried this in Emacs 27 with a key that's listed as [unknown], and I do not get this warning. Is there some additional setting necessary to get the warning? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Mon Aug 11 21:36:32 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25429: 24.5; mml-secure-message-encrypt-pgpmime warns about some User IDs with unknown validity but not about others Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25429 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Cc: 25429@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 25429-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25429.15965326706084 (code B ref 25429); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:18:01 +0000 Received: (at 25429) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2020 09:17:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46797 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2t4w-0001a4-6e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:17:50 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2t4u-0001XC-J6 for 25429@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:17:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Xe/URChnKW6suHqGfH16ghtGIHR2uFdulm60FohjJK0=; b=H5nJ/j3BB8vWtwCRyRRPEA+iwB /fG6dNmAAE0vakFwF6BLjcLTyTQ+EZDN6rC19c/gttE5M0kTAUQLYIPrbzLjgfIfgmYZsu1/JHbnp 2ReEZVJIKWemHcUPelh9FtClLpwiUFXcJAWv7v5QR0Z9PReUGhHeu5hpWT1CbaRFwYok=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2t4k-00065P-Ui; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:17:42 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87mvewqna3.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87r247gann.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:17:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r247gann.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2019 01:43:08 +0200") Message-ID: <87y2murcr2.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm trying to triage this bug, but I just tried this in Emacs 27 with a > key that's listed as [unknown], and I do not get this warning. Is there > some additional setting necessary to get the warni [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I'm trying to triage this bug, but I just tried this in Emacs 27 with a > key that's listed as [unknown], and I do not get this warning. Is there > some additional setting necessary to get the warning? More information was requested, but no response was given within a few months, so I'm closing this bug report. If the problem still exists, please respond to this email and we'll reopen the bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 04 05:17:56 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2020 09:17:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2t52-0001aM-Gi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:17:56 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:53858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2t50-0001Zx-4T for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:17:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KL3WntdjDiA35YKLUF+U5c5OMTvkEF9VitHuN7fHey0=; b=QX4BVAhsIsJ4G1rfcaj/pgX0cP SV1x4eCss5PEa3XoAVwidm8R+593Cc2spNOg862EEKmC66g9P+mUxeGbOf/aPJVB4TPv3bwAsC7Ot ijhdFFsNjub5CdxvMeZVr8nWMWnwYgMzH3lEu0ygYuPpdxR0bOwWsOF8LBaiUC7lQMBE=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2t4s-00065W-Dj for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:17:48 +0200 Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:17:45 +0200 Message-Id: <87wo2ercqu.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #25429 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 25429 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 25429 quit