GNU bug report logs - #25358
Cross Compiling fails because of help2man

Previous Next

Full log

Message #17 received at 25358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
To: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Vishal Biswas <vshlbiswas <at> ymail.com>, 25358 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25358: Cross Compiling fails because of help2man
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:58:51 +0100

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jim and all,
>
>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 11:41, Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> wrote:
>>
>>> 1. make 'doc/sed.1' depend on 'sed/sed.c' and 'doc/sed.x'
>> I'm pretty sure we must retain the dependency, at least when not
>> cross-compiling. If we were to attempt to remove that dependency, I
>> believe that would leave a race condition where help2man may attempt
>> to run the binary before it is built.
>
> GNU Make has a good solution for it with its "order-only-prerequisites"
> (which ensure proper order but ignore timestamp of the dependency):
>
>  https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Prerequisite-Types.html
>
> Too bad it's not portable...

Indeed.

>>> 2. make the building of 'doc/sed.1' conditional, depending on wether
>>>   it is being built from '.git' (then regenerate it)
>>
>> Even when building from a tarball, we should leave as many build rules
>> as we can.
>
> We do already distribute 'doc/sed.1' in the tarball, and currently always rebuild it,
> I wonder if it's worth making an exception in this case?

I don't feel strongly about this either way. You're welcome to make the call.

> For example in coreutils I think man pages are skipped if there's no perl. Doing the same in sed will allow building it on system without perl (BTW this was the cause for bug #25367 - it was a system with non-working perl).
>
> If we do go with only skipping for cross-compilation,
> does this suffice for 'configure.ac' ?
>
>     AM_CONDITIONAL([CROSS_COMPILING], [test "$cross_compiling" = yes])

Since that's all coreutils does, I presume it will work for us.

> In that case, perhaps it's worth adding a test for perl and skipping if it doesn't exist ?
>
> I'm expecting more system will ship without perl as time goes by...

This seems worthwhile.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.