From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:53:22 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#25307 <25307@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#25307 <25307@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: bug report with guile-2.0.13 Reply-To: bug#25307 <25307@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 19:53:22 +0000 retitle 25307 bug report with guile-2.0.13 reassign 25307 guile submitter 25307 "Oppe, Thomas C ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor" severity 25307 normal tag 25307 moreinfo thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 31 01:43:23 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Dec 2016 06:43:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60812 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cNDNz-0000gE-Ar for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 01:43:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58785) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cNCLS-0007PP-TB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:36:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNCLK-0006or-1N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:36:37 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DEAR_SOMETHING, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:57243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNCLJ-0006on-UO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:36:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNCLG-0001m6-1r for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:36:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNCLC-0006n4-Ba for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:36:30 -0500 Received: from rde-gw2.erdc.dren.mil ([134.164.23.111]:57848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cNCLC-0006mX-18 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:36:26 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,432,1477976400"; d="scan'208,217";a="26722539" Received: from unknown (HELO MS-EX1VKS.erdc.dren.mil) ([134.164.254.11]) by rde-gw2.erdc.dren.mil with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 30 Dec 2016 23:36:23 -0600 Received: from MS-EX2VKS.erdc.dren.mil ([169.254.2.46]) by MS-EX1VKS.erdc.dren.mil ([169.254.1.144]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 23:36:21 -0600 From: "Oppe, Thomas C ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor" To: "'bug-guile@gnu.org'" Subject: bug report with guile-2.0.13 Thread-Topic: bug report with guile-2.0.13 Thread-Index: AdJjJ8ji5OhPILPBQaeNT4xMwFoT6Q== Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 05:36:21 +0000 Message-ID: <1B6259370D5EFF488340E9D87BD0580A9DD9944D@MS-EX2VKS.erdc.dren.mil> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [134.164.254.40] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1B6259370D5EFF488340E9D87BD0580A9DD9944DMSEX2VKSerdcdre_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 01:43:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --_000_1B6259370D5EFF488340E9D87BD0580A9DD9944DMSEX2VKSerdcdre_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Sir: On the "make check" step for guile-2.0.13, I get an error message as given = below: Running list.test Running load.test Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 160: 12 [catch #t # ...] In unknown file: ?: 11 [apply-smob/1 #] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 66: 10 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...] In ice-9/eval.scm: 432: 9 [eval # #] 432: 8 [eval # #] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 771: 7 [for-each # #] In ice-9/eval.scm: 481: 6 [lp (#) (("load.test"))] In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 2404: 5 [save-module-excursion #] 4056: 4 [#] 1727: 3 [%start-stack load-stack ...] 1732: 2 [#] In unknown file: ?: 1 [primitive-load "/u/work/oppe/guile-2.0.13/test-suite/tests/load.te= st"] ?: 0 [mkdir "/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13/load-test.dir" #] ERROR: In procedure mkdir: ERROR: In procedure mkdir: File exists FAIL: check-guile =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1 of 1 test failed Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13' make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13' make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13' make: *** [check] Error 2 Also, on a separate issue, when I configure with the command ./configure --prefix=3D${install_dir} --enable-shared --enable-static It complains that it can't find libtool: checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking for libltdl... no configure: error: GNU libltdl (Libtool) not found, see README. The "config.log" file says configure:46273: checking for libltdl configure:46295: gcc -o conftest -I/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/include -I/u= sr/include -L/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib64 -L/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-201612= 29/lib -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib conftest.c /u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib/l= ibltdl.so /usr/lib/libdl.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib = -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib >&5 /usr/lib/libdl.so: error adding symbols: File in wrong format collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status configure:46295: $? =3D 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h */ | #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU Guile" I can get around this problem with the following configure command: ./configure --prefix=3D${install_dir} --enable-shared --enable-static --wit= hout-libltdl-prefix But is there a better solution? Some background: > uname -a Linux muutill-0002.mhpcc.hpc.mil 2.6.32-642.11.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct = 26 10:25:23 EDT 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I am running the "make check" step of the GCC 6.3.1 compiler test suite, wh= ich requires "autogen" which in turn requires "guile". Would "guile-ncurse= s-2.1" plus "ncurses-6.0" be a valid substitute for "guile-2.0.13" in this = context? This is a GCC 6.3.1 snapshot of 12/29/2016. Thank you for any information. Tom Oppe --_000_1B6259370D5EFF488340E9D87BD0580A9DD9944DMSEX2VKSerdcdre_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= Dear Sir:

=  

= On the “make check” step for guile-2.0.13, I get an error messa= ge as given below:

=  

= Running list.test

= Running load.test

= Backtrace:

= In ice-9/boot-9.scm:

= 160: 12 [catch #t #<catch-closure 244d4a0> ...]

= In unknown file:

=    ?: 11 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 244d4a0>]=

= In ice-9/boot-9.scm:

=   66: 10 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]

= In ice-9/eval.scm:

= 432: 9 [eval # #]

= 432: 8 [eval # #]

= In ice-9/boot-9.scm:

= 771: 7 [for-each #<procedure 265a9c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:416:20 (a)> #]=

= In ice-9/eval.scm:

= 481: 6 [lp (#<fluid 23>) (("load.test"))]=

= In ice-9/boot-9.scm:

= 2404: 5 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 3c6a0c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4= 051:3 ()>]

= 4056: 4 [#<procedure 3c6a0c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]

= 1727: 3 [%start-stack load-stack ...]

= 1732: 2 [#<procedure 3f75cf0 ()>]

= In unknown file:

=    ?: 1 [primitive-load "/u/work/oppe/guile-2.0.13/test-suit= e/tests/load.test"]

=    ?: 0 [mkdir "/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13/load-test.d= ir" #<undefined>]

=  

= ERROR: In procedure mkdir:

= ERROR: In procedure mkdir: File exists

= FAIL: check-guile

= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

= 1 of 1 test failed

= Please report to bug-guile@gnu.org

= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

= make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1

= make[3]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13'

= make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2

= make[2]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13'

= make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1

= make[1]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13'

= make: *** [check] Error 2

=  

= Also, on a separate issue, when I configure with the command

=  

= ./configure --prefix=3D${install_dir} --enable-shared --enable-static<= /o:p>

=  

= It complains that it can’t find libtool:

=  

= checking whether to build shared libraries... yes

= checking whether to build static libraries... yes

= checking for libltdl... no

= configure: error: GNU libltdl (Libtool) not found, see README.

=  

= The “config.log” file says

=  

= configure:46273: checking for libltdl

= configure:46295: gcc -o conftest -I/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/include -I/u= sr/include  -L/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib64 -L/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-2= 0161229/lib -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib conftest.c /u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/= lib/libltdl.so /usr/lib/libdl.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib -Wl,-rpat= h -Wl,/usr/lib  >&5

= /usr/lib/libdl.so: error adding symbols: File in wrong format

= collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

= configure:46295: $? =3D 1

= configure: failed program was:

= | /* confdefs.h */

= | #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU Guile"

=  

= I can get around this problem with the following configure command:

=  

= ./configure --prefix=3D${install_dir} --enable-shared --enable-static --wit= hout-libltdl-prefix

=  

= But is there a better solution?

=  

= Some background:

=  

= > uname -a

= Linux muutill-0002.mhpcc.hpc.mil 2.6.32-642.11.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct = 26 10:25:23 EDT 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

=  

= I am running the “make check” step of the GCC 6.3.1 compiler te= st suite, which requires “autogen” which in turn requires ̶= 0;guile”.  Would “guile-ncurses-2.1” plus “ncu= rses-6.0” be a valid substitute for “guile-2.0.13” in this context?  This is a GCC 6.3.1 = snapshot of 12/29/2016.

=  

= Thank you for any information.

=  

= Tom Oppe

=  

--_000_1B6259370D5EFF488340E9D87BD0580A9DD9944DMSEX2VKSerdcdre_-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 12 16:22:12 2017 Received: (at 25307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2017 21:22:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37482 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1b2-00063Q-Fa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1b0-00063D-KG for 25307@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1aq-0006au-GS for 25307@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:05 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1aq-0006ao-Df; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:00 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:55828 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1ap-0005HD-Py; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:00 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: "Oppe\, Thomas C ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor" Subject: Re: bug#25307: bug report with guile-2.0.13 References: <1B6259370D5EFF488340E9D87BD0580A9DD9944D@MS-EX2VKS.erdc.dren.mil> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:21:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1B6259370D5EFF488340E9D87BD0580A9DD9944D@MS-EX2VKS.erdc.dren.mil> (Thomas C. Oppe's message of "Sat, 31 Dec 2016 05:36:21 +0000") Message-ID: <87poinqf4a.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25307 Cc: 25307@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Hello, "Oppe, Thomas C ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor" skribis: > On the "make check" step for guile-2.0.13, I get an error message as give= n below: > > > > Running list.test > > Running load.test > > Backtrace: [...] > In unknown file: > > ?: 1 [primitive-load "/u/work/oppe/guile-2.0.13/test-suite/tests/load.= test"] > > ?: 0 [mkdir "/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13/load-test.dir" #] > > > > ERROR: In procedure mkdir: > > ERROR: In procedure mkdir: File exists > > FAIL: check-guile Could it be that there was a stale =E2=80=9Cload-test.dir=E2=80=9D director= y in your build tree? Could you try, from the top-level build tree: rm -rf load-test.dir && make check Thanks in advance, and sorry for the delay. Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 12 16:22:14 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2017 21:22:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1b4-00063g-NW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59885) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1b3-00063G-A6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1ax-0006ci-3Z for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:08 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1ax-0006ce-0C for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:07 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:55830 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1aw-0005Ia-BL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:22:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:22:04 +0100 Message-Id: <87o9y7qf43.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #25307 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) tags 25307 moreinfo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 01 10:12:08 2017 Received: (at 25307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2017 15:12:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj5vE-0001zx-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:12:08 -0500 Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:65168 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj5vD-0001zq-2L for 25307@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:12:07 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB52165C1D; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:12:06 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Fz6V4ssDs/CE dmuOMFRwE3x52eQ=; b=DvtzwKlNMYOCbx+/BSZbkcYXGACmN0vXloiTiH5XIneO VLuTrQgTOMYo/ppCU3zg5aHcAgRx8c14U5QeuMaV0ZNzjUFk2aGEuZC4gf0vTA0v 6yfDqfSmaxF5AJtZkRpG5RM9XsnimFwbL6yUbj2RFYhfAizuiBG+2UKdqWuuOKU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tTM5Gc 5ylPipOY4bL/7hlO5fZ/g5pZdGMbB5x6r9Qg4YaafGQk1d7L1Pzl/SCvmtdPnQtK 5HgHren+HdAV2uwHFCBEcXNe/mz+b7yDljN/vEUyzycaEE/EKtOK7PA1ARgwYGZj Xl5y1WAZgAc1Zw28BU9y8iNn6G9/O8q33QlaQ= Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E450265C1C; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:12:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from clucks (unknown [109.190.228.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BFA865C1B; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:12:05 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#25307: bug report with guile-2.0.13 References: <1B6259370D5EFF488340E9D87BD0580A9DD9944D@MS-EX2VKS.erdc.dren.mil> <87poinqf4a.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:11:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87poinqf4a.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:21:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87efyhf2v5.fsf@pobox.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6ECB535E-FE91-11E6-B2D2-85AB91A0D1B0-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25307 Cc: 25307@debbugs.gnu.org, "Oppe, Thomas C ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) On Sun 12 Feb 2017 22:21, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> In unknown file: >> >> ?: 1 [primitive-load "/u/work/oppe/guile-2.0.13/test-suite/tests/load= .test"] >> >> ?: 0 [mkdir "/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13/load-test.dir" #] >> >> >> >> ERROR: In procedure mkdir: >> >> ERROR: In procedure mkdir: File exists >> >> FAIL: check-guile > > Could it be that there was a stale =E2=80=9Cload-test.dir=E2=80=9D direct= ory in your > build tree? > > Could you try, from the top-level build tree: > > rm -rf load-test.dir && make check > > Thanks in advance, and sorry for the delay. Another question would be, is it possible this "make test" was running on NFS? Could be we don't do the right thing there (or NFS doesn't do the right thing). Andy From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 14 01:55:13 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2018 05:55:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48707 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBZMv-0008MJ-3n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:55:13 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:38694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gBZMt-0008M5-1j for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:55:11 -0400 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gBZMn-0001VY-Do; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:55:05 -0400 From: Mark H Weaver To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 01:54:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87bm7xul78.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 25307 thanks [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) close 25307 thanks From unknown Fri Aug 15 12:53:22 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator