GNU bug report logs -
#25307
bug report with guile-2.0.13
Previous Next
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 25307 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 25307 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25307
; Package
guile
.
(Sat, 31 Dec 2016 06:44:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"Oppe, Thomas C ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor" <Thomas.C.Oppe <at> erdc.dren.mil>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 31 Dec 2016 06:44:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Dear Sir:
On the "make check" step for guile-2.0.13, I get an error message as given below:
Running list.test
Running load.test
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
160: 12 [catch #t #<catch-closure 244d4a0> ...]
In unknown file:
?: 11 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 244d4a0>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
66: 10 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
432: 9 [eval # #]
432: 8 [eval # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
771: 7 [for-each #<procedure 265a9c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:416:20 (a)> #]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
481: 6 [lp (#<fluid 23>) (("load.test"))]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2404: 5 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 3c6a0c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
4056: 4 [#<procedure 3c6a0c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:4051:3 ()>]
1727: 3 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
1732: 2 [#<procedure 3f75cf0 ()>]
In unknown file:
?: 1 [primitive-load "/u/work/oppe/guile-2.0.13/test-suite/tests/load.test"]
?: 0 [mkdir "/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13/load-test.dir" #<undefined>]
ERROR: In procedure mkdir:
ERROR: In procedure mkdir: File exists
FAIL: check-guile
==================================
1 of 1 test failed
Please report to bug-guile <at> gnu.org
==================================
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13'
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13'
make: *** [check] Error 2
Also, on a separate issue, when I configure with the command
./configure --prefix=${install_dir} --enable-shared --enable-static
It complains that it can't find libtool:
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
checking for libltdl... no
configure: error: GNU libltdl (Libtool) not found, see README.
The "config.log" file says
configure:46273: checking for libltdl
configure:46295: gcc -o conftest -I/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/include -I/usr/include -L/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib64 -L/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib conftest.c /u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib/libltdl.so /usr/lib/libdl.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/u/home/oppe/gcc/6-20161229/lib -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib >&5
/usr/lib/libdl.so: error adding symbols: File in wrong format
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
configure:46295: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "GNU Guile"
I can get around this problem with the following configure command:
./configure --prefix=${install_dir} --enable-shared --enable-static --without-libltdl-prefix
But is there a better solution?
Some background:
> uname -a
Linux muutill-0002.mhpcc.hpc.mil 2.6.32-642.11.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 26 10:25:23 EDT 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I am running the "make check" step of the GCC 6.3.1 compiler test suite, which requires "autogen" which in turn requires "guile". Would "guile-ncurses-2.1" plus "ncurses-6.0" be a valid substitute for "guile-2.0.13" in this context? This is a GCC 6.3.1 snapshot of 12/29/2016.
Thank you for any information.
Tom Oppe
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25307
; Package
guile
.
(Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:23:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 25307 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
"Oppe, Thomas C ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor"
<Thomas.C.Oppe <at> erdc.dren.mil> skribis:
> On the "make check" step for guile-2.0.13, I get an error message as given below:
>
>
>
> Running list.test
>
> Running load.test
>
> Backtrace:
[...]
> In unknown file:
>
> ?: 1 [primitive-load "/u/work/oppe/guile-2.0.13/test-suite/tests/load.test"]
>
> ?: 0 [mkdir "/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13/load-test.dir" #<undefined>]
>
>
>
> ERROR: In procedure mkdir:
>
> ERROR: In procedure mkdir: File exists
>
> FAIL: check-guile
Could it be that there was a stale “load-test.dir” directory in your
build tree?
Could you try, from the top-level build tree:
rm -rf load-test.dir && make check
Thanks in advance, and sorry for the delay.
Ludo’.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Request was from
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:23:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guile <at> gnu.org
:
bug#25307
; Package
guile
.
(Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:13:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #13 received at 25307 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sun 12 Feb 2017 22:21, ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> In unknown file:
>>
>> ?: 1 [primitive-load "/u/work/oppe/guile-2.0.13/test-suite/tests/load.test"]
>>
>> ?: 0 [mkdir "/u/US_SCRATCH4/oppe/guile-2.0.13/load-test.dir" #<undefined>]
>>
>>
>>
>> ERROR: In procedure mkdir:
>>
>> ERROR: In procedure mkdir: File exists
>>
>> FAIL: check-guile
>
> Could it be that there was a stale “load-test.dir” directory in your
> build tree?
>
> Could you try, from the top-level build tree:
>
> rm -rf load-test.dir && make check
>
> Thanks in advance, and sorry for the delay.
Another question would be, is it possible this "make test" was running
on NFS? Could be we don't do the right thing there (or NFS doesn't do
the right thing).
Andy
bug closed, send any further explanations to
25307 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and "Oppe, Thomas C ERDC-RDE-ITL-MS Contractor" <Thomas.C.Oppe <at> erdc.dren.mil>
Request was from
Mark H Weaver <mhw <at> netris.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 14 Oct 2018 05:56:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 11 Nov 2018 12:24:04 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 274 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.