GNU bug report logs - #2530
23/NS: redraws according to mouse-face are slow

Previous Next

Full log

Message #99 received at 2530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Christian Kruse <cjk <at> defunct.ch>
Cc: 2530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ahyatt <at> gmail.com, david.reitter <at> gmail.com,
 cyd <at> stupidchicken.com, ian <at> digg.com, emacs-devel <at> gnu.org,
 adrian.b.robert <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#2530: 23/NS: redraws according to mouse-face are slow
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:38:29 +0200

> From: Christian Kruse <cjk <at> defunct.ch>
> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:39:20 +0100
> Cc: 2530 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>,
> 	Adrian Robert <adrian.b.robert <at> gmail.com>,
> 	Ian Eure <ian <at> digg.com>, Emacs-Devel devel <emacs-devel <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Compared to Linux (the Linux hardware is slower, a Notebook from 2011
> and the OS X notebook is a Macbook Pro Retina from 2014), the OS X
> version is *pretty* slow. While everything I do with Emacs is nearly
> instant when using Linux there is a notably delay when using Emacs with
> OS X.

That's normal: GNU/Linux is significantly more efficient than other
modern OSes.  Nothing related to Emacs, really.

> The worst example is Magit, which I already profiled because it is
> *so* slow: when using Linux `magit-status` shows up instantly. It takes
> about 1.5 seconds when using OS X (hold it, I am aware that this is not
> the place to discuss Magit performance, it is just an example :-) Every
> buffer with lots of lines (e.g. a notmuch buffer with 26k mails, my
> archive of the pg-hackers list) is lightning fast when using Linux, but
> takes round about 30 seconds when using OS X.

Sounds like you describe a situation that is file I/O extensive.  If
so, again, there's little wonder you see much faster operation on
GNU/Linux.  If you'd say the same about comparison with MS-Windows,
say, then it would be something worth investigating.

> Although I’m not sure that it is only the rendering engine (of course it
> could also be the elisp interpreter being slower) it occurs to me that
> it plays its part: especially redraw actions seem to be very slow. For
> example mu4e is unbearable slow when displaying maildirs with a lot of
> mails (e.g. the 26k mails maildir I mentioned above) but works fine for
> small mailboxes; and while the content of the maildir is loading, the
> buffer is flickering all the time as if it gets redrawn all the time.

The flickering you describe can only be triggered by
platform-independent parts of the display engine, so again, this isn't
OS X or NS specific, AFAIU.

Emacs comes with a trace-redisplay command (compiled only if you
configure Emacs --enable-testing='yes,glyphs'), so if someone wants to
test the hypothesis that such flickering is specific to NS, they could
run the same scenario on OS X and on another system, after invoking
trace-redisplay, and compare the outputs.  I'd expect them to be
identical (except for the addresses it prints).

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.