GNU bug report logs -
#25247
26.0.50; Concurrency crashes
Previous Next
Reported by: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:21:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed
Found in version 26.0.50
Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #50 received at 25247 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Elias MÃ¥rtenson <lokedhs <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:30:05 +0800
> Cc: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>, raeburn <at> raeburn.org, 25247 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>
> The C-g issue is still gone.
>
> As for the concurrency issues. I have been hammering this thing pretty
> hard, and no crashes so far.
Thanks, this is good news.
> I open IELM in one window, and an empty buffer "z" in another, and type the
> following:
>
> (loop
> repeat 10
> do (make-thread (lambda ()
> (let ((n (random 10)))
> (with-current-buffer "z"
> (sleep-for n)
> (insert (format "Foo:%d\n" n)))))))
>
> Here, I'd expect to see the "z" buffer being updated at the corresponding
> times. I.e. the message "Foo:4" should be displayed after 4 seconds. This
> is not what I see. Instead the messages appear in batches (i.e. several
> rows appearing at the same time).
And what do the messages that appear together say in the %d part? Do
they all show the same value?
> The following seems to be a problem with lexically bound lambda functions
> used in a thread. The following example illustrates the problem:
>
> (let ((x "test"))
> (make-thread (lambda ()
> (with-current-buffer "z"
> (insert x)))))
>
> I would expect this to insert "test" into the buffer, but instead nothing
> happens. Removing the reference to the variable "x" in the lambda makes it
> work.
Isn't the above expected? If not, why not?
And what do you mean by "removing the reference"?
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 137 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.