GNU bug report logs - #25228
25.1; GNU emacs 25.1: custom-set-faces from init file ~/.emacs ignored

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: werner <at> suse.de, rostislav.svoboda <at> gmail.com, 25228 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#25228: 25.1; GNU emacs 25.1: custom-set-faces from init file ~/.emacs ignored
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:39:14 +0200

> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:18:03 +0100
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
> CC: werner <at> suse.de, 25228 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rostislav.svoboda <at> gmail.com
> 
>  > So all this disaster happens because 96.281588447653434 compares not
>  > equal to 96, is that right?
> 
> Here ;-)
> 
> That's why I wanted Werner to counter-check.  And there was the original
> author of this issue - Rostislav Svoboda.  IIRC I tried to contact him
> once but he did not respond, anyway let's try again.

Thanks.

>  > Would the problem be solved, both for you
>  > and for Werner, if we compare these values after rounding them to the
>  > nearest integer?  It looks to me that xsettings.c reads the new value
>  > as an integer to begin with, so it makes no sense to compare
>  > fractional values.  And AFAIK about DPI (which is very little, and
>  > nothing about Gsettings and Xft), the DPI values are always integers.
> 
> Nothing guarantees that such a silly discrepancy does not show up
> somehwere else.

I'm not sure I understand what discrepancy you had in mind.  Can you
elaborate?

> But I certainly won't mind using this as workaround for Emacs 25.2.

If it works, sure.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.