From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 15 10:33:20 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2016 15:33:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43013 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHY23-0005p0-Id for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53611) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHY21-0005om-0e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHY1q-0000e5-K8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:11 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:51394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHY1q-0000e1-HT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHY1m-00088i-E0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHY1j-0000b6-8v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:33:02 -0500 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:54402) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHY1i-0000aI-V6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:32:59 -0500 Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5E07A107B62; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:32:56 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1481815976; bh=8fVHGyMGcsMkoxTr7Og6KTkHoGW9rvOTn25doofdLBI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=E8cxg55fKdMEZYALte/hzR3xA0tPx6IrJ1XP762X5NV5IZbKeknPhH+HJtJQYiUfA sneF1PqxvAzAR41/zEjhUgEwGmtuaWg24GIB1H5l3yXBxTr6V7d6CjKkRtiw925OSQ P2cnK8RdOiDcvFoFcqfcwS7jq+JJjUSfexts/Dd4= Received: from www.openmailbox.org (unknown [10.91.130.51]) by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197AE107B62 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:32:48 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:32:48 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo Message-ID: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> X-Sender: felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Steps to reproduce =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button Unexpected behavior =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution. Expected behavior =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The description shows the logotype of the Guix package manager. Additional information =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Source files for Guix and GuixSD logos are available in the artwork=20 repository (see https://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=3Dguix). --=20 Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 15 14:26:35 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2016 19:26:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43229 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHbfm-0004kl-Sw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:26:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43331) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHbfk-0004kW-VC for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:26:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHbfa-0005Iy-RR for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:26:27 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHbfa-0005IJ-Nt; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:26:22 -0500 Received: from smb-adpcdg1-04.hotspot.hub-one.net ([213.174.99.132]:34264 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cHbfD-0002Q9-UG; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:26:20 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo In-Reply-To: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2016 10:32:48 -0500") Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 25 Frimaire an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Hello Felipe! Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: > Steps to reproduce > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html > 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button > > > Unexpected behavior > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution. The list of GNU package logos is maintained separately, in the =E2=80=9CGNU womb=E2=80=9D project at . So in general such reports should go to bug-womb@gnu.org. However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly superseded by the other one. I=E2=80=99ve come to the conclusion that it= =E2=80=99s confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway. :-) WDYT? Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 15 15:47:44 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2016 20:47:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHcwJ-0006e5-V7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:47:44 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:47918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHcwI-0006dy-Q4 for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:47:43 -0500 Received: from oolong (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7C2267F6; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:47:40 -0500 (EST) References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1 From: Christopher Allan Webber To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo In-reply-to: <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:47:40 -0600 Message-ID: <87vaukvs0j.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo , 25205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Felipe! > > Luis Felipe López Acevedo skribis: > >> Steps to reproduce >> ================== >> >> 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html >> 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button >> >> >> Unexpected behavior >> =================== >> >> The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution. > > The list of GNU package logos is maintained separately, in the “GNU > womb” project at . So in > general such reports should go to bug-womb@gnu.org. > > However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly > superseded by the other one. I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s > confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway. > :-) > > WDYT? I strongly support this. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 15 16:13:13 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2016 21:13:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43288 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHdKz-0007Ds-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:13:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHdKx-0007Dg-M6 for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:13:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHdKr-0001EC-HV for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:13:06 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58399) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHdKo-00018f-J2; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:13:02 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e35:2ec2:e580:4a5d:60ff:fe57:52cd] (port=56168 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cHdKn-0000Y1-T1; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:13:02 -0500 From: Mathieu Lirzin To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:12:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:27:23 +0100") Message-ID: <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo , 25205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Hi, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: > >> Steps to reproduce >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> 1. Go to https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/g.html >> 2. Locate a guix package, and click on the "Expand" button >> >> >> Unexpected behavior >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> The description shows the logotype of the Guix System Distribution. > > The list of GNU package logos is maintained separately, in the =E2=80=9CG= NU > womb=E2=80=9D project at . So in > general such reports should go to bug-womb@gnu.org. > > However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly > superseded by the other one. I=E2=80=99ve come to the conclusion that it= =E2=80=99s > confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway. > :-) As long as Guix and GuixSD are not synonymous, I would argue that mixing the two logos increases confusion, whether it looks pretty or not. Especially since the logos include their name. If the choice of using GuixSD logo when designing Guix is about esthetics, maybe we could use the same symbol for both logos. Maybe with a slightly different color that would help distinguish them? What do people think? --=20 Mathieu Lirzin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 16 02:01:06 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2016 07:01:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHmVt-0004HO-Bo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 02:01:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:36766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHmVs-0004Gm-08 for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 02:01:04 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f65.google.com with SMTP id a1so1720401pgf.3 for <25205@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:01:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=SYLuNDPiJDfNfmggTBpmnysbshQ/FeqbNsMuGtCZ1rY=; b=PzKxaB0hHAFCUIDCjJgyoriYbwIaX4Mdrnn9GhW/6lqCkmRZITaZ1WbyFyPvd8i06K bQxTurTzx33BJGPYRbzHZdfVTpEeD/bBE6W/TVj2KPNIFJ52ll4TG6czpfeDcSfpqiuP vMOEgXcJFyybwkv5cCddrOZ5xyNXCGJp6TUS4eGNxwUpkSo4sAWZrSUJ9MgEX9/5Ms68 C/kK1OEZSXwZdXdlC/MtuHHQOjuIT0mAMTvtSszdcfOJq9QNEmkmI3kqxTiwVjqqp4j5 pAZ4CbTR8NvLQdEUYtNNMMlf0vGEM1C0H/CxSgRurxRJh/DMtVgpemVsTB8Rzj9m9jL4 zOSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=SYLuNDPiJDfNfmggTBpmnysbshQ/FeqbNsMuGtCZ1rY=; b=rzslC/n8MloJ7sCmtSK821jBur1z/LKEzH7uVAoe4xNnGiyLy2ZRa7bmtGB0dvF35P fd+7ogADKhHq8UCQitMSJCKsVyQVvtdum4fJUn6mNAYY8kp9CGY2xoL8pVzF48a+5dN+ R+0Xl6Jn8BZ/7gtzD4QlZkSaC95BvFjbgSSYMaGk2JDs10lPiNseDsSGmoNteeLrGlTx M5xAwAT2O0lrcoqCxQgEc0MmWKOgm8blQVwdgW9+7CbAh5ng66tKLVmn/8Mkb4x4Vp0i LRBcThzz5bjPfwCqnb5aw4zvzUevYwPMlR6+FH8vyMyPf+Er2J+o12Ryr0JbBODaGV/6 GbMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02TH7ORq3Eo6ihbAtx9l2MFHV5K91JTmsHiq52MiHGfbVHkLyEEVS8XZNYLMSUxog== X-Received: by 10.99.39.132 with SMTP id n126mr2915982pgn.85.1481871657886; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from garuda ([2601:602:9d02:4725:4e0f:6eff:fef6:70b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13sm9016416pfz.30.2016.12.15.23.00.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:00:57 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Marusich To: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:00:52 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2016 22:12:58 +0100") Message-ID: <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 25205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mathieu Lirzin writes: >> However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly >> superseded by the other one. I=E2=80=99ve come to the conclusion that i= t=E2=80=99s >> confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway. >> :-) > > As long as Guix and GuixSD are not synonymous, I would argue that mixing > the two logos increases confusion, whether it looks pretty or not. > Especially since the logos include their name. > > > What do people think? Please understand that this is just my own opinion. I think branding matters. And I think using one icon for the "Guix" and "GuixSD" logos is better branding than two very different-looking icons. Having two icons does not make the difference clearer. If anything, I feel that it is MORE confusing because it fails to emphasize the common component: Guix. Consider Nix. They use only one icon [1] on the websites for Nix [2] and NixOS [3]. When you see it, you know the brand is Nix. Nix and NixOS are closely related to one another, so it's natural to share the icon. What's the difference? A logo won't tell you; you need to read the manual to learn that. But you know it's Nix, regardless of how it's being used. I think GNU Guix should use one logo to strengthen its branding. The golden GNU [4] is better than the other one [5], so that's what I'd use. > If the choice of using GuixSD logo when designing Guix is about > esthetics, maybe we could use the same symbol for both logos. Maybe > with a slightly different color that would help distinguish them? Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't think they need to come in a different color. I do like the off-color "SD" in the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix. [1] https://nixos.org/logo/nixos-logo-only-hires.png [2] https://nixos.org/nix/ [3] https://nixos.org/ [4] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/plain/logo/GuixS= D.svg [5] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/plain/logo/guix-= logo.svg =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlhTkSUACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp3iYA//T/WNtZetfTEjh37C805bOXpOgV+NT1BaJTaoVjk8729xRT41SppnIbkl VHf4osnEa5vqlZrBTj76sRScufHbD1KuLEemTgklBzEj5AeNEpYelA/W+cH16bOZ WKQigmPOyL4VSXI+8aqa8e9HJOVWt80xRYgzW45A0eUEn2KBimqoIwIfNBAwJU0Y np5z54TU8eD545tDwcpmtbk0CXafhVBdhU5j75swI4AHLk2TEHhXqAhu/2v03N1x +mSZPj1JI2e/qHQGzlJOpA0awGOrv+YXz3hGPrXcSDmCE2iBIud7nTB58wt1nI1v SEYFsI0p5TQkh3BSf14FalCRdV41dSCenBkWGOUX0gfoICg+9hGkDtciQqRMf7BI e96dKlwVO1+R0w8suF92dgQSEdTAkPFoh5PGsoNaJZ+YBIO+CvmGcZDV2x9oBl0S oej7S4HG2ExhwUq2AfwbKuKZHQzWW5cUeeMtYgbX0WEt3d2TnUO8/ZqhRW0FPYYp Xtx8KdtyH6YImpa5fOKE6peZGLBxLzBlFDQSdoTHBX7ypPQHwu8vysFsv0sUFE1s cW/d0IiseRtGZ6gBtRT+YUUODGxgPZ/T3OnXE3rzpsrB7gbcbtzTMI+bK0+hefU+ VNnVD4/dtgM0n/qUmkmSVXdzeYJFUkIUYfZL8icEzjQK8vzzSkk= =F91u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 16 04:48:35 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2016 09:48:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43595 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHp7y-00082i-Rp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:48:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58625) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHp7w-00082V-Va for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:48:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHp7q-0006J4-OV for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:48:27 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHp7k-0006BJ-1B; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:48:20 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e35:2ec2:e580:4a5d:60ff:fe57:52cd] (port=55236 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cHp7j-0007HD-77; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 04:48:19 -0500 From: Mathieu Lirzin To: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:48:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:00:52 -0800") Message-ID: <874m24mcgw.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 25205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Hi Chris, Chris Marusich writes: > Mathieu Lirzin writes: > >>> However, I would argue that the original Guix logotype is mostly >>> superseded by the other one. I=E2=80=99ve come to the conclusion that = it=E2=80=99s >>> confusion to have two logos, and that the GuixSD one is cute anyway. >>> :-) >> >> As long as Guix and GuixSD are not synonymous, I would argue that mixing >> the two logos increases confusion, whether it looks pretty or not. >> Especially since the logos include their name. >> >> >> What do people think? > > Please understand that this is just my own opinion. > > I think branding matters. And I think using one icon for the "Guix" and > "GuixSD" logos is better branding than two very different-looking icons. > Having two icons does not make the difference clearer. If anything, I > feel that it is MORE confusing because it fails to emphasize the common > component: Guix. I would not say that having different icons is confusing, however I agree that having one icon can help to visually see how they relate to each other. > Consider Nix. They use only one icon [1] on the websites for Nix [2] > and NixOS [3]. When you see it, you know the brand is Nix. Nix and > NixOS are closely related to one another, so it's natural to share the > icon. What's the difference? A logo won't tell you; you need to read > the manual to learn that. But you know it's Nix, regardless of how it's > being used. > > I think GNU Guix should use one logo to strengthen its branding. The > golden GNU [4] is better than the other one [5], so that's what I'd use. > >> If the choice of using GuixSD logo when designing Guix is about >> esthetics, maybe we could use the same symbol for both logos. Maybe >> with a slightly different color that would help distinguish them? > > Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't think > they need to come in a different color. I do like the off-color "SD" in > the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix. That would definetely match what the Nix project is doing. While IMO Nix is not necessarily a model to follow, this would definitely be better than what is currently done for Guix/GuixSD "branding". Thanks, --=20 Mathieu Lirzin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 16 05:28:55 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2016 10:28:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHpl1-0000VX-CA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:28:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40405) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHpl0-0000VI-3m for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:28:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHpku-0004aC-7l for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:28:48 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41220) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHpko-0004Ok-Vl; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:28:43 -0500 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:58712 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cHpko-0001vp-8b; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:28:42 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 26 Frimaire an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:28:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:00:52 -0800") Message-ID: <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo , Mathieu Lirzin , 25205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Hi! Chris Marusich skribis: > Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't think > they need to come in a different color. I do like the off-color "SD" in > the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix. Right. I thought that having =E2=80=9CSD=E2=80=9D in light gray kind of ma= kes the logo usable for both Guix{,SD}. (And I agree with the branding argument.) I=E2=80=99d like to know what Felipe thinks of this since he=E2=80=99s the = expert. :-) Cheers, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 16 10:56:52 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2016 15:56:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHusO-0002D8-NP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:56:52 -0500 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:53016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHusL-0002Cw-W8 for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:56:50 -0500 Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E95941063C6; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:56:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1481903808; bh=XN6FDrCD52RqhsFei1ufBQF7Y5aEhBqMCKTVUDFZCFI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ah3xRfJ/hoSyZoQPSOmB1chsaYZvMPmOW6mDIEuCTqxWJJbQoASq86BXk9XiU2llm sbtLrAVoH/dFwIQI5HdGOYBRmhAZmYpYpyQAwNC8GxilhO2u1ityGbO/OVWSEPM35P 4DXOMHXUNOEJSLmYh3dBqdeSLHDinhXReEIvwaYI= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on h3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from www.openmailbox.org (unknown [10.91.130.55]) by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DA7107F25; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:56:37 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:56:37 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= To: ludo@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo In-Reply-To: <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> X-Sender: felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Lirzin , Chris Marusich X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) On 2016-12-16 05:28, ludo@gnu.org wrote: > Hi! > > Chris Marusich skribis: > >> Since the words "Guix" and "GuixSD" are already different, I don't >> think >> they need to come in a different color. I do like the off-color "SD" >> in >> the "GuixSD" logo, though, since it emphasizes that it's still Guix. > > Right. I thought that having “SD” in light gray kind of makes the logo > usable for both Guix{,SD}. > > (And I agree with the branding argument.) > > I’d like to know what Felipe thinks of this since he’s the expert. :-) Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but not the same text. For example: ~v~ Guix ~v~ GuixSD If this is OK, then I think we should: - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo. - Send a copy to GNU womb for update. - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/ - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/ - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ I can do the above, so yes? :) -- Luis Felipe López Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 16 11:08:40 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2016 16:08:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHv3n-0002Vz-QH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:08:39 -0500 Received: from sinope.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.23]:47362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHv3m-0002Vq-1m for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:08:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sinope.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A2DBA10B; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:08:36 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mdc-berlin.de; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :message-id:date:date:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from :user-agent:references:received:received:received; s=mdc; t= 1481904510; x=1483718911; bh=YTz7Ut/iV2/RznlzcLK3JwUxC7IAATsKwWr PiD248UQ=; b=c+byozPmhIu5E/UEajiXQ11SJMbJh1O8R1eLmt/ClYEPXwLXaGP CBqL0US8nFGMOGAL43xpu8r4LFITebk8xp4+8ng8YNZ3A5EhFcenC/aCo8x3jkpA YszIxZb9q6Wo9RfumQYSwxHCqt3ZHVRih8V2exlQbfjmsA2XvhHdu8u0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mdc-berlin.de Received: from sinope.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sinope.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xs2ewggldCTr; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:08:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (puck.citx.mdc-berlin.de [141.80.36.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sinope.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:08:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (141.80.180.135) by HTCAONE.mdc-berlin.net (141.80.180.125) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:08:28 +0100 References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo In-Reply-To: <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:08:28 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [141.80.180.135] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4283-8.000.1202-22766.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.871400-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-MatchedID: 150567-823681-703731-139010-701298-702358-710611-704421-7 00852-705235-703786-702143-139705-708196-106580-701005-187113-700274-148004 -148133-20025-41000-42000-42003 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Luis Felipe López Acevedo writes: > Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. > I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but > not the same text. For example: > > ~v~ Guix > ~v~ GuixSD > > If this is OK, then I think we should: > > - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo. > - Send a copy to GNU womb for update. > - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/ > - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/ > - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ > > I can do the above, so yes? :) This sounds good. Thank you! ~~ Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 16 16:37:57 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2016 21:37:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cI0CT-0005YJ-HT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:37:57 -0500 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:40526) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cI0CR-0005YA-4y for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:37:56 -0500 Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 39E57105234; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:37:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1481924274; bh=Y6n0oH+zO0L8JiBRb6H5JKshsw43pyW/IfdNx0nzQJw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MCsAGjpBsehMLfqOCjCAaPDiqA3ahjfMXRx6UPgHGCwa16nXM8kIZ4Osdtwyf1k9H sWMwqemDRg7rmJnR9S1O9MhSGHFK3VYj8rz+ciB8Ocs/zyfXL4PkZLZvARpD0nT5Gc DYOgUBRiuJKbRBlH2g4p1U3EGeU9kixv/YJYNOP0= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on h4 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from www.openmailbox.org (unknown [10.91.130.51]) by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCF5105234; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 22:37:43 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:37:43 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo In-Reply-To: References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <9d2611b2b37f63fbaaae8b8f798ec268@openmailbox.org> X-Sender: felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) On 2016-12-16 11:08, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Luis Felipe López Acevedo writes: > >> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as >> well. >> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, >> but >> not the same text. For example: >> >> ~v~ Guix >> ~v~ GuixSD >> >> If this is OK, then I think we should: >> >> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo. >> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update. >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ >> >> I can do the above, so yes? :) > > This sounds good. Thank you! Ok, I made the changes in the artwork repository, which will be visible for users in the next deployment of the website. Next, I'll contact GNU womb to update the logo over there. -- Luis Felipe López Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 17 09:46:01 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2016 14:46:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44840 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIGFN-0006h5-GH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:46:01 -0500 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:37203) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIGFL-0006gr-Iw for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:46:00 -0500 Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2F80B108CAA; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 15:45:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1481985957; bh=FtLz8FYm3d/cYECV4chWIlkJL3Fkp7Iw/DnjElaXwvM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rBFgRmLdIQrTX+7TGtxXsTJpKNXYLZC7ExxbJl9FYOJEK6rBTR1zIbwILPHTmoZ4b RfxZIUdRrH3AuHeHAu93jNlex/56d7N+QoYp9KfuMe1vHDMCbf2fWXAyc2TiECHfFQ HgR9NzgT9cRBH/N2oo/u+yum7WlRRGBKBpc3pu1s= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on h4 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from www.openmailbox.org (unknown [10.91.130.51]) by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2B41088AD; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 15:45:47 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:45:47 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo In-Reply-To: References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> Message-ID: <8ff5df09b6ff111a590281ed11448b23@openmailbox.org> X-Sender: felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) Luis Felipe López Acevedo writes: > > Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. > I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but > not the same text. For example: > > ~v~ Guix > ~v~ GuixSD > > If this is OK, then I think we should: > > - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo. > - Send a copy to GNU womb for update. > - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/ > - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/ > - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ These tasks are done, and changes are online now. The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU womb links to the new image (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html). -- Luis Felipe López Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 17 12:09:35 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2016 17:09:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45125 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIIUJ-0001cA-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:09:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52653) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIIUG-0001bv-Pv for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:09:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIIUA-00037g-Dg for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:09:27 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIIUA-00037c-AW; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:09:26 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e35:2ec2:e580:4a5d:60ff:fe57:52cd] (port=56086 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cIIU9-00010F-Kd; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 12:09:25 -0500 From: Mathieu Lirzin To: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> <8ff5df09b6ff111a590281ed11448b23@openmailbox.org> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:09:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8ff5df09b6ff111a590281ed11448b23@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:45:47 -0500") Message-ID: <87d1gqjxdp.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo writes: > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo writes: >> >> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. >> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but >> not the same text. For example: >> >> ~v~ Guix >> ~v~ GuixSD >> >> If this is OK, then I think we should: >> >> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo. >> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update. >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ > > These tasks are done, and changes are online now. > > The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU > womb links to the new image > (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html). Thanks! Amazing work as always. :) --=20 Mathieu Lirzin GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761 070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 17 13:50:05 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2016 18:50:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIK3Z-0003vw-8K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:50:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIK3Y-0003vJ-4r for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:50:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIK3O-0003oI-73 for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:49:58 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIK3O-0003oE-37; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:49:54 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:49058 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cIK3N-0004jC-Ek; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:49:53 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> <8ff5df09b6ff111a590281ed11448b23@openmailbox.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 27 Frimaire an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 19:49:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8ff5df09b6ff111a590281ed11448b23@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:45:47 -0500") Message-ID: <87zijuqtkg.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo writes: >> >> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. >> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but >> not the same text. For example: >> >> ~v~ Guix >> ~v~ GuixSD >> >> If this is OK, then I think we should: >> >> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo. >> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update. >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ > > These tasks are done, and changes are online now. > > The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU > womb links to the new image > (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html). Great, thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 17 16:05:42 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2016 21:05:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45216 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIMAo-0007GC-Lx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 16:05:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:32810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIMAl-0007Fz-GK for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 16:05:40 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f67.google.com with SMTP id g1so1876951pgn.0 for <25205@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:05:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=WTL7fxYgww6euKfYC+rk0VpE7mWAlxZAFc3ILCFAYJI=; b=vVYAbiQDMRtl9CRJonXiXt//+AXR00H1C1aCl4qyD1rR4mcCHvNwUOfYfE8Oq8VpST 7OhzY5b3ngFh0AsDJLeD3lg4CiUiZPMSxeFOFVMhpvxW46Io6Pbt5MhaGkC3qc0KTNDQ Jq7in3cVSt5ud5a6OraxhV7ermflJDRHuM1QQRi7dTH+0xeiz1I/evWdM8sIrHdxiUnw Qb6u6uuQN6V3D0wLFzAFlLzGtYpJUPTIw6TrOVdk3kDvoH2+8q6u0TF2rzvAaePogkBk bUa41EnWuMQmsdn+c0h3eJSO4x1l0lL6JU34vpY3RfJDOizkONlvcVMoeBHXp03pw6lE qd1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=WTL7fxYgww6euKfYC+rk0VpE7mWAlxZAFc3ILCFAYJI=; b=kHhH2vGd5qDIMMEbXbA6K9j7by2nV0g5anca+LYhCJ6o1V2plGtYzs21SJclKdJ9T5 HahEL72nfSmtxo2HPJj4W2Bh9KAL5L0M25AgLmp3xs0OKOBO8+Jxb+OWHkFdV8bLTQhD Uv5vcVdrR8lZ9RhcOWjYZBeW/pXCk+7LBtFdTZgVAMYWCg1BIxmDnKl+CbuvuuGnXM8W KEfBkdHEdOZbwkC3HxpsH2T+09zVB2U+ClfKjQGHP2e7kLjQbELG+i+1W83PS70f0Bi7 oYkDsmyM4iP1an08ObPHItiHQcSSRdhj3qnd83lx77UYHAlC1k5NyjyF4jKtLuDhduM3 SnsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01q6N48r+iMYZk4ZkEWIhUlQ6Lokcw08QR2mm3umtrZzgeCOiVuI8K5LkR3ucOHNA== X-Received: by 10.99.253.85 with SMTP id m21mr17113998pgj.38.1482008733888; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from garuda ([2601:602:9d02:4725:4e0f:6eff:fef6:70b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w125sm20866589pfb.8.2016.12.17.13.05.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:05:33 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Marusich To: Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> <8ff5df09b6ff111a590281ed11448b23@openmailbox.org> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 13:05:29 -0800 In-Reply-To: <8ff5df09b6ff111a590281ed11448b23@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:45:47 -0500") Message-ID: <87d1gq6zc6.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo writes: > Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo writes: >> >> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. >> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but >> not the same text. For example: >> >> ~v~ Guix >> ~v~ GuixSD >> >> If this is OK, then I think we should: >> >> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo. >> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update. >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ > > These tasks are done, and changes are online now. > > The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU > womb links to the new image > (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html). Looks great! Does the guix-artwork repository contain the "horizontal" version that is currently published on the website? I couldn't find it. I've also noticed that the Wikipedia article is still using the other logo. I attempted to update it, but because I don't have an account, I wasn't able to replace the SVG file with the new one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guix I don't suppose someone on this thread can fix the Wikipedia article? If not, I'll try again once the 10-day "autoconfirm" period of restricted access for new Wikipedia accounts passes. FWIW, there also appears to be a copy of the logo in Wikimedia commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guix-logo.svg I tried to update this one, too, but the Wikimedia uploader rejected the SVG files as "corrupt". =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlhVqJoACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp1MjQ//TSkzkEtrOqUdpRW1JV/RvsqhMJv4cB1ckPtFDag5zmoJ/RLFynzq9JKd 5K4AfQY7mS5XOwYz3+lUx2vons57+HMCe6dkBMxX5UGAUmi7GR19tdulVhvlLdpB yFClO8scDMdJzy9eJQxxL/SwptklweSzyN4ElF01DqK2VurNuaHX966xUHsMQsCL 9111sT5GP+ZWQpGHO8H5YUvMka2tDWwE31Kgr+X9GQ/phRl7u68/3QwDgW3ldnMk gZGUKPSNLg5bF0CanSz6N4ehJtTnhpuVnoTt44vfnqaaTvuTDitlSfDUWfRPHWNl g5FCK+l7CZ2HDTdUrCVY5fj4KFLC+dNJJVhiMUbnNyd4tG23Nw21gVBYq4/1RaX6 xbbqLKLvznw2YZgMQJ2w5TK+AGZ2aoDwT609Nd89MY+FFBRfadgNmAXLPRX1EbWP 8e1OOxf7t5EgXmfqZByI2JG3QNDaxOHDbJYfHfpc2CVB5ZUUON7hbibXnfyO9w7H aqtnkHbeAnXYecUM+TexyYY7uQbOMZwDJh8ON/eJhjX49gk/+oMPqJPn3e2sSgwz sSgxrGwzXHFJTr32xwgrftH6tx/ncscOx05chfl2utK9Nkiaf89i0BHBaG1c0Fmm yXh4xG4GcsZfvQSlvviVbW8juyygKaRuD8T9aLVn7SguePoP9Wo= =EZyW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 17 21:15:05 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2016 02:15:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45301 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIR0D-0007ir-51 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:15:05 -0500 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:40067) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cIR0A-0007iO-Pn for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:15:03 -0500 Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 98AB5107C38; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 03:15:01 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1482027301; bh=8IaZzRy/OszowGlt2YpV/DFW+ct49UqAdXiViGtNQ4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZLzlHkd0x7WtXeRDp+dHjWkzi5EFXTEnTGdNH6J9MXCGN8jGSt+5CfsfqLSkfsZj6 4H4xMIi+gAJFR3C0aY8UYtSiHY5zGyl/MlNz8XRKsFbLDBxIk8j1txKsQPN8JRQ+p6 Yk/VpivKgEYxsgBv4DBbq1KBC9g71q6d5vZg8214= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on h3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from www.openmailbox.org (unknown [10.91.130.55]) by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EF7107C38; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 03:14:51 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 21:14:51 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= To: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo In-Reply-To: <87d1gq6zc6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <87wpf1ayro.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg187v6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgvgtl23.fsf@gmail.com> <87k2b0417r.fsf@gnu.org> <2ab325910c3ea6cb7e619b795fff850d@openmailbox.org> <8ff5df09b6ff111a590281ed11448b23@openmailbox.org> <87d1gq6zc6.fsf@gmail.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) On 2016-12-17 16:05, Chris Marusich wrote: [...] > Looks great! Does the guix-artwork repository contain the "horizontal" > version that is currently published on the website? I couldn't find > it. Yes, the SVG file for each logo has variants (horizontal, light, dark, etc.). In Inkscape, you can select a variant and export it. > I've also noticed that the Wikipedia article is still using the other > logo. I attempted to update it, but because I don't have an account, I > wasn't able to replace the SVG file with the new one. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guix > > I don't suppose someone on this thread can fix the Wikipedia article? > If not, I'll try again once the 10-day "autoconfirm" period of > restricted access for new Wikipedia accounts passes. I have an account and could update Guix article, but I won't have time until next Thursday (maybe). > FWIW, there also appears to be a copy of the logo in Wikimedia commons: > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guix-logo.svg > > I tried to update this one, too, but the Wikimedia uploader rejected > the > SVG files as "corrupt". The current SVGs from the artwork repository were rejected as corrupt? -- Luis Felipe López Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 21 19:42:23 2016 Received: (at 25205-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2016 00:42:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50725 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJrSh-0005Iq-Or for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:42:23 -0500 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:43642) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJrSf-0005Ig-6m for 25205-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:42:21 -0500 Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F1C9E104220; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 01:42:19 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org; s=openmailbox; t=1482367339; bh=HoIUsXft8qctFNvKuf8kxzUicDm7G5p8H1j2+ianqdA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=kmlu7DakQmZkPHS3K9tZh8upSa+Cg5RZwRupyZBWbPD8iZOKUlhv+n7SgcJpMcWvF x7ylbbMqUJyDIA3EaV3MAaSFlK5XwrqHd8DBCrVr972XXePI0vQ02DO1PdlNlNNtr9 yO+B8ZeuaSqBOUdqrmt2mRVeonQHoZuI/Dl0duXw= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on h3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from www.openmailbox.org (unknown [10.91.130.55]) by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B178104220 for <25205-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 01:42:14 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:42:14 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Luis_Felipe_L=C3=B3pez_Acevedo?= To: 25205-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo Message-ID: X-Sender: felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) GNU womb updated the image. This bug is fixed. -- Luis Felipe López Acevedo http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 22 12:11:08 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2016 17:11:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51780 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cK6tX-0001Vw-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:11:08 -0500 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:51081) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cJy89-0000V8-7E for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 02:49:38 -0500 Received: from mfilter36-d.gandi.net (mfilter36-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.167]) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351F841C080 for <25205@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:49:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter36-d.gandi.net Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.197]) by mfilter36-d.gandi.net (mfilter36-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id alMYc7bvQivh for <25205@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:49:34 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 91.177.24.2 Received: from [192.168.1.24] (unknown [91.177.24.2]) (Authenticated sender: me@tobias.gr) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2387341C084 for <25205@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:49:33 +0100 (CET) To: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Guix Wikipedia page logo updated Message-ID: <4c9cde01-2dcf-597f-4516-94bd9e1cc484@tobias.gr> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:49:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jeS1BnVhnaWJDpPfJNF2U9IhHfiiCPWtT" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:11:06 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jeS1BnVhnaWJDpPfJNF2U9IhHfiiCPWtT Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="4uc6L6IWHu3NcNQ1gRrTxxedwrmffLOeQ"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <4c9cde01-2dcf-597f-4516-94bd9e1cc484@tobias.gr> Subject: Guix Wikipedia page logo updated --4uc6L6IWHu3NcNQ1gRrTxxedwrmffLOeQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guix, [First debbugs post, let's hope this works.] I've updated the Guix Wikipedia page to use the new =E2=80=98unified=E2=80= =99 logo. Since Wikimedia rejects our SVG, I had to resort to copy-pasting the original image in Inkscape and saving it as a new file. It wasn't pretty, but the new logo sure is. Kind regards, T G-R --4uc6L6IWHu3NcNQ1gRrTxxedwrmffLOeQ-- --jeS1BnVhnaWJDpPfJNF2U9IhHfiiCPWtT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEqBAEBCgAUBQJYW4WVDRxtZUB0b2JpYXMuZ3IACgkQkczbm0hUG5kzrwgAxDSI g6U+KxBNTbMLxRe541n3GG+xb1Nvd0lGcnQuT4kt4B/ewi93361c0abvGjzRYr5N 3zL9oSKlqw2tmn7nrGle6/bN3FnmPuXfjIyMgessDZz8w3eMb9rfCqeKu3fEvyNX Z4iSHSpL7XGJ2lA7c80P5D0v4mEBtuhrQb2AaQ57fnaE3FxlSRBjSLJVew1lT5Wy pODqbHX1So35KMSkSfNoaqaLY+6DXIrNhvR7uH0TPHeS/vH25cdoqM16tiE9NoHQ weZKvZXXTToptMPv1aLRE6ioUG/9Dew0kuhRkjouT9jRpVYHpLR8dYoUp2lwgDVf RKTadR1oZMrz0YImgg== =jaH6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jeS1BnVhnaWJDpPfJNF2U9IhHfiiCPWtT-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 29 12:30:48 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2016 17:30:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cMeXQ-0007xx-GY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:30:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47641) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cMeXP-0007xj-5o for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:30:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMeXJ-0001OK-4G for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:30:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMeXB-0001LG-Fu; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:30:33 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:48922 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cMeXA-0001kL-N9; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:30:33 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix package is using the GuixSD logo instead of the Guix logo References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:30:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:42:14 -0500") Message-ID: <87bmvuhcco.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo skribis: > GNU womb updated the image. Thanks for taking care of this! Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 29 12:42:55 2016 Received: (at 25205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2016 17:42:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cMej8-0008Gh-1I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:42:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49358) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cMej5-0008GS-Te for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:42:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMeiv-0004Wu-Py for 25205@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:42:46 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMeiv-0004Wq-MR; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:42:41 -0500 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:48936 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cMeiv-0001mB-7f; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:42:41 -0500 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: bug#25205: Guix Wikipedia page logo updated References: <001ff235e0edbcb0f5a6fa69356555c9@openmailbox.org> <4c9cde01-2dcf-597f-4516-94bd9e1cc484@tobias.gr> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 9 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 225 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:42:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4c9cde01-2dcf-597f-4516-94bd9e1cc484@tobias.gr> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:49:40 +0100") Message-ID: <87pokafx80.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25205 Cc: 25205@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.2 (--------) Hi! Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > [First debbugs post, let's hope this works.] It does! :-) > I've updated the Guix Wikipedia page to use the new =E2=80=98unified=E2= =80=99 logo. Great, thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Jun 20 18:20:04 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator