GNU bug report logs -
#25198
bug: assertion (metadata_length > 0) failed
Previous Next
Reported by: Rauno Viskus <rviskus <at> gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 23:31:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Phil Susi <psusi <at> ubuntu.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
Running
parted -l
crashes with
Backtrace has 15 calls on stack:
15: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x44) [0x7f58e0393644]
14: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x20b26) [0x7f58e03a6b26]
13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x120aa) [0x7f58e03980aa]
12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_add_partition+0x263)
[0x7f58e03989a3]
11: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x20405) [0x7f58e03a6405]
10: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x204a0) [0x7f58e03a64a0]
9: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x204a0) [0x7f58e03a64a0]
8: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x2043f) [0x7f58e03a643f]
7: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x21555) [0x7f58e03a7555]
6: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_new+0x48)
[0x7f58e03985c8]
5: parted() [0x407769]
4: parted() [0x4069cf]
3: parted(main+0x11b2) [0x405f82]
2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)
[0x7f58dfb88b45]
1: parted() [0x405fc7]
You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:
Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:
Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
Please check this version prior to bug reporting.
If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted
for further information.
Your report should contain the version of this release (3.2)
along with the error message below, the output of
parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
and the following history of commands you entered.
Also include any additional information about your setup you
consider important.
Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in
function add_logical_part_metadata() failed.
As much as I found searching aroud mentioned about partitions needing at
least a sector in between eachother for metadata - is that it? Weird thing
is that everything worked before I removed my Windows partition from the
gap in between sda1 and sda3.
Output of fdisk -l:
Disk /dev/sda: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x9a232254
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 3074047 3072000 1.5G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 397805566 485435391 87629826 41.8G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 397805568 436865023 39059456 18.6G 83 Linux
/dev/sda6 436867072 466163711 29296640 14G 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 466163712 485435391 19271680 9.2G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
BR,
Rauno
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 31 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.