GNU bug report logs - #25193
[PATCH] Improve the doc of re-search-forward and re-search-backward.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net>

Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 03:21:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, patch

Merged with 19948

Found in version 24.4

Fixed in version 25.2

Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #17 received at 25193 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: eliz <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>, npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Cc: Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net>, 25193 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#25193: [PATCH] Improve the doc of re-search-forward and
 	re-search-backward.
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 09:21:16 +0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
-------- הודעה מקורית --------מאת: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com> תאריך: 2.4.2017  07:57  (GMT+02:00) אל: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net עותק: 25193 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>, Hong Xu <hong <at> topbug.net> נושא: bug#25193: [PATCH] Improve the doc of re-search-forward and
 	re-search-backward. 
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017, npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net wrote:

>> Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com> 
>> :D
>>
>> But if all of `re-search-backword', re-search-forward',
>> `search-backward', would say "see doc string of `search-forward'" I
>> think it would be okay.
>OK for me if it's just 1 jump, but i slightly prefer self-contained
>docstrings.  Don't know what Eli or John might >think about it.


One hop is fine with me, thanks.



[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 98 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.