From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:05:55 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25175: flyspell-mode: stay off of C-c . best Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: manuel.serrano@sophia.inria.fr, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 25175 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 25175@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: manuel serrano X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs X-Debbugs-Original-Xcc: manuel serrano Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.148148568528101 (code B ref -1); Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:49:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2016 19:48:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38438 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cGA6P-0007J6-6w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:48:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cGA6N-0007IW-PC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:48:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGA6H-00051u-Ru for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:47:58 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:57330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGA6H-00051o-OT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:47:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGA6G-0002ik-63 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:47:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGA6D-00050w-On for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:47:56 -0500 Received: from homie.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.208]:36021 helo=homiemail-a3.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGA6D-00050j-Ic for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 14:47:53 -0500 Received: from homiemail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91508284071 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:47:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= jidanni.org; bh=IhFUFq3AErgsch4FC7vTDLHNTyM=; b=eHAXeNwebRdlTEpv otVJmNQalX89WX/3R6+30rPeMi3yxioK6NSko8CfmCZS3MeartqTw6VC5aO2ksBO mXksNgF7t0xYxu1iAXLiOuYpaDaXk9xIU3hJllrIejNjyl/tAjJ+PyDt2v9tnir4 th+AqwIjsEWMhOwXl+SFmr4RcHA= Received: from jidanni.org (114-41-37-154.dynamic.hinet.net [114.41.37.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a3.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2801328406C for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 11:47:52 -0800 (PST) From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 02:23:28 +0800 Message-ID: <87bmwi9vfj.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.5 (----) X-Debbugs-cc: Manuel Serrano Here binding C-. is too dangerous, as it is too close to undo, C-/, and it will subtly change words not on the screen, far up in the document, with the only evidence being some choices in the modeline. Easy to overlook when doing a lot of undos and ones finger slips a little. Also well gosh if flyspell-use-meta-tab is already true by default, so isn't one key enough. Why do you have to bind two keys to the same thing? (defvar flyspell-mode-map (let ((map (make-sparse-keymap))) (if flyspell-use-meta-tab (define-key map "\M-\t" 'flyspell-auto-correct-word)) (define-key map flyspell-auto-correct-binding 'flyspell-auto-correct-previous-word) (define-key map [(control ?\,)] 'flyspell-goto-next-error) (define-key map [(control ?\.)] 'flyspell-auto-correct-word) (define-key map [?\C-c ?$] 'flyspell-correct-word-before-point) map) "Minor mode keymap for Flyspell mode--for the whole buffer.") OK in .emacs I will do (eval-after-load "flyspell-mode" '(progn ;too close to C-/ (undo) and already on ESC TAB: (define-key flyspell-mode-map [(control ?\.)] []))) Also we see ;; Some user variables control the behavior of flyspell. They are ;; those defined under the `User variables' comment. but below is ;;*---------------------------------------------------------------------*/ ;;* User configuration ... */ ;;*---------------------------------------------------------------------*/ not 'User variables'. So change one or the other. emacs-version "25.1.1". From unknown Sat Jun 21 05:05:55 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#25175: flyspell-mode: stay off of C-c . best Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25175 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: manuel serrano , 25175@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 25175-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25175.15710831854856 (code B ref 25175); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 20:00:03 +0000 Received: (at 25175) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2019 19:59:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41779 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6VN-0001GG-0D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:59:45 -0400 Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=38770 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6VL-0001G5-BM for 25175@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:59:43 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6VF-0003TI-Jw; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:59:40 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87bmwi9vfj.fsf@jidanni.org> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:59:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bmwi9vfj.fsf@jidanni.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Mon, 12 Dec 2016 02:23:28 +0800") Message-ID: <87mue3w11y.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson writes: > X-Debbugs-cc: Manuel Serrano > > Here binding C-. is too dangerous, as it is too close to undo, C-/, > and it will subtly change words not on the screen, far up in t [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson writes: > X-Debbugs-cc: Manuel Serrano > > Here binding C-. is too dangerous, as it is too close to undo, C-/, > and it will subtly change words not on the screen, far up in t [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: jidanni.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: > X-Debbugs-cc: Manuel Serrano > > Here binding C-. is too dangerous, as it is too close to undo, C-/, > and it will subtly change words not on the screen, far up in the document= , with the only > evidence being some choices in the modeline. Easy to overlook when doing > a lot of undos and ones finger slips a little. It changes the word at point, so I'm not sure what you mean by "not on the screen". Anyway, there haven't been many complaints about the key binding that I know of, so it doesn't seem to be a general problems, so I'm closing this bug report. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 14 15:59:49 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2019 19:59:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41782 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6VR-0001GZ-8i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:59:49 -0400 Received: from [80.91.231.51] (port=38786 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6VP-0001GP-PQ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:59:48 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iK6VM-0003Vd-V1 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:59:46 +0200 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:59:44 +0200 Message-Id: <87lftnw11r.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #25175 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 25175 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 25175 quit Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) close 25175 quit