From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 11 05:49:24 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2016 10:49:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cG1h5-0002Xn-PO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:49:23 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57591) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cG1h3-0002Xa-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:49:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG1gx-00083v-Ha for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:49:16 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:58309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG1gx-00083r-EI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:49:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG1gw-00087m-3o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:49:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG1gt-000837-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:49:14 -0500 Received: from mail-qt0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:34996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG1gs-0007vp-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:49:11 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id c47so53661726qtc.2 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 02:48:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=barzilay-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:date:to :subject; bh=bHbr7RQo7Av6vFEWAiexYTVUHrsQcSLxBhUaR7BNVxw=; b=UUFBwwv+A3j0GbdaCoey9Nd3w/jJwVXP1QsNUk3JjM1Q5J+oLkN0GWbc/BbHFyaX5j T/8ZiNclMqtuVS2BLoj9gEsWmMnX9DWDMXMdfGexFgLW9AsHau53CylyAX0mHWKo72xv 4BaVZwop0q7EZjPikKkw7AjXJgIvqCgXQcyzZoqPYGjc+D51sDs7iw9d1UOn6lXcy9Al vQ4H0pjF6ndvW/Aw3hqfmo/vAEgWI3kj5HGrDrQofyAmVMQmZd5VCf44PEXKliNMtgIb 3VrRxk7Q3KdELerOJ8mhQ7UzNiuChDOQGllydOlMYNroKYA/nQFBL5N3B1bmvxECOUzB gkYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:date:to:subject; bh=bHbr7RQo7Av6vFEWAiexYTVUHrsQcSLxBhUaR7BNVxw=; b=Z9ty/x4CJf7fYFqFaaOKw6I97lhW1swj4VxpBo0C5RKz1TCVMXqJWL4REUZpGwwTsx 8UYn6nvRtsTnbTX0yrbxZEnMY1A39PI+1k3EUqwLyyTDn5SWzetm7oXGHni58V96PfMW AFhM3FD9k3vYUBq1Ehvdq4qMLHL4K8Tno62b0tz0hlFgHqlqdyUAwH9uBTbChpUAyjCu 2p/NhqyotNTyfjkrStWo47KJJdZPWScvRQVNC6EVbdtP+NZovnVFbkltPtjXvhoa6bHI tWx2BvfE5Lvv8yAuiC6Jir7hlmsv6rPNGeWaOmZztX5JCnQHQkP5ZEqTBSRon63NkpFM c8Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01cN7AcYOgTl0I5vLLYB3bN2LmblehZpfeUSW9DTlN2cc+fB/4QO4PlV1mcfcZtBw== X-Received: by 10.200.55.69 with SMTP id p5mr88253750qtb.67.1481453268495; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 02:47:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from barzilay (c-73-149-112-115.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.149.112.115]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t124sm24035796qke.3.2016.12.11.02.47.47 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Dec 2016 02:47:48 -0800 (PST) From: Eli Barzilay MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <22605.11965.719480.82725@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:47:25 -0500 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.1; variable-pitch face misbehaves X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0a under 25.1.1 (x86_64-w64-mingw32) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) I'm using Emacs with a rather large default font. One thing that doesn't work well on Windows is variable-pitch face: it is much smaller than my usual font. Another way to see this without customizing the font: * run `info` * use `text-scale-adjust` to make the font larger * notice that variable-pitch headers stay at the same size I looked at the definition of the face and followed the linked discussion: indeed, when I try to reset the face to the same (using just :family "Sans Serif") I get a bold-italic version of Arial, and the best I could get was a larger version of plain Arial (using a similar string, with a larger number instead of a "*") that is similarly unaffected by size settings. -- ((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 11 10:35:13 2016 Received: (at 25168) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2016 15:35:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38267 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cG69h-0006Ln-K5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:35:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38523) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cG69g-0006Lb-IF for 25168@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:35:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG69W-0004r9-KE for 25168@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:35:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cG69W-0004r5-H0; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:35:02 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3055 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cG69V-0007ze-Rl; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 10:35:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:35:37 +0200 Message-Id: <83twaaeawm.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Eli Barzilay In-reply-to: <22605.11965.719480.82725@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (message from Eli Barzilay on Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:47:25 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#25168: 25.1; variable-pitch face misbehaves References: <22605.11965.719480.82725@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25168 Cc: 25168@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) > From: Eli Barzilay > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 05:47:25 -0500 > > I'm using Emacs with a rather large default font. One thing that > doesn't work well on Windows is variable-pitch face: it is much > smaller than my usual font. Another way to see this without > customizing the font: > > * run `info` > > * use `text-scale-adjust` to make the font larger > > * notice that variable-pitch headers stay at the same size Is this really related to variable-pitch fonts, or is this related to the fact that the face is defined with a height attribute relative to the default face? AFAIR, text-scale-adjust only affects the basic faces, not any arbitrary face defined by modes. But maybe I misremember. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 06 06:42:23 2021 Received: (at 25168) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 11:42:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45268 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Lyp-0006X0-L7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:42:23 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Lyo-0006Wm-3J for 25168@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:42:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zysRP2/szxs5HmBFkI6YNy96RacW5R9UqaYMLn/arAA=; b=df5nXqicwqg7knvvhrKCZuoocD Qii6mxm6PTBjIRow/egHFZqvjirp9WeiaXgvWOk5Vh3p9TabWU8IKOTU5LTgm+hqww0YIelqkAnfg 8uTLAlj/t+2gAaferZ34Lv5qIvKFFRJBmsZqAl2mctiZlQDor9mGwzBdfjS0DsGSBGV0=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8LyY-00057g-OO; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:42:15 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#25168: 25.1; variable-pitch face misbehaves References: <22605.11965.719480.82725@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <83twaaeawm.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Thomas Mery's _Hallonsaft_: "interlude01" Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:42:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83twaaeawm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:35:37 +0200") Message-ID: <87a6shctiq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Is this really related to variable-pitch fonts, or is this related to > the fact that the face is defined with a height attribute relative to > the default face? > > AFAIR, text-scale-adjust only af [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25168 Cc: Eli Barzilay , 25168@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Is this really related to variable-pitch fonts, or is this related to > the fact that the face is defined with a height attribute relative to > the default face? > > AFAIR, text-scale-adjust only affects the basic faces, not any > arbitrary face defined by modes. But maybe I misremember. Yup -- ---- Adjust the height of the default face by INC. ---- So it's not supposed to do anything for other faces, and I guess this is working as documented. So I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 06 06:42:29 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 11:42:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45271 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Lyu-0006XI-UC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:42:29 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Lys-0006Ws-RV for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 06:42:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dcxezUFX9JDsjJE/4cOXQEwUu/6qUMzgJj2yZNZ//ek=; b=Xj48BcQZuqzEjEtOmKiwh/fJDy KAKhNyRmQMkAhuQlq2OCXTLfTDvVqs2hXnLN02jk62dsd+frH6VBzco4daQOTIuYjpoAa92rtKb8J nVo6bN8j5DUGtX8DcdrgoZ2+klXIVwr2psOZ4Tsu6aaq3Cq+DitQNRJ5bD3/LPveGo2Y=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Lyl-00057v-81 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:42:21 +0100 Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:42:18 +0100 Message-Id: <878s81ctid.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #25168 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 25168 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 25168 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 06 07:22:37 2021 Received: (at 25168) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 12:22:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45367 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Mbl-0005Sb-7P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:22:37 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f48.google.com ([209.85.218.48]:46463) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Mbi-0005SN-QM for 25168@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:22:35 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f48.google.com with SMTP id w2so17078580ejk.13 for <25168@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 04:22:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=barzilay-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eajwmCUJsQFeSAaIPh5AStUbVwzv2PnkYGT/lgeg570=; b=f1qxGmPcgrO+uOhfC8ZiDUGehPuSrbYHBM9jfRBiv7UPbF4FCtILDpVkCCMG6N9EtJ HmxVabdpdKVcmhOS8+XvorTXydvET2dtHbclYnUSVPYlNHzxp1piRoS0dbyfaxrxaPSB E23j8XVChpNLRVdVDCw6o2KJjlDJM7NMa+akilw62S82UXKPgpOpEYBEUYxlIP6LGGGQ N/ee0LgFtEVB1XyXYsG4h1K2ge8LNkUmpgO8VS54Y3qdI1p/nZj9Oayl8jf4jdt/TK7A 7eb6AxUi/rvqO5E9K3sVvG/32GfXfMbKT2l7Tj1s4WDQeY87yGRI5bbRys+zfypyxQhO Cicw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eajwmCUJsQFeSAaIPh5AStUbVwzv2PnkYGT/lgeg570=; b=e6/S65JKh3dM3gsthCmo9+jWbIk1M14kHDspvXKrvux8y/zA2Q4Z1YkUPRJhFuOxLB OYIdZJTgfrp6tUAGR2BAvzPg8diaAuyW0WUMGUas1856RgbL7jMih8gP2JnTPe+b/hlG qR1XPoxZ3baZ3ApJ/HF5l4uVvZBOYdVtaK/gOorHImpQrN59RD4iW/ACPGrb5sUNn3n1 v2H6FWJbToMYQmVIhnfQBbi11x0JyUcwNzgq3sPz5JM9gfaxqm0fmCBAoTODlgxe4sUH YAZCivMgsuQLb1k0MmPqOyOYqfBTU1krOpLsoosfaNUXOx6J9pkZvbXmB1NaiW9IKmP1 XjJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RTN8lXG8AEUVZ8zZoxdNgo+s/wpqyjYH/pl+U1s/77ojIeyKP 8GfBzeJejtzDHAwJM4oV2FSaUB+HkPYgYI34jBQZtA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPvZKC9ytmjlqY92rSKdbniLmbOzIbr+K8+TKLKe+IVFFVzPZkgQ58yBw/b8+CbQV5+6XzndzAn6WgGbi5cV0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9401:: with SMTP id q1mr8854356ejx.516.1612614148878; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 04:22:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <22605.11965.719480.82725@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <83twaaeawm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6shctiq.fsf@gnus.org> In-Reply-To: <87a6shctiq.fsf@gnus.org> From: Eli Barzilay Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:22:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25168: 25.1; variable-pitch face misbehaves To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25168 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 25168@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) It would be nice to clarify that in the `text-scale-adjust` docstring. To be more specific, it currently repeats: the default face height many times, and this can be interpreted as "the default (face height)" or "the (default face) height". Worse, for people who don't know that there's an actual face called default, "Adjust the height of the default face" is just as confusing. On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 6:42 AM Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Is this really related to variable-pitch fonts, or is this related to > > the fact that the face is defined with a height attribute relative to > > the default face? > > > > AFAIR, text-scale-adjust only affects the basic faces, not any > > arbitrary face defined by modes. But maybe I misremember. > > Yup -- > > ---- > Adjust the height of the default face by INC. > ---- > > So it's not supposed to do anything for other faces, and I guess this is > working as documented. So I'm closing this bug report. > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no -- ((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 06 07:33:29 2021 Received: (at 25168) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 12:33:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8MmH-0007rp-K5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:33:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8MmG-0007ra-A6 for 25168@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:33:29 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38407) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8MmA-0000yZ-SZ; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:33:22 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4131 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l8Mm7-0003ON-Gh; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 07:33:20 -0500 Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2021 14:33:27 +0200 Message-Id: <83o8gxnzoo.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Eli Barzilay In-Reply-To: (message from Eli Barzilay on Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:22:41 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#25168: 25.1; variable-pitch face misbehaves References: <22605.11965.719480.82725@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <83twaaeawm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6shctiq.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25168 Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 25168@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > From: Eli Barzilay > Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:22:41 -0500 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 25168@debbugs.gnu.org > > It would be nice to clarify that in the `text-scale-adjust` docstring. > To be more specific, it currently repeats: > > the default face height > > many times, and this can be interpreted as "the default (face height)" > or "the (default face) height". Worse, for people who don't know that > there's an actual face called default, "Adjust the height of the default > face" is just as confusing. I made it say "adjust the height of the default face" because I think it should be clear (or at least more clear than the original wording). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 06 13:50:48 2021 Received: (at 25168) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2021 18:50:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46427 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8SfQ-0004NB-40 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 13:50:48 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:44613) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8SfO-0004Mx-63 for 25168@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 13:50:46 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f53.google.com with SMTP id w1so18231810ejf.11 for <25168@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 10:50:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=barzilay-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=otax9yIubzPkdPdgoJK3a0WMmDwD+c3cuvLpR3jM7fI=; b=IgMOlGYh96vUpsjmvoGwc1YkTyEdw9ogs7cJp3AL9v5Z/LMCrAmrUai2AtRD2atnDr ToU5XjuR1H4The0daxsCAk3os4t5FlyucEmy2QFolHdnwWjRHBoE+sIS9MCrFDIK1jO6 D2pY7d9ZAuqEfrQH9PzT2EqSMLvV2V0qcs1EjlKTvPZKWR2NYn+31Ki8Fq5z6hWLYvrW vJzQXHAaIPdrE2x3ji4iliNZwLTI93oJ59GC95GNvvNW51BTqy49qHy4acRECWbe1WK0 6LF6BuU8BuOtW52qHO4PF5v/Oz1sr0LQjGHwlQQ4krhd61tpIETPrrJ60WkQP7P2aXEk gZ4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=otax9yIubzPkdPdgoJK3a0WMmDwD+c3cuvLpR3jM7fI=; b=pTTgJFpXzxxS5K2QxS+s3Us8PKseywFk1IPbiXfJy0sfPMry5WJByXgLcNcK9ZZpwD P+WbHVIFAWngkG3sYBZ1GyZ6bQXikK6/9sIxrp+v0pOfc8pRgLGQksE2fF24fs80u5vK pI+9NzGt1BI241lSoXhtU57AOJWwXFN0xy/7kmLxVxDptY6z7HLYU95/Z5UC5KftTDvt cXx2notiIbe6fcuoAr4/cuj9TILapqCB8shlT011esRC48bEypaVixLfX0mPJDlYHW7h WRdx4jcXRl9r8aXh28MF/cqYJodRaPNy2KZu6YMxSUTCFTQEsGcZVQ9IU81Y8LE+KkFW RkPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531r4lXszkBghV6tV3JVI4OH7e9S9zDfeYnMlJMXMBQSZ0x6reIo 0qPLOUw1BXfVV+eZHwpW52ODWkcfEk8eQblPGwjHJQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwY4vvnRFWPuIl0zqsthNsMeXCTt6hp/Lv5c5fTkCOym/pi0YX/Ny/27FnjRq/jQBxcLLjbg6Ep04T42b8ZetE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2bce:: with SMTP id n14mr3061602ejg.171.1612637440212; Sat, 06 Feb 2021 10:50:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <22605.11965.719480.82725@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <83twaaeawm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6shctiq.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8gxnzoo.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83o8gxnzoo.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Barzilay Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 13:50:53 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25168: 25.1; variable-pitch face misbehaves To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25168 Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 25168@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) That's much better, thanks! -- It would be nice to add some comment somewhere that not all faces inherit from it (but I can't figure out a short way of saying that). On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 7:33 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Eli Barzilay > > Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 07:22:41 -0500 > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 25168@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > It would be nice to clarify that in the `text-scale-adjust` docstring. > > To be more specific, it currently repeats: > > > > the default face height > > > > many times, and this can be interpreted as "the default (face height)" > > or "the (default face) height". Worse, for people who don't know that > > there's an actual face called default, "Adjust the height of the default > > face" is just as confusing. > > I made it say "adjust the height of the default face" because I think > it should be clear (or at least more clear than the original wording). -- ((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! From unknown Tue Aug 19 04:06:38 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator