GNU bug report logs - #25154
25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 23:55:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: notabug

Found in version 25.1

Done: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
To: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 25154 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>, Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:01:55 +0900 (JST)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Philipp Stephani wrote:

> 
> 
> Tino Calancha <tino.calancha <at> gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 10. Dez. 2016 um 08:45 Uhr:
>       Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>       Right, the order of evaluation in a let is up to the implementation.  A program
>       should not rely on such details.
>       The same statement should apply to cl-letf.
Sorry, i meant above
the order of 'assign the bindings' is up to the implementation.

> I think that should be mentioned explicitly in the manuals: given that the order of value evaluations is specified, people might
> expect the same for the bindings themselves.
Yes, it's worth to remark than in the manual.
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 150 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.