Subject: bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:53:05 +0200

> From: Philipp Stephani <[email-masked]>
> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 12:17:54 +0000
> Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
> 
>  I agree, patches to that effect are welcome. (AFAICT, the manual
>  tries to say that already, but the wording could be more explicit.)
> 
> OK, I've attached a patch that hopefully clarifies this a bit. 

Thanks.  My only comment is that I think we prefer talking about
"binding" instead of "assignment".