Subject: Re: bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order

From: Tino Calancha <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 23:01:55 +0900 (JST)

On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Philipp Stephani wrote:

> 
> 
> Tino Calancha <[email-masked]> schrieb am Sa., 10. Dez. 2016 um 08:45 Uhr:
>       Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
>
>       Right, the order of evaluation in a let is up to the implementation.  A program
>       should not rely on such details.
>       The same statement should apply to cl-letf.
Sorry, i meant above
the order of 'assign the bindings' is up to the implementation.

> I think that should be mentioned explicitly in the manuals: given that the order of value evaluations is specified, people might
> expect the same for the bindings themselves.
Yes, it's worth to remark than in the manual.