Subject: Re: bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 09:22:15 +0200

> From: Alex <[email-masked]>
> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:36:15 -0600
> 
> Compare the following:
> 
> (let ((x 5)
>       (x 6))
>   (+ x 10))
> 
> => 16
> 
> (cl-letf ((x 5)
>           (x 6))
>   (+ x 10))
> 
> => 15

Isn't it true that the order of evaluation in a 'let' is unspecified?
If you want a particular order, use 'let*'.