Subject: Re: bug#25129: 26.0.50; seq-some function

From: Nicolas Petton <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:31:30 +0100

Tino Calancha <[email-masked]> writes:

> The first line with the repetition of 'non-nil' sounds a little poetic.
> How about?
>   Return non-nil if PRED is satisfied for at least one element of SEQUENCE.
>    If so, return the first non-nil value returned by PRED.

Is poetic bad? ;-)

I'll apply your version, so I'm closing this issue.

Cheers,
Nico