From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:12:46 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#25084 <25084@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#25084 <25084@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc Reply-To: bug#25084 <25084@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:12:46 +0000 retitle 25084 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc reassign 25084 emacs submitter 25084 Glenn Morris severity 25084 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 01 14:51:51 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2016 19:51:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXOY-0000hz-VX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:51:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36781) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXOX-0000hm-Ft for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:51:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXOR-0005cx-O5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:51:44 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXOR-0005cs-LQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:51:43 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXOR-000891-81; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:51:43 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:51:43 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) Package: emacs Version: 25.1.90 In the 25.1.90 tarball, files.el is newer than files.elc. This ought to be impossible, if the tarfile was created from a bootstrap. It causes building to recompile files.el, which is harmless but should not be needed in a release. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 01 14:54:50 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2016 19:54:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49101 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXRS-0000mi-BE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:54:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37952) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXRR-0000mX-Q4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:54:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXRM-0007G0-5I for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:54:44 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXRM-0007Ft-2g for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:54:44 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXRL-0008TY-Pl for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:54:43 -0500 Subject: control message for bug 21966 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:54:43 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) block 21966 by 25084 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 02 02:04:49 2016 Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2016 07:04:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cChtp-0002mP-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 02:04:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40523) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cChtn-0002mD-Ll for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 02:04:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cChte-0007ca-Mg for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 02:04:42 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cChte-0007cW-Jh for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 02:04:38 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1149 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cChtc-0006kB-W1; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 02:04:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 09:04:46 +0200 Message-Id: <83vav2olpt.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Glenn Morris In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:51:43 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25084 Cc: 25084@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:51:43 -0500 > > In the 25.1.90 tarball, files.el is newer than files.elc. > This ought to be impossible, if the tarfile was created from a bootstrap. Indeed, and there were a couple of other files with the same issue. mule-cmds.el is one other, and also the ELisp manual was rebuilt because one of its source files was newer. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 02 08:20:27 2016 Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2016 13:20:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnlL-0004zk-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:20:27 -0500 Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:41839) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCnlK-0004zX-5n for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 08:20:26 -0500 From: Nicolas Petton To: Glenn Morris , 25084@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:20:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1480684820; bh=XyxFE+M9spr3iJF2Ft8YRuv4hiTcgPQEXAJU1CRhnVA=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0h2chi/VvH+zOFd8phOEXZuyTZqReBNp9H3LJT/ZZ9sZPdyoL7gQl+h5ygTsNlajlG7pHkLeTcmaugx6xfU24qcjWVszWfcqfgZ63tXC2+hpXJTu58VanDw0wL4hB3pTkLMYC+nNPdBqCZPWnnP6/GWplPgw4yYYuOBo25iFfsQ= X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25084 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Glenn Morris writes: Hi Glenn, > In the 25.1.90 tarball, files.el is newer than files.elc. > This ought to be impossible, if the tarfile was created from a > bootstrap. It was, but I might have pulled a commit after bootstrapping (Eli mentioned that reason to me, and while I don't remember doing that, it has to be the case). > It causes building to recompile files.el, which is harmless but should > not be needed in a release. Indeed. I'll keep this bug report open until the next pretest. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEbBAEBCAAGBQJYQXUSAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQzoEH93DCgAWQNokfQU5GZ1B+/qP5 zc51s4WLe3vEXRzFS6pmlDpQ21VqKZgX2BZKC0P3NZr5fgUOKYN3yuHKQx95cprf p63fvsx3b1InKEkqJUlr15BoU0NcctJ3ImDBSC4p3xXgSLH7uBHN53XZ+XUnt2eM 50RhPTihWprnQx27e/D41JGN6G4WyVQvyST1N5rgbywjipMqiIJiXJMjjhzSMej5 SiRAM0iIUQB+s1/i4ES+eWzGAvTCAToCi9IJE28HN4FNM7e2YbGcVRyBB+vo/Fri trGsXtPf0t4O0Kupq4RZK4LFivCKSNOa5WLEihLLGmv2Ddye1dJYcOFr7kSmwA== =CsW/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 07 10:46:39 2016 Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 15:46:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQZ-00009b-5z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:46:39 -0500 Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk ([185.116.214.213]:51701) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQX-00009P-Go for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:46:38 -0500 Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7EBC4DBC for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:46:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mycpanelcloud.co.uk Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D35AC4C0F for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:46:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com (unknown [31.216.48.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D0BFC47BD for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:46:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dxx49uFZQ3wWT1Lsy3oQNN8L5opmtOCnzTm3ZzN3Z7c=; b=WWgoANEAQUw4BFNimFXsDl6ji ALpeOwBX8tZ0LVgN0+iQdc4edQNaJFawmVyPXImK7zjVduRQ1VLpeASVg9WP2kNk/0qaVdeTeW6mh MxXTlmH5WOQwdcpbihEHmNWUxUxqieWldURXmxvzimBAmIyW0x7avXjJmcsCKXealqY3O0HDoatvl UQwHeO7nPQwPICKYco/1fb+INoezIP9do4DSsxzM19IsvhQ1UmdEYe8BsBfawnhyQRIPP0g/PrPOL LGZLCHjQ1ivxW4SmDQ2hC3x5NZoH0Q0Fp7BrS4S2Oidxt4kE+yKXHvYVqzGeSfk4wQH8bbQ8PBqtm 8w9xGeItA==; Received: from cpc2-benw10-2-0-cust42.gate.cable.virginm.net ([77.103.60.43]:58250 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeQN-0018rb-Dg; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:46:27 +0000 From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) To: Nicolas Petton Subject: Re: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc References: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:46:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:20:18 +0100") Message-ID: <878trrhhdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25084 Cc: Glenn Morris , 25084@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Nicolas Petton writes: > Glenn Morris writes: > > Hi Glenn, > >> In the 25.1.90 tarball, files.el is newer than files.elc. >> This ought to be impossible, if the tarfile was created from a >> bootstrap. > > It was, but I might have pulled a commit after bootstrapping (Eli > mentioned that reason to me, and while I don't remember doing that, it > has to be the case). > >> It causes building to recompile files.el, which is harmless but should >> not be needed in a release. > > Indeed. I'll keep this bug report open until the next pretest. Can we add something to the build that checks this before the tar step? Phil From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 07 13:02:30 2016 Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 18:02:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59524 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEgY2-000055-Lt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:02:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56204) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEgY0-00004q-UU for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:02:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEgXv-0003fZ-4M for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:02:23 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEgX4-0003SV-4n; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:01:30 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cEgX1-0002cH-DJ; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:01:27 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Subject: Re: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc References: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> <878trrhhdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> X-Spook: SSL Suspicious substance terrorism Tijuana Fortezza X-Ran: Cf06+hUPf:Y=\1S>@7BBxwbN$/}v&>c?3NvpzwR'k3\%a{?.x@Y{e1[F0rb (Phillip Lord's message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2016 15:46:24 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25084 Cc: Nicolas Petton , 25084@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) Phillip Lord wrote: > Can we add something to the build that checks this before the tar step? I think "make-dist" should get a check for this (for each .elc. check it is newer than the .el, probably also for .info and .texi), which --snapshot should run by default. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 07 19:15:41 2016 Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2016 00:15:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEmNB-0007xM-67 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:15:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43286) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEmNA-0007xB-MV for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:15:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEmN4-0002N5-Ot for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:15:35 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59331) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEmMG-00027V-Oq; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:14:44 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cEmMF-00039d-Vk; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:14:44 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Subject: Re: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc References: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> <878trrhhdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> X-Spook: Screening Lon Horiuchi BLU-97 A/B password ICE World X-Ran: 6RLjk}&J%,:v_S><,+3q(Ue1p=vY*(D=d^yNiv2|ndMGdP4MAa_7QUdY3eoJdl@C{s?Md4 X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:14:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:01:27 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25084 Cc: 25084@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas Petton X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) Glenn Morris wrote: > I think "make-dist" should get a check for this (for each .elc. check it > is newer than the .el, probably also for .info and .texi), > which --snapshot should run by default. Done in 129645a. (Necessarily on emacs-25 to benefit next pretest.) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 09 12:58:34 2016 Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2016 17:58:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36240 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFPRJ-0003r7-QN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:58:33 -0500 Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk ([185.116.214.205]:33485) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFPRI-0003qU-Ji for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 12:58:33 -0500 Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0279C418D for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:18:57 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mycpanelcloud.co.uk Received: from mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C71C40B2 for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:18:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com (unknown [31.216.48.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgw.mycpanelcloud.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B05C4068 for <25084@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:18:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Qj1gOClwpW2I5j+jVovyq3x2GzNfvA3ji9w9pMhLh/o=; b=YYuloZzXmw3YKhf2Q5WlI7STY a2tq76GGNFWFB8goQOBYOb+M8XfrwMsgNJwYzEJp7vBRW2nPS4BFdsau4//mSsQ/7IgdF1QZphbSS HL2mKmtYBzPmAystXVNkoyk8/0scPunQy/v8G/QCN/58Sv/CxmFcqTjCoEvokofalFHwFbDU5sTQl TOyXNRwwGtQUIghrqHU0nEBjDywBeNBwDAzw3NYEbk062LU5mveVtwsEqFLocLtY62aZDbp+M7VGB uQig3xvZuf+DoqeBFelEy8rRCKRs81mmgAhAj9FITu39UQ0s1zoZPRr66YBTZTdepMhPyrZUHspVa LtklWRx+w==; Received: from janus-nat-128-240-225-37.ncl.ac.uk ([128.240.225.37]:59917 helo=russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cFOpF-0008Gn-Gi; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:19:13 +0000 From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc References: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> <878trrhhdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 17:19:13 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2016 19:14:43 -0500") Message-ID: <87lgvpkoku.fsf@russet.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25084 Cc: 25084@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas Petton X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Glenn Morris writes: > Glenn Morris wrote: > >> I think "make-dist" should get a check for this (for each .elc. check it >> is newer than the .el, probably also for .info and .texi), >> which --snapshot should run by default. > > Done in 129645a. (Necessarily on emacs-25 to benefit next pretest.) Thanks! From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 09 20:12:02 2016 Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2016 01:12:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36429 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFWCo-0005iC-CC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:12:02 -0500 Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:43201) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFWCl-0005hg-Fg for 25084@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:12:00 -0500 From: Nicolas Petton To: Glenn Morris , Phillip Lord Subject: Re: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc In-Reply-To: References: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> <878trrhhdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 02:11:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8c4twoa.fsf@petton.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1481332312; bh=HEPm/w5M0jEvY5FnRgkA7qQNQgFXgWn6evqlxAMW9IM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hHLdRy+pNKYnrhsWkWc2hCSL7wKMqQR4H028+67Ab5htTwbMEGWejvkrAf6UzESoK8e61RrZtReeVRkg2U4CqxOIbvq8AGYZkCMKPw4f4X1xW8zLSZwOJ2gFTJXIEuZ06TFN3ciu0c3cGCZfhemqDKLkLdQd6xEIAcRHUO1xBRI= X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25084 Cc: 25084@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Glenn Morris writes: > Done in 129645a. (Necessarily on emacs-25 to benefit next pretest.) Thank you! Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYS1ZVAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQiXUH/1pYjftNgAflut3wYdZT0Y1s UncnX9es04Ac6kPeAQcTLQtXa/lVL9I5gu7LoiLrCpyBwUOuegCbTwi0z9fqr4FV 1eEmyN+bflNoxWz8WMjHjN/GdsCEiTg2+sxbrHB/LdxGOl6V3SMPWlrw1rnFk+Bu euxxIO4jaWHbMxJPnkqVCYQQOZPxWQN/iOwTBXwOSrWKf9ima6j2RMnMbnZ3VgBm hWGjVhb7pRzCDtv9wx7PZsU5FW27dcsTfRCDxfBvNMSpAEi4IIBXezi7Kz/qwBQI xKo1MLR6nxOosdonI9LQMfo7OEQrgiEVIGOGlX/GpJLpfcA5LU2sJXzpMXQeGss= =nlVY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 30 18:12:53 2016 Received: (at 25084) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2016 23:12:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cN6M1-0006vV-CL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:12:53 -0500 Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:42882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cN6Lz-0006vC-94; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:12:51 -0500 From: Nicolas Petton To: Glenn Morris , Phillip Lord Subject: Re: bug#25084: 25.1.90 tarfile has files.el newer than files.elc In-Reply-To: References: <87polamprh.fsf@petton.fr> <878trrhhdb.fsf@russet.org.uk> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 00:12:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87r34p2eqf.fsf@petton.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1483139564; bh=+UM5d7OGaXG1h+6UglYW9kXiyJ1uVAq4aRfoS+trpwc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TTOgIOn3zxdRQrQrNKC08n/3QRTRZ8goTa3d45yUVrRx+4LqiK3yjbuviQ3NB55S0a5aK/9+RadfSiUEsYQZbLBubIzrBT6pov/441Ypd2MlQSsSgepgtesh80Wa/c5IKJ25AXKJ8xtMtzmlr4oUgIOkfnh7WnZZaZp/1cMxbaw= X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25084 Cc: 25084@debbugs.gnu.org, 25084-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Glenn Morris writes: > Glenn Morris wrote: > >> I think "make-dist" should get a check for this (for each .elc. check it >> is newer than the .el, probably also for .info and .texi), >> which --snapshot should run by default. > > Done in 129645a. (Necessarily on emacs-25 to benefit next pretest.) Now that the new pretest is out, I'm closing this issue. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYZunoAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQZ6QIAJf1r4k7iwh3hx2gLuyOZb7a 2r2/gVQKOSnbF397/AngM/5N8eXrrZpZw4K7Mb/fv4BwdDvYr+KQXnYyEcvYcNGw 4Eq+FCL0n2GP9xCgYIj/x9S76PZW7NDzX/np7gdX++R155pjdRwlUYf7mOfbH3ug Mpk9vCKs7CXx+akaweOgK4NBI9w3udTO/iFa47ZF0rBNk1aKqqb97wChRSKG8xcc vwghzWLL15HSAr/8ZIM7mUIo3PYvVc0PxQpzo6I6kUiZuBJ88X0hlqq8WRECd6Rn 5x//fFMafhrujlnmUTu7zIpTXDAKrpft5L3DWWH/ta4wFm5QkAVTJzteVArRlkc= =RD6W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:12:46 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator