From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Nov 30 21:00:16 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2016 02:00:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47934 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCGfY-0002f9-0v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:00:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34777) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCGfV-0002ew-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:00:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCGfP-0006C3-Qb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:00:08 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCGfP-0006Bj-ND for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:00:07 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53981) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCGfO-0007Um-Nd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:00:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCGfO-000697-3t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:00:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]:35711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCGfN-00068S-TV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:00:06 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id i88so42388079pfk.2 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:00:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=70dzCZYJlffkm2fyilFh89Mtjr19DKK75C0H6QuflUM=; b=GxdcxKDNEbVeHuVH5B2pL8pfa1S/iwYuj+upVgnArSpMd+GPIu+7HZ3H7se7pM7lud eCd37WjODBSc39ls02iwnZWgVc+57tdgs+70YEc7yNyDlCMpxg7JiqCTWGdwt/s5oREC QaoQxBVsla7UTVoJJ3Ae8ZTPMQ5BsGzgiAWjU1mI3ihPPiH7yHFPBZ/kQ36RdZm0uI0+ iXG7DrShHZfEWzeeTs77onmEjLHvaM+KKXvu1d4s/mQMeBbavDrCHx7YbGiDugbQ5T/B l6Rncj78aSWKUUH1eH6NjOmvPDc7njCFmymuoH7TDbKmUaAT/02xtUCb0cV92eT5wCIU zDfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=70dzCZYJlffkm2fyilFh89Mtjr19DKK75C0H6QuflUM=; b=KsoBbDmDpxDHjn+edSi78/Cerr9urX6jKQHQTiiTu7MzpO+fwuxbm9gdGn3kvzj4yZ HZxOZFHm2UMnSqITZYfZp7lIIXe4miv7B+wcl0lYDR9VE/w8Y6Iq7KRpsABt6KzmgfxI AjtimhNV+qa7EJerUJENHBmqH9435ImFwIOZK1YrGC4n/JTgYd1ryiKQnnJ0JpRusygD 9GlkbzNFFn6gQGgiNsHZ2IyJgoYUg6w3rJg3hnHAXzF2/nc5IGaFBJz1vGzEotMRHUSJ b2Y0bCrdoGp4kWsCod3EIWpMtn3eRq03p7M1fGNAvFjmeQhUve4lmPGfdSpe4jDkCPV8 2fOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03Mk/Fj7ZDTKWL+oNGzJJ44uoQRDwAoaoOirvpaKgkNO5qWps44df7U2xjr+hDTgQ== X-Received: by 10.84.218.136 with SMTP id r8mr79379902pli.23.1480557604625; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:00:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from garuda ([2601:602:9d80:13d4:4e0f:6eff:fef6:70b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y134sm105659603pfg.81.2016.11.30.18.00.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:00:04 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Marusich To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: When removing a user, 'guix system reconfigure' does not remove the user's home directory Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:00:02 -0800 Message-ID: <87r35sxvbx.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, If you add a user to your operating system configuration file, reconfigure, remove the user, and reconfigure again, then the user's home directory will remain. I expected it to be deleted when I reconfigured the second time. Is this expected behavior? =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYP4QiAAoJEN1AmhXYIkadHe4QAIJvpKeTXu4iVX5VBp9Rsd7/ 7cgV8AnqBEFUeNgqBxvCyqwZziaTYKo/707aEPaAMervl6lK1k5YHzHlFdfFAs5Z P5IYpLTZRYtDotbrsqRMn9THbeO3jfzVWSY7tLurUMU3oCjvYp88qFiNTtNYWK8T cRHVXCXsYRu3G7z7bbp4a3dtcmI+xqFZAeDjIFGnQh/IOJmwnu8M5mATGSXc9u1H 7VmXYJ+8wyZRjV7CEbM0stOAcoM6IfJu7Rxw/gi8YitE1STJM5ka/7Tc74tqHt1L OKYgnA9An/NIpkz5hnWOT8c/DL4NE5+4F3FfNXBd8jqUBLO9A+jenJOz9bzhj+cp OOoTfS0CKekD5Wx6rlEIh4WMdWmmTAqAzrugaemkydrWEOcJAOkt+le/SYjiEvLA 5n8c5SMktN5Hi0x4GXOm1gFjdDrOwSNkvgYBm5+KtK/WJuMkXwsv5UQRqxJEbpyF FDI+e8l0WKCsKJpZHiWENG2OwXsF2tSgfanDOW6OzZThHUJhiz7GlcBUmQGgDIgW 4aaxMWh+Qf9IGKzwA5gNsEoJEbR4S2GVQLOu4Cie0G3rofscRfhXBKI9y4dM6hYC u7p48aZk+wxFkrnHXyk9VGXJq2btEQzTvN0lX6mCHWcTbCJ2uB0p+C2C2bkvqCSn N6oh9ajNRnBpV1qGjFAB =DphL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 01 05:14:55 2016 Received: (at 25080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2016 10:14:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCOOF-0005eu-I6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 05:14:55 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:33011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCOOE-0005eh-6Q for 25080@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 05:14:54 -0500 Received: from pool-72-93-36-23.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.36.23] helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCOO8-0007BZ-DJ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 05:14:48 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver To: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: bug#25080: When removing a user, 'guix system reconfigure' does not remove the user's home directory References: <87r35sxvbx.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 05:14:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r35sxvbx.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:00:02 -0800") Message-ID: <87h96oez1v.fsf@netris.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Chris Marusich writes: > If you add a user to your operating system configuration file, > reconfigure, remove the user, and reconfigure again, then the user's > home directory will remain. I expected it to be deleted when I > reconfigured the second time. > > Is this expected behavior? [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [50.252.239.5 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25080 Cc: 25080@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Chris Marusich writes: > If you add a user to your operating system configuration file, > reconfigure, remove the user, and reconfigure again, then the user's > home directory will remain. I expected it to be deleted when I > reconfigured the second time. > > Is this expected behavior? [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [50.252.239.5 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] Hi, Chris Marusich writes: > If you add a user to your operating system configuration file, > reconfigure, remove the user, and reconfigure again, then the user's > home directory will remain. I expected it to be deleted when I > reconfigured the second time. > > Is this expected behavior? I think (hope?) so. If I accidentally made a mistake in my system configuration and it resulted in the deletion of my home directory, I would be *very* angry and probably never trust GuixSD again. Mark From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 01 06:40:33 2016 Received: (at 25080) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2016 11:40:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCPj7-0007dI-1q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 06:40:33 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:33151) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCPj5-0007d3-4R for 25080@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 06:40:31 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d2so46028082pfd.0 for <25080@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 03:40:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=IDneomHMvaUfw4B3YOOXR/5kNXDCBTdoLqT2GPglouw=; b=o8ENvtNwMDfTru5hcCdJngFybJDSQBmf3yvdymASvqMgb5lam/iegruRlLxje1EurF CCavTSAHbs9YTm7r1DuEtvdTo8/ZOrMVAGf9tbdDJyx4zfdZmSWMVjvDfpdq8TWjTkjk fMyl3rvv7IN9Wj3grz0E7Aey/8rmOyqeG+zGrEhGreHbCKnHNuf9U/+k5kWdZUey8qus nBHUhCiaA7WCzP72ZwCmtCiS55DyQun0eCQ1QKh/6kLr1B+kUuWGCbJM7tjBFp104IAU MWKNJd8wGqt4OaeJbVOlmKk3E5Dk7X3YoMFz0KODK4DN592FaReh6EE/CSXwdTRZCwpk jtHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=IDneomHMvaUfw4B3YOOXR/5kNXDCBTdoLqT2GPglouw=; b=axLIH28eaXG8fGgKhwyFbT8+MLArhBtidiGLTS6uIjLr1VpBYAAlJgZDRbkWPs6Hcb NBFHMupuldTZWfTxs0bK016hplh+r1UFy6K7Krqv00JT1HwfJIo/INH5lUG6+joyQhsZ 01oDYg9dYm2o2bur7g4xs+nr7XfG4Ce90pOprootZLRC2ofjVD7ih3xFK1wQbCd3cs9v NGPcTyPf8lNX4ktZwLkyAiM1MNL6J3eiLzCfKGXNpqmHr6aN08UyrUI3+AiEAaQdm4uD 6nZKi+vbpOCM2/Rq/sresJYhyviTCpU4nrcK55DyUWC5YT4O3vJYz/Z9J1ObYVszHpGW S4Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01gj3PZnAohT5soXTQk3eoa3eh/Km8yQqQZhIo3Ul58e3zvP0sUFNVosI7ju7JD3w== X-Received: by 10.84.197.129 with SMTP id n1mr83472003pld.30.1480592425178; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 03:40:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from garuda ([2601:602:9d80:13d4:4e0f:6eff:fef6:70b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2sm40137093pgy.27.2016.12.01.03.40.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 01 Dec 2016 03:40:24 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Marusich To: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: bug#25080: When removing a user, 'guix system reconfigure' does not remove the user's home directory References: <87r35sxvbx.fsf@gmail.com> <87h96oez1v.fsf@netris.org> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 03:40:23 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87h96oez1v.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 01 Dec 2016 05:14:36 -0500") Message-ID: <8760n3lvx4.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 25080 Cc: 25080@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi, > > Chris Marusich writes: >> If you add a user to your operating system configuration file, >> reconfigure, remove the user, and reconfigure again, then the user's >> home directory will remain. I expected it to be deleted when I >> reconfigured the second time. >> >> Is this expected behavior? > > I think (hope?) so. If I accidentally made a mistake in my system > configuration and it resulted in the deletion of my home directory, I > would be *very* angry and probably never trust GuixSD again. Yeah, I think you're right. Not deleting the directory automatically is the safe thing to do. Thanks for confirming the behavior is expected. This bug report can be closed now. =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYQAwnAAoJEN1AmhXYIkad20wQAJXdvdr5WSRz/FrMYfkePCNK KP7In5jaIVMXQqJ/aTzaITdyiz6GQMgKTV+YyGP1XaWWbAGjjoZRw35hAufTUU8t B/ALCjouNSfHW9IBUbLI9ISNOZ2S4b6O2loLfeaqe3i5dY14QxOY0o8LB0Og3MWc jWISj8pqc00EQFAxsbbq9ELQTy8FPtCjaokOPir5b+M+VOS5fn+CCgqbOkwm90/b X7D+eD/lHr2kdc2D723k++kFbG+9a2JIfo7oE9WHhOY7E035JN7smSveLWEepdQC cNCKLz3fKW95lKIp4gtIiRwJwCRvUpKRABnlx7CQQaTMMIBiHGYM8SWsS61OBoNZ O7rYZhegDSXLLp5vWgN9TXuNR5PNHK7cijbA81pQ4T/Al4HU/Qb0mCv3RBRg9Msz yZXdpe+6CqTLdCP5O/E4dtvHiUbLlHfBUOXXUvVYEPmIAdd/+v9KB+BOmd4f2Q74 tZWzhVZLH8Ne4aMk+x6VA9pzzO2Hk9oMdjdlnopexMmQA55BXZGnPs0d2BGFuNpX GKUghieqmV7RT0nnpbw6AvYttwwywReSbbzbVOPn3F5bFQIVVg6CGAddditzUvB1 ovKILtyCoqmBLPHv/sRgK77im2KXdJ7hzXQTbu+htS5tz4as5TEQ2VA6K760iG8k EIKCVmKMHraWtauAJ4ox =DWzu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 01 09:17:31 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2016 14:17:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCSB1-0004UQ-97 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:17:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57368) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cCSAz-0004UB-5w for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:17:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCSAq-0001ZO-Ts for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:17:24 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCSAq-0001Z7-QX for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:17:20 -0500 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:48632 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cCSAq-000111-8E for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 09:17:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:17:18 +0100 Message-Id: <8737i7spht.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: control message for bug #25080 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) tags 25080 notabug close 25080 From unknown Sun Aug 17 22:09:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 12:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator