GNU bug report logs - #24902
25.1; C-x = for Unicode

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl <at> rz.uni-regensburg.de>

Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:04:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: wontfix

Found in version 25.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #204 received at 24902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: rms <at> gnu.org, mattiase <at> acm.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com,
 Ulrich.Windl <at> rz.uni-regensburg.de, juri <at> linkov.net, 24902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 20:00:59 +0200
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
> Cc: rms <at> gnu.org,  mattiase <at> acm.org,  rpluim <at> gmail.com,
>   Ulrich.Windl <at> rz.uni-regensburg.de,  juri <at> linkov.net,
>   24902 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 18:00:11 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > <Shrug> They are different commands with evidently different goals, so
> > making them new commands sounds appropriate to me.  If the intent is
> > not to repurpose what-cursor-position, then what exactly is the intent?
> 
> The intent is to have something that's useful for a larger portion of
> the users on `C-x ='?

To me, this means you want new and different commands.  But I won't
argue.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 112 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.