Subject: bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 18:46:40 +0200

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked],  [email-masked],  [email-masked],
>   [email-masked],  [email-masked],
>   [email-masked]
> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:27:00 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> > Why not put the 2 new commands on 2 other keys, and leave "C-x ="
> > alone?
> 
> It doesn't feel optimal to have a command that vaguely covers two other
> commands.

<Shrug> They are different commands with evidently different goals, so
making them new commands sounds appropriate to me.  If the intent is
not to repurpose what-cursor-position, then what exactly is the intent?