GNU bug report logs - #24892
{s,}brk removed from FreeBSD 11.x and later, arm64 architecture

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: ashish.is <at> lostca.se (Ashish SHUKLA)

Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:09:02 UTC

Severity: important

Tags: fixed, patch

Merged with 28308

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #125 received at 24892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu
Cc: 24892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24892: {s, }brk removed from FreeBSD 11.x and later,
 arm64 architecture
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 16:37:31 +0300
unblock 24655 by 24892
thanks

> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:20:50 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 24892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> unblock 21966 by 24892
> block 24655 by 24892
> thanks
> 
> > From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
> > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:22:07 -0800
> > Cc: freebsd-hackers <at> freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks <at> freebsd.org>,
> > 	24892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Ashish SHUKLA <ashish.is <at> lostca.se>
> > 
> > Ed Maste wrote:
> > > arm64 support was first available in a release in FreeBSD 11.0, without sbrk, and sbrk never existed on the stable/11 branch.
> > 
> > Thanks, I didn't know that. So Emacs has never worked in this environment.
> 
> Since Emacs never worked on FreeBSD/arm64, we don't need to block the
> release of 25.2 on this issue (although it would be nice to have it
> resolved by 25.2).

And because we've heard nothing since Nov 2016, it looks like this
issue shouldn't block Emacs 26.1, either.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 201 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.