GNU bug report logs - #24868
26.0.50; LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims-local isn't taken into account

Previous Next

Full log

Message #23 received at 24868 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
To: Clément Pit--Claudel <clement.pitclaudel <at> live.com>,
 Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 24868 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24868: 26.0.50;
 LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims-local isn't taken into account
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 20:27:51 +0100

Hi again,

Thanks for your responses. I'll take care of this issue at the weekend.

Thanks,
Tassilo


Am 3. November 2016 20:06:51 schrieb Clément Pit--Claudel 
<clement.pitclaudel <at> live.com>:

> On 2016-11-03 14:35, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>> I guess Clement is actually reporting an AUCTeX bug and accidentally
>> used `report-emacs-bug' instead of `TeX-submit-bug-report'.
>
> Spot on :) Sorry for the mistake!
>
>> (2) there's no hook-like thing that would be run whenever some specific
>>     variable is modified due to file-local or directory-local variables,
>>     no?
>
> There is one :)
>
>     hack-local-variables-hook is a variable defined in ‘files.el’.
>     Its value is nil
>
>       This variable may be risky if used as a file-local variable.
>
>     Documentation:
>     Normal hook run after processing a file’s local variables specs.
>     Major modes can use this to examine user-specified local variables
>     in order to initialize other data structure based on them.
>
>> So I guess the right way to make Clément's use-case work was to
>> provide functions for modifying those variables that can be run from
>> an eval: local variables block and then refresh the fontification if
>> needed, right?
>
> I think installing a hack-local-variable hook would be the way to go :)
>
> Cheers and thanks for the quick answer!
> Clément.
>

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.