From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:06 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#24851 <24851@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#24851 <24851@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Small Typo in Guix Documentation Reply-To: bug#24851 <24851@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:13:06 +0000 retitle 24851 Small Typo in Guix Documentation reassign 24851 guix submitter 24851 saffronsnail@hushmail.com severity 24851 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 01 13:21:12 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 17:21:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckJ-0006ki-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckI-0006kW-6b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckC-0006v8-6q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckC-0006v2-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckA-0002Dz-TQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ck7-0006tc-Ny for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:02 -0400 Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com ([65.39.178.142]:43964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ck7-0006t6-FF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:20:59 -0400 Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 50DD320203 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hushmail.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=an41YcQZaBtP6DSw8jPXd2OF6hyml0ZA1d2mj436B+I=; b=uucefQZ5RCNaCa6OW9+Rc5NS7SCRds3WtL+l/XHi5EupE2lpbKaPcPTfXaLqkSVW783rtv7HjhcgJyVK1+deEi8BVkI3S9YLHxYPSC0yYVhQJkvUZ1fHWPfiFPQU7WlC+IndrvPaTwXvPJD23XZIyaKxHqhB//Dd+cyHF0GVMtCp0OgpSwG/kcUv+LNU38P6LeD2gYUQRaeYwyHd4OqDgPE95g6WgSAMq1z61AKkMHeh+B20jmGnmCtLrnEt5NnzaK+AVFGXrjxIV1EDAMN8zs11rEsSTNYGW/2M3QZ7KTgfBF+BM+Ek/vUxFdZviDUVhT/P7CLu4aW/btcmNF9q1w== Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w6.hushmail.com [65.39.178.92]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1259B200F7; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:20:55 -0700 To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Small Typo in Guix Documentation From: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e" Message-Id: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manual and I noticed a small typo. In the second paragraph beneath the initrd example the sentence reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd honors several options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, arguments passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QEMU, notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after "QEMU", not after "option". Thanks for your time,saff --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Hello,

I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manu= al and I noticed a small typo. In the second paragraph beneath the init= rd example the sentence reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd= honors several options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, a= rguments passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QE= MU, notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after "QEMU= ", not after "option".

Thanks for your time,
=
saff
 --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 01 15:07:03 2016 Received: (at 24851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 19:07:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39338 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1eOl-0000mC-MU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:03 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:52590) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1eOk-0000m5-8e for 24851@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:02 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F4F20593; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:07:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh= Yk8Az+Red4Ed1KOU4vqS5+OZxVQ=; b=AUr6B8GQhRAtSZQCVgASgCHmzu4M5WNX fbebeKXgZVN7BPE6ZolAUWWm/GTpjiWTFF53AHD+nlJNi+pLtobVbdvf/Zzo913q AebTadJKGFfhcnngBPu8jVHPEdxOGSRnjQPZf+vpWI9wuU6Jwcs8xF3rjxqxxFOp GA/0HQAz/aI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=Yk8Az+Red4Ed1KOU4vqS5+OZxVQ=; b=HX7f uJecgP03VRtfgX/r4gri8X/bq2F8bWJDHxurqw2TGR7apaLOBmOmdqp7SXOOaYnR 3MOlDB31RQjctB8jRQKyK4QFUtHjKXCkFO7oL8CZ5ocCh6W6PrRbkWK/FUzotvjM sLraPNdfmk3WXT815q03E3pTFHjLgWq6qPD/ztI= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 8unNvlFlx2LlPxRuDXoFcDSEG2I+b1MABOghQLqA9oxj 1478027220 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 76CE1CC07F; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:06:58 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Subject: Re: bug#24851: Small Typo in Guix Documentation Message-ID: <20161101190658.GB14310@jasmine> References: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24851 Cc: Andreas Enge , 24851@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:20:55AM -0700, saffronsnail@hushmail.com wrote: > Hello, > I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manual and I noticed a small > typo. In the second paragraph beneath the initrd example the sentence > reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd honors several > options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, arguments > passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QEMU, > notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after > "QEMU", not after "option". > Thanks for your time,saff Hm, I'm not sure exactly which meaning is intended here. Does anyone have advice? Andreas, you made this change in 1068f26b7. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 01 17:12:07 2016 Received: (at 24851-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 21:12:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLn-0005g9-8S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:12:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLl-0005fe-Gy for 24851-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:12:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLd-0005hR-42 for 24851-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:12:00 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLT-0005aI-FK; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:11:47 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:51378 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLS-0002CD-LM; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:11:47 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Subject: Re: bug#24851: Small Typo in Guix Documentation References: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> <20161101190658.GB14310@jasmine> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 22:11:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20161101190658.GB14310@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:06:58 -0400") Message-ID: <87pomenbw0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.5 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24851-done Cc: Andreas Enge , 24851-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.5 (-------) Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:20:55AM -0700, saffronsnail@hushmail.com wrote: >> Hello,=20 >> I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manual and I noticed a small >> typo. In the second paragraph beneath the initrd example the sentence >> reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd honors several >> options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, arguments >> passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QEMU, >> notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after >> "QEMU", not after "option". You are right, I=E2=80=99ll push a fix shortly, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:06 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator