From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:23:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24851: Small Typo in Guix Documentation Resent-From: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 24851 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 24851@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.147802087225964 (code B ref -1); Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:22:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 17:21:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckJ-0006ki-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckI-0006kW-6b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckC-0006v8-6q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckC-0006v2-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckA-0002Dz-TQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ck7-0006tc-Ny for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:02 -0400 Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com ([65.39.178.142]:43964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ck7-0006t6-FF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:20:59 -0400 Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 50DD320203 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hushmail.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=an41YcQZaBtP6DSw8jPXd2OF6hyml0ZA1d2mj436B+I=; b=uucefQZ5RCNaCa6OW9+Rc5NS7SCRds3WtL+l/XHi5EupE2lpbKaPcPTfXaLqkSVW783rtv7HjhcgJyVK1+deEi8BVkI3S9YLHxYPSC0yYVhQJkvUZ1fHWPfiFPQU7WlC+IndrvPaTwXvPJD23XZIyaKxHqhB//Dd+cyHF0GVMtCp0OgpSwG/kcUv+LNU38P6LeD2gYUQRaeYwyHd4OqDgPE95g6WgSAMq1z61AKkMHeh+B20jmGnmCtLrnEt5NnzaK+AVFGXrjxIV1EDAMN8zs11rEsSTNYGW/2M3QZ7KTgfBF+BM+Ek/vUxFdZviDUVhT/P7CLu4aW/btcmNF9q1w== Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w6.hushmail.com [65.39.178.92]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1259B200F7; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:20:55 -0700 From: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e" Message-Id: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manual and I noticed a small typo. In the second paragraph beneath the initrd example the sentence reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd honors several options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, arguments passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QEMU, notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after "QEMU", not after "option". Thanks for your time,saff --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Hello,

I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manu= al and I noticed a small typo. In the second paragraph beneath the init= rd example the sentence reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd= honors several options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, a= rguments passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QE= MU, notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after "QEMU= ", not after "option".

Thanks for your time,
=
saff
 --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:23:14 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24851: Small Typo in Guix Documentation Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 19:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24851 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Cc: Andreas Enge , 24851@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24851.14780272232992 (code B ref 24851); Tue, 01 Nov 2016 19:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 24851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 19:07:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39338 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1eOl-0000mC-MU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:03 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:52590) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1eOk-0000m5-8e for 24851@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:02 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F4F20593; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:07:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:07:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h= x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh= Yk8Az+Red4Ed1KOU4vqS5+OZxVQ=; b=AUr6B8GQhRAtSZQCVgASgCHmzu4M5WNX fbebeKXgZVN7BPE6ZolAUWWm/GTpjiWTFF53AHD+nlJNi+pLtobVbdvf/Zzo913q AebTadJKGFfhcnngBPu8jVHPEdxOGSRnjQPZf+vpWI9wuU6Jwcs8xF3rjxqxxFOp GA/0HQAz/aI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=Yk8Az+Red4Ed1KOU4vqS5+OZxVQ=; b=HX7f uJecgP03VRtfgX/r4gri8X/bq2F8bWJDHxurqw2TGR7apaLOBmOmdqp7SXOOaYnR 3MOlDB31RQjctB8jRQKyK4QFUtHjKXCkFO7oL8CZ5ocCh6W6PrRbkWK/FUzotvjM sLraPNdfmk3WXT815q03E3pTFHjLgWq6qPD/ztI= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 8unNvlFlx2LlPxRuDXoFcDSEG2I+b1MABOghQLqA9oxj 1478027220 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 76CE1CC07F; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:06:58 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20161101190658.GB14310@jasmine> References: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:20:55AM -0700, saffronsnail@hushmail.com wrote: > Hello, > I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manual and I noticed a small > typo. In the second paragraph beneath the initrd example the sentence > reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd honors several > options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, arguments > passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QEMU, > notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after > "QEMU", not after "option". > Thanks for your time,saff Hm, I'm not sure exactly which meaning is intended here. Does anyone have advice? Andreas, you made this change in 1068f26b7. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:23:14 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Subject: bug#24851: closed (Re: bug#24851: Small Typo in Guix Documentation) Message-ID: References: <87pomenbw0.fsf@gnu.org> <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 24851 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix Reply-To: 24851@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:13:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1478034782-21940-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1478034782-21940-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #24851: Small Typo in Guix Documentation which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 24851@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 24851: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D24851 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1478034782-21940-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 24851-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 21:12:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLn-0005g9-8S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:12:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42472) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLl-0005fe-Gy for 24851-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:12:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLd-0005hR-42 for 24851-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:12:00 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLT-0005aI-FK; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:11:47 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:51378 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c1gLS-0002CD-LM; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:11:47 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Subject: Re: bug#24851: Small Typo in Guix Documentation References: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> <20161101190658.GB14310@jasmine> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 22:11:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20161101190658.GB14310@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:06:58 -0400") Message-ID: <87pomenbw0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.5 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24851-done Cc: Andreas Enge , 24851-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo Famulari X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.5 (-------) Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:20:55AM -0700, saffronsnail@hushmail.com wrote: >> Hello,=20 >> I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manual and I noticed a small >> typo. In the second paragraph beneath the initrd example the sentence >> reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd honors several >> options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, arguments >> passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QEMU, >> notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after >> "QEMU", not after "option". You are right, I=E2=80=99ll push a fix shortly, thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. ------------=_1478034782-21940-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 17:21:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckJ-0006ki-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckI-0006kW-6b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckC-0006v8-6q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:47318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckC-0006v2-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60561) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ckA-0002Dz-TQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ck7-0006tc-Ny for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:21:02 -0400 Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com ([65.39.178.142]:43964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c1ck7-0006t6-FF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 13:20:59 -0400 Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 50DD320203 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=hushmail.com; h=date:to:subject:from; s=hush; bh=an41YcQZaBtP6DSw8jPXd2OF6hyml0ZA1d2mj436B+I=; b=uucefQZ5RCNaCa6OW9+Rc5NS7SCRds3WtL+l/XHi5EupE2lpbKaPcPTfXaLqkSVW783rtv7HjhcgJyVK1+deEi8BVkI3S9YLHxYPSC0yYVhQJkvUZ1fHWPfiFPQU7WlC+IndrvPaTwXvPJD23XZIyaKxHqhB//Dd+cyHF0GVMtCp0OgpSwG/kcUv+LNU38P6LeD2gYUQRaeYwyHd4OqDgPE95g6WgSAMq1z61AKkMHeh+B20jmGnmCtLrnEt5NnzaK+AVFGXrjxIV1EDAMN8zs11rEsSTNYGW/2M3QZ7KTgfBF+BM+Ek/vUxFdZviDUVhT/P7CLu4aW/btcmNF9q1w== Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w6.hushmail.com [65.39.178.92]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1259B200F7; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:20:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:20:55 -0700 To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Small Typo in Guix Documentation From: saffronsnail@hushmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e" Message-Id: <20161101172056.1259B200F7@smtp.hushmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manual and I noticed a small typo. In the second paragraph beneath the initrd example the sentence reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd honors several options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, arguments passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QEMU, notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after "QEMU", not after "option". Thanks for your time,saff --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Hello,

I was reading Section 7.2.11 of the Guix manu= al and I noticed a small typo. In the second paragraph beneath the init= rd example the sentence reads "The initial RAM disk produced by base-initrd= honors several options passed on the Linux kernel command line (that is, a= rguments passed via the linux command of GRUB, or the -append option) of QE= MU, notably:". I believe that the close parenthesis should come after "QEMU= ", not after "option".

Thanks for your time,
=
saff
 --=_e1c24ef19b939f2455c80804f601651e-- ------------=_1478034782-21940-1--